DARK FEATURES ARE ALL THAT MATTERS

This is all fax

The other day a girl reposted a tiktok on her story which said some shit like I have no idea how girls find blonde guys attractive
 
  • +1
Reactions: OCDMaxxing, Deleted member 7098 and Deleted member 3073
Ohh ok but so many meds are ethnic looking
wrong. it's the other way around, many ethnics are mediterranean looking. and that is what safes them from inceldom.

If you're white passing with dark hair and kind of european facial features you can be italian/kroatian/spanish/greek/turkish/north-african or maybe in rare cases, north indian, and you still get all the appeal mentioned in the thread.

ethnic means non-european facial features and/or brown shit-skin.

and to make it clear, tanned white skin ≠ shit skin.
and tanned whites > pale whites > shit-skin
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: 5'8manlet, Selfahate and Deleted member 6873
wrong. it's the other way around, many ethnics are mediterranean looking. and that is what safes them from inceldom.

If you're white passing with dark hair and kind of european facial features you can be italian/kroatian/spanish/greek/turkish/north-african or maybe in rare cases, north indian, and you still get all the appeal mentioned in the thread.

ethnic means non-european facial features and/or brown shit-skin.

and to make it clear, tanned white skin ≠ shit skin.
and tanned whites > pale whites > shit-skin
god i cant wait for my fucking tanning lotion
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7098
god i cant wait for my fucking tanning lotion
Softmaxxing will ascend you hard, boyo. white teeth, tanned, blue eyes, long dark hair and the jaw of the gods.

JBs will be lusting over you. i wish i was as good looking as you to begin with and started looksmaxxing as early as you are doing right now
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 6873
This is all fax

The other day a girl reposted a tiktok on her story which said some shit like I have no idea how girls find blonde guys attractive
bruh i saw that too and i think she said dirty blonde gets a pass
 
Softmaxxing will ascend you hard, boyo. white teeth, tanned, blue eyes, long dark hair and the jaw of the gods.

JBs will be lusting over you. i wish i was as good looking as you to begin with and started looksmaxxing as early as you are doing right now
Mirin' the only thing that somewhat worries my is my hard diet since i'm somewhat scared it'll hypertrophy the masseters too much :p but yeah i am getting my hair slightly shorter since it is quite unmanageable at this length, think keanu reeves long hair.
My softmaxxing protocol will be:

Tan
Gymcelling
Teeth whitening
(Shorter hair, again Keanu length)
And coconut oil for thicker brows.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7098
bruh i saw that too and i think she said dirty blonde gets a pass
yuh I asked her to send me the vid and here it is
 
  • +1
Reactions: Looks234
wrong. it's the other way around, many ethnics are mediterranean looking. and that is what safes them from inceldom.

If you're white passing with dark hair and kind of european facial features you can be italian/kroatian/spanish/greek/turkish/north-african or maybe in rare cases, north indian, and you still get all the appeal mentioned in the thread.

ethnic means non-european facial features and/or brown shit-skin.

and to make it clear, tanned white skin ≠ shit skin.
and tanned whites > pale whites > shit-skin
Ok thanks for clearing that up
 
The politically correct SJW’s say race is not a preference, but phenotype may be the the biggest subjective preference of all time.
 
wow I inherited the worst pheno didn't i

pale as fuck skin even in the summer
dark as hell eyes and hair

literally look like a vampire without the light eyes part. :feelswhy:
 
Whenever I see someone say that women prefer light-featured cuck high trust prettyboys over dark triad masc mediterranean beasts I can't help but howl in absolute amusement

View attachment 356486

It's already proven that women put dark features over fair features

I'm not talking about being black or shitskin hindu ethnic

I'm talking about having dark hair, dark eyes (in some cases there's exceptions), 5 o'clock shadow, tanned/olive skin and being tall

View attachment 356505
View attachment 356506
View attachment 356507

And it's not because of the "muh tall, dark and handsome stereotype"

It's already proven that dark features are subconsciously associated with virility, sex, mystery, villainy and danger. As this article suggests:



Also that's the same reason we males prefer fair women.

View attachment 356557

I'm not talking only about blonde women (even if this is mostly the case)

View attachment 356558

I'm talking about those of fair skin tone.

