irrumator praetor
Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Posts
- 5,451
- Reputation
- 6,727
Dating and relationships game explained (logical and simple)
There is no tldr but paragraphs are brief
I tried making my insta feed more NT but in doing so got a bunch of dating slop. Writing this was as easy as cake, but did it to clear up confusion going forward. Wrote it kinda to help myself and keep the mind straight and on the goal. Never saw anyone make an analysis like this. It should be objectively correct according to stats. Critics \/ write comments. THIS SHOULD BE WATER THOUGH
Dating game
objectives: getting kids, securing future for kids. Scales: how well can you do for the genetics of your kids, the relationship and setting up your kids for the future (relationship stability)
Latest these objectives can be fulfilled is approaching 30 years old.
Is the section above even possible at current? You can have kids, doing well for their genes is severely limited (unless you fool the other person or get lucky), as well as relationship stability (same).
What is the optimized/winning play? You will not be able to do too well for the genetics or stability. So you will have to do the best you mathematically possibly can. The strategy, as it pertains to these 2 points, would have to be offensive/hostile against the interests of the other gender. Often times this loses out, primarily because women have the most leverage and men the least. When it comes to settling down this is slightly reversed. So you have a good chance with the genetics. But on the stability side of things, there is the laws which give leverage once more to the woman.
Conclusion: you can do well genetically but not so well when it comes to stability. Proactive stance towards greater stability can realistically (in an acceptable way) be very moderate and limited. Precaution is rewarded but mostly the decision is in the hands of the female. In fact, as it pertains to stability, you will almost always lose out, so its better to already prepare for that moment rather than to try to prevent it.
What is the time frame of the winning play? Since the weakest link in the chain, stability, cannot be helped no matter your precaution or efforts (vanity). Since no precaution benefits stability, no extreme time frame is needed for this. Start preparing 25+, 25-27 get serious, 27-30 settle the deal.
Whats left from the dating game? The hypergamy and "maximizing" your earlier years (until the 25-27 period). This I would define as the "hypergamy rush". You had the gold and uranium rush, now you have the rush for romantic and sexual memories and experiences (highscore, can't get enough as it is a status and success symbol). There is a point of plateau (boredom, diminishing returns) but also a severe punishment of ostracization and subsequent bitterness if not checked. Usually happens during college, and highschool leading up to college, for most people who are the population that are playing the pre-settling hypergamy game.
Who are the pre-settling hypergamy game (lets call this "solo" time going forward) players? 2/3rds of all women, 1/3rd of all men (both higher percentiles). Those not playing are left out completely (socially), called "losers". Due to the over-sexualization of society (everything as a sex interest-signal) these undesirables become untouchables (dalits) hence inept and incapable, immoral, angry and bitter. Hence they start occupying the lower classes as opposed to their prettier peers that start pushing up the classes (for the duration of their lifetime. This isn't eugenic).
Trajectory of the current status-quo? People will be further pushed to loneliness via accelerationism (cause-effect and ill intent) such as wanting more etc. You will see people skipping the 25-27 and 27-30 periods and freezing eggs and sperm (already happening) so they can extend their "solo" time. Parenting will probably be pushed towards the end of their lifetimes. If it takes 25 years to raise a kid (and you DGAF about grandkids JFL) then you take expected life length -25 and thats when you get your partner to make the kids. So they will start parenting at like fucking 60 years old near retirement (Abraham and Sarah larping ass niggas). Eventually something in this unnecessarily complex or overcomplicated system (tower of babylon) will fail and then it will all be a catastrophic collapse (unless that literally doesn't happen). At the end of the road for this status-quo (if there is one), women have a high likelihood of losing their rights
"Solo" time strategies
Can you be a good person and not a loser during the "solo" phase? No. You have to be a terrible person to have the best and most experiences possible. Be a good person only a few times with WEAK people, because that has the least likelihood of failing (for just the memories). Otherwise being traditionally ethical in solo time sexual relationships is a losing strategy (fundamentally because you're just maximizing slays).
