Do you have to be subhuman to get a gf in 2021?

Deleted member 14682

Deleted member 14682

Just a man and his will to ascend
Joined
Jul 25, 2021
Posts
120
Reputation
139
I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Slothcel, thecel and 9 others
strong pics
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel, EverythingMattersCel, never_lucky and 2 others
Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating
Another @Biggdink alt account :ROFLMAO:
:bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
@volcelfatcel @Chadeep
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Deleted member 4946, Deleted member 11758 and 9 others
Not doxxing myself. I want to see if anyone else noticed the same thing or if i'm a legit schizo who's living in a fantasy world.
I'm not seeing it at least in my area. but I barely ever see couples at all here tbh.

I think generally subhumans always get cucked in LTRs and the bish doesn't actually get wet for them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lolcel, thereallegend, Deleted member 14274 and 2 others
Another @Biggdink alt account :ROFLMAO:
:bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:
@volcelfatcel @Chadeep
cope

I'm not seeing it at least in my area. but I barely ever see couples at all here tbh.

I think generally subhumans always get cucked in LTRs and the bish doesn't actually get wet for them.
I don't doubt that at least some of them get cucked. But as long as they still get to fuck that pussy they're winners. A 5/10 fucking a Stacy is winning even if she's fucking some other guy on the side.
 
I'm not seeing it at least in my area. but I barely ever see couples at all here tbh.

I think generally subhumans always get cucked in LTRs and the bish doesn't actually get wet for them.
This, ngl sometimes the cope is too strong, examples like this happens every time
 
you're coping hard underrating guys
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Deleted member 13787, EverythingMattersCel and 2 others
you're coping hard underrating guys
I’m not. These are the most average joe guys you could come across, guys who you could spend the day with and you’d forget their face next morning.
Some are somewhat tall (6’2) and some are buff but most of them are just skinnyfat normans.
 
Well, this is often true to a certain age - before girls realize their own SMV. Many girls do not realize their own SMV until 18 or so. How old is she? Many girls date guys with lower SMV in their youth.

I've been with girls who talk about the "ugly guys" they lost their virginity to or dated in their early teens JFL. They become aware of this later
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Slothcel, Chadeep and 2 others
I’m not. These are the most average joe guys you could come across, guys who you could spend the day with and you’d forget their face next morning.
Some are somewhat tall (6’2) and some are buff but most of them are just skinnyfat normans.
they're probably decent looking if you stop comparing to male models
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and .👽.
water
everyone knows looks theory is cope anyway
you have to be NT to get a gf
 
  • +1
Reactions: Slothcel and Deleted member 7580
I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
id have a gf if that was true tbh they prob are just rich or smth
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14682
Well, this is often true to a certain age - before girls realize their own SMV. Many girls do not realize their own SMV until 18 or so. How old is she? Many girls date guys with lower SMV in their youth.
I graduated highschool2 years ago so they’re in their early 20.


they're probably decent looking if you stop comparing to male models
i‘M only comparing them to other guys in my area.


id have a gf if that was true tbh they prob are just rich or smth
Everyone’s rich where I live.
id have a gf if that was true tbh they prob are just rich or smth
You’re on an incel forum. You’re not NT. these guys are NT, i’n not denying that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14667
another guy who thinks chads grow on trees or a guy who thinks that when youre high PSL then women are automatically stacked in a row and one by one will be sucking off the chad.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot and Slothcel
another guy who thinks chads grow on trees or a guy who thinks that when youre high PSL then women are automatically stacked in a row and one by one will be sucking off the chad.
I'm aware of how rare Chads are. I'm also aware of how desirable they are so your joke about them lining up isn't that far off.
I just don't understand how foids, who should have insane standards, are settling for subhumans and actually treating them like they're a prize. It doesn't make logical sense.
 
Reminder that in nightclubs and ig pics all foids wear huge amounts of makeup. Deduct 3psl points for every one of them.
930c75500a6ad3fd843ac9c318018d5e
 
  • +1
Reactions: delta7, Deleted member 4946, thisend and 4 others
I'm not seeing it at least in my area. but I barely ever see couples at all here tbh.