We associate fairness with femininity, innocence and purity (all cope nowadays anyway)

That's why in the 1950s the primary nuclear family stereotype was dark husband and fair wife

View attachment 356513
View attachment 356516

View attachment 356517
View attachment 356518

"Psychologists from the University of Liverpool, who worked with colleagues in Poland and Finland, found that it is not the love of danger that attracts women to dark featured men, as previously believed, but a primitive desire to find a mate who appears mentally strong, confident and physically attractive in order to have healthier children"

Exhibiting dark triad traits such as Machiavellianism, Narcissism and Psychopathy is also attractive to women.

Several mainstream academic, peer-reviewed studies have confirmed that women are sexually attracted to men who exhibit dark triad traits, likely because of women's evolutionary history.

They want an alpha, a commander, someone that can provide them safety, supplies and a strong offspring.

View attachment 356562

Height is associated with leadership and strength.

It's complicated to display all the characteristics mentioned above if there's lack of height, since dark traits and stature are complementary




Tl;dr it's all about being a dark abusive badboy

Edit: This are the type to try and argument against this logic

View attachment 356576
The cope 🤣
 
hair color doesnt matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: JosephGarrot123
Bumping this for the nerdic copers.
 
Whenever I see someone say that women prefer light-featured cuck high trust prettyboys over dark triad masc mediterranean beasts I can't help but howl in absolute amusement

View attachment 356486

It's already proven that women put dark features over fair features

I'm not talking about being black or shitskin hindu ethnic

I'm talking about having dark hair, dark eyes (in some cases there's exceptions), 5 o'clock shadow, tanned/olive skin and being tall

View attachment 356505
View attachment 356506
View attachment 356507

And it's not because of the "muh tall, dark and handsome stereotype"

It's already proven that dark features are subconsciously associated with virility, sex, mystery, villainy and danger. As this article suggests:



Also that's the same reason we males prefer fair women.

View attachment 356557

I'm not talking only about blonde women (even if this is mostly the case)

View attachment 356558

I'm talking about those of fair skin tone.

We associate fairness with femininity, innocence and purity (all cope nowadays anyway)

That's why in the 1950s the primary nuclear family stereotype was dark husband and fair wife

View attachment 356513
View attachment 356516

View attachment 356517
View attachment 356518

"Psychologists from the University of Liverpool, who worked with colleagues in Poland and Finland, found that it is not the love of danger that attracts women to dark featured men, as previously believed, but a primitive desire to find a mate who appears mentally strong, confident and physically attractive in order to have healthier children"

Exhibiting dark triad traits such as Machiavellianism, Narcissism and Psychopathy is also attractive to women.

Several mainstream academic, peer-reviewed studies have confirmed that women are sexually attracted to men who exhibit dark triad traits, likely because of women's evolutionary history.

They want an alpha, a commander, someone that can provide them safety, supplies and a strong offspring.

View attachment 356562

Height is associated with leadership and strength.

It's complicated to display all the characteristics mentioned above if there's lack of height, since dark traits and stature are complementary




Tl;dr it's all about being a dark abusive badboy

Edit: This are the type to try and argument against this logic

View attachment 356576
Fax no one will reject Ian somerholder
 
Anybody could have black hair you fuckin tard
Obviously, but it’s more prominent in ethnic populations. Most white people will not have black hair you imbecile.
 
Obviously, but it’s more prominent in ethnic populations. Most white people will not have black hair you imbecile.
No shit, but having black hair doesn’t make somebody more or less white. There are other indicators to look out for. I had a teacher last year who had jet black hair, green eyes and a breathtaking bone structure that no ethnic could ever possess. Ethnics are dog shit ugly and that’s what separates them from whites
 
No shit, but having black hair doesn’t make somebody more or less white. There are other indicators to look out for. I had a teacher last year who had jet black hair, green eyes and a breathtaking bone structure that no ethnic could ever possess. Ethnics are dog shit ugly and that’s what separates them from whites
:feelsuhh:

It’s not about what it does or doesn’t make you, but about what it makes you look like.

No one’s claiming it’s the only variable that contributes to looking more ethnic, but it’s obviously one, since hair color is one of the most visible ways whites differ from other phenotypes.

Genuinely don’t understand what’s the hold up here, your original reply didn’t even contradict mine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
:feelsuhh:

It’s not about what it does or doesn’t make you, but about what it makes you look like.

No one’s claiming it’s the only variable that contributes to looking more ethnic, but it’s obviously one, since hair color is one of the most visible ways whites differ from other phenotypes.

