DEBUNK: 5.5" is not the avg, 6.5" is new western avg penis size COPE

C

clungemaxer

Iron
Joined
Jul 3, 2026
Posts
71
Reputation
60
You've probably seen this popular post claiming that 5.5" is not the average erect length in the west, that's it's now 6.5" from a huge meta analysis



Here's why this is complete bullshit. Also just lol at your source being a woman filming a tiktok

  1. Debunking the garbage study

The cited study is
Worldwide Temporal Trends in Penile Length: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”Belladelli et al., World Journal of Men’s Health, 2023 (senior author Michael Eisenberg, Stanford).
75 studies between 1942 and 2021, these are the pooled means by decades:
DecadeErect length (mean)95% CI
1990–199913.12 cm or 5.17"11.15–15.09
2000–200913.56 cm or 5.34"12.44–14.67
2010–202114.55 cm or 5.73"13.86–15.23

The 15.23 cm (exactly 6.0 inches) figure that got widely reported is not the raw average of the latest studies. It is the meta-regression model projection after they adjusted for region, age, population type, etc., and extended the trend line to 2021.

Now obviously for this to have any bearing, we would need to consider the individual studies included which make up this regression line:

The 2010–2021 erect mean of 14.55 cm (13.86–15.23) in Belladelli et al. 2023 comes from a relatively small number of studies that reported erect measurements.
The paper included only about 20 studies total across all decades that provided usable erect-length data (out of the overall 75 studies)

Let's look at a few of these studies:

One of the largest and highest-mean recent contributors is the 2021 Italian study (Di Mauro / related large Italian series of ~4,685 men):
  • Men were instructed how to measure themselves.
  • Reported erect mean = 16.78 cm or 6.6"
  • This single study pulls the recent pooled average upward significantly.
Meme Lol GIF by ALL SEEING EYES


Other studies which measured erect BP length which contributed to the 2010-2021 means:
  • Clinician-measured (some with pharmacologically induced erection, some spontaneous).
  • Instructed self-measurement.
  • Clinical populations (e.g., men seeking urology care, fertility evaluation, or other reasons) as well as volunteers.
tl;dr poor data, self reporting, inconsistent methodology.


2. The gold standard for penile measurements, Veale et al. (2015)

Veale et al. 2015 – “Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men”
(BJU International).

MeasurementnMean (cm)SD (cm)Mean (inches)
Flaccid length (pendulous)10,7049.161.573.61
Flaccid stretched length14,16013.241.895.21
Erect length69213.121.665.17
Flaccid circumference/girth9,4079.310.903.67
Erect circumference/girth38111.661.104.59

2.1. Busting copes about this study + other penis measurement typical copes

  • Measurement performed by a health professional (not self-report).
  • Minimum 50 participants per study.
  • Participants aged ≥17 years.
  • Standardized measurement: length from root (pubo-penile junction / pubic bone) to tip of glans on the dorsal surface, with pre-pubic fat pad pushed to the bone (i.e., bone-pressed).
  • Flaccid stretched = maximal extension.
  • Circumference at base or mid-shaft.
  • English-language publications.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Congenital or acquired penile abnormality (Peyronie’s, hypospadias, intersex, phimosis, penile cancer, etc.).
  • Previous penile or prostatic surgery.
  • Men who complained of small penis size.
  • Men with erectile dysfunction.
  • Any other potential measurement bias from the sample or procedure.
you could therefore conclude actual averages are even smaller.

Ethnic makeup:
  • Total unique men across all measurements: up to 15,521.
  • Greatest proportion were Caucasoids
  • Explicit counts given in the paper:
    • Negroid (sub-Saharan African): one study, 320 men.
    • Mongoloid (East Asian): two studies, 445 men.
  • Therefore non-Caucasoid ≈ 765 men → roughly 95% of the total sample was Caucasoid / White + Middle Eastern.
the 445 mongoloids all had micros and brought down the average!!!

Muh erection quality, performance anxiety:

Stretched flaccid (13.24 cm) and erect (13.12 cm) means are almost identical → stretched is generally a good proxy.


