Current list of high IQ threads & rebuttals.

[ZenithZXV]

Anyways you are brown, enough said. I mog you to death and it’s over for you…

"I mog you to death" but anyways you always told me that you mog me to death because in reality you are incorrect so you proceed to focus on physical appearance instead

 

[ZenithZXV]

keep giving me the ugh reaction you utter subhuman…

"utter subhuman" as if whites cannot be a subhuman themselves, yeah keep spamming the "you are brown" card while typing this shit on islamabad library's free wifi

 

[sub5_poopcel]

Not when the sample size is large enough, where mine is...


70 iq struggles with 100, it also struggles with 105, 110, 115, etc. This proves it's low and a general bound can be formed. Off this, I was able to tell you have low IQ.


People trained for this can assuming they have my data set..?

Im trying to stay professional with you but you are the most retarded and biased ive met on this forum

“Muh my dataset says” your dataset isnt real evidence

“But muh ive seen this alot so im accurate and i know a low iq when i see one”

This is both
Unverified
And
Biased (you decide who is “low iq” based off of your dataset which cant be classified as evidence in an argument sorry to crush your dreams)

You assume communication issues comes from low iq but ignore other causes (like the ones ive stated) and then jumping to “70 iq” its not pattern recognition you fucking iqlet its bias at its best

I wouldnt be as retarded as you and say your low iq but i can 100% tell you’re not on the smarter side by these answers

 

[Futur_streamerr]

"I mog you to death" but anyways you always told me that you mog me to death because in reality you are incorrect so you proceed to focus on physical appearance instead

Molecule. Not only do I mog you looks wise but intelligence wise, financially wise… I mean we dont really live in the same realm of reality

 

[Algernon]

Do you think I haven't thought of that? I've gauged the iq of 50+ users via the free IQ test in the looksmax.org Discord.

ok ig this next part is overly analytical but since you kind of bragged about it

did you randomly sample them and get all responses?

+ obviously, that free iq test isn't accurate, it only will measure comparative differences between the people and it has no relation to actual well known iq distributions, you'd probably have to shift the mean to 120 and then skew it but then your just guessing the data to fit

The study was on informal conversations...

ig i didn't know that
still, text has much more in it then speaking like grammar etc
talking informally vs formally in speech is much different the in text
punctuation, the way you format
it's kind of obvious what that'd do to data and any attempt at meaningful representation of iq from text, it destroys comparison or any fair usage of that study in this context

IQ is also largely subconscious.. See how it works..? The studies done were on people having normal conversations and not aware. They thought of all possible issues.

thats more of how non-aware conversations correlate to aware iq testing, that doesn't prove iq is subconscious, maybe it proves inawareness in speech conversations can correlate to aware testing of IQ, but again not texting

You only believe this due to the fact that your IQ isn't high enough. Past 45 points it's practically impossible.

i've never actually had my iq reliably tested

idk, i guess if i were to i will come back to you on this

 

[topology]

“Muh my dataset says” your dataset isnt real evidence

Dataset of https://cognitivemetrics.com/

It is verified. Go ahead and look it up, moron.

“But muh ive seen this alot so im accurate and i know a low iq when i see one”

This is both
Unverified
And
Biased (you decide who is “low iq” based off of your dataset which cant be classified as evidence in an argument sorry to crush your dreams)

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Read it and weep. Go do research.

You assume communication issues comes from low iq but ignore other causes (like the ones ive stated) and then jumping to “70 iq” its not pattern recognition you fucking iqlet its bias at its best

Not relevant once again as you can see how that plays out with a large dataset.

I wouldnt be as retarded as you and say your low iq but i can 100% tell you’re not on the smarter side by these answers

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

You're assuming and making arguments for me. Thanks, you've demonstrated you're a moron.

