debunking slavshit copes

All it has is its resources. Spiritual gulf state
so what?
It's like France has less people to go around and less of an ability to send people to overseas colonies
its just nobody wants to live there
Im talking about the ethnic turks that make up ~30% of Russia bro
they are like 5% of population and have tiny birthrate. they got replaced by russians not the otherwise
Nobody thinks east germany is the true german state (unless you're a tankie) lmao, just like how nobody claims the ussr is the same as Russia
ussr is russia in a certain period of time, its not modern russia but its political origin
east germany is a part of germany so your point is retarded as shit. keep making false analogies lol.
 
Culture??? Political structure??? History of a completely different state??? Language and ethnicity make sense because they inherited the territory bruhh
same culture due to inheriting same territories with same ethnicity
same political structure (authoritarianism) with one single person runs the country
and the state originated from russian empire so its not completely different
again russians colonized you thus you are coping here lmfao.
 
It means Russia lacks human capital for edge in trade
its just nobody wants to live there
Nobody wants to live in North Siberia either
they are like 5% of population and have tiny birthrate. they got replaced by russians not the otherwise
?????
ussr is russia in a certain period of time, its not modern russia but its political origin
east germany is a part of germany so your point is retarded as shit. keep making false analogies lol.
Oml bro this has to be bait
 
russia genocided @whiteegyptian 's ethnicity. thats what i mean. russia by far is the greatest country in history, that colonized siberia, turned half of europe into its puppet states, destroyed british empire and nazi germany, discovered entire continents (america from eastern side and antarctica), they came to space first which is the greatest human achievement of all time, only neolithic revolution could be a bit close to it.
uralic admixure is present in NORTHERN russia, and those "uralic" people with whom russians were mixing with are not chinks lol they were genetically similar to modern finns. and again, thats only northern russia. most russians aren't brachy you retard they are usually mesocephalic. the brachycephaly sometimes is present but again mostly in northern russians who are 20% finnish who are ehg admixed.
balts and finns were eating their own shit and created like cattle by germans, russians created their inferiors better and brought them civilization
Russia was only great under germanics Romanovs and the whole administration consisting of west europeans like dutch. But even then ethnic russians were basically slaves of their own country. Russia was shit before and absolute shit after.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EuphoricAsianNormie and tenmacel
same culture due to inheriting same territories with same ethnicity
They didn't have the same culture? They outlawed religion?
same political structure (authoritarianism) with one single person runs the country
The ROC and the PRC were both essentially autocratic bro
and the state originated from russian empire so its not completely different
You have to be baiting
again russians colonized you thus you are coping here lmfao.
🪤
 
the Slavic people are an inferior sub Europid race that insist on claiming the achievements of the White man. I will be debunking all of this.
1 - predominantly light features. the first cope. Slavs like to cope and insist they have predominantly light features, like man, haven't you seen Rina? but that's not usually the case. now, that's false on everything.

statistically, Slavs don't have light features as much as North-West Europeans, as Finns, Swedes, and Danes are the blondest people on earth. while the English, the Irish, and the Scottish are the palest, with the most red-hair, and straw berry hair color.

View attachment 5656337View attachment 5656338

which is completely fine. as the best looking Slavic phenotype is the North Pontid. which is not pasty pale.

View attachment 5656341View attachment 5656346

but Slavs historically have an inferiority complex to the Finns, and the Baltic people. so they want to be like them.

even fucking Vasiliy dyed his hair and he had dark brown hair. Slavs really just wish they were Finnish.

View attachment 5656360

2 - we share the same components as Whites. the second cope. light features is highly variable, some Slavs can be swarthy, and some British / Scandinavian people can be light, and vice versa, BUT, Slavs like to cope that they share the same components as Whites. such as the Farmer ancestry, Yamnaya ancestry, and WHG. which is cool. and they even argue that actually makes them Whiter due to them having higher Yamnaya ancestry.

let's debunk this:

first of all it's false. since the Russian people carry Asiatic markers, and derive 13% of their ancestry from Asians, and have Asian haplogroups. not to mention their Jewish, and Paleo-Balkan, and Caucasian admixtures down South. same thing counts for most Slavs. West Slavs have Balkan haplogroups, making them more shitskin shifted. meanwhile the British and the Nordics are predominantly R1b and I1.

