Do i have neutral orbitals?

shehzadgillani

shehzadgillani

Cope a day, keeps the rope away!
Joined
Jan 6, 2023
Posts
416
Reputation
218
do i?

 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser
Solution
Zeekie
got it bro, i've heard sean o pry, chico , gandy they all have negative vectors, while jordan has positive vector , is it a big failo?
So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

1748966780425
Yea
your eyeballs don't recess or protrude over the cheek line
 
  • +1
Reactions: shehzadgillani
Yea
your eyeballs don't recess or protrude over the cheek line
what do you say about my under eye support, is it good? the UEE in the video is cause of lens distortion and bad angle, (from bottom)
 
@jockidc120610 what do you think?
 
1748966397856


"On sagittal view, they placed a line or “vector” between the most anterior projection of the globe and the malar eminence and lid margin. A “positive” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe is posterior to the lid margin and the malar eminence. A “negative” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe lies anterior to the lower lid and the malar eminence."

Going off this definition your orbital vector is negative.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and shehzadgillani
View attachment 3795988

"On sagittal view, they placed a line or “vector” between the most anterior projection of the globe and the malar eminence and lid margin. A “positive” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe is posterior to the lid margin and the malar eminence. A “negative” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe lies anterior to the lower lid and the malar eminence."

Going off this definition your orbital vector is negative.
got it bro, i've heard sean o pry, chico , gandy they all have negative vectors, while jordan has positive vector , is it a big failo?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zeekie
got it bro, i've heard sean o pry, chico , gandy they all have negative vectors, while jordan has positive vector , is it a big failo?
So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

1748966780425
 
  • +1
Reactions: LTNUser and shehzadgillani
Solution
So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

View attachment 3796004
yeah i agree, i've seen some pics on google i don't think its a big failo untill its recessed a lot, those guys in images have sunken look even from front, gandy sean o pry and even chico has this slightly so i don't think its a big failo
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zeekie
@zemult salludon needs ur help
 
  • JFL
Reactions: shehzadgillani
Negative,even I have that and it cooks my side profile
 
  • +1
Reactions: shehzadgillani
So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

View attachment 3796004
Orbital vector is law
 
  • JFL
Reactions: shehzadgillani
negative orbital vector isn't that important in the grand scheme of things
agree bro, do you think gandy, chico and even sean o pry have it? so its not a big failo
 
  • +1
Reactions: acc_bolshevik

Similar threads

Azie555
Replies
14
Views
208
Azie555
Azie555
shehzadgillani
Replies
17
Views
321
iraqi
iraqi
iblameautistickids
Replies
12
Views
115
EliasDePoop
EliasDePoop
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
7
Views
123
wishIwasSalludon
wishIwasSalludon
kjpness
Replies
5
Views
49
Deleted member 95994
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top