Debunking "FEMCEL = INFINITE SMV" theory once and for all.

[HarrierDuBois]

I did two threads a week ago asking you guys the lowest level woman you would fuck and marry respectively. The answers are in.

Lowest level woman you would fuck?

Anonymous.

looksmax.org

Lowest level woman you would marry?

Title.

looksmax.org

Muh femcels have infinite SMV bro... muh LTB has more SMV than chad bro...
Guess what, here are the numbers.

For sex only, ONS:
More than 50% of you would only fuck a woman average and up.
Less than 50% of you would consider fucking a woman average or below, even by a little bit.
Less than 20% of you would consider fucking a woman noticeably below average.

This is still the easy part since ONS are not that serious and most women want commitment from guys they find sexually attractive.

For full legal commitment, marriage:
More than 90% of you would never marry a woman below average looking, if even by a tiny bit.
Less than 10% of you would marry a woman below average looking, if even by a tiny bit.
Less than 5% of you would marry a woman noticeably below average looking.
More than 50% of you would only marry a woman noticeably above average looking.

Let's end this cope that muh femcel got infinite SMV. I am aware that this site is narcy as fuck and there is a slight discrepancy of people who trolled as well. But in no real universe does a below average womans SMV hold up to that of a Chadlite+. Try debunking this. OLD doesn't count since disproportionate gender distributions. In every real life scenario it's over for most femcels and even just most women below average if they want to get commitment.

Spoiler: Tagging users.

@LiteralCaucasian @StrangerDanger @cutie @LooksOrDeath @ike57 @pneumocystosis @Allandro @Xangsane @luljankybo @defezman @aBetterMii @NordicMaxxer @julianchicago @MoggerChad @Bashan @BrahminBoss @mrriceguy @ReadBooksEveryday @5.5psl @8PSLcel @HimmyButler @Ellipsis @Octillionaire @David Rothschild @enchanted_elixir @Artemis @cantsleep @Iasacrko @NFA PB rand @rand anon @User49 @StacySlayer @cytoplasm @Beastimmung @WishIwasChico @p0lishsubhuman @ihatereddit @Solar @LastTemp

 

[Deleted member 22829]

Its still worse for men.

 

[Deleted member 19174]

A femcel can get a chadlite easily

 

[5.5psl]

Isn't it obvious that femcels have no smv

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Isn't it obvious that femcels have no smv

A femcel can get a chadlite easily

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Its still worse for men.

It is, but the comparisons they unironically make are starting to get tiring. Femcels can't compete with attractive men.

 

[Deleted member 21182]

I dont think ltb has good options at all tho mtb is when it starts

 

[5.5psl]

It's time to log out and touch the grass

 

[Deleted member 22829]

It's time to log out and touch the grass

Free yourself.

 

[Xangsane]

A femcel can get a chadlite easily

most women want commitment from guys they find sexually attractive.

 

[HarrierDuBois]

I dont think ltb has good options at all tho mtb is when it starts

LTB can get ONS relatively easily but marriage is very difficult.

 

[LiteralCaucasian]

I am aware that this site is narcy as fuck and there is a slight discrepancy of people who trolled as well.

Only slight? XD

 

[ReadBooksEveryday]

1.The incels here do not reprsent the average societal population

2. Its easy to call random femoids subhuman on screen. Guarantee you most of these users would fall head over heel over any femoid giving these incels even a whiff of attention

 

[HarrierDuBois]

1.The incels here do not reprsent the average societal population

2. Its easy to call random femoids subhuman on screen. Guarantee you most of these users would fall head over heel over any normal looking femoid giving these incels even a whiff of attention

Already defined LTB and femcel respectively in the thread. Also MTB's have no problems in dating market, but below average do.

Lowest level woman you would fuck?

Anonymous.

looksmax.org

 

[Xangsane]

I did two threads a week ago asking you guys the lowest level woman you would fuck and marry respectively. The answers are in.

Lowest level woman you would fuck?

Anonymous.

looksmax.org

Lowest level woman you would marry?

Title.

looksmax.org

Muh femcels have infinite SMV bro... muh LTB has more SMV than chad bro...
Guess what, here are the numbers.

For sex only, ONS:
More than 50% of you would only fuck a woman average and up.
Less than 50% of you would consider fucking a woman average or below, even by a little bit.
Less than 20% of you would consider fucking a woman noticeably below average.

This is still the easy part since ONS are not that serious and most women want commitment from guys they find sexually attractive.

For full legal commitment, marriage:
More than 90% of you would never marry a woman below average looking, if even by a tiny bit.
Less than 10% of you would marry a woman below average looking, if even by a tiny bit.
Less than 5% of you would marry a woman noticeably below average looking.
More than 50% of you would only marry a woman noticeably above average looking.

