Do i have neutral orbitals?

[shehzadgillani]

do i?

 

[shehzadgillani]

@imontheloose

 

[shehzadgillani]

@Zeekie bro any idea?

 

[shehzadgillani]

@jihadi

 

[shehzadgillani]

@KaisenMaxxer any idea bro

 

[shehzadgillani]

@copercel123

 

[jihadi]

Yea
your eyeballs don't recess or protrude over the cheek line

 

[shehzadgillani]

Yea
your eyeballs don't recess or protrude over the cheek line

so they are neutral right?

 

[shehzadgillani]

Yea
your eyeballs don't recess or protrude over the cheek line

what do you say about my under eye support, is it good? the UEE in the video is cause of lens distortion and bad angle, (from bottom)

 

[Copercel]

do i?

Yes

 

[shehzadgillani]

@jockidc120610 what do you think?

 

[Zeekie]

@Zeekie bro any idea?

I'm pretty sure yours is negative

 

[jihadi]

what do you say about my under eye support, is it good? the UEE in the video is cause of lens distortion and bad angle, (from bottom)

Not bad nor good

 

[shehzadgillani]

I'm pretty sure yours is negative

are they severally recessed or slighlty recessed

 

[Zeekie]

"On sagittal view, they placed a line or “vector” between the most anterior projection of the globe and the malar eminence and lid margin. A “positive” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe is posterior to the lid margin and the malar eminence. A “negative” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe lies anterior to the lower lid and the malar eminence."

Going off this definition your orbital vector is negative.

 

[Zeekie]

are they severally recessed or slighlty recessed

It's a slight recession, don't think it's worth it to address it.

 

[shehzadgillani]

View attachment 3795988

"On sagittal view, they placed a line or “vector” between the most anterior projection of the globe and the malar eminence and lid margin. A “positive” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe is posterior to the lid margin and the malar eminence. A “negative” vector relationship exists when the most anterior projection of the globe lies anterior to the lower lid and the malar eminence."

Going off this definition your orbital vector is negative.

got it bro, i've heard sean o pry, chico , gandy they all have negative vectors, while jordan has positive vector , is it a big failo?

 

[Zeekie]

got it bro, i've heard sean o pry, chico , gandy they all have negative vectors, while jordan has positive vector , is it a big failo?

So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

 

[shehzadgillani]

So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

View attachment 3796004

yeah i agree, i've seen some pics on google i don't think its a big failo untill its recessed a lot, those guys in images have sunken look even from front, gandy sean o pry and even chico has this slightly so i don't think its a big failo

 

[shehzadgillani]

@Orc

 

[LegendaryKennen]

@zemult salludon needs ur help

 

[jockidc120610]

@jockidc120610 what do you think?

yeah pretty much

 

[shehzadgillani]

@zemult salludon needs ur help

What do you think

 

[imontheloose]

@imontheloose

No. Negative orbital vector.

 

[LTNUser]

Negative,even I have that and it cooks my side profile

 

[acc_bolshevik]

do i?

slightlllly negative

 

[acc_bolshevik]

Negative,even I have that and it cooks my side profile

it's not the orbital vector

 

[LTNUser]

it's not the orbital vector

What are you talking about?

 

[shehzadgillani]

@ThatBoneStructure

 

[shehzadgillani]

No. Negative orbital vector.

is it a lot recessed or like okay?

 

[shehzadgillani]

slightlllly negative

should get implants or shouldn't care?

 

[imontheloose]

is it a lot recessed or like okay?

It's noticeably recessed from your side profile. Doesn't seem to harm your frontal profile much.

 

[acc_bolshevik]

should get implants or shouldn't care?

everything else theory

 

[shehzadgillani]

everything else theory

wdym

 

[aloooeJIEEES]

So, typically negative orbital vector is seen as a problem because it is a sign of facial aging, positive orbital vector is seen as a positive because it's the opposite, a sign of youthfulness. On average, overly prominent eyes are considered less attractive, but these findings mostly correspond to women, who're much more affected by perceptions of youth, in general unless the recession is very significant (see the image below) it's irrelevant for main, specially if we consider that's mostly an issue from the front profile view.

View attachment 3796004

Orbital vector is law

 

[shehzadgillani]

Orbital vector is law

"Orbital Vector is law"

 

[acc_bolshevik]

wdym

negative orbital vector isn't that important in the grand scheme of things

 

[shehzadgillani]

negative orbital vector isn't that important in the grand scheme of things

agree bro, do you think gandy, chico and even sean o pry have it? so its not a big failo

 

[shehzadgillani]

@Haseeb bhai side profile