daily reminder in ancient cultures the average man was probably 6 psl

So how do babies instinctively recognize and prefer an 'attractive' face?



Only pheno hierarchy as far as looks are concerned is subjective. What pheno is considered attractive has changed throughout history.

Babies know about beautiful faces (i.e. BONES) the moment they're out from the womb. But they learn about which pheno is attractive and which one isn't later on through mass media and watching the pheno preferences of their parents and others in the household.
I wouldnt say its entirely subjective. the way pheno contrasts and reveals shadows and tones in the skin isnt really subjective. but some part it is
 
So how do babies instinctively recognize and prefer an 'attractive' face?



Only pheno hierarchy as far as looks are concerned is subjective. What pheno is considered attractive has changed throughout history.

Babies know about beautiful faces (i.e. BONES) the moment they're out from the womb. But they learn about which pheno is attractive and which one isn't later on through mass media and watching the pheno preferences of their parents and others in the household.



2 things wrong with the study what race were they? And what was the methodology they used 1 can have correlates doesn't mean it's causation though.


Also these are your generic average faces which is even admitted In study babies like masculine characters they tend to go towards those.

The critims I have of it
I wouldnt say its entirely subjective. the way pheno contrasts and reveals shadows and tones in the skin isnt really subjective. but some part it is



It's subjective to the system in charge minus masculinity generic average faces babies are drawn to
 

Similar threads

whiteegyptian
Replies
139
Views
887
IraniancelV2
IraniancelV2
Vantablack
Replies
12
Views
565
KT-34
KT-34
D
Replies
14
Views
521
KeepCopingLads
KeepCopingLads
Jué
Replies
60
Views
825
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top