Genuinely don’t understand what’s the hold up here, your original reply didn’t even contradict mine.
Okay…and black hair makes you look ethnic? That’s utter nonsense lmao. Because as we know whites with black hair do exist. Hair colour is one of many that distinguish whites from the rest but redundant as it’s multifactorial, every feature should be assessed. The hold up is that a white with black hair should still be held as indisputably white, unless mixed with something else. If you are to say “yeah this dude with black hair could be ethnic” then he probably is mixed. There shouldn’t be any second guessing, zero “contribution” to anything as a white person is evidently white irregardless of darkness of features. You can’t mistaken a sand nigger for a pure white with dark hair
 
Okay…and black hair makes you look ethnic? That’s utter nonsense lmao. Because as we know whites with black hair do exist. Hair colour is one of many that distinguish whites from the rest but redundant as it’s multifactorial, every feature should be assessed. The hold up is that a white with black hair should still be held as indisputably white, unless mixed with something else. If you are to say “yeah this dude with black hair could be ethnic” then he probably is mixed. There shouldn’t be any second guessing, zero “contribution” to anything as a white person is evidently white irregardless of darkness of features. You can’t mistaken a sand nigger for a pure white with dark hair
Okay, I see your point that white people can have black hair, but you're missing a few things.

Just because a feature exists in multiple groups doesn't mean it doesn't contribute to how someone is perceived. Black hair is statistically less common in traditionally "white" populations, so yes, it can make someone look more "ethnic" even if they're white.

You're right that multiple factors contribute to someone's appearance, but then which features would you be talking about?
Thin nasal aperture (narrow nose) a small mouth (thin lips), orthognathism, a prominent supraorbital ridges and a sharp nasal sill?

Those features are common in North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of Asia too.
1726349465415


So, that "breathtaking" bone structure you were alluding to earlier isn't even distinctly white.

And this whole idea of "pure" or "indisputably" white is a bit ridiculous. Just what would that look like if not for someone with light blue eyes, blonde hair and pale skin?

Someone can have features that fall outside the typical "white" presentation without having any recent non-white ancestry.

For example, someone with dark hair and eyes might have ancestors from Southern Europe or the Mediterranean who carried those traits for centuries within a predominantly European population.

1726350042470
vs.
1726350422403


The guy on the right has more ethnic admixture than the guy on the left.

Phenotype exists on a spectrum, and there's no clear-cut division between "white" and "non-white." Where's the line there? The truth is, there isn't one.

Pretty much the only phenotypes that'd be regarded unanimously white here would be west & northern European, and almost all of them stereotypically have blond/brown hair with light eyes.
1726349202963


So, while someone with black hair can absolutely be white, it's not unreasonable to say that it can affect how their ethnicity is perceived, especially when combined with other features.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Debetro
Whenever I see someone say that women prefer light-featured cuck high trust prettyboys over dark triad masc mediterranean beasts I can't help but howl in absolute amusement

View attachment 356486

It's already proven that women put dark features over fair features

I'm not talking about being black or shitskin hindu ethnic

I'm talking about having dark hair, dark eyes (in some cases there's exceptions), 5 o'clock shadow, tanned/olive skin and being tall

View attachment 356505
View attachment 356506
View attachment 356507

And it's not because of the "muh tall, dark and handsome stereotype"

It's already proven that dark features are subconsciously associated with virility, sex, mystery, villainy and danger. As this article suggests:



Also that's the same reason we males prefer fair women.

View attachment 356557

I'm not talking only about blonde women (even if this is mostly the case)

View attachment 356558

I'm talking about those of fair skin tone.

We associate fairness with femininity, innocence and purity (all cope nowadays anyway)

That's why in the 1950s the primary nuclear family stereotype was dark husband and fair wife

View attachment 356513
View attachment 356516

View attachment 356517
View attachment 356518

"Psychologists from the University of Liverpool, who worked with colleagues in Poland and Finland, found that it is not the love of danger that attracts women to dark featured men, as previously believed, but a primitive desire to find a mate who appears mentally strong, confident and physically attractive in order to have healthier children"

Exhibiting dark triad traits such as Machiavellianism, Narcissism and Psychopathy is also attractive to women.

Several mainstream academic, peer-reviewed studies have confirmed that women are sexually attracted to men who exhibit dark triad traits, likely because of women's evolutionary history.

They want an alpha, a commander, someone that can provide them safety, supplies and a strong offspring.

View attachment 356562

Height is associated with leadership and strength.

It's complicated to display all the characteristics mentioned above if there's lack of height, since dark traits and stature are complementary




Tl;dr it's all about being a dark abusive badboy

Edit: This are the type to try and argument against this logic

View attachment 356576
This is legit curry cope. North Atlantid pheno is ideal, a mix of both light and dark features, it gives the best contract and is the most striking.
 
