Rashm0n
Wanderer
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2026
- Posts
- 231
- Reputation
- 96
By definition, on the decile scale, both among normies and among beckies, as rank increases there are fewer and fewer butterfaces (since PSL is linked to facial attractiveness according to sexual dimorphism).
Therefore, the distribution of butterfaces is similar both among normies and beckies on the decile scale (excluding SMV, of course).
However, the distribution of butterbodies turns out to be different. As shown in the graph: among normies, as butterfaces decrease, butterbodies also decrease; on the contrary, among beckies, as butterfaces decrease, butterbodies increase.
Indeed, a Chad (besides obviously having a Chad face) will also have a Chad body, a LTN often has an unattractive body, and a sub is obese.
Instead, thick Stacys are almost nonexistent; most of them are butterbodies (no particularly curvy figures). There are therefore many LTBs, MTBs butterfaces with a “juicy” body.
Example:
If you don’t agree with me, attach a nude of a thick Stacy.(Lhana doesn't count)
Therefore, the distribution of butterfaces is similar both among normies and beckies on the decile scale (excluding SMV, of course).
However, the distribution of butterbodies turns out to be different. As shown in the graph: among normies, as butterfaces decrease, butterbodies also decrease; on the contrary, among beckies, as butterfaces decrease, butterbodies increase.
Indeed, a Chad (besides obviously having a Chad face) will also have a Chad body, a LTN often has an unattractive body, and a sub is obese.
Instead, thick Stacys are almost nonexistent; most of them are butterbodies (no particularly curvy figures). There are therefore many LTBs, MTBs butterfaces with a “juicy” body.
Example:
If you don’t agree with me, attach a nude of a thick Stacy.(Lhana doesn't count)
Last edited:
