Constant gh vs pulses/spikes

T

tyl

Gold
Joined
Aug 20, 2025
Posts
760
Reputation
342
I still don’t know what is truly correct
Abt 50% of the time i see people say that it’s better to spike ur gh and that u don’t want it to constantly be elevated
Then the other 50% says the opposite and that you should always have ur gh elevated

What’s better
To me it makes more sense to always want it to be elevated but idk I’m not that tapped in with the research
 
how are you suppose to do either? what do you think personally is better
 
how are you suppose to do either? what do you think personally is better
I’m mainly referring to peptides and mk
Mk constantly has ur levels elevated
Something like cjc+ipa does spikes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Snowskinned
pulses - healthier, more natural (less strong)
constant - stronger, more effective (more risks)
 
pulses - healthier, more natural (less strong)
constant - stronger, more effective (more risks)
I agree,

Also what I’d like to add, is that pulses need daily multiple injections (2-3) on average, and Hgh needs only one. This will just be fk annoying if u got school/work
 
I agree,

Also what I’d like to add, is that pulses need daily multiple injections (2-3) on average, and Hgh needs only one. This will just be fk annoying if u got school/work
that’s actually the main reason why i hopped on gh instead of peps jfl
 
land of greys
Kermit The Frog Map GIF by Muppet Wiki


Now mark this reply as a solution from pressing the chekmark next to the arrows ->
 

Similar threads

7evenvox22
Replies
19
Views
1K
7evenvox22
7evenvox22
BWC
Replies
48
Views
2K
Whatsamaxilla__
Whatsamaxilla__
2chevskuy
Replies
39
Views
1K
2chevskuy
2chevskuy
Aryan Incel
Replies
55
Views
3K
frayed
frayed
J
Replies
14
Views
1K
Whirr22222
Whirr22222

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top