3. Other exclusively white/European men studies


StudySampleMeasurementMean
Khan et al. 2012 (BJU Int)609 Caucasian British menStretched14.3 cm (5.63 in)
Schneider et al. 2001111 German volunteers (young)Erect14.48 cm (5.70 in)
Ponchietti et al. 20013,300 young Italian menStretched (median)~12.5 cm (4.92 in)
Wessells et al. 199680 US men (mostly White)Erect12.9 cm (5.07 in)
Later European regional meta-analysesPooled European samplesStretched~12.6 cm (4.96 in)

Generally they are similar to the Veale study, no the average white male does not have 6.5" or even 6".

4. Few pornstars have a legit 8"+ BP length

They are much bigger than the general population by standard deviations, yes.
But few of them have 8-8.5" bp length. Only the biggest in the industry will have this.

Johnny sins is around 6.9-7.1"x5.5".


There are people on the internet that use women's average hand measurements based on their heights and then count the fucking pixels.

5. They lie in studies to prevent mass suicides of men

hahahahaha

I know some people saying this are being satirical, but some do genuinely believe this.

There is nothing they would want more than young men to mass rope. Everything about society is designed to demoralize young men, so this doesn't even make any sense.

you're legit retarded if you believe this btw.

@Nardicus101
@SoundnVision
@horseman.

I'm not debunking the dickpill, I never said it wasnt better to have a larger size.
I'm just saying 6-6.5" legit BP measured properly, is not the average, and large ones are rare otherwise they wouldnt even care that much
so also your advanced math formula for probability she has encountered x size is also bullshit.

Thanks for reading.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Morgan, PeenoResurrected, Nardicus101 and 6 others
You've probably seen this popular post claiming that 5.5" is not the average erect length in the west, that's it's now 6.5" from a huge meta analysis



Here's why this is complete bullshit. Also just lol at your source being a woman filming a tiktok

  1. Debunking the garbage study

The cited study is

75 studies between 1942 and 2021, these are the pooled means by decades:
DecadeErect length (mean)95% CI
1990–199913.12 cm or 5.17"11.15–15.09
2000–200913.56 cm or 5.34"12.44–14.67
2010–202114.55 cm or 5.73"13.86–15.23

The 15.23 cm (exactly 6.0 inches) figure that got widely reported is not the raw average of the latest studies. It is the meta-regression model projection after they adjusted for region, age, population type, etc., and extended the trend line to 2021.

Now obviously for this to have any bearing, we would need to consider the individual studies included which make up this regression line:

The 2010–2021 erect mean of 14.55 cm (13.86–15.23) in Belladelli et al. 2023 comes from a relatively small number of studies that reported erect measurements.
The paper included only about 20 studies total across all decades that provided usable erect-length data (out of the overall 75 studies)

Let's look at a few of these studies:

One of the largest and highest-mean recent contributors is the 2021 Italian study (Di Mauro / related large Italian series of ~4,685 men):
  • Men were instructed how to measure themselves.
  • Reported erect mean = 16.78 cm or 6.6"
  • This single study pulls the recent pooled average upward significantly.
Meme Lol GIF by ALL SEEING EYES


Other studies which measured erect BP length which contributed to the 2010-2021 means:
  • Clinician-measured (some with pharmacologically induced erection, some spontaneous).
  • Instructed self-measurement.
  • Clinical populations (e.g., men seeking urology care, fertility evaluation, or other reasons) as well as volunteers.
tl;dr poor data, self reporting, inconsistent methodology.


2. The gold standard for penile measurements, Veale et al. (2015)

Veale et al. 2015 – “Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men”
(BJU International).

MeasurementnMean (cm)SD (cm)Mean (inches)
Flaccid length (pendulous)10,7049.161.573.61
Flaccid stretched length14,16013.241.895.21
Erect length69213.121.665.17
Flaccid circumference/girth9,4079.310.903.67
Erect circumference/girth38111.661.104.59

2.1. Busting copes about this study + other penis measurement typical copes

  • Measurement performed by a health professional (not self-report).
  • Minimum 50 participants per study.
  • Participants aged ≥17 years.
  • Standardized measurement: length from root (pubo-penile junction / pubic bone) to tip of glans on the dorsal surface, with pre-pubic fat pad pushed to the bone (i.e., bone-pressed).
  • Flaccid stretched = maximal extension.
  • Circumference at base or mid-shaft.
  • English-language publications.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Congenital or acquired penile abnormality (Peyronie’s, hypospadias, intersex, phimosis, penile cancer, etc.).
  • Previous penile or prostatic surgery.
  • Men who complained of small penis size.
  • Men with erectile dysfunction.
  • Any other potential measurement bias from the sample or procedure.
you could therefore conclude actual averages are even smaller.

