Conclusive proof that slightly closer set eyes and slightly long mid-face are male dimorphic traits

[Deleted member 18810]

Unlike what many people on here think, slightly close set eyes (Eye separation ratio of 0.445-0.45) and slightly longer mid-face (mid-face ratio as low as 0.93 to as high as 1.00, not any more) are male dimorphic traits

Matt Bomer has ideal male dimorphic eye separation ratio -



WATCH FROM 2:40

Hexum face analysis -



WATCH FROM 9:26

Sean O'Pry has an unideal mid-face ratio cause of wide-set eyes combined with compact mid-face -



WATCH FROM 7:51

 

[Deleted member 18810]

@Preston @phukmikehok @Korea @Chinacurry @AscendingHero @greeneyes
@Chadeep @john2 @EverythingMattersCel

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Bump

 

[sub5inchcel]

thats barely close set, and thats not long midface, long midface is sub90 jfl

 

[Deleted member 1660]

sean o pry's side profile looks like @Birdcell

 

[Jason Voorhees]

All of them have long eyebrows to offset it and they are barely close set. Here I edited Bomer to have short eyebrows and his eyes appear to be closer.

 

[ErbCel]

How many threads are people going to have to make about disproving that compact midface is ideal and that high ish IPD is ideal before they realise they are grasping at straws and collectively coping. Every fucking week is a new thread about this shitty ass debate. You already know the obvious answer you just want to cope.
If you've been trying to disprove something so often and still can't convince people then you're wrong buddy.

 

[ErbCel]

Obligatory @thecel tag because this coper said narrow IPD is better because it is more masculine. When will they realise that masculine =/= attractive?

 

[thecel]

Obligatory @thecel tag because this coper said narrow IPD is better because it is more masculine. When will they realise that masculine =/= attractive?

Keep putting words in my mouth. I didn’t say narrow IPD is better. The whole point I was making is that masculine =/= attractive. I stated narrow IPD is masculine and wide IPD is better looking.

 

[sub5inchcel]

tag because this coper said narrow IPD is better because it is more masculine. When will they realise that masculine =/= attractive?

masculine is attrative ian somerhalder mogs every nale model eoth long midface and close ipd keep coping

 

[thecel]

masculine is attrative ian somerhalder mogs every nale model eoth long midface and close ipd keep coping

no he doesn’t bro Somercoper is subhuman af

Ian Somerhalder is subhuman

https://looksmax.org/threads/this-is-the-highest-psl-face-ever.178505/ Some people think this man has the highest PSL face ever. JFL Mogged Changes: Wider IPD Wider PFL More positive canthal tilt Vertically shorter eye opening Longer and straighter eyebrows Lower hairline Protruding...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 18810]

How many threads are people going to have to make about disproving that compact midface is ideal and that high ish IPD is ideal before they realise they are grasping at straws and collectively coping. Every fucking week is a new thread about this shitty ass debate. You already know the obvious answer you just want to cope.
If you've been trying to disprove something so often and still can't convince people then you're wrong buddy.

Cope. This dude has almost 50 different measurements for a single face. Has analysed many faces, and over and over again has seen the pattern of conventionally good looking men, who are considered unanimously handsome have slightly long mid-face and slightly close-set eyes. It all makes sense since men have both, longer and wider faces than women and both contribute to closer set eyes and longer mid-face respectfully than women.

 

[thecel]

Cope. This dude has almost 50 different measurements for a single face. Has analysed many faces, and over and over again has seen the pattern of conventionally good looking men, who are considered unanimously handsome have slightly long mid-face and slightly close-set eyes. It all makes sense since men have both, longer and wider faces than women and both contribute to closer set eyes and longer mid-face than women.

They’re attractive in spite of these traits and not because of these.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Obligatory @thecel tag because this coper said narrow IPD is better because it is more masculine. When will they realise that masculine =/= attractive?

Your argument is literal cage tier.
There is a difference between "ogre tier" and "masculine". I never told that Marko Jaric's eye area is ideal. Slightly closer set eyes make men look more striking

 

[thecel]

Your argument is literal cage tier.
There is a difference between "ogre tier" and "masculine". I never told that Marko Jaric's eye area is ideal. Slightly closer set eyes make men look more striking

Wider-set eyes make men look more striking.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

They’re attractive in spite of these traits and not because of these.

It is because of these traits that make them attractive. Men should have slightly closer set eyes compared to women and slightly longer mid-faces, same goes with nose to mouth ratio not being any more than 1.5 for men

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Wider-set eyes make men look more striking.

