Current list of high IQ threads & rebuttals.

I read everything, and i only commented on how i thought it was a fun thread to read btw
It’s just important to state considering he picks a specific part of a debate and most people will just view that single part without reading through the whole thing which is what he’s hoping for. I have no doubt he won some of the debates against others but It’s an obvious victory in my favour in our debate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Scandicel and ZenithZXV
@
ZenithZXV
@ZenithZXV, whose only argument was my post Numbers and ratios on this indian forum. Brutal shit innit
Meanwhile your argument is about discussing my ethnicity and sexuality, nigga go back to looksmaxxing.com where you truly belong
 
  • +1
Reactions: tansel and topology
@topology you cant accurately measure and pinpoint an iq based off of an persons text but you can see a difference in typing levels based on a higher or lower iq. Stop trying to use my own words against me because i didnt even contradict myself you’re just taking my words out of context
You made a terrible argument. No one argues you can pin point the exact number. The standard deviation rounded to a whole number can be found often from what I've observed. You land 1 standard deviation below the mean.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Fridx, tomahawk and ZenithZXV
It’s just important to state considering he picks a specific part of a debate and most people will just view that single part without reading through the whole thing which is what he’s hoping for. I have no doubt he won some of the debates against others but It’s an obvious victory in my favour in our debate.
"I doubt he won" implying you haven't read it to comment on it... Yikes..
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
i already replied to u dude, i don’t want to argue with you. i don’t know why you don’t like me, i’ve never insulted you or said anything negative towards you, we’ve barely even interacted with each other but its whatever
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
i already replied to u dude, i don’t want to argue with you. i don’t know why you don’t like me, i’ve never insulted you or said anything negative towards you, we’ve barely even interacted with each other but its whatever
You're 22 and a loser. Get off my site.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fridx and ZenithZXV
  • JFL
Reactions: topology
High IQ threads:


Many more where I spoke and commented about general things but I cannot find them.

Logical molestations:

@iblamexyz being educated on the blackpill when I was a greycel: https://looksmax.org/threads/ideal-blonde.1700785/page-3#post-24196394
@EmperorVon being educated on formal argument theory & dishonesty when he called me a pseudo intellectual: https://looksmax.org/threads/is-there-a-more-true-quote.1979410/page-3#post-27545195
@User28823 generally just being educated on everything & me exposing the girl he larps dating: https://looksmax.org/threads/i-told-her-its-time-for-me-to-move-on.1979135/#post-27540269


Too many to count.. Those are some of the high post users who I have embarrassed. No one here is even on the same level as me. You people are below me in every metric. Stay. In. Your. Lane.
mans fighting a 20v1
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ZenithZXV
@User28823 you are not a white girl fucker? Boo, what a tragedy :ogre:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV, ltnbrownacnecel, dhusc and 1 other person
"I doubt he won" implying you haven't read it to comment on it... Yikes..
I said I have no doubt he won which means I believe you won the other debates. Are you genuinely just trying to rage bait? You really aren’t as smart as you profess yourself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
I said I have no doubt he won which means I believe you won the other debates. Are you genuinely just trying to rage bait? You really aren’t as smart as you profess yourself.
Haven't read it, aren't allowed to comment on it. Follow the logic?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Fridx and ZenithZXV
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: tomahawk, ZenithZXV, EmperorVon and 2 others
Haven't read it, aren't allowed to comment on it. Follow the logic?
When did I say I didn’t read them. I said most users won’t read through the whole thing. Stop jumping to conclusions it’s low iq.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
You made a terrible argument. No one argues you can pin point the exact number. The standard deviation rounded to a whole number can be found often from what I've observed. You land 1 standard deviation below the mean.
you cannot reliably place me 1 sd below the mean just by “observation” and thats because iq isnt directly observable

You sound smart by saying “you land 1 sd below the mean”

But in reality this statement just means in simple words

“I think you’re below average because im
Basing it off of your text writing”
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Yes and use your single digit IQ to the full extent and come back
Wont even respond to this pathetic comeback. I feel like Anakin killing the younglings in the Jedi temple when eviscerating both of you….
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0748.jpeg
    IMG_0748.jpeg
    43.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
any moron can graduate with honors? from a financial analysis program? ok lol. whatever dude i don’t wanna argue with you, i don’t know why you don’t like me, i’ve never insulted you or said something negative towards you, we’ve barely even talked to each other but it’s whatever.
tbf finance isn't the most difficult major

it is difficult since it is analysis, but topology has a comp sci degree i think which is STEM, most stem majors are more difficult which i do think comp sci > financial analysis

it does depend on which college and which classes though since some people do different courses
You made a terrible argument. No one argues you can pin point the exact number. The standard deviation rounded to a whole number can be found often from what I've observed. You land 1 standard deviation below the mean.
text and iq don't correlate

unless your in an academic setting where people are giving effort to formally type, most people on here choose to write quickly what they think as they write out their sentence in their head rather then in strucfured sentences

maybe you can make a judgement on that aswell but it's conditional and not really reliable
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
you cannot reliably place me 1 sd below the mean just by “observation” and thats because iq isnt directly observable