Let's end this cope that muh femcel got infinite SMV. I am aware that this site is narcy as fuck and there is a slight discrepancy of people who trolled as well. But in no real universe does a below average womans SMV hold up to that of a Chadlite+. Try debunking this. OLD doesn't count since disproportionate gender distributions. In every real life scenario it's over for most femcels and even just most women below average if they want to get commitment.

Spoiler: Tagging users.

@LiteralCaucasian @StrangerDanger @cutie @LooksOrDeath @ike57 @pneumocystosis @Allandro @Xangsane @luljankybo @defezman @aBetterMii @NordicMaxxer @julianchicago @MoggerChad @Bashan @BrahminBoss @mrriceguy @ReadBooksEveryday @5.5psl @8PSLcel @HimmyButler @Ellipsis @Octillionaire @David Rothschild @enchanted_elixir @Artemis @cantsleep @Iasacrko @NFA PB rand @rand anon @User49 @StacySlayer @cytoplasm @Beastimmung @WishIwasChico @p0lishsubhuman @ihatereddit @Solar @LastTemp

Subhuman grannies can get plenty of likes on Tinder but next to nothing on Hinge, as proven on my Grannyfish experiments. It's also assumed that the majority of women who are on Hinge are looking for LTR.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

standardcels.org

The thing is that so many of us are desperate for just one sexual experience, but once we get past that hypothetical checkpoint we plan ahead, creating looks thresholds for ourselves. This site does strive towards near-perfection / idealized conditions, so such is natural.

 

[Xangsane]

Already defined LTB and femcel respectively in the thread. Also MTB's have no problems in dating market, but below average do.

Lowest level woman you would fuck?

Anonymous.

looksmax.org

Just go on r/hingeapp for femcels and LTBs complaining about "men don't want them for commitment". @Chadeep

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Just go on r/hinge for femcels and LTBs complaining about "men don't want them for commitment". @Chadeep

Subhuman grannies can get plenty of likes on Tinder but next to nothing on Hinge, as proven on my Grannyfish experiments. It's also assumed that the majority of women who are on Hinge are looking for LTR.

Yes, below average is close to impossible for LTR.

standardcels.org

The thing is that so many of us are desperate for just one sexual experience, but once we get past that hypothetical checkpoint we plan ahead, creating looks thresholds for ourselves. This site does strive towards near-perfection / idealized conditions, so such is natural.

You are right.

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Subhuman grannies can get plenty of likes on Tinder but next to nothing on Hinge, as proven on my Grannyfish experiments. It's also assumed that the majority of women who are on Hinge are looking for LTR.

Over for shriveled raisins with shingles and meningitis B.

 

[NFA PB]

Honestly didn’t read

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Honestly didn’t read

TL;DR: Plenty of femcels and ltbs to go around.

 

[Deleted member 21661]

Women have an infinite supply of guys for sex, but not for LTR
The thing is that a lot of femcels want to date above their looksmatch, and expect commitment from chad which they won't get

Also, you think that the results here are legit? These guys try to act like they have high standards but everyone simped for an LTB gook jfl.

 

[Xangsane]

TL;DR: Plenty of femcels and ltbs to go around.

Women have an infinite supply of guys for sex, but not for LTR
The thing is that a lot of femcels want to date above their looksmatch, and expect commitment from chad which they won't get

Also, you think that the results here are legit? These guys try to act like they have high standards but everyone simped for an LTB gook jfl.

Which of these looks levels do Stacies/Stacylites MOST OFTEN date long-term/marry?

Based on YOUR observations. No meme answers please, such as "Toronto Stacies date Indian subhumans" or "All Stacies date bajillionaire Chads with 6M Instagram followers".

looksmax.org

Which of these looks levels do Chads/Chadlites MOST OFTEN date long-term/marry?

Inspired by @marauder 's thread: https://looksmax.org/posts/10593347/ This thread is a spin-off from this thread: https://looksmax.org/threads/which-of-these-looks-levels-do-stacies-stacylites-most-often-date-long-term-marry.667397/...

looksmax.org

This is the average face of a Stacy's boyfriend/husband.

I averaged out the faces of as many Stacy and Stacylite models' boyfriends on BetaFace and this was the result. Of the 22 faces used for this composite, only 2 weren't white (both were mulatto). The average age of the composite was a man in his late 30s. Chad's girlfriend edition...

looksmax.org

This is the average face of a Chad's girlfriend/wife.