Okay, I see your point that white people can have black hair, but you're missing a few things.

Just because a feature exists in multiple groups doesn't mean it doesn't contribute to how someone is perceived. Black hair is statistically less common in traditionally "white" populations, so yes, it can make someone look more "ethnic" even if they're white.

You're right that multiple factors contribute to someone's appearance, but then which features would you be talking about?
Thin nasal aperture (narrow nose) a small mouth (thin lips), orthognathism, a prominent supraorbital ridges and a sharp nasal sill?

Those features are common in North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of Asia too.
View attachment 3171432

So, that "breathtaking" bone structure you were alluding to earlier isn't even distinctly white.

And this whole idea of "pure" or "indisputably" white is a bit ridiculous. Just what would that look like if not for someone with light blue eyes, blonde hair and pale skin?

Someone can have features that fall outside the typical "white" presentation without having any recent non-white ancestry.

For example, someone with dark hair and eyes might have ancestors from Southern Europe or the Mediterranean who carried those traits for centuries within a predominantly European population.

View attachment 3171445 vs. View attachment 3171464

The guy on the right has more ethnic admixture than the guy on the left.

Phenotype exists on a spectrum, and there's no clear-cut division between "white" and "non-white." Where's the line there? The truth is, there isn't one.

Pretty much the only phenotypes that'd be regarded unanimously white here would be west & northern European, and almost all of them stereotypically have blond/brown hair with light eyes.
View attachment 3171424

So, while someone with black hair can absolutely be white, it's not unreasonable to say that it can affect how their ethnicity is perceived, especially when combined with other features.
Italiens and south EU look arab because they are mixed with them.
The reason why you cant draw a line between whats white and whats not is race mixing.
North EU are unanimously regarded as white because they are not mixed.
Peoples that come from EU( america partially included )and that are not mixed are white.
Taking each feature alone wont lead you to anything. All of them gathered do give you a specific face for each "race".
I dare you to find ONE guy from any other place on earth beside EU that look even slightly close to that.
4386291 1726350422403
 
Okay, I see your point that white people can have black hair, but you're missing a few things.

Just because a feature exists in multiple groups doesn't mean it doesn't contribute to how someone is perceived. Black hair is statistically less common in traditionally "white" populations, so yes, it can make someone look more "ethnic" even if they're white.

You're right that multiple factors contribute to someone's appearance, but then which features would you be talking about?
Thin nasal aperture (narrow nose) a small mouth (thin lips), orthognathism, a prominent supraorbital ridges and a sharp nasal sill?

Those features are common in North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of Asia too.
View attachment 3171432

So, that "breathtaking" bone structure you were alluding to earlier isn't even distinctly white.

And this whole idea of "pure" or "indisputably" white is a bit ridiculous. Just what would that look like if not for someone with light blue eyes, blonde hair and pale skin?

Someone can have features that fall outside the typical "white" presentation without having any recent non-white ancestry.

For example, someone with dark hair and eyes might have ancestors from Southern Europe or the Mediterranean who carried those traits for centuries within a predominantly European population.

View attachment 3171445 vs. View attachment 3171464

The guy on the right has more ethnic admixture than the guy on the left.

Phenotype exists on a spectrum, and there's no clear-cut division between "white" and "non-white." Where's the line there? The truth is, there isn't one.

Pretty much the only phenotypes that'd be regarded unanimously white here would be west & northern European, and almost all of them stereotypically have blond/brown hair with light eyes.
View attachment 3171424

So, while someone with black hair can absolutely be white, it's not unreasonable to say that it can affect how their ethnicity is perceived, especially when combined with other features.
I’m talking
Okay, I see your point that white people can have black hair, but you're missing a few things.

Just because a feature exists in multiple groups doesn't mean it doesn't contribute to how someone is perceived. Black hair is statistically less common in traditionally "white" populations, so yes, it can make someone look more "ethnic" even if they're white.

You're right that multiple factors contribute to someone's appearance, but then which features would you be talking about?
Thin nasal aperture (narrow nose) a small mouth (thin lips), orthognathism, a prominent supraorbital ridges and a sharp nasal sill?

Those features are common in North Africa, the Horn of Africa, and parts of Asia too.
View attachment 3171432

So, that "breathtaking" bone structure you were alluding to earlier isn't even distinctly white.

