Do you have to be subhuman to get a gf in 2021?

I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
This is common in UK lmao where you from? Usually comes from social circle from school days
 
If your argument is that it doesn't make sense, then yeah fair enough it doesn't make sense, I'll agree with that, it's what happens though. Since when have women made sense as a general rule? They don't have our T levels, they're not competitive, that's why they aren't always trying to punch up like we do
Women still have a sexuality. They obsess over good looking guys. I see them posting men on their VSCOs all the time. Then those same women go out and date subhumans or just average joe 5/10 guys.
the only thing you got right there was well defined face (well, close to right), halos =\= requirements
the REQUIREMENTS for a man to be good looking are: don't be recessed, and you should have either a decent eye area or a decent lower third (that or have everything average but with no failoes)
Height and penis are important too. But yeah, those requirements don't really apply to women in the same way. Weak jaw, strong jaw, they attractive either way.
From a man's point of view (or at least, from mine) all a chick needs to be attractive is ass and titties, but it's different from a woman's point of view, and that's what she's basing the idea of her looksmatch on.
Sure. A quick google search will tell you what women find attractive, which is exactly what I said above. And it's not really rocket science. I'm 100% straight but I know a good looking man when I see one, just like I do with women.
Women are the same.
If you were better looking you could shit your pants and still get your dick sucked, promise (that's an exaggeration)
That's also not related to being NT, if you're good looking you'll have success by PUTTING YOURSELF OUT THERE at all, that's not NT, that's just called, you know, going outside. You can be a good looking autist and still have success, you just have to actually talk to them.
I'm good looking enough to get occasional street approaches and multiple approaches whenever I go to a bar or club. And the conversation always starts with the woman complimenting my looks. So i'm probably not ugly. I always either bore them off, despite them being 100% down for sex at first or I get a sudden feeling of inferiority and I simply run away because it's too much for my autistic brain to handle.
Listen, you're not the first autistic narcy to come here and try to make the argument that looks aren't important so you can pretend that you're better looking than you are, and you won't be the last either. This thread has existed thousands of times before, it's still a cope
I'm good looking enough to regularly get offered sex. Still a virgin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadethnic101
Women still have a sexuality. They obsess over good looking guys. I see them posting men on their VSCOs all the time. Then those same women go out and date subhumans or just average joe 5/10 guys.
She's not dating subhumans unless he's rich or she's a subhuman herself (barring extreme outlier examples)
Like I said, they all ideally want chad, it's not going to happen, they go for their looksmatch instead (it's just what happens, yes I know it doesn't make sense, yes they can likely get a htn or a chadlite, for whatever reason 99% will choose their looksmatch instead. The only reasonable explanation I've heard is that they prefer not to be mogged, and that does make sense, many girls do like to pretend like they don't find chads attractive and shit just to boost their own egos.)
Height and penis are important too. But yeah, those requirements don't really apply to women in the same way. Weak jaw, strong jaw, they attractive either way.
important =\= requirement
if you can give examples of good looking guys without these features, then they're not REQUIREMENTS.
Like I said, you're rating female attractiveness differently than girls rate female attractiveness, they all have their own little systems for it and that's how they come up with their looksmatch ideas.
Sure. A quick google search will tell you what women find attractive, which is exactly what I said above. And it's not really rocket science. I'm 100% straight but I know a good looking man when I see one, just like I do with women.
Women are the same.
No a quick google search won't tell you what women find attractive, it'll tell you to get a good haircut and be confident, to ACTUALLY know you need a site like this. Anyway I offered underrating men as a possible explanation, but we're not going to brush off the fact that you're an obvious giga simp female worshipper who's almost certainly overrating every woman you see, you said it yourself "it doesn't take much for me to consider a woman attractive" In YOUR eyes they are not looksmatched, in HER eyes they ARE looksmatched, that's just the truth of it. Yes she could do better but she prefers to be looksmatched. No you're not seeing attractive girls dating subhumans on any regular basis, you are 100% not, I promise you this.
I'm good looking enough to get occasional street approaches and multiple approaches whenever I go to a bar or club. And the conversation always starts with the woman complimenting my looks. So i'm probably not ugly. I always either bore them off, despite them being 100% down for sex at first or I get a sudden feeling of inferiority and I simply run away because it's too much for my autistic brain to handle.