Ethnic makeup:
  • Total unique men across all measurements: up to 15,521.
  • Greatest proportion were Caucasoids
  • Explicit counts given in the paper:
    • Negroid (sub-Saharan African): one study, 320 men.
    • Mongoloid (East Asian): two studies, 445 men.
  • Therefore non-Caucasoid ≈ 765 men → roughly 95% of the total sample was Caucasoid / White + Middle Eastern.
the 445 mongoloids all had micros and brought down the average!!!

Muh erection quality, performance anxiety:

Stretched flaccid (13.24 cm) and erect (13.12 cm) means are almost identical → stretched is generally a good proxy.


3. Other exclusively white/European men studies


StudySampleMeasurementMean
Khan et al. 2012 (BJU Int)609 Caucasian British menStretched14.3 cm (5.63 in)
Schneider et al. 2001111 German volunteers (young)Erect14.48 cm (5.70 in)
Ponchietti et al. 20013,300 young Italian menStretched (median)~12.5 cm (4.92 in)
Wessells et al. 199680 US men (mostly White)Erect12.9 cm (5.07 in)
Later European regional meta-analysesPooled European samplesStretched~12.6 cm (4.96 in)

Generally they are similar to the Veale study, no the average white male does not have 6.5" or even 6".

4. Few pornstars have a legit 8"+ BP length

They are much bigger than the general population by standard deviations, yes.
But few of them have 8-8.5" bp length. Only the biggest in the industry will have this.

Johnny sins is around 6.9-7.1"x5.5".


There are people on the internet that use women's average hand measurements based on their heights and then count the fucking pixels.

5. They lie in studies to prevent mass suicides of men

hahahahaha

I know some people saying this are being satirical, but some do genuinely believe this.

There is nothing they would want more than young men to mass rope. Everything about society is designed to demoralize young men, so this doesn't even make any sense.

you're legit retarded if you believe this btw.

@Nardicus101
@SoundnVision
@horseman.

I'm not debunking the dickpill, I never said it wasnt better to have a larger size.
I'm just saying 6-6.5" legit BP measured properly, is not the average, and large ones are rare otherwise they wouldnt even care that much
so also your advanced math formula for probability she has encountered x size is also bullshit.

Thanks for reading.
I thought it was 4.5. This is very unsettling
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: PeenoResurrected, Nardicus101 and clungemaxer
 
  • +1
Reactions: clungemaxer
I have a skinny mushroom 4.1 incher do I have hope?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PeenoResurrected
I had 7 inches at 14 i think
 
Dnr but true

Also only confident mfs would actually voluntary participate in those studies

to get the global average even 10k people wont be enough as its considering 4b people worldwide
 
  • +1
Reactions: clungemaxer
Will wait for the most trusted cock connoisseur @Gengar’s Ghost to confirm this info, but I think it might be true.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: SoundnVision, arlo_420 and clungemaxer
You've probably seen this popular post claiming that 5.5" is not the average erect length in the west, that's it's now 6.5" from a huge meta analysis



Here's why this is complete bullshit. Also just lol at your source being a woman filming a tiktok

  1. Debunking the garbage study

The cited study is

75 studies between 1942 and 2021, these are the pooled means by decades:
DecadeErect length (mean)95% CI
1990–199913.12 cm or 5.17"11.15–15.09
2000–200913.56 cm or 5.34"12.44–14.67
2010–202114.55 cm or 5.73"13.86–15.23

The 15.23 cm (exactly 6.0 inches) figure that got widely reported is not the raw average of the latest studies. It is the meta-regression model projection after they adjusted for region, age, population type, etc., and extended the trend line to 2021.