View attachment 5656402View attachment 5656408View attachment 5656412



I might make another thread soon. which is civilization debunks.

@killuacel @horseman. @JewishNationalist @shedontluv-U

no shade to @Bully but us Slavs should accept ourselves for who we are.
If I was a Slav, i would just larp as a Westerner or a Finn, after some surgery to get rid of Ostbaltid features.

Turanid is a good phenotype, but Ostbaltid is ugly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: tenmacel
Russia was only great under germanics Romanovs and the whole administration consisting of west europeans like dutch. Russia was shit before and absolute shit after.
romanovs were never germanic (its ethnic russian dynasty). and russia reached its peak of greatness under Khrushev (ethnic russian) not under romanovs. and by the say 90% of nobidility in russian empire was ethnic russian not fucking dutch. you are a fuckign azeri got colonized by russia thus coping here.
 
If I was a Slav, i would just larp as a Westerner or a Finn, after some surgery to get rid of Ostbaltid features.

Turanid is a good phenotype, but Ostbaltid is ugly.
ost baltid is finnish pheno itself, its not slavic
 
  • +1
Reactions: tenmacel
Denying reality :feelsuhh:
reality is that romanovs were never ethnic germans
1789708947552

Why not stalin
didn't go to space under him
What's your source nigger
1789709031757
 
Traditional Russian culture among others was dismantled lmao

So now I can support both Taiwan and the PRC?

"inferior" yet one of us is a slav
one of us got conquered and destroyed by slavs
 
This is just the worst shit I've seen, rip out my eyes
@sasha108 @JewishNationalist
Anglo-Saxons seem to have an average IQ of 50 times they write such shit. Say thank you to the migrants who raised you to 99 points
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
This is just the worst shit I've seen, rip out my eyes
@sasha108 @JewishNationalist
Anglo-Saxons seem to have an average IQ of 50 times they write such shit. Say thank you to the migrants who raised you to 99 points
this guy is not anglo, he is circassian. an ethnicity that russians mogged the hardest.
 
One of us got conquered and enslaved by turks, mongols, vikings so what's your point?
the "slavs" who got conquered by someone ARE NOT the ancestors of modern slavs, as they were taken to turkey and scandinavia and mixed with locals. basically scandis and turks have their ancestors, not slavs:geek:
 
One of us got conquered and enslaved by turks, mongols, vikings so what's your point?
Cope, Mongols never controlled our Territories and certainly did not take our women, the only thing we did was pay tribute
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
I don't even like to argue about swarthy. but why are us Slavs / Balkans so mentally handicapped? even ''shitskin'' Spaniards and Portuguese with literal SSA ancestry did more than us. why man, why?

View attachment 5656427

my thread on the civilization of Slavs will be even more interesting.
poland conqured russia btw
 
  • +1
Reactions: tenmacel
the "slavs" who got conquered by someone ARE NOT the ancestors of modern slavs, as they were taken to turkey and scandinavia and mixed with locals. basically scandis and turks have their ancestors, not slavs:geek:
🪤 "the chinese that got conquered by the mongols ARE NOT ancestors of the modern chinese"
 
Cope, Mongols never controlled our Territories and certainly did not take our women, the only thing we did was pay tribute
They frequently stole women wdym
 
at the end of the day poland got free of ussr
at the end of the day, poland never conquered russia except for one city (moscow) for 2 years but thats a tiny part of russia, meanwhile russia controlled poland for 200 years
 
Cope, Mongols never controlled our Territories and certainly did not take our women, the only thing we did was pay tribute
the slave trade was literally a huge part of history wtf r u on about
 
I don't even like to argue about swarthy. but why are us Slavs / Balkans so mentally handicapped? even ''shitskin'' Spaniards and Portuguese with literal SSA ancestry did more than us. why man, why?