Yeah, some random bloke with eyes literally starting at the temples is more attractive than Matt Bomer

 

[thecel]

It is because of these traits that make them attractive. Men should have slightly closer set eyes compared to women and slightly longer mid-faces, same goes with nose to mouth ratio not being any more than 1.5 for men

They don’t make them attractive. Other male dimorphic traits, which correlate with these traits, make them attractive.

For example, let’s say scientists found that bigger dicks have hairier ballsacks. Correlation. But it’s the dick size that’s attractive to women, not the hair on the ballsack. A big-dick guy can make his big dick more attractive by shaving the hair off his balls. Likewise, a long-midfaced maesthetic Chad can be more handsome with a shorter midface.

 

[thecel]

Yeah, some random bloke with eyes literally starting at the temples is more attractive than Matt Bomer

Cage-tier argument. Your comparison is complete shit.

Matt Bomer with slightly wider-set eyes would look better than the original Matt Bomer.

 

[ErbCel]

Keep putting words in my mouth. I didn’t say narrow IPD is better. The whole point I was making is that masculine =/= attractive. I stated narrow IPD is masculine and wide IPD is better looking.

I actually agree with you bro, idk where you saw that I'm disagreeing lmao

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Cage-tier argument. Your comparison is complete shit.

Matt Bomer with slightly wider-set eyes would look better than the original Matt Bomer.

Make a photoshopped Bomer with noticeably wide-set eyes and show it to women while comparing it to his original picture. You'll definitely get laughed at if you try to argue with them choosing the original one.

 

[thecel]

idk where you saw that I'm disagreeing lmao

huh

Obligatory @thecel tag because this coper said narrow IPD is better because it is more masculine. When will they realise that masculine =/= attractive?

OK, so “this coper” refers to the OP of this thread and not me. Got it.

 

[sub5inchcel]

no he doesn’t bro Somercoper is subhuman af

no he doesn’t bro Somercoper is subhuman af

Ian Somerhalder is subhuman

https://looksmax.org/threads/this-is-the-highest-psl-face-ever.178505/ Some people think this man has the highest PSL face ever. JFL Mogged Changes: Wider IPD Wider PFL More positive canthal tilt Vertically shorter eye opening Longer and straighter eyebrows Lower hairline Protruding...

looksmax.org

he does because nose, the nose being way narrower than his temples/cheekboned balances his ipd/es ratio, same eith david laid

 

[ErbCel]

Like thecel said these guys are handsome in spite of having a slightly long mid face and slightly close set eyes. They offset those by having close set eyebrows and taller facial thirds.

 

[thecel]

he does because nose, the nose being way narrower than his temples/cheekboned balances his ipd/es ratio, same eith david laid

cope and cage

 

[ErbCel]

Wait, isn't your stance that higher IPD is better? That's what I'm saying

 

[thecel]

Wait, isn't your stance that higher IPD is better? That's what I'm saying

Yes. I thought you meant me with “this coper”.

Obligatory @ /data/avatars/s/7/7018.jpg?1659903726 @thecel tag because this coper said narrow IPD is better because it is more masculine. When will they realise that masculine =/= attractive?

OK, so “this coper” refers to the OP of this thread and not me. Got it.

 

[sub5inchcel]

cope and cage

your the one coping, the nose is the middle of thr face, so its width obviously has an affect on eyes and harmony jfl you utter coper also

 

[thecel]

your the one coping, the nose is the middle of thr face, so its width obviously has an affect on eyes and harmony jfl you utter coper also

nose affects harmony is true , but Somerhalder’s eye area looks noticeably close-set and ugly

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Wait, isn't your stance that higher IPD is better? That's what I'm saying

Yes. I thought you meant me with “this coper”.

Again to prove that your cope is baseless -

 

[sub5inchcel]

nose affects harmony is true , but Somerhalder’s eye area looks noticeably close-set and ugly

not noticeabkey enoguh to destroy, and subhuman jfl thats cope dude

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Wdyt about coloured eyes decansh? For Indians

 

[greeneyes]

yeah agree with the title but the linked videos are retarded and the guy that makes them is a low iq aspie

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Wdyt about coloured eyes decansh? For Indians

Makes them striking as most Indians are of wheatish complexion, coloured eyes coupled with dark features are a striking combo and are sought after in the modelling industry.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Makes them striking as most Indians are of wheatish complexion, coloured eyes coupled with dark features are a striking combo and are sought after in the modelling industry.