You sound smart by saying “you land 1 sd below the mean”

But in reality this statement just means in simple words

“I think you’re below average because im
Basing it off of your text writing”
If you want to go off studies, then sure, every 2 standard deviation differences between people talking, a gap exists. It also gets bigger the bigger the difference is. I can gauge your intelligence by seeing how you interact with different people. Follow the logic now..?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
@topology

Yet again I said I don’t doubt. And that’s just me stating my opinion from scanning through, not guessing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
text and iq don't correlate

unless your in an academic setting where people are giving effort to formally type, most people on here choose to write quickly what they think as they write out their sentence in their head rather then in strucfured sentences

maybe you can make a judgement on that aswell but it's conditional and not really reliable
If you want to go off studies, then sure, every 2 standard deviation differences between people talking, a gap exists. It also gets bigger the bigger the difference is. I can gauge your intelligence by seeing how you interact with different people. Follow the logic now..?


Text would be informal enough such that it translates to basically what would be said in a real conversation face to face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
It’s just important to state considering he picks a specific part of a debate and most people will just view that single part without reading through the whole thing which is what he’s hoping for. I have no doubt he won some of the debates against others but It’s an obvious victory in my favour in our debate.
i read three words, its 7AM, ill read it when i wake up
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV, EmperorVon and topology
Yet again I said I don’t doubt. And that’s just me stating my opinion from scanning through, not guessing.
Your opinion is useless... That's the point.. Read and analyze X thing for your opinion to matter..
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Your opinion is useless... That's the point.. Read and analyze X thing for your opinion to matter..
But you were wrong and just made assumptions. More proof you’re not a genius. You’re switching the goalposts.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
tbf finance isn't the most difficult major

it is difficult since it is analysis, but topology has a comp sci degree i think which is STEM, most stem majors are more difficult which i do think comp sci > financial analysis

it does depend on which college and which classes though since some people do different courses

text and iq don't correlate

unless your in an academic setting where people are giving effort to formally type, most people on here choose to write quickly what they think as they write out their sentence in their head rather then in strucfured sentences

maybe you can make a judgement on that aswell but it's conditional and not really reliable
ok.. this isn’t a college or educational forum, it’s a lookism forum. i didn’t join .org to discuss the difficulty of college, at the end of the day i don’t care who’s high iq & who’s not. i’m 22 & have already had 2 plastic surgeries, filler, botox, & am getting 2 more plastic surgeries (one of them being a trimax) in istanbul in 2 months. every single looksmax or surgical procedure i’ve done was paid with my money, no one else’s. he can keep his iq to himself.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
But you were wrong and just made assumptions. More proof you’re not a genius. You’re switching the goalposts.
I have no doubt he won some of the debates against others but It’s an obvious victory in my favour in our debate.
Nope, you're the one making the assumptions. I only stated that you had not read the threads which was correct. It was implied when you said "I have no doubt," follow the logic? You're the one making the assumptions here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Text would be informal enough such that it translates to basically what would be said in a real conversation face to face.
no, it's more like your minds speech, in a conversation it's planned out, in text people usually are just thoughtlessly typing what their brain sends into their fingers (myself included)
ok.. this isn’t a college or educational forum, it’s a lookism forum. i didn’t join .org to discuss the difficulty of college
then don't get in an argument about iq?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
Nope, you're the one making the assumptions. I only stated that you had not read the threads which was correct. It was implied when you said "I have no doubt," follow the logic? You're the one making the assumptions here.
I have no doubt, which means no doubts you won the debates against them. That is not just merely an assumption, are you out of your mind. You're the only one whose made assumptions in this thread.
 
no, it's more like your minds speech, in a conversation it's planned out, in text people usually are just thoughtlessly typing what their brain sends into their fingers (myself included)
That's a formal convesation... I'm talking about a normal one.. The gap exists when it's just normal things being spoken about.
 
If you want to go off studies, then sure, every 2 standard deviation differences between people talking, a gap exists. It also gets bigger the bigger the difference is. I can gauge your intelligence by seeing how you interact with different people. Follow the logic now..?
You’re taking group-level correlations and treating them like a precise tool for judging individuals. Even if communication differences exist at large IQ gaps, that doesn’t mean you can reliably infer someone’s IQ or place them at “1 SD below” from casual text. At that point, you’re just dressing up a subjective impression in statistical language.

(Ofc there is going to be a communication difference in a 130 iq vs 100 iq individual:lul:)

:lul:
 
how can you eviscerate someone when all you do is to post memes instead:feelskek:
Yes ignore the brutal cortisol spikes from the former eviscerations. Being ethnic is already stressful enough ig.
 
no, it's more like your minds speech, in a conversation it's planned out, in text people usually are just thoughtlessly typing what their brain sends into their fingers (myself included)

then don't get in an argument about iq?
i wasn’t arguing with him, i was just interested in why somebody i’ve barely interacted with is calling me low iq.. i’ve talked to him maybe two or three times. he’s just a hurtful person, its whatever idc
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV
No, it's to show how little you think for yourself. You cannot bring up an argument as I speak about a lot of STEM subjects. Answer the question.


So nothing is smart to you. Nothing can satisfy your demands. You want an impossible condition to be met.
listening and repeating doesn't require intelligence. were you the autistic malnourished faggot who got his glasses broken after being shoved in lockers in school and is maybe shoving how HIGH IQ BRO you are in people's faces a form of having dominance for once in your life?
Not even an argument as you can observe the results that come from it and deduce results.
when you eat food you don't feel hungry anymore
officialy, according to LE SCIENCE that happens because you start producing "satiety hormones"

can you prove any of that? can you observe it? no. you just feel not hungry anymore because you just don't, we will probably never know why.

you can reply to this but i'm not arguing further because now i see that you are exactly the narcy autist who gets sexually aroused to being perceived as smart and right. take it as a concession and go jerk off to your virtual win if you want.
 
  • +1
Reactions: recessedyn and ZenithZXV
Which is an assumption.



It was an assumption as you didn't look into it.



No, as I had read into it. I knew the situation, you didn't.
It wouldn’t be an assumption if I also possess knowledge on the topics discussed and not just assuming based on no information.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV and tansel
You’re taking group-level correlations and treating them like a precise tool for judging individuals.
This is the most obvious GPT argument EVER. I've seen it make this exact argument across MULTIPLE fields.

Regardless, it can give an accurate number within standard deviations. Off that, you're nowhere near average IQ.

Even if communication differences exist at large IQ gaps, that doesn’t mean you can reliably infer someone’s IQ or place them at “1 SD below” from casual text.
You can....? You can observe the habit within 2 deviations and go off that....?

At that point, you’re just dressing up a subjective impression in statistical language.
AI spotted, you're a moron. AI specifically makes these types of sentences. It makes a declaration like this at the end of every paragraph. You're not smart or slick.


(Ofc there is going to be a communication difference in a 130 iq vs 100 iq individual:lul:)
Your IQ would be measured upon a lot of users here.. You're acting as if I'm only putting you against 1 user. Yikes..
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
listening and repeating doesn't require intelligence. were you the autistic faggot who got his glasses broken after being shoved in lockers in school and is maybe shoving how HIGH IQ BRO you are in people's faces a form of having dominance for once in your life?

when you eat food you don't feel hungry anymore
officialy, according to LE SCIENCE that happens because you start producing "satiety hormones"

can you prove any of that? can you observe it? no. you just feel not hungry anymore because you just don't, we will probably never know why.

you can reply to this but i'm not arguing further because now i see that you are exactly the narcy autist who gets sexually aroused to being perceived as smart and right. take it as a concession and go jerk off to your virtual win if you want.
Are you special? It’s a fact chemicals are what cause hunger and satiate hunger, if that wasn’t the case how could we inject someone with a specific chemical to cause or satiate hunger.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
That's a formal convesation... I'm talking about a normal one.. The gap exists when it's just normal things being spoken about.
?
people plan in informal conversations

or at least i do and others i know
 
  • +1
Reactions: EmperorVon and ZenithZXV
Being ethnic is already stressful enough ig.
As if you are not some curry larping on .org planning to "eviscerate" other curries just because you disagree with them:feelshaha:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Algernon, tansel, topology and 1 other person
listening and repeating doesn't require intelligence.
Once again, a criteria which you have no solution for.

when you eat food you don't feel hungry anymore
officialy, according to LE SCIENCE that happens because you start producing "satiety hormones"

can you prove any of that? can you observe it? no. you just feel not hungry anymore because you just don't, we will probably never know why.
Yes.....? Blood tests are a thing......? Are you perhaps mentally impaired...? The name and process we give to them is based upon the results we've observed and proven.. It doesn't matter how it's labeled as long as the process is correct with the nuances correct too...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Algernon and ZenithZXV
Are you special? It’s a fact chemicals are what cause hunger and satiate hunge
a fact is something you can sense
e.g the sky is blue (even that is not a fact in this context because i'm telling you, if you go outside and look at it then it is indeed a fact)
if that wasn’t the case how could we inject someone with a specific chemical to cause or satiate hunger.
dont know just like how nobody knows what is actually being injected or what is produced in the body
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EmperorVon
people plan in informal conversations
And people plan when typing too..? What is exactly your point? The average person doesn't think before they speak or type.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ZenithZXV

Similar threads

topology
Replies
126
Views
611
topology
topology
topology
Replies
23
Views
216
Fridx
Fridx
teddy101
Replies
29
Views
235
teddy101
teddy101
tomahawk
Replies
26
Views
231
Fedora Corp
Fedora Corp

Users who are viewing this thread

  • solodolo
Back
Top