I think generally subhumans always get cucked in LTRs and the bish doesn't actually get wet for them.
LTR is for subhumans slaying is for Chad. Chad gets access to pussy without giving up commitment. Don’t envy those guys you see on IG they are basically slaves to those girls.
 
  • +1
Reactions: delta7, thereallegend, Chadeep and 2 others
Brb using imagination since no pics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeraCope54
Reminder that in nightclubs and ig pics all foids wear huge amounts of makeup. Deduct 3psl points for every one of them.
View attachment 1245751
What if men wore makeup (not like James Charles, though)
But unfortunately it isn't socially acceptable for us to wear makeup unless if you're gay or female it seems.
Why should only women looksmax?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Chadeep, thecel and 1 other person
this isn't very common, i do see it with girls that are poorly socialized and slightly fucked in the head, a socially savvy subhuman might be able to take advantage of them
most often seen in the working classes, as subhumans have more status in the working class

i had a oneitis just like this though I don't really think about her much anymore, and she also went for a short goofy guy with missing teeth
retard got away with taking 5000 pics with his mouth closed and either no smile or a goofy lip smile with no teeth showing, dumbass clown
guy looked like Dirlewanger ran out of growth hormones

lesson to be learned from this, whores never stay alone for long, and never wait for "the one", ever
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: Slothcel, Deleted member 5786, .👽. and 4 others
What if men wore makeup (not like James Charles, though)
But unfortunately it isn't socially acceptable for us to wear makeup unless if you're gay or female it seems.
Why should only women looksmax?
Yeah foids can increase their subhuman psl by 2, 3 points with fakeup, but god forbid a man wants a hair transplant or something, he's immediately called insecure.
4754a5795ef3bb612e85a427607fbc27 798x800
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Deleted member 14274, Chadeep and 4 others
Yeah foids can increase their subhuman psl by 2, 3 points with fakeup, but god forbid a man wants a hair transplant or something, he's immediately called insecure.
View attachment 1245765
That's true. Society only allows women to looksmax whereas men are told to be slobbish and the girl comes along. :soy::soy::soy::soy::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill::bluepill:

I'm not sure if I should try on a tiny dab of makeup and wear lifts on a casual walk outside and see how people react.

If women are allowed to wear heels why can't we wear platforms or lifts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, owlofathena, TeraCope54 and 2 others
You’re on an incel forum. You’re not NT. these guys are NT, i’n not denying that.
The overwhelming majority of guys are NT. This meme is so annoying.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
What if men wore makeup (not like James Charles, though)
But unfortunately it isn't socially acceptable for us to wear makeup unless if you're gay or female it seems.
Why should only women looksmax?

Men don’t looksmax using makeup because they can’t; makeup barely ascends men if at all.

  • Most kinds of makeup are incompatible with masculine aesthetics. The majority of makeup types—like lipstick, blush, eye shadow, mascara, etc.—are feminine and can’t be used to make men look more masculinely aesthetic. The only makeup that men can benefit from are stuff like eyebrow pencils and concealer.
  • Male beauty is mainly about facial form. The biggest difference between sub-5 males and Chads is their massively different craniofacial bone structures. Makeup is good for enhancing external features and covering external flaws not creating the illusion of better craniofacial structure. Incels, whose biggest looks problems are internal and bone-shape-related, can only get very minimal improvements with makeup.


Incels aren’t normies covered in acne; incels need osteotomies to look good.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14478 and Xangsane
The overwhelming majority of guys are NT. This meme is so annoying.
Normies don’t know what the internet is outside of Snapchat and Instagram. If you’re here then that means your development was fucked up in one way or another. Normal people don’t use forums such as this.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 4946, Slothcel, Edgar and 2 others
Men don’t looksmax using makeup because they can’t; makeup barely ascends men if at all.

