Contemporary western social norms is a simulation of Chinese and Indian historical norms: Proof

EuphoricAsianNormie

EuphoricAsianNormie

Sphinx
Joined
Jul 21, 2025
Posts
2,799
Reputation
3,284
Historically speaking Chinese and Indian women were the most hypergamous women on the planet mainly because:

- It was very common for China to have a male-shifted gender ratio because female infanticide has been a common phenomenon since at least the Han dynasty. Female infanticide was also common in India, so India also historically had a high male to female gender ratio.

- Unlike in Western countries where monogamy was legally enforced, Chinese and Indian society tolerated polygyny and concubinage leading to the marriage market being hypercompetitive considering the gender ratio of both societies being male-shifted. Inceldom among Chinese and Indian men was very common even before widespread contact with Whites or other foreign races.

- China and India historically was the location of mass violence and violent rebellions, with high incel participation. Historically speaking, both ricecels and currycels were very violent and low-inhib, but modern society made them soft and passive as well as high inhib.


Contemporary internet experience, especially dating apps is a simulation of very normal historical experiences in China and India, causing mass inceldom, giving females a large pool of males to choose from, resembling the historic gender ratio of Chinese and Indian society.

The introduction of soy into processed foods is also a sign of the Sinicization and Indianization of Western society since Soy is a staple of Chinese and Indian cuisine. meat consumption only became common in China in the past few decades. The popularization of Chinese and indian cuisine is also a sign.

The adaptation of Chinese neologisms and slang words such as "feng shui", "kowtow", "gung ho", "tycoon", "chi" or Indian ones "shampoo", "bhai", "izzat", "avatar", "thug", "mantra", "guru".

The decentralization of religion and the popularization of new age and alternative spirituality, often originating from Chinese or Indian traditions and contexts mainly due to them never becoming Abrahamic majority, although both Chinese and Indians have influential Muslim minorities.

The rise of of mix-raced populations in the west Such as Wasians and Windians only reenforce the Sinicization and the Indianization of Western society due to blood ties with such regions.

Chinese and Indians being overrepresented in the tech establishments of the US also reenforces the popular studycel culture which has always existed in those countries.

Entertainment in western countries is increasingly shifted towards East Asian or Subcontinental originated themes with more visibility of Asian and Indian entertainers, both pure and racially mixed.

Here is one difference between Asian and Indian diaspora women and their historic counterparts in their ancestral homeland:

Historically both East Asia and India was patriarchal societies, way more patriarchal and controlling than both European and steppe Asian society. Asian and Indian women in the diaspora have become matriarchs who dictate social norms and cast aside much of their male population in favor of white men if they could, rending them incels or genetic dead ends.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HardStuckLTN;, ICL, epic09 and 1 other person
interesting
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
@mohito @ltnbrownacnecel @Bars @Skitsuna @ICL
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
Historically speaking Chinese and Indian women were the most hypergamous women on the planet mainly because:

- It was very common for China to have a male-shifted gender ratio because female infanticide has been a common phenomenon since at least the Han dynasty. Female infanticide was also common in India, so India also historically had a high male to female gender ratio.

- Unlike in Western countries where monogamy was legally enforced, Chinese and Indian society tolerated polygyny and concubinage leading to the marriage market being hypercompetitive considering the gender ratio of both societies being male-shifted. Inceldom among Chinese and Indian men was very common even before widespread contact with Whites or other foreign races.

- China and India historically was the location of mass violence and violent rebellions, with high incel participation. Historically speaking, both ricecels and currycels were very violent and low-inhib, but modern society made them soft and passive as well as high inhib.


Contemporary internet experience, especially dating apps is a simulation of very normal historical experiences in China and India, causing mass inceldom, giving females a large pool of males to choose from, resembling the historic gender ratio of Chinese and Indian society.

The introduction of soy into processed foods is also a sign of the Sinicization and Indianization of Western society since Soy is a staple of Chinese and Indian cuisine. meat consumption only became common in China in the past few decades. The popularization of Chinese and indian cuisine is also a sign.

The adaptation of Chinese neologisms and slang words such as "feng shui", "kowtow", "gung ho", "tycoon", "chi" or Indian ones "shampoo", "bhai", "izzat", "avatar", "thug", "mantra", "guru".

The decentralization of religion and the popularization of new age and alternative spirituality, often originating from Chinese or Indian traditions and contexts mainly due to them never becoming Abrahamic majority, although both Chinese and Indians have influential Muslim minorities.

The rise of of mix-raced populations in the west Such as Wasians and Windians only reenforce the Sinicization and the Indianization of Western society due to blood ties with such regions.

Chinese and Indians being overrepresented in the tech establishments of the US also reenforces the popular studycel culture which has always existed in those countries.

Entertainment in western countries is increasingly shifted towards East Asian or Subcontinental originated themes with more visibility of Asian and Indian entertainers, both pure and racially mixed.

Here is one difference between Asian and Indian diaspora women and their historic counterparts in their ancestral homeland:

Historically both East Asia and India was patriarchal societies, way more patriarchal and controlling than both European and steppe Asian society. Asian and Indian women in the diaspora have become matriarchs who dictate social norms and cast aside much of their male population in favor of white men if they could, rending them incels or genetic dead ends.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Overlord- and ICL
Historically speaking Chinese and Indian women were the most hypergamous women on the planet mainly because:

- It was very common for China to have a male-shifted gender ratio because female infanticide has been a common phenomenon since at least the Han dynasty. Female infanticide was also common in India, so India also historically had a high male to female gender ratio.