I'm good looking enough to regularly get offered sex. Still a virgin.
Stop calling it "offered sex," if you were being offered sex you would just say "yes" and that's that. You're not being offered sex, you're being offered an opportunity to prove that your looks level is high enough to justify your behavior, it's clearly not. That's not an NT pill, though, that's a "don't be giga autistic unless you're chad" pill
If you were SLIGHTLY less autistic or SLIGHTLY more attractive then you wouldn't have made this thread, I'll put it that way
This is a choice though, all you have to do is say some stupid but straightforward shit and you'll probably be fine. "girls won't do 100% of the work for me" is not an nt pill, it's a "don't be a pussy" pill, it's a "you have to actually do SOMETHING if you're sub chad" pill (even that's not true in every case, I'm definitely sub chad but even I've had girls do 100% of the work before, you're just unlucky)
 
  • +1
Reactions: hebbewem
pics or stfu nigga
 
,
 
Last edited:
I don't know why you just deleted all of that, I saw most of it though

I don't have to EXPLAIN the looksmatch thing, I'm telling you as an objective fact that the majority of couples are looksmatched. WHY that is? there's no real answer when women automatically have higher smv than men, but it IS that. You go outside, you see looksmatched couples. You see normie girls with normie guys, it's just what you see, it is what it is. Guys above that level are decently rare in general, that could be a decent explanation for it, but again I don't have to explain WHY that is, because that's not the point, I'm not going to try to dissect and explain female behavior for you. Actually, maybe I know what's happening, you're probably placing a LOT of emphasis on height, I see a lot of gl girls with gl manlets too (not turbo manlets, we're not going to give anybody the opportunity to cope here), you're probably just learning that face is a lot more important than height and combining that with simping for every chick you see

Also don't try to pretend I'm bluepilled when you're the guy trying to pretend that subhumans can get high tier beckies by being "nt broooo" when it's not happening on any regular basis sans money.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mulattomaxxer
I don't know why you just deleted all of that, I saw most of it though

I don't have to EXPLAIN the looksmatch thing, I'm telling you as an objective fact that the majority of couples are looksmatched. WHY that is? there's no real answer when women automatically have higher smv than men, but it IS that. You go outside, you see looksmatched couples. You see normie girls with normie guys, it's just what you see, it is what it is. Guys above that level are decently rare in general, that could be a decent explanation for it, but again I don't have to explain WHY that is, because that's not the point, I'm not going to try to dissect and explain female behavior for you. Actually, maybe I know what's happening, you're probably placing a LOT of emphasis on height, I see a lot of gl girls with gl manlets too (not turbo manlets, we're not going to give anybody the opportunity to cope here), you're probably just learning that face is a lot more important than height and combining that with simping for every chick you see

Also don't try to pretend I'm bluepilled when you're the guy trying to pretend that subhumans can get high tier beckies by being "nt broooo" when it's not happening on any regular basis sans money.
Then you're making shit up off the top of your head. Either women go for the best looking men they can find or they go for their looksmatches. Pick one. Do you even interact with them?

I'm a virgin solely because i'm not NT. Being better looking than I am wouldn't change anything.
 
Even if that was true, in a looksmatched couple, the female’s literal SHIT has more SMV than her boyfriend.
A woman does not need to settle for her looksmatch at all, let alone simp for him on her social media acting like she won the lottery.
And no, a lot of these girls fog their boyfriends. They just do.



i’ll try to look for some more obvious pics. Going to sleep now though. But like I said above, a looksmatched couple is not SMVmatched.
SMV operates differently for men and women. You can't compare men and women under the guise of SMV. It doesn't work because men have much higher sex drives, and are much more willing to settle.

A landwhale could eventually get a ONS with chad, but thats because men have higher sex drives. Maybe his friends were telling him to go "shag that fat bird" for a joke. However chad would NEVER COMMIT to a becky. There are exceptions but in alot of cases where chad is fucking becky she is a ONS/side piece.

I have seen couples where they are mismatched lookswise, but this is in the minority. 90% of couples are looksmatched.
 
What are you even trying to say? That women want a boyfriend that's her looksmatch instead of a better looking one?
Male and female SMV is not apples and oranges. Sure, most women have a higher SMV than most men, but high SMV men are a thing. The majority of the girls i'm talking about could literally get boyfriends 3 points higher than their actual boyfriends. They're not looksmatched. A lot of these girls do unironically mog their boyfriends, but even being looksmatched doesn't make sense. I'm not saying they could lock down a Chad, but they could do much better than they're doing. And that's facts.


No, I see them outside too. And they post pics literally in bed together jfl.
If that’s the case why do I not have a gf? I am sub 5
 
betabux
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser
Its changed like crazy in recent years. Most of these females don't want to looksmatch when single and money has lost the value it had years ago when average looks Joe could get hot females by having the money. I. see those guys simping now even at higher ages. If you do see a single female looksmatched at places like bars etc where people are looking to hookup her and the guy are usually 7/10s at least. Its crazy how the single 5/10 females act now compared to years ago.
 
I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
Water.

"Went to school with" Once a girls out of college her strategy takes a 180 degree turn. Only a few 2-5% are chad whores.

Most girls date Normie-High Tier Normies from their friendgroups. OLD are fuck apps, nothing else. Women date 1-3 points down on guys they know are simps, trustyworthy, betabuxers, marriage potential,friendly...etc.