25 faces were used in this composite. All the faces used belonged to the girlfriends or wives of white (or mixed-race, white-leaning) Chads and Chadlites. Of the 25 faces, 10 didn't belong to white women. I split up the faces according to phenotype to make the comparison fairer. White...

looksmax.org

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Women have an infinite supply of guys for sex, but not for LTR
The thing is that a lot of femcels want to date above their looksmatch, and expect commitment from chad which they won't get

Also, you think that the results here are legit? These guys try to act like they have high standards but everyone simped for an LTB gook jfl.

I am aware that this site is narcy as fuck and there is a slight discrepancy of people who trolled as well.

 

[rand anon]

Already defined LTB and femcel respectively in the thread. Also MTB's have no problems in dating market, but below average do.

Lowest level woman you would fuck?

Anonymous.

looksmax.org

Going off ur definitions, I think when most of us casually say that we'd fuck femcels, we usually are referring to what u define as LTB. Ur definition of a femcel is a foid that's pretty much deformed, I think it's fair that most incels here wouldn't hit given that most of them are are ltn lookswise

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Going off ur definitions, I think when most of us casually say that we'd fuck femcels, we usually are referring to what u define as LTB. Ur definition of a femcel is a foid that's pretty much deformed, I think it's fair that most incels here wouldn't hit given that most of them are are ltn lookswise

Femcel = Woman who is involuntarily celibate looks wise. Still I see your argument.

 

[Deleted member 17531]

CBA to explain why this is wrong but trust me it is

 

[HarrierDuBois]

CBA to explain why this is wrong but trust me it is

Try debunking this.

 

[Deleted member 23115]

more like debunking the idea that you have a brain

 

[sibience]

Honestly the reality is even worse than this experiment because the average guy thinks the average girls looks level is a girl that is actually in the top 20% of looks.

For guys who rot on this site and will barely call anything a stacy, it is even worse, guys here call top 10% of girls LTB.

Just like how girls think that rich guys are extremely common when it isn't.

Hypergamy is a myth.

 

[Sprinkles]

Femcel = Woman who is involuntarily celibate looks wise. Still I see your argument

Femcel = a woman who can’t get commitment from a man beyond her league that she feels entitled to

 

[stamaster21]

Women have an infinite supply of guys for sex, but not for LTR
The thing is that a lot of femcels want to date above their looksmatch, and expect commitment from chad which they won't get

Also, you think that the results here are legit? These guys try to act like they have high standards but everyone simped for an LTB gook jfl.

i agree womens problem is the majority have sexual access to men 1-3 points more attractive, but the women are not attractive enough to get chad/tyrone to stop fucking other women and commit to her. But the women rather get their brains fucked out by chad/tyrone then get ltr with lesser or avg man. Even when they get older instead of 80-20 it becomes 80-40.

 

[MoggerChad]

High iq thread

 

[WishIwasChico]

I dont think ltb has good options at all tho mtb is when it starts

Make a ltb tinder and leave it 3 days and come back to this pls

 

[WishIwasChico]

CBA to explain why this is wrong but trust me it is

Just do a ltb tinder experiment and prove it it’s not even hard. Women can fuck guys way hotter than their lookslevel but obviously the guy won’t stick around.
I’ve fucked girls off tinder then I objectively mog to death and they think I will ltr them and all I do is fuck and block.

Women however as OP says are fucked when it comes to commitment it is true.

 

[Deleted member 22924]

femcel women = htn men smv

 

[Sleeper]

I did two threads a week ago asking you guys the lowest level woman you would fuck and marry respectively. The answers are in.

Lowest level woman you would fuck?

Anonymous.

looksmax.org

Lowest level woman you would marry?

Title.

looksmax.org

Muh femcels have infinite SMV bro... muh LTB has more SMV than chad bro...
Guess what, here are the numbers.

For sex only, ONS:
More than 50% of you would only fuck a woman average and up.
Less than 50% of you would consider fucking a woman average or below, even by a little bit.
Less than 20% of you would consider fucking a woman noticeably below average.

This is still the easy part since ONS are not that serious and most women want commitment from guys they find sexually attractive.

For full legal commitment, marriage:
More than 90% of you would never marry a woman below average looking, if even by a tiny bit.
Less than 10% of you would marry a woman below average looking, if even by a tiny bit.
Less than 5% of you would marry a woman noticeably below average looking.
More than 50% of you would only marry a woman noticeably above average looking.

Let's end this cope that muh femcel got infinite SMV. I am aware that this site is narcy as fuck and there is a slight discrepancy of people who trolled as well. But in no real universe does a below average womans SMV hold up to that of a Chadlite+. Try debunking this. OLD doesn't count since disproportionate gender distributions. In every real life scenario it's over for most femcels and even just most women below average if they want to get commitment.