View attachment 5656427

my thread on the civilization of Slavs will be even more interesting.
Russians are slavic, what is the point of the picture then?
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
then why none of them has slavic admixture
Central Russians have small amounts of mongol/turkic admixture, if they went back to the central steppe it was a negligible amount (noblemen and whatnot took them back) and got diluted over 700 yrs
 
at the end of the day, poland never conquered russia except for one city (moscow) for 2 years but thats a tiny part of russia, meanwhile russia controlled poland for 200 years
what is the point controling whole russia if 95% of it is a cold ass forest ,they controled not only moscow but also kremlin and smolensk
 
Central Russians have small amounts of mongol/turkic admixture, if they went back to the central steppe it was a negligible amount (noblemen and whatnot took them back) and got diluted over 700 yrs
central russians have no mongol or turkic admixture. literally 0%, and if mongols kidnapped slav women then these are mongols who would have slavic admixture rather than slavs having mongol admixture. seems like you cannot use logic.
 
If I was a Slav, i would just larp as a Westerner or a Finn, after some surgery to get rid of Ostbaltid features.

Turanid is a good phenotype, but Ostbaltid is ugly.
Screenshot 20260918 083457 comyandexbrowser
Screenshot 20260918 083408 comyandexbrowser

Turanid vs ostbaltish
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
what is the point controling whole russia if 95% of it is a cold ass forest ,they controled not only moscow but also kremlin and smolensk
whats the point of controlling small city if 95% of russia has 100x times more resources than moscow
 
then why none of them has slavic admixture
because they were captured n sold into slavery so passed around or they were were raped in there homelands during the war they weren’t just sent to the mongol homeland especially since there really wasn’t one as they were constantly migrating
 
central russians have no mongol or turkic admixture. literally 0%, and if mongols kidnapped slav women then these are mongols who would have slavic admixture rather than slavs having mongol admixture. seems like you cannot use logic.
It fades away over time genius
 
whats the point of controlling small city if 95% of russia has 100x times more resources than moscow
in 17centuries it reasaurces werent as important as they are right now , they controled moscow to make their pepole tsar
 
Central Russians have small amounts of mongol/turkic admixture, if they went back to the central steppe it was a negligible amount (noblemen and whatnot took them back) and got diluted over 700 yrs
All European nations have a non-European admixture, is a very dumb argument
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
because they were captured n sold into slavery so passed around or they were were raped in there homelands during the war they weren’t just sent to the mongol homeland especially since there really wasn’t one as they were constantly migrating
also to further back my point it was largely Turkic groups too

who have Slavic admixture
 
in 17centuries it reasaurces werent as important as they are right now , they controled moscow to make their pepole tsar
and why failed
 
also to further back my point it was largely Turkic groups too

who have Slavic admixture
mongols don't have slavic admixture
 
All European nations have a non-European admixture, is a very dumb argument
No shit it fades away and is indicative of history though
 
I don't even like to argue about swarthy. but why are us Slavs / Balkans so mentally handicapped? even ''shitskin'' Spaniards and Portuguese with literal SSA ancestry did more than us. why man, why?

View attachment 5656427

my thread on the civilization of Slavs will be even more interesting.
In what world did greeks and italians "create" civilization?
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
No shit it fades away and is indicative of history though
All European nations have a non-European admixture, is a very dumb argument
there's no european nation that is pure WHG/cro magnon. like, yamnayas had 25% of ANE admixture (ane were 1/3 proto-mongoloid), and anatolian neolithic farmers came from modern day turkey (not europe again). so yeah all europeans have non-european origin
 

Similar threads

ArchangeI
Replies
20
Views
94
Jordan Barrett
Jordan Barrett
MixedBoyo12
Replies
4
Views
41
MixedBoyo12
MixedBoyo12
orbitlet
Replies
20
Views
103
jlim
jlim
FiendFiend
Replies
2
Views
47
sasha777
sasha777
C
Replies
21
Views
110
meøw
meøw

Users who are viewing this thread

  • JewishNationalist
  • tenmacel
  • inyerta
  • autistretard77
  • dhusc
  • terralsace
  • Finnougric
  • romey_y
Back
Top