Colonialism isn't the reason why your country is poor in 2022.

Wallenberg

Wallenberg

Kraken
Joined
Jan 9, 2021
Posts
28,896
Reputation
37,489
Colonialism happened a long time ago. If your country still is poor, it's not because of colonialism. It's time to start taking responsibility for your own actions. Yeah, colonialism was bad, but it's not the reason why your country is poor today.

South Korea was as poor as African nations in the 1960s. Now it's much richer.

China was poorer than many African countries in the 1960s. Now it's way wealthier.

Botswana was a colony, but it has developed in recent decades because it adopted good policies.

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet now they are among the world's most prosperous countries.

Japan and Germany were bombed to ashes in WW2, yet they are still developed and rich countries.

One could say the Soviet Union colonized Eastern European countries. Yet Eastern European countries are getting wealthier now with the right policies.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Lonenely sigma, Daniel Plainview, EdouardManlet and 18 others
Ever heard about the Marshall Plan?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, |Daddy_Zygos|, Shrek2OnDvD and 5 others
Africa and other countries are poor because of corrupt government. People at the top taking 80% of funds meanwhile giving 20% for development.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: fauxfox, Lmao, stamaster21 and 5 others
@Wallenberg

The Rock Clapping GIF


All the threads about muh colonialism are giga annoying what tf has that shit got to do with looksmaxxing.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 19997 and Deleted member 18244
Ever heard about the Marshall Plan?
Marshall Plan was an aid program to some Western European countries. And it on its own wasn't enough to make countries rich.

And there is a lot of aid given to developing countries. Some of it goes to corrupt elites, but that's not colonialism's fault.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Lmao and Jason Voorhees
Colonialism happened a long time ago. If your country still is poor, it's not because of colonialism. It's time to start taking responsibility for your own actions. Yeah, colonialism was bad, but it's not the reason why your country is poor today.

South Korea was as poor as African nations in the 1960s. Now it's much richer.

China was poorer than many African countries in the 1960s. Now it's way wealthier.

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet now they are among the world's most prosperous countries.

Japan and Germany were bombed to ashes in WW2, yet they are still developed and rich countries.


It's all down to genetics at this point. Homogenous nations just perform better. Japan great example.

Colonialism did exploit those nations but it also gave back in return...improving infrastructure as an example


If a nation once thrived that means they have the capability of picking themselves up again. If a nation is thriving and something happens and for some reason can't establish equilibrium it just means they were never suppose to reach that economic level in the first place.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23819, Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 19997 and 1 other person
Africa and other countries are poor because of corrupt government. People at the top taking 80% of funds meanwhile giving 20% for development.
A study showed how money flows to Swiss bank accounts from Africa on the same days these countries receive big aid donations...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997, Lmao, Deleted member 9670 and 1 other person
Marshall Plan was an aid program to some Western European countries. And it on its own wasn't enough to make countries rich.

And there is a lot of aid given to developing countries. Some of it goes to corrupt elites, but that's not colonialism's fault.
Yes it wasnt enough to make them rich but it was enough to get them started. Also the US invested in Japan, Korea and China for it's profit. How is the middle east supposed to progress when the US and Israel destabilize their countries just to exploit some oil reserves?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, Shrek2OnDvD, 5'8manlet and 3 others
It's all down to genetics at this point. Homogenous nations just perform better. Japan great example.

Colonialism did exploit those nations but it also gave back in return...improving infrastructure as an example


If a nation once thrived that means they have the capability of picking themselves up again. If a nation is thriving and something happens and for some reason can't establish equilibrium it just means they were never suppose to reach that economic level.
I don't think it's only because of genetics. I think countries can develop if they adopt the right policies and fix their culture. For example, I can see India having a bright future with the right policies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997
China and Korea received trillions in loans and foreign investment into industry though, meanwhile African countries are still fighting over water rights against European corporations
 
  • +1
Reactions: fauxfox, Deleted member 14262, Deleted member 19997 and 4 others
China and Korea received trillions in loans and foreign investment into industry though, meanwhile African countries are still fighting over water rights against European corporations
Western countries send a lot of development aid to Africa. China is investing in Africa.
 
What about the crusades?
 
