Do you believe nukes are real? Or is it a government pysop to make the masses afraid?

[inyerta]

Maybe it was and is a terror and grifting scam by governments in collusion

- Hiroshima & Nagasaki are now totally proven to have been chemically firebombed like Tokyo or Dresden (a 66-plane fleet of chemical firebombers hit Hiroshima, not a 'lone B-29 flying solo')
- Mushroom clouds are standard in chemical blasts, you see them all the time as Chinese factories explode
- Those old 'nuke blast' videos are clearly doctored

 

[tweet]

I dunno

 

[kisslessvirgin]

so to speak, another man made fairy tale

 

[idontlikemyself6]

New buzzword has to be psyop because yall just be saying shit

 

[khazarianmafia73]

Interesting theory

 

[lurking00214]

the scale of nukes are more insignificant thank you think, none would take out the entirety of america to scale size.

 

[Saint Casanova]

Turk nuclear fission is too complex for you to understand

 

[primalboi]

yes nuclear bombs are fake

 

[_Zygomatic_]

i can assure you they are real

 

[petsmart]

Castle Bravo, Tsar Bomba and Starfish Prime?

 

[Whatever]

I always leave room that the government could be lying about anything but the argument for this is weak. The bomb over Nagasaki exploded in mid air and the destruction of the city was in a radial, circular pattern. You can say that was fake but people from Hiroshima and Nagasaki had unique burns and there’s shadows burnt into the ground and other stuff there that’s unique.

And the purpose of nukes has never been to make the masses afraid, they don’t even do that, the purpose is that they’re a geopolitical playing card. And from there you’d have to come up with some other explanation as to why a lot of countries do what they do when the nukes card can be played. World history since 1945 (maybe even earlier) would probably be very different.

I also don’t think all the cancer and the birth defects in places where they’re tested (New Mexico, Semey, Algeria) is fake either.