  • Most kinds of makeup are incompatible with masculine aesthetics. The majority of makeup types—like lipstick, blush, eye shadow, mascara, etc.—are feminine and can’t be used to make men look more masculinely aesthetic. The only makeup that men can benefit from are stuff like eyebrow pencils and concealer.
  • Male beauty is mainly about facial form. The biggest difference between sub-5 males and Chads is their massively different craniofacial bone structures. Makeup is good for enhancing external features and covering external flaws not creating the illusion of better craniofacial structure. Incels, whose biggest looks problems are internal and bone-shape-related, can only see very minimal improvements with makeup.

Nah I'm referring to men who are 5 PSL or above.
I was just referring to the use of light-handed concealer and maybe a little dark shadow under the natural bone area (e.g. cheekbones and jaw)
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Men don’t looksmax using makeup because they can’t; makeup barely ascends men if at all.

  • Most kinds of makeup are incompatible with masculine aesthetics. The majority of makeup types—like lipstick, blush, eye shadow, mascara, etc.—are feminine and can’t be used to make men look more masculinely aesthetic. The only makeup that men can benefit from are stuff like eyebrow pencils and concealer.
  • Male beauty is mainly about facial form. The biggest difference between sub-5 males and Chads is their massively different craniofacial bone structures. Makeup is good for enhancing external features and covering external flaws not creating the illusion of better craniofacial structure. Incels, whose biggest looks problems are internal and bone-shape-related, can only see very minimal improvements with makeup.

7018.jpg
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Toth's thot and thecel
Yeah foids can increase their subhuman psl by 2, 3 points with fakeup, but god forbid a man wants a hair transplant or something, he's immediately called insecure.
View attachment 1245765

Women who get huge makeup transformations, like the one above, have decent bone structures and ratios. They aren’t subhumans; they’re normies with acne.

Craniofacially subhuman women can’t get beautiful just by putting on makeup:

1627569941982
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Lawton88 and TITUS
Women who get huge makeup transformations, like the one above, have decent bone structures and ratios. They aren’t subhumans; they’re normies with acne.

Craniofacially subhuman women can’t get beautiful just by putting on makeup:

View attachment 1245810

Depends on what it is. I was shocked how much makeup can hide a messed up nose and lack of decent cheekbones on a female. But when its on thick like that alarm bells should go off the female is a few points below what she is with the crazy makeup.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
DM me pics @Moeggels, I will rate the couples honestly. I won't doxx you, I have no interest in ruining users lives. If you want to make them hard to trace, draw bright coloured lines on them so they can't be found online.

Chances are they are looksmatched. Most couples are actually looksmaxxed. You are either overating the females (likely because its easily to do) or underrating the males. Alternatively you could just be surrounded by jbf couples. Wheat Waffles has a good video on this topic. Its also important to rate people by IRL standards and not PSL autism sub 8 = subhuman standards.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Slothcel, Deleted member 14682 and Deleted member 14478
I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
99.9% of people are in relationships with their looksmatch. You’re imagining the girls mog the guys because 1. You are jealous, this is clear. And 2. You are a simp and a slave to females, this is evident from the fact that you have a oneitis jfl
 
99.9% of people are in relationships with their looksmatch. You’re imagining the girls mog the guys because 1. You are jealous, this is clear. And 2. You are a simp and a slave to females, this is evident from the fact that you have a oneitis jfl
Even if that was true, in a looksmatched couple, the female’s literal SHIT has more SMV than her boyfriend.
A woman does not need to settle for her looksmatch at all, let alone simp for him on her social media acting like she won the lottery.
And no, a lot of these girls fog their boyfriends. They just do.


DM me pics @Moeggels, I will rate the couples honestly. I won't doxx you, I have no interest in ruining users lives. If you want to make them hard to trace, draw bright coloured lines on them so they can't be found online.

