Do you think Stanley Kubrick was killed for exposing too much in Eyes Wide Shut?

chadmanlet04

chadmanlet04

Luminary
Joined
Apr 30, 2021
Posts
5,773
Reputation
8,026
He died 6 days prior its premier from a heart attack and Warner Bros cut 20 (allegedly 45) minutes worth of content from it before it was released.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jontevt, Deleted member 16275 and Deleted member 29581
kubrick before he died
13755.jpg
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Dr. Bludy, EnglandBadman, LampPostPrime and 5 others
also based movie.

3 hours of tom cruise blowing the back of some 5'11 bitch who height mogs him.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: svbhvman, LampPostPrime and Deleted member 29581
He died 6 days prior its premier from a heart attack and Warner Bros cut 20 (allegedly 45) minutes worth of content from it before it was released.
What's the movie about? What did it reveal?
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 29581
he was 170cm, fat and smoked while reading books. Doubt it.
as I doubt that a 70 year old man in that condition did not die of natural causes as you suggest
 
What's the movie about? What did it reveal?
Watch it, and try to connect the dots. I was late to this movie, saw it during the summer with a friend… Theory will only take you so far
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lefty Rankin and chadmanlet04
  • JFL
Reactions: chadmanlet04 and Deleted member 29581
as I doubt that a 70 year old man in that condition did not die of natural causes as you suggest
maybe, but the timing is too suspicious isn't it? 70 isn't super old.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 25059
You didn't watch the movie, did you?
You know they say, in the 15 or so minutes of the movie that were removed… they gave up the baby to ‘THEM’
@Bushman Thoughts on the ending to eyes wide shut and Sacrifices?
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Bushman and Deleted member 16275
maybe, but the timing is too suspicious isn't it? 70 isn't super old.
sure mate, you have 30 year olds dying of cardiac arrest and 70 doesn't seem old? Did you know that the average age of death in the world is still around 67 for men
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23239
Also, i believe jewz got him assassinated 100%
 
  • +1
Reactions: svbhvman
You know they say, in the 15 or so minutes of the movie that were removed… they gave up the baby to ‘THEM’
@Bushman Thoughts on the ending to eyes wide shut and Sacrifices?
the cut 20 minutes are pure speculation and random made shit up.

it was cut, and warner made every actor sign heavy contracts that forbid them from disclosing any further info.

the true uncut version probably only belongs to kubricks daughter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29581
sure mate, you have 30 year olds dying of cardiac arrest and 70 doesn't seem old? Did you know that the average age of death in the world is still around 67 for men
its more fun to mentally masturbate about him getting assasinated tho
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 25059
sick of hearing bout this shit movie he didnt expose shit anybody with half a brain already knows about that shit and the other half with no brain will never connect dots no matter how obvious oh and its boring af meanwhile i watch actual exposes on youtube everyday
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: chadmanlet04 and Deleted member 23239
any1 who thinks so is an certified idiot
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 25059 and chadmanlet04
the cut 20 minutes are pure speculation and random made shit up.
Think about it, if you recall their kid was not seen again after the two men were seen tailing the couple in the store. Then recall nicole kidman was crying prior to that scene speaking about how they could start over in a new place (paraphrasing).


the true uncut version probably only belongs to kubricks daughter.
execs likely burn it
 
sick of hearing bout this shit movie he didnt expose shit anybody with half a brain already knows about that shit and the other half with no brain will never connect dots no matter how obvious oh and its boring af meanwhile i watch actual exposes on youtube everyday
>actual exposes
>youtube
 
the cut 20 minutes are pure speculation and random made shit up.

it was cut, and warner made every actor sign heavy contracts that forbid them from disclosing any further info.

the true uncut version probably only belongs to kubricks daughter.
idk where did you get this but the final cut he showed to WR went to cinemas

after his death they were just minor post-production of sound design, music and effects. the overall cut was already done.
 
idk where did you get this but the final cut he showed to WR went to cinemas

after his death they were just minor post-production of sound design, music and effects. the overall cut was already done.
there is no definitive proof to content being cut obviously, thats what it makes a theory to begin with, with its only backing being movies pacing/ending being abrupt at certain points.

there are however few censored/altered scenes (orgy ones) and true deleted footage (like the family riding horses/rowing and the scenes with Keitel and Leigh) which can be found pretty easily.
 
You know they say, in the 15 or so minutes of the movie that were removed… they gave up the baby to ‘THEM’
@Bushman Thoughts on the ending to eyes wide shut and Sacrifices?
I have not seen these movies
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29581

Similar threads

CorinthianLOX
Replies
42
Views
830
ormonecell
ormonecell
Sloppyseconds
Replies
13
Views
1K
registerfasterusing
registerfasterusing
Сигма Бой
Replies
27
Views
621
Сигма Бой
Сигма Бой
CorinthianLOX
Replies
22
Views
1K
irrumator praetor
irrumator praetor
got.daim
Replies
85
Views
3K
turkcelfatcel
turkcelfatcel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top