Now obviously for this to have any bearing, we would need to consider the individual studies included which make up this regression line:

The 2010–2021 erect mean of 14.55 cm (13.86–15.23) in Belladelli et al. 2023 comes from a relatively small number of studies that reported erect measurements.
The paper included only about 20 studies total across all decades that provided usable erect-length data (out of the overall 75 studies)

Let's look at a few of these studies:

One of the largest and highest-mean recent contributors is the 2021 Italian study (Di Mauro / related large Italian series of ~4,685 men):
  • Men were instructed how to measure themselves.
  • Reported erect mean = 16.78 cm or 6.6"
  • This single study pulls the recent pooled average upward significantly.
Meme Lol GIF by ALL SEEING EYES


Other studies which measured erect BP length which contributed to the 2010-2021 means:
  • Clinician-measured (some with pharmacologically induced erection, some spontaneous).
  • Instructed self-measurement.
  • Clinical populations (e.g., men seeking urology care, fertility evaluation, or other reasons) as well as volunteers.
tl;dr poor data, self reporting, inconsistent methodology.


2. The gold standard for penile measurements, Veale et al. (2015)

Veale et al. 2015 – “Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men”
(BJU International).

MeasurementnMean (cm)SD (cm)Mean (inches)
Flaccid length (pendulous)10,7049.161.573.61
Flaccid stretched length14,16013.241.895.21
Erect length69213.121.665.17
Flaccid circumference/girth9,4079.310.903.67
Erect circumference/girth38111.661.104.59

2.1. Busting copes about this study + other penis measurement typical copes

  • Measurement performed by a health professional (not self-report).
  • Minimum 50 participants per study.
  • Participants aged ≥17 years.
  • Standardized measurement: length from root (pubo-penile junction / pubic bone) to tip of glans on the dorsal surface, with pre-pubic fat pad pushed to the bone (i.e., bone-pressed).
  • Flaccid stretched = maximal extension.
  • Circumference at base or mid-shaft.
  • English-language publications.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Congenital or acquired penile abnormality (Peyronie’s, hypospadias, intersex, phimosis, penile cancer, etc.).
  • Previous penile or prostatic surgery.
  • Men who complained of small penis size.
  • Men with erectile dysfunction.
  • Any other potential measurement bias from the sample or procedure.
you could therefore conclude actual averages are even smaller.

Ethnic makeup:
  • Total unique men across all measurements: up to 15,521.
  • Greatest proportion were Caucasoids
  • Explicit counts given in the paper:
    • Negroid (sub-Saharan African): one study, 320 men.
    • Mongoloid (East Asian): two studies, 445 men.
  • Therefore non-Caucasoid ≈ 765 men → roughly 95% of the total sample was Caucasoid / White + Middle Eastern.
the 445 mongoloids all had micros and brought down the average!!!

Muh erection quality, performance anxiety:

Stretched flaccid (13.24 cm) and erect (13.12 cm) means are almost identical → stretched is generally a good proxy.


3. Other exclusively white/European men studies


StudySampleMeasurementMean
Khan et al. 2012 (BJU Int)609 Caucasian British menStretched14.3 cm (5.63 in)
Schneider et al. 2001111 German volunteers (young)Erect14.48 cm (5.70 in)
Ponchietti et al. 20013,300 young Italian menStretched (median)~12.5 cm (4.92 in)
Wessells et al. 199680 US men (mostly White)Erect12.9 cm (5.07 in)
Later European regional meta-analysesPooled European samplesStretched~12.6 cm (4.96 in)

Generally they are similar to the Veale study, no the average white male does not have 6.5" or even 6".

4. Few pornstars have a legit 8"+ BP length

They are much bigger than the general population by standard deviations, yes.
But few of them have 8-8.5" bp length. Only the biggest in the industry will have this.

Johnny sins is around 6.9-7.1"x5.5".


There are people on the internet that use women's average hand measurements based on their heights and then count the fucking pixels.

5. They lie in studies to prevent mass suicides of men

hahahahaha

I know some people saying this are being satirical, but some do genuinely believe this.

There is nothing they would want more than young men to mass rope. Everything about society is designed to demoralize young men, so this doesn't even make any sense.

you're legit retarded if you believe this btw.

@Nardicus101
@SoundnVision
@horseman.

I'm not debunking the dickpill, I never said it wasnt better to have a larger size.
I'm just saying 6-6.5" legit BP measured properly, is not the average, and large ones are rare otherwise they wouldnt even care that much
so also your advanced math formula for probability she has encountered x size is also bullshit.

Thanks for reading.
i thought it was obvious.
 