Chances are they are looksmatched. Most couples are actually looksmaxxed. You are either overating the females (likely because its easily to do) or underrating the males. Alternatively you could just be surrounded by jbf couples. Wheat Waffles has a good video on this topic. Its also important to rate people by IRL standards and not PSL autism sub 8 = subhuman standards.


i’ll try to look for some more obvious pics. Going to sleep now though. But like I said above, a looksmatched couple is not SMVmatched.
 
Even if that was true, in a looksmatched couple, the female’s literal SHIT has more SMV than her boyfriend.
A woman does not need to settle for her looksmatch at all, let alone simp for him on her social media acting like she won the lottery.
And no, a lot of these girls fog their boyfriends. They just do.
SMV is nothing, it means nothing, you are comparing apples to oranges. I'll let you in on a little secret, a ONS for a man is the equivalent of an LTR for a woman, comparing ONS to ONS is asinine. Women gain nothing from letting chad pump and dump them, their goal is purely to lock down chad in an ltr, which most are aware they won't be able to pull off unless they get really lucky (don't cope on that, average girls are not LOCKING DOWN chads on any regular basis, don't cherrypick and show me an outlier, either.) It goes back to the master key/shitty lock thing, women know that shit to be true even if they get fake offended at it being brought up, they want ltr's, ons' are easy for them and thus give them next to nothing.

The idea of a looksmatch is INSANELY more important in a woman's mind than it is in a man's mind, to the point that I've had several looksmatched girlfriends BRING UP THE FACT THAT WE'RE LOOKSMATCHED (obviously they don't use that terminology.)

I can pretty much guarantee that the majority of couples where you think the girl is better looking is a case of 1. you not knowing yet what women are attracted to and 2. you overrating the girls and/or underrating the guys.

Comparing ons to ons for men and women is like saying the top pro baseball player is the same as the top in the little league, it doesn't convert like that. Or hell, it might even be like saying the top football player is just as good at BASEBALL as the top baseball player, no, they're playing completely different games.
 
They just do that to virtue signal for Instagram. Step outside you will never see a sub 7 with a girl. It’s just not reality
 
The idea of a looksmatch is INSANELY more important in a woman's mind than it is in a man's mind, to the point that I've had several looksmatched girlfriends BRING UP THE FACT THAT WE'RE LOOKSMATCHED (obviously they don't use that terminology.)

I can pretty much guarantee that the majority of couples where you think the girl is better looking is a case of 1. you not knowing yet what women are attracted to and 2. you overrating the girls and/or underrating the guys.

Comparing ons to ons for men and women is like saying the top pro baseball player is the same as the top in the little league, it doesn't convert like that. Or hell, it might even be like saying the top football player is just as good at BASEBALL as the top baseball player, no, they're playing completely different games.
What are you even trying to say? That women want a boyfriend that's her looksmatch instead of a better looking one?
Male and female SMV is not apples and oranges. Sure, most women have a higher SMV than most men, but high SMV men are a thing. The majority of the girls i'm talking about could literally get boyfriends 3 points higher than their actual boyfriends. They're not looksmatched. A lot of these girls do unironically mog their boyfriends, but even being looksmatched doesn't make sense. I'm not saying they could lock down a Chad, but they could do much better than they're doing. And that's facts.

They just do that to virtue signal for Instagram. Step outside you will never see a sub 7 with a girl. It’s just not reality
No, I see them outside too. And they post pics literally in bed together jfl.
 