 

[Futur_streamerr]

"utter subhuman" as if whites cannot be a subhuman themselves, yeah keep spamming the "you are brown" card while typing this shit on islamabad library's free wifi

Truth hurts nigga… truth hurts… anyways I have to go your cortisol levels will be able to drop nw

 

[topology]

+ obviously, that free iq test isn't accurate, it only will measure comparative differences between the people and it has no relation to actual well known iq distributions, you'd probably have to shift the mean to 120 and then skew it but then your just guessing the data to fit

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Done a lot. Was just promoted on a LM server so I can link it to certain people. It has a lot of data.

ig i didn't know that
still, text has much more in it then speaking like grammar etc
talking informally vs formally in speech is much different the in text
punctuation, the way you format
it's kind of obvious what that'd do to data and any attempt at meaningful representation of iq from text, it destroys comparison or any fair usage of that study in this context

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

thats more of how non-aware conversations correlate to aware iq testing, that doesn't prove iq is subconscious, maybe it proves inawareness in speech conversations can correlate to aware testing of IQ, but again not texting

i've never actually had my iq reliably tested

idk, i guess if i were to i will come back to you on this

Go ahead and try to speak to someone at 55 IQ while at 100. It's not as bad but it's similar to someone at 145 IQ speaking to someone at 100 IQ. The brain is completely different. It's not alike at all.

 

[ZenithZXV]

Not only do I mog you looks wise but intelligence wise, financially wise

Sure buddy boyo, sure

 

[ZenithZXV]

Truth hurts nigga… truth hurts

Where is the truth in your statements

 

[Algernon]

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Done a lot. Was just promoted on a LM server so I can link it to certain people. It has a lot of data.

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Go ahead and try to speak to someone at 55 IQ while at 100. It's not as bad but it's similar to someone at 145 IQ speaking to someone at 100 IQ. The brain is completely different. It's not alike at all.

i never said i had 100 iq

also yeah ig i'll check the dataset, maybe i'll take the test and see what i get

although its 2am, so it might not be good but i think my brain doesn't really change even if im tired

 

[Algernon]

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Done a lot. Was just promoted on a LM server so I can link it to certain people. It has a lot of data.

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Go ahead and try to speak to someone at 55 IQ while at 100. It's not as bad but it's similar to someone at 145 IQ speaking to someone at 100 IQ. The brain is completely different. It's not alike at all.

which test should i do?

 

[sub5_poopcel]

Dataset of https://cognitivemetrics.com/

It is verified. Go ahead and look it up, moron.

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

Read it and weep. Go do research.


Not relevant once again as you can see how that plays out with a large dataset.

CognitiveMetrics - Take Professional-Grade IQ Tests

Your destination for professional-grade cognitive assessments. Featuring validated IQ tests like the AGCT by the US army and CAIT inspired by WAIS-IV. Explore your cognitive abilities with IQ tests recognized by Mensa and Triple 9.

cognitivemetrics.com

You're assuming and making arguments for me. Thanks, you've demonstrated you're a moron.

congrats you just showed to me you’re a complete iqlet.

First off your “dataset” is a self-selected group of test nerds. Not the general population. So by that i can tell its already biased. Also those scores comes from actual tests. Not from “reading messages” you’re taking real data and using it in a retarded and invalid way just to justify a guess. (Saying how you can distuingish between 85, 100, 115

Your dataset came from randos on the internet who are interested in intelligence

Its like saying if i took a bunch of gymrats and made them bench press in which i then calculated the average i’d get the average of a bunch of gymrats. Not normal human beings

 

[sub5_poopcel]

Sure buddy boyo, sure

Please just ignore this faggot no one likes him ive even put him on ignore too

 

[ZenithZXV]

Please just ignore this faggot no one likes him ive even put him on ignore too

Good, but then again that greycel is easy to argue with, he gets humiliated so he leaves

 

[sub5_poopcel]

Good, but then again that greycel is easy to argue with, he gets humiliated so he leaves