And this whole idea of "pure" or "indisputably" white is a bit ridiculous. Just what would that look like if not for someone with light blue eyes, blonde hair and pale skin?

Someone can have features that fall outside the typical "white" presentation without having any recent non-white ancestry.

For example, someone with dark hair and eyes might have ancestors from Southern Europe or the Mediterranean who carried those traits for centuries within a predominantly European population.

View attachment 3171445 vs. View attachment 3171464

The guy on the right has more ethnic admixture than the guy on the left.

Phenotype exists on a spectrum, and there's no clear-cut division between "white" and "non-white." Where's the line there? The truth is, there isn't one.

Pretty much the only phenotypes that'd be regarded unanimously white here would be west & northern European, and almost all of them stereotypically have blond/brown hair with light eyes.
View attachment 3171424

So, while someone with black hair can absolutely be white, it's not unreasonable to say that it can affect how their ethnicity is perceived, especially when combined with other features.
The features I mention encompass that of a lengthy alar base that droops down below nostrils, typically found in arabid populations. Thin lips are commonly associated with “white” groups too. Hair texture plays a role wherein ethnics have curly/coily hair and whites either straight or wavy, with exceptions of course. I notice that many ethnics or people that are mixed have depigmented skin surrounding their eyes, usually of a brown tint. Coloured eyes are worth noting for sure. Also undertones play a huge role, try analyzing the colour of ones hands/feet as they aren’t exposed to sunlight often and are sometimes a persons baby skin tone. The hue that taints the proximal phalanges on the fingers can indicate undertone complexion, ie many indians can have the skin around it a lightbrown and these areas could be ashy/brown. If a persons skin is even then their undertones are that same colour or lighter granted that the skin has darkened it. It is fractionally instinctual when categorizing somebody to a race; ranging phenotypes can be similar yet there’s room for compartmentalization and it boils down to the finite subtle differences. It’s not as black and white as “dark hair/dark eyes=ethnic” the facial dimensions of these phenotypes are varying, although hard to notice when not examining.

Digressing, I was exaggerating when speaking on that past teacher of mine. It was a joke. I must say that I disagree with you on the ideas of pure. You don’t need blonde and blue eyes to fit that definition. Many irish people have black hair and brown eyes and they are no less pure than germans.

Yes people certainly can fall out of the standard embodiment of what a “white” person is but that’s where you draw the line between non European and european phenotypes, a gracile med cannot be mistaken for an arabid upon close inspection. If you can hone in on accurate discernment of facial cues and characteristics then you cannot clump them together. Are southern europeans not white? They are at the very least predominantly white, and that’s what separates them from middle eastern populations.

On paper it can influence immediate perception, can’t deny that. It makes me think of siblings in which one has dark hair and the other light. I have dark hair but my sisters is lighter. It’s gene expression
 
Italiens and south EU look arab because they are mixed with them.
The reason why you cant draw a line between whats white and whats not is race mixing.
North EU are unanimously regarded as white because they are not mixed.
Peoples that come from EU( america partially included )and that are not mixed are white.
Taking each feature alone wont lead you to anything. All of them gathered do give you a specific face for each "race".
I dare you to find ONE guy from any other place on earth beside EU that look even slightly close to that.
View attachment 3171790
Italians have little admixture with arabs. Truth is italians have always had darker features, people have harnessed a false pretence that EVERY european must have light features when that couldn’t be further from the truth
 
Water

But the thing is you can ACT dark triad without actually being dark triad. This is evident in movies like twilight and divergent, where the bad boy actually has a soft side or is kind on the inside and is tough on the outside.

If you think being an asshole 24/7 when you’re with her will get her to love you you spend way too much time online and never had a gf :lul:.

Be dark triad outside and then be a good person inside.
 
Italians have little admixture with arabs. Truth is italians have always had darker features, people have harnessed a false pretence that EVERY european must have light features when that couldn’t be further from the truth
italiens always had darker features than the rest. but not as much as most have today. I know what im saying. I am from Italy even tho I live in France.
 
italiens always had darker features than the rest. but not as much as most have today. I know what im saying. I am from Italy even tho I live in France.
Where from in italy are you?
 
  • +1
Reactions: mathis

Similar threads

JOJOcelReturns
Replies
12
Views
419
VHD
VHD
BinPanda
Replies
26
Views
1K
BinPanda
BinPanda
sab78.
Replies
8
Views
465
RapeAllFemales
RapeAllFemales
ApacheMaxx
Replies
41
Views
515
iblamejohann
iblamejohann

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top