There is no tldr but paragraphs are brief
I tried making my insta feed more NT but in doing so got a bunch of dating slop. Writing this was as easy as cake, but did it to clear up confusion going forward. Wrote it kinda to help myself and keep the mind straight and on the goal. Never saw anyone make an analysis like this. It should be objectively correct according to stats. Critics \/ write comments. THIS SHOULD BE WATER THOUGH
Dating game
objectives: getting kids, securing future for kids. Scales: how well can you do for the genetics of your kids, the relationship and setting up your kids for the future (relationship stability)
Latest these objectives can be fulfilled is approaching 30 years old.
Is the section above even possible at current? You can have kids, doing well for their genes is severely limited (unless you fool the other person or get lucky), as well as relationship stability (same).
What is the optimized/winning play? You will not be able to do too well for the genetics or stability. So you will have to do the best you mathematically possibly can. The strategy, as it pertains to these 2 points, would have to be offensive/hostile against the interests of the other gender. Often times this loses out, primarily because women have the most leverage and men the least. When it comes to settling down this is slightly reversed. So you have a good chance with the genetics. But on the stability side of things, there is the laws which give leverage once more to the woman.
Conclusion: you can do well genetically but not so well when it comes to stability. Proactive stance towards greater stability can realistically (in an acceptable way) be very moderate and limited. Precaution is rewarded but mostly the decision is in the hands of the female. In fact, as it pertains to stability, you will almost always lose out, so its better to already prepare for that moment rather than to try to prevent it.
What is the time frame of the winning play? Since the weakest link in the chain, stability, cannot be helped no matter your precaution or efforts (vanity). Since no precaution benefits stability, no extreme time frame is needed for this. Start preparing 25+, 25-27 get serious, 27-30 settle the deal.
Whats left from the dating game? The hypergamy and "maximizing" your earlier years (until the 25-27 period). This I would define as the "hypergamy rush". You had the gold and uranium rush, now you have the rush for romantic and sexual memories and experiences (highscore, can't get enough as it is a status and success symbol). There is a point of plateau (boredom, diminishing returns) but also a severe punishment of ostracization and subsequent bitterness if not checked. Usually happens during college, and highschool leading up to college, for most people who are the population that are playing the pre-settling hypergamy game.
Who are the pre-settling hypergamy game (lets call this "solo" time going forward) players? 2/3rds of all women, 1/3rd of all men (both higher percentiles). Those not playing are left out completely (socially), called "losers". Due to the over-sexualization of society (everything as a sex interest-signal) these undesirables become untouchables (dalits) hence inept and incapable, immoral, angry and bitter. Hence they start occupying the lower classes as opposed to their prettier peers that start pushing up the classes (for the duration of their lifetime. This isn't eugenic).
Trajectory of the current status-quo? People will be further pushed to loneliness via accelerationism (cause-effect and ill intent) such as wanting more etc. You will see people skipping the 25-27 and 27-30 periods and freezing eggs and sperm (already happening) so they can extend their "solo" time. Parenting will probably be pushed towards the end of their lifetimes. If it takes 25 years to raise a kid (and you DGAF about grandkids JFL) then you take expected life length -25 and thats when you get your partner to make the kids. So they will start parenting at like fucking 60 years old near retirement (Abraham and Sarah larping ass niggas). Eventually something in this unnecessarily complex or overcomplicated system (tower of babylon) will fail and then it will all be a catastrophic collapse (unless that literally doesn't happen). At the end of the road for this status-quo (if there is one), women have a high likelihood of losing their rights
"Solo" time strategies
Can you be a good person and not a loser during the "solo" phase? No. You have to be a terrible person to have the best and most experiences possible. Be a good person only a few times with WEAK people, because that has the least likelihood of failing (for just the memories). Otherwise being traditionally ethical in solo time sexual relationships is a losing strategy (fundamentally because you're just maximizing slays).
Last edited:
