does anyone read books

[existingandliving]

yes, a few

which ones, and btw you could add me to your book club

 

[got.daim]

lmaoo, btw have you ever read anything from Kierkegaard?

The Concept of Anxiety
and
The Sickness Unto Death

which ones, and btw you could add me to your book club

sure

 

[Claymoreboy0118]

I used to write
my book got popular and I retired
what's ur book abt

Dystopian setting

 

[imontheloose]

Yeah I agree he does ramble a bit
But he always summarizes his ideas at the end of a chapter

Fair, but again, it’s almost begging the question. He has this sort of, mask (?), acting as a summary so to say which he tries to use at the end of the chapter. But there’s never a single footnote of anything to it bar cherry-picked anecdotes. Now, I don’t want to speak for him, but it seems obvious he’s using a circular reason / begging the question fallacy to his advantage. He takes it as a given it is true, then explains it. “Why? Because it’s true. But how? It just is.” I hope you get what I’m getting at.

Also, Greene just states these maxims with confidence of that of an immutable law. They’re just his opinions. He just twists history. I caught him, personally, at times using outright fiction from Tudor intrigues.

Plus, the laws which seemingly contradict, he is well-aware of this I assume, however he doesn’t offer any in between. It’s an odd piece of writing. I’m sorry to say so.

I could go on and on, but I hope you get my gist.

 

[Deleted member 157994]

Is this o9a book good? I've came across the book before but never bought it.

It’s reads more of manual for practice of magick rather than theory or entertainment. Bases a lot of its contents on Jung’s ideas

 

[Deleted member 103645]

i cant focus on books, i get all my info from short form content ideally with subway surfers on the side

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Fair, but again, it’s almost begging the question. He has this sort of, mask (?), acting as a summary so to say which he tries to use at the end of the chapter. But there’s never a single footnote of anything to it bar cherry-picked anecdotes. Now, I don’t want to speak for him, but it seems obvious he’s using a circular reason / begging the question fallacy to his advantage. He takes it as a given it is true, then explains it. “Why? Because it’s true. But how? It just is.” I hope you get what I’m getting at.

Also, Greene just states these maxims with confidence of that of an immutable law. They’re just his opinions. He just twists history. I caught him, personally, at times using outright fiction from Tudor intrigues.

Plus, the laws which seemingly contradict, he is well-aware of this I assume, however he doesn’t offer any in between. It’s an odd piece of writing. I’m sorry to say so.

I could go on and on, but I hope you get my gist.

Yeah i have caught him directly contradicting what Machiavelli says which confused me. Maybe he is on the spectrum.
I do believe though he shares some of the elites strategies, like a tell all book on their behalf, hard to explain,

 

[imontheloose]

Yeah i have caught him directly contradicting what Machiavelli says which confused me. Maybe he is on the spectrum.
I do believe though he shares some of the elites strategies, like a tell all book on their behalf, hard to explain,

True. We agree there.

 

[A_H0T_Wombat]

i read fan fic and scp does that count ?

 

[got.daim]

i read fan fic and scp does that count ?

do you want to help me write a yaoi about @Blackgymmax and @Clavicular