I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
I've had similar experience and I have shown proof to many users here. Ugly losers with gfs
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Johanjohan, Chadeep and Deleted member 14682
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot, Chadeep and Jason Voorhees
I've had similar experience and I have shown proof to many users here. Ugly losers with gfs.
Thank you. I'm not going crazy after all. Women are generally stupid and if you're NT you can do whatever you want with them unless you're aiming for the top-tier Stacys.
It's an NT man's world.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Johanjohan and Jason Voorhees
What are you even trying to say? That women want a boyfriend that's her looksmatch instead of a better looking one?
Male and female SMV is not apples and oranges. Sure, most women have a higher SMV than most men, but high SMV men are a thing.
the ideal for women is to lock down chad, that's not going to happen for the vast majority of women (btw that's not gender specific, everyone would lock down a gigachad/gigastacy if they could), so instead they focus on getting their looksmatch. nearly every relationship you see when you go outside will be looksmatched, girls date their looksmatch or SLIGHTLY above in 99% of cases. I have never heard a non-blackpilled man talk about their looksmatch, maybe some vague mentions of "she's way out of my league" but that's about the closest thing, meanwhile I've known so many girls who make it a BIG point that we're the same looks level (again different terminology)
The majority of the girls i'm talking about could literally get boyfriends 3 points higher than their actual boyfriends. They're not looksmatched.
You asked if you're living in a fantasy world, yes, you are living in a fantasy world. You are a giga simp and you rate women MUCH better than you rate men, don't worry, this is completely normal for a bluepilled guy such as yourself. my recommendation is that you start looking at threads that outline WHAT makes a man attractive specifically.

Hypergamy, in BOTH DIRECTIONS, is bullshit. Take that, ingest it, get it in your system, understand it, accept it. nearly all relationships are looksmatched with some outlier examples, just like everything else.

Thank you. I'm not going crazy after all. Women are generally stupid and if you're NT you can do whatever you want with them unless you're aiming for the top-tier Stacys.
It's an NT man's world.
whatever copes your boat, I prefer reality
make sure you hold frame bro :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: hebbewem and bddmaxxed
I'm stalking insta profiles of foids I went to school with. Even the hottest Stacys are fucking 5/10 5'9 - 6'1 guys.
There is literally no difference between the girls that average John Joe and Chad is dating. I'm seeing pics of these foids showing off their mediocre boyfriend and it's legit suifuel. They're showing so much affection towards them in these photos and the guys look indifferent.
It's the same thing when I go out to a nightclub. So many subhumans with girls 2 - 3 points above them.

I wish the whole thing about foids only fucking Chads was true because that would make sense. But it's just not true from my real life experiences.

My 3 year long oneitis who lives rent free in my head every single minute of every day is currently getting fucked by a manlet little twink shit because I was too autistic to talk to her back then. This little faggot has what I would throw my grandmother off a cliff for. https://looksmax.org/threads/i-got-cucked-by-a-manlet-shit.378781
Bro you are my favorite new forum member
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 14682
Thank you. I'm not going crazy after all. Women are generally stupid and if you're NT you can do whatever you want with them unless you're aiming for the top-tier Stacys.
It's an NT man's world.
For ons I do believe looks matter a lot tho
 
the ideal for women is to lock down chad, that's not going to happen for the vast majority of women, so instead they focus on getting their looksmatch. nearly every relationship you see when you go outside will be looksmatched, girls date their looksmatch or SLIGHTLY above in 99% of cases. I have never heard a non-blackpilled man talk about their looksmatch, maybe some vague mentions of "she's way out of my league" but that's about the closest thing, meanwhile I've known so many girls who make it a BIG point that we're the same looks level (again different terminology)
So suppose a 5/10 can't get the ideal Chad, so instead of going for a Chadlite or even a HTN, they settle for their looksmatch? What kind of logic is that? Even if she can't get a Chad, she has the SMV to get a much better looking man than her. No reason a 5/10 woman should go for a 5/10 man. I'm aware of many couples being looksmatched. I'm saying that it doesn't make sense, not that it doesn't happen. Compared to a 5/10 woman, a 5/10 man IS a subhuman.
You asked if you're living in a fantasy world, yes, you are living in a fantasy world. You are a giga simp and you rate women MUCH better than you rate men, don't worry, this is completely normal for a bluepilled guy such as yourself. my recommendation is that you start looking at threads that outline WHAT makes a man attractive specifically.
It's much easier for a woman to be good looking than for a man. Most women can look decent if they're not fat. That's all it takes.
To be good looking a man has to be tall, have a well-defined face and have a big dick. For a woman her height doesn't mean shit, nobody outside of autistic forums ever makes fun of women for having a "loose" pussy. A woman can have a defined face or a cute, soft, chubby face. MAYBE she might have to do some squats if she doesn't naturally have an ass. That's it.
Hypergamy, in BOTH DIRECTIONS, is bullshit. Take that, ingest it, get it in your system, understand it, accept it. nearly all relationships are looksmatched with some outlier examples, just like everything else.


