Constant gh vs pulses/spikes

[Deleted member 210219]

I still don’t know what is truly correct
Abt 50% of the time i see people say that it’s better to spike ur gh and that u don’t want it to constantly be elevated
Then the other 50% says the opposite and that you should always have ur gh elevated

What’s better
To me it makes more sense to always want it to be elevated but idk I’m not that tapped in with the research

 

[Deleted member 210219]

Bump

 

[unstable]

how are you suppose to do either? what do you think personally is better

 

[Deleted member 210219]

how are you suppose to do either? what do you think personally is better

I’m mainly referring to peptides and mk
Mk constantly has ur levels elevated
Something like cjc+ipa does spikes

 

[acsensionbeforeover]

pulses - healthier, more natural (less strong)
constant - stronger, more effective (more risks)

 

[Fleisch]

pulses - healthier, more natural (less strong)
constant - stronger, more effective (more risks)

I agree,

Also what I’d like to add, is that pulses need daily multiple injections (2-3) on average, and Hgh needs only one. This will just be fk annoying if u got school/work

 

[acsensionbeforeover]

I agree,

Also what I’d like to add, is that pulses need daily multiple injections (2-3) on average, and Hgh needs only one. This will just be fk annoying if u got school/work

that’s actually the main reason why i hopped on gh instead of peps jfl

 

[Arzenic]

land of greys

Now mark this reply as a solution from pressing the chekmark next to the arrows ->