Hot girls/above average girls want to leverage their looks and get a good provider before their old and washed up. Girl do NOT want to waste year(s) dating/pump and dumped/single with Looksmatchs and chadlites. So they date DOWN.

Just be NT, Social Circle theory strikes agian.

Wanna go lonewolf max and looksmax, have fun smahing low tier beckies of OLD.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel
If your argument is that it doesn't make sense, then yeah fair enough it doesn't make sense, I'll agree with that, it's what happens though. Since when have women made sense as a general rule? They don't have our T levels, they're not competitive, that's why they aren't always trying to punch up like we do

the only thing you got right there was well defined face (well, close to right), halos =\= requirements
the REQUIREMENTS for a man to be good looking are: don't be recessed, and you should have either a decent eye area or a decent lower third (that or have everything average but with no failoes) From a man's point of view (or at least, from mine) all a chick needs to be attractive is ass and titties, but it's different from a woman's point of view, and that's what she's basing the idea of her looksmatch on. She's rating herself and you objectively whereas you're basing it on your dick only, this is how she decides whether you two look the same or not.

If you were better looking you could shit your pants and still get your dick sucked, promise (that's an exaggeration)
That's also not related to being NT, if you're good looking you'll have success by PUTTING YOURSELF OUT THERE at all, that's not NT, that's just called, you know, going outside. You can be a good looking autist and still have success, you just have to actually talk to them.

Listen, you're not the first autistic narcy to come here and try to make the argument that looks aren't important so you can pretend that you're better looking than you are, and you won't be the last either. This thread has existed thousands of times before, it's still a cope
You make logical points. So the girl is going off FACE and all guys see is ASS/TITTIES.

While I think they prefer looksmatched males. I do believe they date down a 1-2 points when looking to marry. Chicks have to really punch below their belt if they want a guy to actually marry them. Tons and Tons of women trying to date looksmatchs or even a mogger get left pump/dumped after weeks/months/years.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: loksr and thecel
You make logical points. So the girl is going off FACE and all guys see is ASS/TITTIES.

While I think they prefer looksmatched males. I do believe they date down a 1-2 points when looking to marry. Chicks have to really punch below their belt if they want a guy to actually marry them. Tons and Tons of women trying to date looksmatchs or even a mogger get left pump/dumped after weeks/months/years.
I’d say 99% of couples are looksmatched, the idea of hypergamy is generally just narcy copes so delusional average guys can go “I’m definitely chadlite trust me why can I only get average girls?”

girls are pretty autistic about being sure they’re with their rough looksmatch in my experience
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel
Women still have a sexuality. They obsess over good looking guys. I see them posting men on their VSCOs all the time. Then those same women go out and date subhumans or just average joe 5/10 guys.

Height and penis are important too. But yeah, those requirements don't really apply to women in the same way. Weak jaw, strong jaw, they attractive either way.

Sure. A quick google search will tell you what women find attractive, which is exactly what I said above. And it's not really rocket science. I'm 100% straight but I know a good looking man when I see one, just like I do with women.
Women are the same.

I'm good looking enough to get occasional street approaches and multiple approaches whenever I go to a bar or club. And the conversation always starts with the woman complimenting my looks. So i'm probably not ugly. I always either bore them off, despite them being 100% down for sex at first or I get a sudden feeling of inferiority and I simply run away because it's too much for my autistic brain to handle.

I'm good looking enough to regularly get offered sex. Still a virgin.
You are not as good looking as you think you are. Sorry to burst your bubble. To make matters worse, you are NT but you sexually inexperience, you lack performance in bed, and that’s where your “autism” or inhibitions stem from. Start being honest with yourself. It will help you in the long run
 
You are not as good looking as you think you are. Sorry to burst your bubble. To make matters worse, you are NT but you sexually inexperience, you lack performance in bed, and that’s where your “autism” or inhibitions stem from. Start being honest with yourself. It will help you in the long run
you havent been active in ages
i asked you about longitudal bone growth why havent u replied
 
What was the question? I have been busy with actual research (not “internet” research as in googling stuff). When it comes to long bone growth, this forum is very misguided. For example , they thing that GH and AI will enhance your adult height above and beyond what is predicted by your genetic blueprint. This is simply not the case. Doing this when you have advanced bone age or growth plates are nearly fused is even more misguided. People simply ignore that the asymmetric division in the stem cell pool of chndroprogenitors in the local niche at the froth plates is the limiting step
 
another example of a guy who overestimates females and underestimates men
 
When I go to bars and clubs all I see are subhumans leaving them with girls while the Good looking guys go home with nothing to jerk off. Just be NT subhuman theory seems legit
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
8
Views
64
bye_bye
B
HighTierSubhuman
Replies
5
Views
110
Whatever
Whatever
6ft4
Replies
63
Views
1K
nofap
nofap
Jiaxi
Replies
9
Views
494
BrutalMogger
BrutalMogger

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top