whatever copes your boat, I prefer reality
make sure you hold frame bro :feelsuhh::feelsuhh::feelsuhh:
I got pussy handed to me on a silver platter more times than I can count and I barely go out or put myself out there. I'm a virgin if you don't count prostitutes and a girl (oneitis) that was initially crazily into me is making up rumors that i'm stalking her and it's a matter of time before her army of simps beats me up. Meanwhile, she's also fucking some manlet subhuman shit while i'm jacking off into my sock. All because I was too beta to talk to her whenever she came up to me. Not NT IRL = death sentence.
 
Last edited:
So suppose a 5/10 can't get the ideal Chad, so instead of going for a Chadlite or even a HTN, they settle for their looksmatch? What kind of logic is that? Even if she can't get a Chad, she has the SMV to get a much better looking man than her. No reason a 5/10 woman should go for a 5/10 man. I'm aware of many couples being looksmatched. I'm saying that it doesn't make sense, not that it doesn't happen. Compared to a 5/10 woman, a 5/10 man IS a subhuman.
If your argument is that it doesn't make sense, then yeah fair enough it doesn't make sense, I'll agree with that, it's what happens though. Since when have women made sense as a general rule? They don't have our T levels, they're not competitive, that's why they aren't always trying to punch up like we do
It's much easier for a woman to be good looking than for a man. Most women can look decent if they're not fat. That's all it takes.
To be good looking a man has to be tall, have a well-defined face and have a big dick. For a woman her height doesn't mean shit, nobody outside of autistic forums ever makes fun of women for having a "loose" pussy. A woman can have a defined face or a cute, soft, chubby face. MAYBE she might have to do some squats if she doesn't naturally have an ass. That's it.
the only thing you got right there was well defined face (well, close to right), halos =\= requirements
the REQUIREMENTS for a man to be good looking are: don't be recessed, and you should have either a decent eye area or a decent lower third (that or have everything average but with no failoes) From a man's point of view (or at least, from mine) all a chick needs to be attractive is ass and titties, but it's different from a woman's point of view, and that's what she's basing the idea of her looksmatch on. She's rating herself and you objectively whereas you're basing it on your dick only, this is how she decides whether you two look the same or not.
I got pussy handed to me on a silver platter more times than I can count and I barely go out or put myself out there. I'm a virgin if you don't count prostitutes and a girl that was initially crazily into me is making up rumors that i'm stalking her and it's a matter of time before her army of simps beats me up. Meanwhile, she's also fucking some manlet subhuman shit while i'm jacking off into my sock. All because I was too beta to talk to her whenever she came up to me. Not NT IRL = death sentence.
If you were better looking you could shit your pants and still get your dick sucked, promise (that's an exaggeration)
That's also not related to being NT, if you're good looking you'll have success by PUTTING YOURSELF OUT THERE at all, that's not NT, that's just called, you know, going outside. You can be a good looking autist and still have success, you just have to actually talk to them.

Listen, you're not the first autistic narcy to come here and try to make the argument that looks aren't important so you can pretend that you're better looking than you are, and you won't be the last either. This thread has existed thousands of times before, it's still a cope
 

Similar threads

Jiaxi
Replies
9
Views
494
BrutalMogger
BrutalMogger
GreekGenes
Replies
7
Views
311
NORDEN SLAVORUM
NORDEN SLAVORUM
nuisance
Replies
7
Views
186
madaaa
madaaa
Inceltruestorytellr
Replies
15
Views
930
AverageCurryEnjoyer
AverageCurryEnjoyer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top