Are u getting stroma

 

[Pakicel]

Are u getting stroma

He thinks he has blue eyes.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

yeah agree with the title but the linked videos are retarded and the guy that makes them is a low iq aspie

The guy is knowledgeable, he measures even the smallest of areas to look for flaws and the cumulates a rating chart. He's far from low IQ, although, people in general might consider him aspie for analysing random faces.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

Are u getting stroma

Nope. I have agreed upon the fact that attractive eyes have way more to them than just the colour and eye shape and harmony is way more important.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

He thinks he has blue eyes.

Do you guys eat trash and grow up to say such absurd stuff with no basis?

 

[stressftw]

.45 ESR is not close set, is still in ideal range lol

Slightly longer midface at maximum 0.95 can look very good but no less. Under that is always a flaw, low mid face ratio reveal that either your eyes are too close set, or your midface is too long, it can be both. Under .95 is never ideal and under .9 is a huge harmony breaker.

Ofc there will be GL guys with unideal features like long midface or close set eyes, even all PSL gods have unideal features. But long midface and close set eyes are usually huge flaws among the hardest to overcome

 

[ErbCel]

Again to prove that your cope is baseless -

You can litterally see in the side profile that his nose is slightly hooked instead of being the ideal straight or slightly upturned. His maxilla is slightly lacking, he would do better with the same IPD or slightly higher IPD and a shorter midface. Otherwise he's a mogger in the lower and upper third, he's just handsome in spite of his longish midface and anyways his is slightly long.

 

[Pakicel]

Do you guys eat trash and grow up to say such absurd stuff with no basis?

According to you both of these eyes are the same:

 

[Deleted member 18810]

.45 ESR is not close set, is still in ideal range lol

Slightly longer midface at maximum 0.95 can look very good, no less. Under that is always a flaw, low mid face ratio reveal that either your eyes are too close set, or your midface is too long, it can be both. Under .95 is never ideal and under .9 is a huge harmony breaker.

Not really, maybe a little less than 0.9 would be on the lower side but 0.95 is fine for men. You have to account for the fact that sometimes your head is not level, or the lens has distorted the image and measurement errors, these errors, when corrected, mostly lead to a more ideal mid-face ratio in conventionally attractive men, and anything in the ballpark of 1.00 is fine, higher than one is when it starts becoming too compact for men.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

You can litterally see in the side profile that his nose is slightly hooked instead of being the ideal straight or slightly upturned. His maxilla is slightly lacking, he would do better with the same IPD or slightly higher IPD and a shorter midface. Otherwise he's a mogger in the lower and upper third, he's just handsome in spite of his longish midface and anyways his is slightly long.

1. His nose isn't hooked (although slight hump at the start of the nasal bridge is ideal in men)
2. Upturned noses in men are unideal. His nose actually too upturned as it has an angle of 116 degrees.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Nope. I have agreed upon the fact that attractive eyes have way more to them than just the colour and eye shape and harmony is way more important.

wdyt about contacts wont it halo? and isnt stroma not that expensive when it comes out? cause itll be commercial

 

[stressftw]

Not really, maybe a little less than 0.9 would be on the lower side but 0.95 is fine for men. You have to account for the fact that sometimes your head is not level, or the lens has distorted the image and measurement errors, these errors, when corrected, mostly lead to a more ideal mid-face ratio in conventionally attractive men, and anything in the ballpark of 1.00 is fine, higher than one is when it starts becoming too compact for men.

Yeah u agreed with me, 0.95 is stil lin ideal range.

I have .89 - 0.9 midface ratio with 0.45 ESR, which means that my midface is long it fucks the entire harmony out of my face. Believe me, i would pay top dollar to make my face more compact if there was anything i could do to shorten my midface, but it doesnt.

 

[Deleted member 18810]

wdyt about contacts wont it halo? and isnt stroma not that expensive when it comes out? cause itll be commercial

Good contacts enhance the look, but that is still rare as only a few can pull off contacts.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Good contacts enhance the look, but that is still rare as only a few can pull off contacts.

do u think most indians will benefit from rhino as most have bulbous noses. I think persians are similar to indo nordics nord indid indo iranids except they have much sharper noses

 

[Deleted member 17429]

Holy fuck at the autism in this thread
U think foids are gonna say “he doesn’t have a wide ipd, I wouldn’t date him “ “matt bomer isn’t hot, he needs wider eyes “

 

[Hueless]

Cyclops cope, look at this gigachad