Hope he genuinely gets banned its greys like him im talking about in my threads

 

[ZenithZXV]

Good, but then again that greycel is easy to argue with, he gets humiliated so he leaves

Wait, there is a bit of misunderstanding

 

[ZenithZXV]

Hope he genuinely gets banned its greys like him im talking about in my threads

that dude is arrogant, he brings up user's looks when he cannot defeat them by logic

 

[tomahawk]

If you want to go off studies, then sure, every 2 standard deviation differences between people talking, a gap exists. It also gets bigger the bigger the difference is. I can gauge your intelligence by seeing how you interact with different people. Follow the logic now..?

you really feel it when a dude is stupid ngl

 

[Futur_streamerr]

Hope he genuinely gets banned its greys like him im talking about in my threads

 

[tomahawk]

dont know just like how nobody knows what is actually being injected or what is produced in the body

 

[ZenithZXV]

you really feel it when a dude is stupid ngl

yes especially that greycel right here on this thread, he cannot debunk Topology, now he proceeds to bring up his looks instead

 

[Futur_streamerr]

that dude is arrogant, he brings up user's looks when he cannot defeat them by logic

You really did use supreme Platonic rethoric when responding to me obviously

 

[Futur_streamerr]

yes especially that greycel right here on this thread, he cannot debunk Topology, now he proceeds to bring up his looks instead

Mogged all of your coping crew to utter submission anyways, don’t need to have an army of jesters with me to 1v5 coping subhumans with 2 digits IQ

 

[ZenithZXV]

coping subhumans with 2 digits IQ

And you are one of them

Mogged all of your coping crew to utter submission anyways

Coping is when someone ignores the reality, the one who avoids the correct statement is a coper and you truly fit in the description, funny how a greycel learned the word coping and uses it in his everyday life to argue with other users on an incel forum

 

[topology]

First off your “dataset” is a self-selected group of test nerds. Not the general population. So by that i can tell its already biased. Also those scores comes from actual tests. Not from “reading messages” you’re taking real data and using it in a retarded and invalid way just to justify a guess. (Saying how you can distuingish between 85, 100, 115

The "test nerds" wouldn't change anything as IQ is relative.. The link is still there as it's all based upon how it is relative to someone else. How about using your brain for once..? The scores determine people I know on this site & I base your intelligence off interactions with them. Follow the logic yet.?

Also, the site accounts for that... Shocker, isn't it..? I've seen the site and the dataset. I needed evidence it was reliable and it is. Any more objections..?

So, since the data is valid and the way I go off is based upon science, are there any more objections..? You have been proven to have low IQ. Go ahead and concede already.

Your dataset came from randos on the internet who are interested in intelligence

Once again, it doesn't matter.

Its like saying if i took a bunch of gymrats and made them bench press in which i then calculated the average i’d get the average of a bunch of gymrats. Not normal human beings

Once again, not relevant.

you really feel it when a dude is stupid ngl

This is supported by studies, go ahead and disprove it.

i never said i had 100 iq

I was giving an example.

 

[Futur_streamerr]

And you are one of them

Coping is when someone ignores the reality, the one who avoids the correct statement is a coper and you truly fit in the description

Yes sure okay…

 

[tomahawk]

This is supported by studies, go ahead and disprove it.

im agreeing with you you madman

 

[topology]

im agreeing with you you madman

Cool. Wouldn't impact me either way...

 

[Futur_streamerr]

Thread 'Yo whats up rate me (IM HTN BTW)'
https://looksmax.org/threads/yo-whats-up-rate-me-im-htn-btw.1926619/
Bruh… @ZenithZXV @sub5_poopcel your whole lives are humiliation rituals. I genuinely feel bad for you now I’m so sorry shouldn’t have picked on easy targets…

 

[sub5_poopcel]

The "test nerds" wouldn't change anything as IQ is relative.. The link is still there as it's all based upon how it is relative to someone else. How about using your brain for once..? The scores determine people I know on this site & I base your intelligence off interactions with them. Follow the logic yet.?