- Unlike in Western countries where monogamy was legally enforced, Chinese and Indian society tolerated polygyny and concubinage leading to the marriage market being hypercompetitive considering the gender ratio of both societies being male-shifted. Inceldom among Chinese and Indian men was very common even before widespread contact with Whites or other foreign races.

- China and India historically was the location of mass violence and violent rebellions, with high incel participation. Historically speaking, both ricecels and currycels were very violent and low-inhib, but modern society made them soft and passive as well as high inhib.


Contemporary internet experience, especially dating apps is a simulation of very normal historical experiences in China and India, causing mass inceldom, giving females a large pool of males to choose from, resembling the historic gender ratio of Chinese and Indian society.

The introduction of soy into processed foods is also a sign of the Sinicization and Indianization of Western society since Soy is a staple of Chinese and Indian cuisine. meat consumption only became common in China in the past few decades. The popularization of Chinese and indian cuisine is also a sign.

The adaptation of Chinese neologisms and slang words such as "feng shui", "kowtow", "gung ho", "tycoon", "chi" or Indian ones "shampoo", "bhai", "izzat", "avatar", "thug", "mantra", "guru".

The decentralization of religion and the popularization of new age and alternative spirituality, often originating from Chinese or Indian traditions and contexts mainly due to them never becoming Abrahamic majority, although both Chinese and Indians have influential Muslim minorities.

The rise of of mix-raced populations in the west Such as Wasians and Windians only reenforce the Sinicization and the Indianization of Western society due to blood ties with such regions.

Chinese and Indians being overrepresented in the tech establishments of the US also reenforces the popular studycel culture which has always existed in those countries.

Entertainment in western countries is increasingly shifted towards East Asian or Subcontinental originated themes with more visibility of Asian and Indian entertainers, both pure and racially mixed.

Here is one difference between Asian and Indian diaspora women and their historic counterparts in their ancestral homeland:

Historically both East Asia and India was patriarchal societies, way more patriarchal and controlling than both European and steppe Asian society. Asian and Indian women in the diaspora have become matriarchs who dictate social norms and cast aside much of their male population in favor of white men if they could, rending them incels or genetic dead ends.
Interesting overview, to be fair, I don't have anything relevant to add. Although the Indian men were very powerful at the time; they were historically taller [now, the opposite, due to famine and other epigenetic factors] as they averaged 5'11, they were tall and dimorphic for their time period. Specifically the Al-Zutt of India, they were powerful curries who were leading in sodomizing practices [since during those days, these practices weren't considered weird and were required. Either way, there is no point going in depth into it] which would make sense why there would be genetically-superior indians who engaged in polygamy, keeping the genetic dead-ends as incels. They had many kids however, which is why they still exist and have such a big population, except due to genetic recombination, not every offspring ended up as Chads; in fact, quite the opposite
 
  • +1
Reactions: EuphoricAsianNormie
Interesting overview, to be fair, I don't have anything relevant to add. Although the Indian men were very powerful at the time; they were historically taller [now, the opposite, due to famine and other epigenetic factors] as they averaged 5'11, they were tall and dimorphic for their time period. Specifically the Al-Zutt of India, they were powerful curries who were leading in sodomizing practices [since during those days, these practices weren't considered weird and were required. Either way, there is no point going in depth into it] which would make sense why there would be genetically-superior indians who engaged in polygamy, keeping the genetic dead-ends as incels. They had many kids however, which is why they still exist and have such a big population, except due to genetic recombination, not every offspring ended up as Chads; in fact, quite the opposite
Currycels and Ricecels are descendants of Chadjeets and Changs with low standards.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
Currycels and Ricecels are descendants of Chadjeets and Changs with low standards.
Which explains the whole genetic recombination thing.

Chadpreet/Chang go for many women, producing many kids each, for the slim chance that a Chadpreet/Chang is born, so that this cycle could be repeated, as they reproduce with concubines, who have terrible facial features [which is why they aren't wives, but concubines] which have a possibility of not smudging the chad's genes with theirs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EuphoricAsianNormie
Which explains the whole genetic recombination thing.

Chadpreet/Chang go for many women, producing many kids each, for the slim chance that a Chadpreet/Chang is born, so that this cycle could be repeated, as they reproduce with concubines, who have terrible facial features [which is why they aren't wives, but concubines] which have a possibility of not smudging the chad's genes with theirs.
I should probably try to shorten my future threads because lots of people here have dangerously low attention spans.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICL
I should probably try to shorten my future threads because lots of people here have dangerously low attention spans.
It's simple.

Most people are going to either exclusively read the start or skim through it

Your threads need to appeal to them to get coherent replies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EuphoricAsianNormie

Similar threads

HyperMog69
Replies
2
Views
44
HyperMog69
HyperMog69
Androgynous
Replies
2
Views
46
crazyguy
crazyguy
BrutusTheBulldozer
Replies
7
Views
62
Rick_bozo
Rick_bozo
autistic_tendencies
Replies
13
Views
48
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top