  • +1
Reactions: clungemaxer
Yes over 6 is the baseline atp but the range is not as big as people think. The biggest pornstars are around 9 inches, and a 7.5 will probably be the biggest most girls see in their life
 
  • +1
Reactions: PeenoResurrected and arlo_420
Great cock thread, can never have too many cock threads on this forum.
 
You've probably seen this popular post claiming that 5.5" is not the average erect length in the west, that's it's now 6.5" from a huge meta analysis



Here's why this is complete bullshit. Also just lol at your source being a woman filming a tiktok

  1. Debunking the garbage study

The cited study is

75 studies between 1942 and 2021, these are the pooled means by decades:
DecadeErect length (mean)95% CI
1990–199913.12 cm or 5.17"11.15–15.09
2000–200913.56 cm or 5.34"12.44–14.67
2010–202114.55 cm or 5.73"13.86–15.23

The 15.23 cm (exactly 6.0 inches) figure that got widely reported is not the raw average of the latest studies. It is the meta-regression model projection after they adjusted for region, age, population type, etc., and extended the trend line to 2021.

Now obviously for this to have any bearing, we would need to consider the individual studies included which make up this regression line:

The 2010–2021 erect mean of 14.55 cm (13.86–15.23) in Belladelli et al. 2023 comes from a relatively small number of studies that reported erect measurements.
The paper included only about 20 studies total across all decades that provided usable erect-length data (out of the overall 75 studies)

Let's look at a few of these studies:

One of the largest and highest-mean recent contributors is the 2021 Italian study (Di Mauro / related large Italian series of ~4,685 men):
  • Men were instructed how to measure themselves.
  • Reported erect mean = 16.78 cm or 6.6"
  • This single study pulls the recent pooled average upward significantly.
Meme Lol GIF by ALL SEEING EYES


Other studies which measured erect BP length which contributed to the 2010-2021 means:
  • Clinician-measured (some with pharmacologically induced erection, some spontaneous).
  • Instructed self-measurement.
  • Clinical populations (e.g., men seeking urology care, fertility evaluation, or other reasons) as well as volunteers.
tl;dr poor data, self reporting, inconsistent methodology.


2. The gold standard for penile measurements, Veale et al. (2015)

Veale et al. 2015 – “Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men”
(BJU International).

MeasurementnMean (cm)SD (cm)Mean (inches)
Flaccid length (pendulous)10,7049.161.573.61
Flaccid stretched length14,16013.241.895.21
Erect length69213.121.665.17
Flaccid circumference/girth9,4079.310.903.67
Erect circumference/girth38111.661.104.59

2.1. Busting copes about this study + other penis measurement typical copes

  • Measurement performed by a health professional (not self-report).
  • Minimum 50 participants per study.
  • Participants aged ≥17 years.
  • Standardized measurement: length from root (pubo-penile junction / pubic bone) to tip of glans on the dorsal surface, with pre-pubic fat pad pushed to the bone (i.e., bone-pressed).
  • Flaccid stretched = maximal extension.
  • Circumference at base or mid-shaft.
  • English-language publications.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Congenital or acquired penile abnormality (Peyronie’s, hypospadias, intersex, phimosis, penile cancer, etc.).
  • Previous penile or prostatic surgery.
  • Men who complained of small penis size.
  • Men with erectile dysfunction.
  • Any other potential measurement bias from the sample or procedure.
you could therefore conclude actual averages are even smaller.

Ethnic makeup:
  • Total unique men across all measurements: up to 15,521.
  • Greatest proportion were Caucasoids
  • Explicit counts given in the paper:
    • Negroid (sub-Saharan African): one study, 320 men.
    • Mongoloid (East Asian): two studies, 445 men.
  • Therefore non-Caucasoid ≈ 765 men → roughly 95% of the total sample was Caucasoid / White + Middle Eastern.
the 445 mongoloids all had micros and brought down the average!!!

Muh erection quality, performance anxiety:

Stretched flaccid (13.24 cm) and erect (13.12 cm) means are almost identical → stretched is generally a good proxy.


3. Other exclusively white/European men studies


StudySampleMeasurementMean
Khan et al. 2012 (BJU Int)609 Caucasian British menStretched14.3 cm (5.63 in)
Schneider et al. 2001111 German volunteers (young)Erect14.48 cm (5.70 in)
Ponchietti et al. 20013,300 young Italian menStretched (median)~12.5 cm (4.92 in)
Wessells et al. 199680 US men (mostly White)Erect12.9 cm (5.07 in)
Later European regional meta-analysesPooled European samplesStretched~12.6 cm (4.96 in)

Generally they are similar to the Veale study, no the average white male does not have 6.5" or even 6".

4. Few pornstars have a legit 8"+ BP length

They are much bigger than the general population by standard deviations, yes.
But few of them have 8-8.5" bp length. Only the biggest in the industry will have this.

Johnny sins is around 6.9-7.1"x5.5".


There are people on the internet that use women's average hand measurements based on their heights and then count the fucking pixels.

5. They lie in studies to prevent mass suicides of men

hahahahaha

I know some people saying this are being satirical, but some do genuinely believe this.

There is nothing they would want more than young men to mass rope. Everything about society is designed to demoralize young men, so this doesn't even make any sense.

you're legit retarded if you believe this btw.

@Nardicus101
@SoundnVision
@horseman.

I'm not debunking the dickpill, I never said it wasnt better to have a larger size.
I'm just saying 6-6.5" legit BP measured properly, is not the average, and large ones are rare otherwise they wouldnt even care that much
so also your advanced math formula for probability she has encountered x size is also bullshit.

Thanks for reading.
7.4 BPEL 5.5
 
You've probably seen this popular post claiming that 5.5" is not the average erect length in the west, that's it's now 6.5" from a huge meta analysis



Here's why this is complete bullshit. Also just lol at your source being a woman filming a tiktok

  1. Debunking the garbage study

The cited study is

75 studies between 1942 and 2021, these are the pooled means by decades:
DecadeErect length (mean)95% CI
1990–199913.12 cm or 5.17"11.15–15.09
2000–200913.56 cm or 5.34"12.44–14.67
2010–202114.55 cm or 5.73"13.86–15.23

The 15.23 cm (exactly 6.0 inches) figure that got widely reported is not the raw average of the latest studies. It is the meta-regression model projection after they adjusted for region, age, population type, etc., and extended the trend line to 2021.

Now obviously for this to have any bearing, we would need to consider the individual studies included which make up this regression line:

The 2010–2021 erect mean of 14.55 cm (13.86–15.23) in Belladelli et al. 2023 comes from a relatively small number of studies that reported erect measurements.
The paper included only about 20 studies total across all decades that provided usable erect-length data (out of the overall 75 studies)

Let's look at a few of these studies:

One of the largest and highest-mean recent contributors is the 2021 Italian study (Di Mauro / related large Italian series of ~4,685 men):
  • Men were instructed how to measure themselves.
  • Reported erect mean = 16.78 cm or 6.6"
  • This single study pulls the recent pooled average upward significantly.
Meme Lol GIF by ALL SEEING EYES


Other studies which measured erect BP length which contributed to the 2010-2021 means:
  • Clinician-measured (some with pharmacologically induced erection, some spontaneous).
  • Instructed self-measurement.
  • Clinical populations (e.g., men seeking urology care, fertility evaluation, or other reasons) as well as volunteers.
tl;dr poor data, self reporting, inconsistent methodology.


2. The gold standard for penile measurements, Veale et al. (2015)

Veale et al. 2015 – “Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15,521 men”
(BJU International).

MeasurementnMean (cm)SD (cm)Mean (inches)
Flaccid length (pendulous)10,7049.161.573.61
Flaccid stretched length14,16013.241.895.21
Erect length69213.121.665.17
Flaccid circumference/girth9,4079.310.903.67
Erect circumference/girth38111.661.104.59

2.1. Busting copes about this study + other penis measurement typical copes

  • Measurement performed by a health professional (not self-report).
  • Minimum 50 participants per study.
  • Participants aged ≥17 years.
  • Standardized measurement: length from root (pubo-penile junction / pubic bone) to tip of glans on the dorsal surface, with pre-pubic fat pad pushed to the bone (i.e., bone-pressed).
  • Flaccid stretched = maximal extension.
  • Circumference at base or mid-shaft.
  • English-language publications.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Congenital or acquired penile abnormality (Peyronie’s, hypospadias, intersex, phimosis, penile cancer, etc.).
  • Previous penile or prostatic surgery.
  • Men who complained of small penis size.
  • Men with erectile dysfunction.
  • Any other potential measurement bias from the sample or procedure.
you could therefore conclude actual averages are even smaller.

Ethnic makeup:
  • Total unique men across all measurements: up to 15,521.
  • Greatest proportion were Caucasoids
  • Explicit counts given in the paper:
    • Negroid (sub-Saharan African): one study, 320 men.
    • Mongoloid (East Asian): two studies, 445 men.
  • Therefore non-Caucasoid ≈ 765 men → roughly 95% of the total sample was Caucasoid / White + Middle Eastern.
the 445 mongoloids all had micros and brought down the average!!!

Muh erection quality, performance anxiety:

Stretched flaccid (13.24 cm) and erect (13.12 cm) means are almost identical → stretched is generally a good proxy.


3. Other exclusively white/European men studies


StudySampleMeasurementMean
Khan et al. 2012 (BJU Int)609 Caucasian British menStretched14.3 cm (5.63 in)
Schneider et al. 2001111 German volunteers (young)Erect14.48 cm (5.70 in)
Ponchietti et al. 20013,300 young Italian menStretched (median)~12.5 cm (4.92 in)
Wessells et al. 199680 US men (mostly White)Erect12.9 cm (5.07 in)
Later European regional meta-analysesPooled European samplesStretched~12.6 cm (4.96 in)

Generally they are similar to the Veale study, no the average white male does not have 6.5" or even 6".

4. Few pornstars have a legit 8"+ BP length

They are much bigger than the general population by standard deviations, yes.
But few of them have 8-8.5" bp length. Only the biggest in the industry will have this.

Johnny sins is around 6.9-7.1"x5.5".


There are people on the internet that use women's average hand measurements based on their heights and then count the fucking pixels.

5. They lie in studies to prevent mass suicides of men

hahahahaha

I know some people saying this are being satirical, but some do genuinely believe this.

There is nothing they would want more than young men to mass rope. Everything about society is designed to demoralize young men, so this doesn't even make any sense.

you're legit retarded if you believe this btw.

@Nardicus101
@SoundnVision
@horseman.

I'm not debunking the dickpill, I never said it wasnt better to have a larger size.
I'm just saying 6-6.5" legit BP measured properly, is not the average, and large ones are rare otherwise they wouldnt even care that much
so also your advanced math formula for probability she has encountered x size is also bullshit.

Thanks for reading.

Oh great i see the cockprofessors are already mentioned.

@SoundnVision will get a double tag to not miss this jfl
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Bipolar2Cel, Nardicus101 and SoundnVision
Ahh, I see my thread's have cause you mental dissociation which can take toll on mental health but let's go through some stuff here

Johnny sins is around 6.9-7.1"x5.5".
Screenshot 2026 08 06 at 45703PM
Johnny sin's is 7.2 in length, n its already been discussed that he frauds
Infact ive made a post on this:
so also your advanced math formula for probability she has encountered x size is also bullshit.
She most likely has
My formula doesnt only account for probability percentile of human population size, rather it also add's in novelty driven behavior
I mean ive already quite illustrated that just having a meat print alone can make a girl wanna slay, that is something I have to put into account as people are well endowed let other's know there well endowed. If your a girl n you hear all the time online "bigger is better" you are going to go out of your way to try out said "bigger is better" that just how it is, n ive seen it play countless of time's.

Quick question, do you use snapchat or social media? do you know how often women receive dick pic's ??????? JFL:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
Muh erection quality, performance anxiety:

Stretched flaccid (13.24 cm) and erect (13.12 cm) means are almost identical → stretched is generally a good proxy.
Wow this is simply just not true at all If where talking in term's of predicting full erectile length. I use to think this so its okay


I'll respond to the other stuff later, but regarding thread you pinned, its more so to illustrate the average size is increasing with trend's

Imma go back to doing more Dih Theory research, I'll let you dwell on average's. but the sad reality is the fact we can go back n forth on what's average, but no one want's average :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: SoundnVision and NW3Slayer
Ahh, I see my thread's have cause you mental dissociation which can take toll on mental health but let's go through some stuff here


View attachment 5476183 Johnny sin's is 7.2 in length, n its already been discussed that he frauds
Infact ive made a post on this:

She most likely has
My formula doesnt only account for probability percentile of human population size, rather it also add's in novelty driven behavior
I mean ive already quite illustrated that just having a meat print alone can make a girl wanna slay, that is something I have to put into account as people are well endowed let other's know there well endowed. If your a girl n you hear all the time online "bigger is better" you are going to go out of your way to try out said "bigger is better" that just how it is, n ive seen it play countless of time's.

