Holy shit he mogs salih here
Exactly my point. But women sub-conciously understand everything objective and objectively, slightly longer mid-face and closer set eyes are ideal on menHoly fuck at the autism in this thread
U think foids are gonna say “he doesn’t have a wide ipd, I wouldn’t date him“ “matt bomer isn’t hot, he needs wider eyes
Yes but it is all about harmony
Who are ur top 3 psl gods
Bruh, idk what to tell you his nose isn't straight is slightly hooked, you can see that past the bump the angle changes lightly. Slightly upturned noses can work in some men but it rarely does because of excessive nostril show. Also you can see in the video during the part where he talks about IPD and midface, he only photoshops his IPD to be way higher instead of reducing the midface length. I guarantee you that with a shorter midface he would be better looking.
Damn hard question, but my personal favourites include Cruise, Cavill and Salih.
a delon tier midface doesn’t work on tall skulls bro it messes the thirds up
He just gives an example and clearly mentions that wide set and bigger eyes look more feminizing.
Have u seen that I frauded salih pic ? He looked chadlite tops in that. Thoughts on chico gandy and delon? Do they make ur top 7?
I forgot Delon too, he is also my personal favourite.
all are above 7 PSL. Chico isn't my favourite, but that doesn't negate the fact that he is a 7 PSL
I think he has close set eyes as well right? Horizontally not long as well? So why does .org obsess with high pfl
Wider set eyes are more feminine, but masculine =/= attractive. He doesn't make his midface shorter at any point, litterally if he had a shorter nose he would be better looking
First of all I don't think tall skull is ideal but yeah midface should be as short as upper third and shorter than lower third
.org has retarded guys too who obsess over aspie looking models and completely throw harmony out of the window. Delon has within the range eye separation ratio of around 0.45, and his eyes are almost 3:1 ratio,
I am not squinching like Cruise. Say what you want.
So does horizontal width not matter? Only the pfl? What about the vertical width? Long horizontally but big vertically?
PFL is horizontal width and men with vertically compact eyes look better.
Pfl is horizontal by vertical right? Do you like delisollas high pfl or medium pfl like delon George best etc
No one said that though, we said he looks good despite the close set eyes but since org users can only think in extremes I understand why you'd think thatHoly fuck at the autism in this thread
U think foids are gonna say “he doesn’t have a wide ipd, I wouldn’t date him
Again Harmony is what I prefer. Gandy has the highest palpebral fissure length yet his eyes look harmonious to the rest of his face, same goes with Delon and his lower palpebral fissure length.
Thoughts on Lorenzo zurzolo?
Objective bias coming from someone with closer set eyes on their own face.
Unlike what many people on here think, slightly close set eyes (Eye separation ratio of 0.445-0.45) and slightly longer mid-face (mid-face ratio as low as 0.93 to as high as 1.00, not any more) are male dimorphic traits
Matt Bomer has ideal male dimorphic eye separation ratio -
WATCH FROM 2:40
Hexum face analysis -
WATCH FROM 9:26
Sean O'Pry has an unideal mid-face ratio cause of wide-set eyes combined with compact mid-face -
WATCH FROM 7:51
Cyclops coper spotted
What about the hundreds of threads about "wide-set eyes being ideal in men" by all the aspies on this forum with wide-set shark tier eyes? At least mine has conclusive proof, while all they have is "wide-set eyes are ideal end of discussion", that is actual cope without going over "facts".
Your argument is cage tier and shows your ignorance. Slightly closer set is always preferred on men and they look more striking with them, it will always be a male dimorphic feature.
Depends. If it's like only a few millimetres away from the preferred ideal, it becomes a halo for men, if it is like Marko Jaric, it then ruins the harmony.
It's more within the 0.43 range from what I recall and based on measurements from non distorted photos where you were already quite skinny to the point where fat would be an irrelevant factor to your facial width
Try with this image and then come back to me -
I am at 30 percent body fat here, that does make a significant difference. In the previous image I was less than half the body fat, around 13-14 percentage body fat, hence the increased eye separation ratio. My eye separation cannot magically drop, and there isn't any lens distortion in the above image as both are from the front cameras and 2+ feet away from the mirror
O'pry looks great, but Bomer with a 0.45 eye separation ratio utterly mogs him by having 96 percent facial harmony, while O'pry has 77 percent facial harmony.
Copium, you have a warped sense of beauty.
Imo .95 isnt ideal, .93-.97 isnt a failo, but .98-1.05 is ideal. Albeit I saw a solid male model with .92 mf ratio
There are few models with .9 or even lower but is very rare
A lot of it also depends on the head tilt, the kind of camera lens and finally how accurate the measurements of the mid-face are, now considering the guy doesn't seem to have a long mid-face when looked from bare eyes, he could very well have a 1:1 mid-face ratio
Ballou is one of my favourite models
You make random lame mog battles about pretty-boys, so I guess you don't know the first thing about aesthetics.
Compact midface is the very first thing model scouts look for when they are trying to determine if a face is aesthetic or not
No they dont.
