Snicket
Luminary
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2024
- Posts
- 5,101
- Reputation
- 7,085
I'm not saying this is right but what do you think?
Let's assume normal distribution and model looks occurrence based on IQ.
LTN: 2nd-16th percentile (borderline impaired to lower intelligence) - borderline deformed to well below average
MTN: 16th-84th percentile (lower average to upper average) - low MTN to high MTN
HTN: 84th-98th percentile (above average to superior) - low HTN to High HTN
CL: 98th-99.9 percentile (gifted) - low CL to high CL
Chad: 99.9 percentile (genius) - Chad
Obviously, there are big variations within each group.
It works better than I imagined. You're as likely to see a chad as a deformed person if you follow this model.
I've seen an absolute handful of real life chads in my life. Very few CLs. Mostly see HTNs and even they are on the rarer side.
Does this make sense or do you think there are glaring deficiencies here?
Let's assume normal distribution and model looks occurrence based on IQ.
LTN: 2nd-16th percentile (borderline impaired to lower intelligence) - borderline deformed to well below average
MTN: 16th-84th percentile (lower average to upper average) - low MTN to high MTN
HTN: 84th-98th percentile (above average to superior) - low HTN to High HTN
CL: 98th-99.9 percentile (gifted) - low CL to high CL
Chad: 99.9 percentile (genius) - Chad
Obviously, there are big variations within each group.
It works better than I imagined. You're as likely to see a chad as a deformed person if you follow this model.
I've seen an absolute handful of real life chads in my life. Very few CLs. Mostly see HTNs and even they are on the rarer side.
Does this make sense or do you think there are glaring deficiencies here?