Quick question, do you use snapchat or social media? do you know how often women receive dick pic's ??????? JFL:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Wow this is simply just not true at all If where talking in term's of predicting full erectile length. I use to think this so its okay


I'll respond to the other stuff later, but regarding thread you pinned, its more so to illustrate the average size is increasing with trend's

Imma go back to doing more Dih Theory research, I'll let you dwell on average's. but the sad reality is the fact we can go back n forth on what's average, but no one want's average :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
Johnny sins confirmed 7 and jason luv confirmed 7

Jason luv tried to claim he was 10 inches in length and 7 v0 djy327aaxycb1


But if you're not 9 inches it's over bro !

7 inches? Might as well transition to a woman bro !
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Nardicus101, NW3Slayer and Bipolar2Cel
Johnny sins confirmed 7 and jason luv confirmed 7

View attachment 5476416

But if you're not 9 inches it's over bro !

7 inches? Might as well transition to a woman bro !
Isnt he measuring bone pressed tho ? to be fair n he's not using a ruler which is the standard way of measuring

rather hes using a tape measure, which bend's a bit, hence why hes trying to hold it down on the fat pad to show Bone pressed length
 
Johnny sins confirmed 7 and jason luv confirmed 7

View attachment 5476416

But if you're not 9 inches it's over bro !

7 inches? Might as well transition to a woman bro !

Ahh, I see my thread's have cause you mental dissociation which can take toll on mental health but let's go through some stuff here


View attachment 5476183 Johnny sin's is 7.2 in length, n its already been discussed that he frauds
Infact ive made a post on this:

She most likely has
My formula doesnt only account for probability percentile of human population size, rather it also add's in novelty driven behavior
I mean ive already quite illustrated that just having a meat print alone can make a girl wanna slay, that is something I have to put into account as people are well endowed let other's know there well endowed. If your a girl n you hear all the time online "bigger is better" you are going to go out of your way to try out said "bigger is better" that just how it is, n ive seen it play countless of time's.

Quick question, do you use snapchat or social media? do you know how often women receive dick pic's ??????? JFL:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Wow this is simply just not true at all If where talking in term's of predicting full erectile length. I use to think this so its okay


I'll respond to the other stuff later, but regarding thread you pinned, its more so to illustrate the average size is increasing with trend's

Imma go back to doing more Dih Theory research, I'll let you dwell on average's. but the sad reality is the fact we can go back n forth on what's average, but no one want's average :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:

Big jfl at both guys tape Coverupgame

I smell the insecurity through my fucking phone


A proper cock measurement has the 0 right on the pubic bone with 0 pressing


Mogging johnny and jason with ease
Great cock thread, can never have too many cock threads on this forum.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SoundnVision and Bipolar2Cel
Big jfl at both guys tape Coverupgame

I smell the insecurity through my fucking phone


A proper cock measurement has the 0 right on the pubic bone with 0 pressing


Mogging johnny and jason with ease
Yeah.. if my face wasn't already known I would have posted my erect cock here already lol. Maybe I can do boner in pants like some other massive dick guy did the other day lol.. anyway I posted massive bulge in a couple other cock threads and even a couple other huge dick guys didn't doubt I was huge. Besides that these "don't believe you" guys never post their shit.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: NW3Slayer

Similar threads

isis_Bleach
Replies
6
Views
89
gandylite.
gandylite.
returnofthecutecel
Replies
104
Views
642
olyen
olyen
Starchie
Replies
7
Views
121
Niebvll
Niebvll
horseman.
Replies
9
Views
82
iblamechico
iblamechico
j1gga
Replies
16
Views
98
Rothschild
Rothschild

Users who are viewing this thread

  • NW3Slayer
  • SharkBlitzz
  • section8soldierr
  • Bipolar2Cel
Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →