impius
unversed
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2025
- Posts
- 209
- Reputation
- 225
"Thread 'i can proof god is real (agnostic and atheist click this!)"
https://looksmax.org/threads/i-can-proof-god-is-real-agnostic-and-atheist-click-this.2229793/
disclaimer: i'm an agnostic but i don't like people who try and forcefully convert people into religious beliefs with evidence that is clearly illogical and state "low iq" to people who disagree also sorry for no formatting i don't really care to put in effort ok thanks bye
let’s stop pretending this is a serious argument, because it isn’t. the entire “scientific miracle” is a con, and it only works if you refuse to look at how the trick is done. every single claim is read backwards. not once did anyone pull the big bang or the expanding universe out of the quran before western scientists figured it out and handed them the answer. they waited, saw the result, then went crawling back to the text to reinterpret it into a miraculous match. that’s not prophecy, it's learning something and saying u made it lmao
and the crown jewel, the “expanding universe” in 51:47, the whole thing hangs on one word, mūsiʿūn, which actually means “vast” or “having the means,” and not a single scholar in over a thousand years read it as cosmic expansion because the fucking concept didn’t exist yet.
“expander” is a word somebody grasped at after 1929. fucking crazy isn't it? that’s it. that’s the miracle. strip that lie away and what’s left is actually WATER. life needs water? thales said that in 600 bce. the water cycle? it’s sitting right there in ecclesiastes and aristotle. rain, clouds, the sun crossing the sky, two seas meeting at a visible line, this is stuff any human being with functioning eyeballs already knew. and the embryology verse is simply flat wrong, it lifts galen’s outdated greek medicine wholesale and repeats the false claim that bones form before muscle when they actually develop together. wrong. debunked by a first-year biology textbook. (looksmaxer doesn't understand simple fucking biology? calling people who disagree low iq is a pathetic attempt at trying to claim some sort of superiority over people who are factually correct)and the whole thing is cherry picked to hell, because any thick poetic book looks divine if you spotlight the lucky hits and bury every miss, like the sun setting in a muddy spring in 18:86, which they never bring up, funny huh. so even when a verse accidentally grazes a real fact, coincidence and vague wording and pure hindsight explain it better than a god does. and the one thing that would actually prove any of this is a clear specific fact nobody in the 7th century could possibly have known, stated so plainly it can’t be twisted, appears nowhere. not one time. AND NO SHIT THERE ISNT ONE, the argument collapses the second it touches its own sources. it’s a bad argument. it was always a bad argument. fuck you.
https://looksmax.org/threads/i-can-proof-god-is-real-agnostic-and-atheist-click-this.2229793/
disclaimer: i'm an agnostic but i don't like people who try and forcefully convert people into religious beliefs with evidence that is clearly illogical and state "low iq" to people who disagree also sorry for no formatting i don't really care to put in effort ok thanks bye
let’s stop pretending this is a serious argument, because it isn’t. the entire “scientific miracle” is a con, and it only works if you refuse to look at how the trick is done. every single claim is read backwards. not once did anyone pull the big bang or the expanding universe out of the quran before western scientists figured it out and handed them the answer. they waited, saw the result, then went crawling back to the text to reinterpret it into a miraculous match. that’s not prophecy, it's learning something and saying u made it lmao
and the crown jewel, the “expanding universe” in 51:47, the whole thing hangs on one word, mūsiʿūn, which actually means “vast” or “having the means,” and not a single scholar in over a thousand years read it as cosmic expansion because the fucking concept didn’t exist yet.
“expander” is a word somebody grasped at after 1929. fucking crazy isn't it? that’s it. that’s the miracle. strip that lie away and what’s left is actually WATER. life needs water? thales said that in 600 bce. the water cycle? it’s sitting right there in ecclesiastes and aristotle. rain, clouds, the sun crossing the sky, two seas meeting at a visible line, this is stuff any human being with functioning eyeballs already knew. and the embryology verse is simply flat wrong, it lifts galen’s outdated greek medicine wholesale and repeats the false claim that bones form before muscle when they actually develop together. wrong. debunked by a first-year biology textbook. (looksmaxer doesn't understand simple fucking biology? calling people who disagree low iq is a pathetic attempt at trying to claim some sort of superiority over people who are factually correct)and the whole thing is cherry picked to hell, because any thick poetic book looks divine if you spotlight the lucky hits and bury every miss, like the sun setting in a muddy spring in 18:86, which they never bring up, funny huh. so even when a verse accidentally grazes a real fact, coincidence and vague wording and pure hindsight explain it better than a god does. and the one thing that would actually prove any of this is a clear specific fact nobody in the 7th century could possibly have known, stated so plainly it can’t be twisted, appears nowhere. not one time. AND NO SHIT THERE ISNT ONE, the argument collapses the second it touches its own sources. it’s a bad argument. it was always a bad argument. fuck you.