Spoiler: Tagging users.

@LiteralCaucasian @StrangerDanger @cutie @LooksOrDeath @ike57 @pneumocystosis @Allandro @Xangsane @luljankybo @defezman @aBetterMii @NordicMaxxer @julianchicago @MoggerChad @Bashan @BrahminBoss @mrriceguy @ReadBooksEveryday @5.5psl @8PSLcel @HimmyButler @Ellipsis @Octillionaire @David Rothschild @enchanted_elixir @Artemis @cantsleep @Iasacrko @NFA PB rand @rand anon @User49 @StacySlayer @cytoplasm @Beastimmung @WishIwasChico @p0lishsubhuman @ihatereddit @Solar @LastTemp

This is the worst possible place to make such a survey because it is a blackpilled site that revolves almost exclusively about analising peoples looks and discerning what makes someone as attractive as possible. Of course the people here are going to be hypercritical on all things regarding looks. You cant decide to just throw out OLD when it is the most common way in which hookups and relationships are starting nowadays and yes, even the most hideously morphed femcel is getting a literal infinite amount of sexual attention online which arguably does translate to an infinite smv

 

[Deleted member 25667]

@Xangsane link the granny experiment tbh

 

[Deleted member 21182]

Make a ltb tinder and leave it 3 days and come back to this pls

She will get matches but doe women locking in a guy is more important and a LTB will only be able to date the ugliest ones

Plus will she even match htn+

 

[Xangsane]

This is the worst possible place to make such a survey because it is a blackpilled site that revolves almost exclusively about analising peoples looks and discerning what makes someone as attractive as possible. Of course the people here are going to be hypercritical on all things regarding looks. You cant decide to just throw out OLD when it is the most common way in which hookups and relationships are starting nowadays and yes, even the most hideously morphed femcel is getting a literal infinite amount of sexual attention online which arguably does translate to an infinite smv

Just do a ltb tinder experiment and prove it it’s not even hard. Women can fuck guys way hotter than their lookslevel but obviously the guy won’t stick around.
I’ve fucked girls off tinder then I objectively mog to death and they think I will ltr them and all I do is fuck and block.

Women however as OP says are fucked when it comes to commitment it is true.

Foids want men to commit 90% of the time.

 

[Xangsane]

@Xangsane link the granny experiment tbh

[STATE OF UK LADS IN 2023] JOYCE, MY FAMOUS GRANNYFISH IS BACK. 99+ LIKES WITHIN 1 HOUR. AGE RANGE SET TO 18-25.

WHO REMEMBERS THIS GRANNY FROM LAST YEAR? https://looksmax.org/threads/gtfih-grannyfish-tinder-experiment-in-uk-32-likes-within-5-minutes-of-opening-the-account.435244/ WELL SHE'S BACK WITH A BANG IN LANDAN TOWN. I SET THE AGE RANGE FROM 18 - 25. I GAVE HER A BARRISTER JOB JUST LIKE LAST TIME...

looksmax.org

 

[HarrierDuBois]

even the most hideously morphed femcel is getting a literal infinite amount of sexual attention online which arguably does translate to an infinite smv

She unironically isn't, most men hate ugly women and are open to fuck, but not settle, just below average looking women.

 

[Sleeper]

She unironically isn't, most men hate ugly women and are open to fuck, but not settle, just below average looking women.

Yet below average women get into relationships all the time. In fact since women generally date up you can safely assume that a substantial amount of relationships are composed of below average women with above average men. This is the basis of hypergamy and we're seeing it play out in real time. I do agree that there's more single women than ever but thats by their own choice since theyve decided that it's Chad or death. Not being able to secure commitment from someone far above your smv level does not mean that theyre not capable of securing commitment at all or that its hard to find, it just means theyre being overly hypergamous retards. At any moment they could date within their own level and instantly secure a proper relationship

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Bump tbh

 

[HarrierDuBois]

standardcels.org

The thing is that so many of us are desperate for just one sexual experience, but once we get past that hypothetical checkpoint we plan ahead, creating looks thresholds for ourselves. This site does strive towards near-perfection / idealized conditions, so such is natural.

We only want pretty ladies.

 

[norwegianfreak]

JBF is LAW

 

[HarrierDuBois]

JBF is LAW

First amendment in the constitution of PSL: Just be first.

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

one man's femcel is another man's stacy

so point is moot

not the same with men

 

[Deleted member 24262]

I realized that a skinny LTB/MTB in my country is a solid Stacylight for the average american woman