One could say the Soviet Union colonized Eastern European countries. Yet Eastern European countries are getting wealthier now with the right policies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997
Western countries send a lot of development aid to Africa. China is investing in Africa.
China is actually investing in industry, the US just sends billions to the dictators to do as the US says
 
  • +1
Reactions: fauxfox and Deleted member 14262
China is actually investing in industry, the US just sends billions to the dictators to do as the US says
Aid is supposed to help poor ordinary citizens in African countries, but corrupt elites steal a big portion of it.
 
I don't think it's only because of genetics. I think countries can develop if they adopt the right policies and fix their culture. For example, I can see India having a bright future with the right policies.

That comes back to brain power. Germany was so inflated after WW1 they literally elected Hitler and came back thriving so hard despite all the odds against them. All they needed was a proper leader despite international gangsters doing everything in their power to keep them under debt slavery.


India has so much shit going on it's unreal. Too much racial differences that live with one another,

We'll see what happens to them but I don't think they will ever become properly developed as a western country could unless there was some kind of intervention by whites. They have a high GDP but that doesn't correlate to higher standards of living.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview and Deleted member 19997
@GypsyEyes, what do you think about this?
 
Proof of corrupt elites stealing part of the development aid:

This paper documents that aid disbursements to highly aid-dependent countries coincide with sharp increases in bank deposits in offshore financial centers known for bank secrecy and private wealth management, but not in other financial centers.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao
India has so much shit going on it's unreal. We'll see what happens to them but I don't think they will ever become properly developed as a western country could. They have a high GDP but that doesn't correlate to higher standards of living.
India has a very low GDP per capita. Of course India has a high GDP because there are 1.4 billion Indians. When measuring living standards we should measure GDP per person, not the total GDP. Average Swiss is way wealthier than average Russian despite Russia having higher GDP (because GDP per person is higher in Switzerland).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997 and Deleted member 18931
the very fact that these countries were colonized indicates an inherent inferiority to the colonizer. is it really surprising that the people who were the beneficiaries of much harsher evolutionary pressures would develop the the ability to create great civilizations, build ships and sophisticated weapons, travel the world, and subjugate anybody they come across much faster than everyone else? and it wouldn't be a uniquely european thing to do. any equally advanced civilization would have done the same. it just so happens no one else was even close. to say if these primitive civilizations had been left alone they'd have become just as successful as europe is really delusional and low iq. most likely by delaying colonization, it would have just delayed the development of their society that much longer. if we waited only until now in 2022 to go into africa, it'll still be mud huts and naked people hunting wild boars living in abject ignorance and squalor. it's no coincidence that the people who were never able to leave their continent because they haven't even invented the wheel much less the ship, like the native americans/amerindians, africans, and australian aboriginals, would have the lowest iqs in the world.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 19997, Lmao and 2 others
@GypsyEyes, what do you think about this?
What do you think I think? He's fucking retarded and out of touch and has 0 education on sociology/economy/history/basic logic lmfao


Its time to take responsibility after we milked your resources, genocided a million or two of your people, destroyed your infrastructure and completely politically and economically destabilized you with embargoes and sanctions and endless wars :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:


Just catch up brah!! :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262, Deleted member 19997, PrinceLuenLeoncur and 4 others
Low iq thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262 and Deleted member 17311
What do you think I think? He's fucking retarded and out of touch and has 0 education on sociology/economy/history/basic logic lmfao


Its time to take responsibility after we milked your resources, genocided a million or two of your people, destroyed your infrastructure and completely politically and economically destabilized you with embargoes and sanctions and endless wars :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:


Just catch up brah!! :ROFLMAO:
Embargoes and sanctions, lol. The West gives a huge amount of aid to poor countries.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997 and Deleted member 17311
africa has a trove of natural resources but the goverment is so low iq that they just let people take and abuse them without any reprocussion
imagine your continent being controlled by fucking chocolate manufacturers
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview and Deleted member 19997
africa has a trove of natural resources but the goverment is so low iq that they just let people take and abuse them without any reprocussion
imagine your continent being controlled by fucking chocolate manufacturers
Yeah. African corrupt elites don't care about their people.

But Botswana is an exception. It has developed. Not a surprise: Botswana adopted the right policies.
 
Truth

Also not the whole world was colonized

Thailand was never colonised and still very poor
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 19997, Deleted member 13787 and 3 others
Truth

Also not the whole world was colonized

Thailand was never colonised and still very poor
Russia was not colonized, actually, Russia (Soviet Union) colonized Eastern European countries. Russia still isn't rich despite having a lot of natural resources.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262, Lmao, Chadeep and 1 other person
Embargoes and sanctions, lol. The West gives a huge amount of aid to poor countries.
you sound even more retarded every post and reveal how little you know about the world despite being a 30 yo "civilized and educated" incel

Foreign aid = high interest rate loans by jews that you have to repay and will stunt your economy even more, and if you don't take them you are raped by even more sanctions
 
  • +1
Reactions: fauxfox, Deleted member 14262, Deleted member 19997 and 4 others
Russia was not colonized, actually, Russia (Soviet Union) colonized Eastern European countries. Russia still isn't rich despite having a lot of natural resources.
Also Ireland was colonised had famines, giga mass emmigration, unindustrialised, rural, religious and ethnic tensions the whole third world experience and now has a successful economy and country.
The Celtic Tiger period has also been called "The Boom" or "Ireland's Economic Miracle". During that time, the country experienced a period of economic growth that transformed it from one of Western Europe's poorer countries into one of its wealthiest.
9269185_orig.jpg

migration-rates-in-ireland-18251.jpg

gdp.ireland.gif

CSU600.gif

1657435411361
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Lmao and Wallenberg
Truth

Also not the whole world was colonized

Thailand was never colonised and still very poor
How is Thailand poor? Thailand has the 20th largest economy as measured by total GDP (PPP) / average per capita income of $16000.

It has the second largest economy in SE Asia after Indonesia. There is poverty and crime in Thailand but nowhere close to other south east asian countries
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997 and 5'8manlet
Foreign aid = high interest rate loans by jews that you have to repay and will stunt your economy even more
Lol, just lol.

Foreign aid is not a loan. It is aimed to alleviate human suffering and help communities recover from crises. Countries that receive international aid do not have to pay it back. Foreign aid is given voluntarily by donor countries and they do not expect it to be repaid.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao
Y
Lol, just lol.

Foreign aid is not a loan. It is aimed to alleviate human suffering and help communities recover from crises. Countries that receive international aid do not have to pay it back. Foreign aid is given voluntarily by donor countries and they do not expect it to be repaid.

Yup, 2 second Jewgle search settles it! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Watch this video you ignorant retard

 
  • +1
Reactions: fauxfox, PrinceLuenLeoncur and Deleted member 17311
How is Thailand poor? Thailand has the 20th largest economy as measured by total GDP (PPP) / average per capita income of $16000.

It has the second largest economy in SE Asia after Indonesia. There is poverty and crime in Thailand but nowhere close to other south east asian countries
PPP is a giga cope metric jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997
How is Thailand poor? Thailand has the 20th largest economy as measured by total GDP (PPP) / average per capita income of $16000.

It has the second largest economy in SE Asia after Indonesia. There is poverty and crime in Thailand but nowhere close to other south east asian countries
Yeah, Thailand isn't very poor, but neither it is rich. It's quite an average country globally.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, Deleted member 14262, Deleted member 19997 and 1 other person
Yup, 2 second Jewgle search settles it! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Antisemitism is a low IQ coping mechanism. Jews are successful and rich, maybe that's why ethnics hate them. They are high IQ too.

But if poor countries want to stop getting foreign aid (which aren't loans), then let's stop giving aid to them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997 and Moggie
Also Ireland was colonised had famines, giga mass emmigration, unindustrialised, rural, religious and ethnic tensions the whole third world experience and now has a successful economy and country.
9269185_orig.jpg

migration-rates-in-ireland-18251.jpg


CSU600.gif

View attachment 1773526
Ireland got away with having a very favourable business tax/regulation environment inside the EU, which made them a compelling site of operations for multinationals wanting to access the EU market and labour pool.

It's a recent phenomenon and has little to do with 150 years of history. As late as the 90s, Ireland had a GDP/capita about 70% of the UK. By the turn of the millennium they were on the same level and today Ireland's is some 80% higher.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262, Chadeep, Wallenberg and 1 other person
Ireland got away with having a very favourable business tax/regulation environment inside the EU, which made them a compelling site of operations for multinationals wanting to access the EU market and labour pool.

It's a recent phenomenon and has little to do with 150 years of history. As late as the 90s, Ireland had a GDP/capita about 70% of the UK. By the turn of the millennium they were on the same level and today Ireland's is some 80% higher.
Yeah and Ireland's GDP isn't comparable due to being a tax haven for corporations. That is why Ireland's central bank has developed a modified GDP that is better for comparing Ireland's economy to other economies. But Ireland still is an affluent 1st world country.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Jason Voorhees and Moggie
Ireland got away with having a very favourable business tax/regulation environment inside the EU, which made them a compelling site of operations for multinationals wanting to access the EU market and labour pool.

It's a recent phenomenon and has little to do with 150 years of history. As late as the 90s, Ireland had a GDP/capita about 70% of the UK. By the turn of the millennium they were on the same level and today Ireland's is some 80% higher.
They also got cucked by excessive underpriced exports to the uk preventing growth and also emmigration to the uk and out of ireland. Ireland is doing better not just due to favourable economic conditions but also because so many less people are leaving and also good friday was important aswell.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
International monetary fund exists for a reason tho

@GypsyEyes @Wallenberg
 
International monetary fund exists for a reason tho

@GypsyEyes @Wallenberg
The World Bank is more about helping the poorest countries. IMF helps both rich and poor countries.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Moggie
Last edited:
can't speak for others, but this is true for my country - 500 years of fighting off the Ottomans, used as a military frontier while in the Habsburg Monarchy, constantly assaulted by Hungary and Venice, devastated in WW1, completely destroyed in WW2, lost like 30% of the economy in the 90s war with serbian goatfuckers; still, all that could have been overcame if the local people and politicians weren't lazy and corrupt
 
  • +1
Reactions: Daniel Plainview, fauxfox, Deleted member 14262 and 4 others
It's an excuse for being lazy. The same people who whine about jews, capitalism, and colonialism are lazy fucks who do nothing productive throughout the day and blame it on others so they don't have to accept the responsibility of it. When was the last time you saw a communist actually put effort into anything in their life?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997 and Wallenberg
I
Colonialism happened a long time ago. If your country still is poor, it's not because of colonialism. It's time to start taking responsibility for your own actions. Yeah, colonialism was bad, but it's not the reason why your country is poor today.

South Korea was as poor as African nations in the 1960s. Now it's much richer.

China was poorer than many African countries in the 1960s. Now it's way wealthier.

Botswana was a colony, but it has developed in recent decades because it adopted good policies.

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet now they are among the world's most prosperous countries.

Japan and Germany were bombed to ashes in WW2, yet they are still developed and rich countries.

One could say the Soviet Union colonized Eastern European countries. Yet Eastern European countries are getting wealthier now with the right policies.
It's all about genetics. Look at eastern europe. Land of subhumans with highest murder, suicide, alcoholism and HIV rates. Not to mention that 90% of population lives in commieblocks.
 
It all comes down to IQ. It's no suprise that Africa can not get out of poverty. People here will make all sorts of excuses, but they are just too stupid to.

They will continue to be exploited by the Chinese which is a good thing. They have no use for their own resources because they will inevitably be taken over by criminal gangs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19997
Colonialism happened a long time ago. If your country still is poor, it's not because of colonialism. It's time to start taking responsibility for your own actions. Yeah, colonialism was bad, but it's not the reason why your country is poor today.

South Korea was as poor as African nations in the 1960s. Now it's much richer.

China was poorer than many African countries in the 1960s. Now it's way wealthier.

Botswana was a colony, but it has developed in recent decades because it adopted good policies.

Singapore and Hong Kong were colonies yet now they are among the world's most prosperous countries.

Japan and Germany were bombed to ashes in WW2, yet they are still developed and rich countries.

One could say the Soviet Union colonized Eastern European countries. Yet Eastern European countries are getting wealthier now with the right policies.
It’s not the SOLE reason but a big reason for many you also forget France still had a neo empire
 
i mean if your country is poor fair enough but its within ur own power to accumulate wealth i never feel bad for broke niggas cuz i used to be one now im ballin' :)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14262
The reason shot countries are shot are because of shot economic policies. If my country had competent leadership we would have been wealthy. Many African countries are too ethnically diverse as well making it more difficult to be cohesive
 
  • +1
Reactions: fauxfox, Lmao and Wallenberg

Similar threads

D
Replies
106
Views
2K
Bomber517
Bomber517
Edgarpill
Replies
21
Views
1K
IncelJihadist
IncelJihadist
orangomango2003
Replies
93
Views
6K
SecularIslamist
SecularIslamist

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top