Also, the site accounts for that... Shocker, isn't it..? I've seen the site and the dataset. I needed evidence it was reliable and it is. Any more objections..?

So, since the data is valid and the way I go off is based upon science, are there any more objections..? You have been proven to have low IQ. Go ahead and concede already.


Once again, it doesn't matter.


Once again, not relevant.


This is supported by studies, go ahead and disprove it.


I was giving an example.

this is gonna be my last post in this conversation so let me break down everything you said down clearly

An average iq of self selected test nerds wont apply to the general population

Its like meeting a tall basketball player and you say

“Hes short in my dataset” well maybe because the people in your dataset are taller and the person you met is short in a dataset full of tall people. Same logic applies to iq. Iq isnt relative get that through your head

Now lets address your next claim because this is just fucking stupid

“I base your intelligence off interactions with them” this is an invalid method of estimating my intelligence because this can stem from a variety of other factors such as the ones i stated and you cannot base this solely off of iq and now thats where i explain it

EVEN if:
A persons writing style may be caused by their iq

That does not mean

low iq = dumb writing style

This is an invalid and retarded take based off of your personal bias

“Its science so its proven”

What you are doing is reading text > forming impressions > assigning iq

This is not a validated measuring method and it pisses me off why you keep doing it

“My data exists, my conclusion is proven”

Yes iq tests are scientific tools

But is there any proof that text based guessing reliably predicts iq? No

Calling it science doesnt mean its valid

You are not the intellect you are claiming to be. (I hate using this word) but you are the biggest larper ive ever met. Do not ever claim yourself as intellectual again because you keep applying the same logic “my dataset exists therefore it is correct” or “basing off my interactions with the people ive met on another site i can come to a conclusion you are low iq” nobody has ever challenged you on this forum like i have leading you to have a fed ego by using dumb analogy like what ive stated and winning over retards. Ill admit you are not inherently stupid. But you are not smart either. You’re just playing dirty cards to get at me and when they wont work you go to using dumbass logic like “based off my interactions with people ive met on a site i can come to a conclusion you are low iq” this is simply not true you are a dumbass pretending to be intellectual. Dont ever try this shit again faggot i won this debate whether you like it or not and the reason for that is you use your personal interactions to predict my iq. That just goes to show you went off facts and tried to do some dumb shit that wouldnt hold up in a debate. I am simply said smarter then you when it comes to facts.
And this is why nobody likes you. You think you’re intellectually superior to everyone on this forum while people are too lazy to give a shit. And i was too until you started calling me out for my iq. I debunked every thing you said and you kept repeating it just in other words. You’re not as smart as you think you are dumb retard

Like i said last post in this convo so whatever you reply with i wont respond to

 

[Fridx]

High IQ threads:

PTHrP, SOX9, and the reason why estrogen actually closes growth plates.

TAG SAYS THEORY BUT THIS IS SCIENCE. I DIDN'T KNOW WHICH OTHER ONE COULD BE USED As most people know, higher estrogen levels will lead to faster closure of the growth plates. However, estrogen cannot solely drive closure. Without it, as seen in aromatase-deficient individuals, plates fail to...

looksmax.org

Lowering T3/T4 can make you taller?

This is me spitballing, I haven't heard this discussed anywhere and I'm curious about other perspectives. The common myth is to actually TAKE more T4. As we know, gigantism mostly occurs when a tumor forms on the pituitary gland, causing massive amounts of growth hormone to be released...

looksmax.org

Yea those are nice threads

 

[sub5_poopcel]

you really feel it when a dude is stupid ngl

are you talking to me? I doubt you even have any idea what we’re discussing about

 

[tomahawk]

are you talking to me? I doubt you even have any idea what we’re discussing about

schizo what u on

 

[sub5_poopcel]

schizo what u on

“You really feel it when a dude is stupid” you were referring to me

 

[tomahawk]

“You really feel it when a dude is stupid” you were referring to me

no schizo

 

[sub5_poopcel]

no schizo

yeah whatever keep telling yourself that you retard. Im smarter then you

 

[alurmo]

can u just shitpost for once like banned user

isnt his threads already shitposts to u

 

[tomahawk]

yeah whatever keep telling yourself that you retard. Im smarter then you

what a schizo nigga

 

[topology]

An average iq of self selected test nerds wont apply to the general population

The dataset makes sure to fix that issue, moron. I pointed that out.

Iq isnt relative get that through your head

“I base your intelligence off interactions with them” this is an invalid method of estimating my intelligence because this can stem from a variety of other factors such as the ones i stated and you cannot base this solely off of iq and now thats where i explain it

EVEN if:
A persons writing style may be caused by their iq

That does not mean

low iq = dumb writing style

This is an invalid and retarded take based off of your personal bias

“Its science so its proven”

What you are doing is reading text > forming impressions > assigning iq

This is not a validated measuring method and it pisses me off why you keep doing it

Not a valid argument as if the trend occurs with issues across 5 deviations, it will be accounted for that. I have analyzed you and you don't fit into that criteria. You're arguing for me trying to measure your IQ with a small data set.

But is there any proof that text based guessing reliably predicts iq? No

Yes.

You are not the intellect you are claiming to be. (I hate using this word) but you are the biggest larper ive ever met. Do not ever claim yourself as intellectual again because you keep applying the same logic “my dataset exists therefore it is correct” or “basing off my interactions with the people ive met on another site i can come to a conclusion you are low iq” nobody has ever challenged you on this forum like i have leading you to have a fed ego by using dumb analogy like what ive stated and winning over retards. Ill admit you are not inherently stupid. But you are not smart either. You’re just playing dirty cards to get at me and when they wont work you go to using dumbass logic like “based off my interactions with people ive met on a site i can come to a conclusion you are low iq” this is simply not true you are a dumbass pretending to be intellectual. Dont ever try this shit again faggot i won this debate whether you like it or not and the reason for that is you use your personal interactions to predict my iq. That just goes to show you went off facts and tried to do some dumb shit that wouldnt hold up in a debate. I am simply said smarter then you when it comes to facts.

Once again, not an argument as you fail to see the dataset accounts for possible issues & the way it measures it based upon interactions accounts any social issues and other faults. Get a grip, you're trying to hang onto anything and fail at it... Yikes.

 

[sub5_poopcel]

The dataset makes sure to fix that issue, moron. I pointed that out.







Not a valid argument as if the trend occurs with issues across 5 deviations, it will be accounted for that. I have analyzed you and you don't fit into that criteria. You're arguing for me trying to measure your IQ with a small data set.



Yes.



Once again, not an argument as you fail to see the dataset accounts for possible issues & the way it measures it based upon interactions accounts any social issues and other faults. Get a grip, you're trying to hang onto anything and fail at it... Yikes.

Ahhh okay then so even if the dataset accounts for variables during testing you think you can judge iq from interactions? No

Im surprised i even replied back to you but you’re so illiterate i have to keep explaining things to you.
the moment you went off facts “i know people on the site basing off interactions with them i can see you’re low iq”
You lost the debate. You went off facts not only that you still dont realize you cant judge someones iq based off of text interactions

 

[topology]

Ahhh okay then so even if the dataset accounts for variables during testing you think you can judge iq from interactions? No

Yes, when it's a large dataset & you have large amounts of messages to go off of, which I do..

Im surprised i even replied back to you but you’re so illiterate i have to keep explaining things to you.
the moment you went off facts “i know people on the site basing off interactions with them i can see you’re low iq”
You lost the debate. You went off facts not only that you still dont realize you cant judge someones iq based off of text interactions

Great rebuttal.