does anyone read books

Yeah I agree he does ramble a bit
But he always summarizes his ideas at the end of a chapter
Fair, but again, it’s almost begging the question. He has this sort of, mask (?), acting as a summary so to say which he tries to use at the end of the chapter. But there’s never a single footnote of anything to it bar cherry-picked anecdotes. Now, I don’t want to speak for him, but it seems obvious he’s using a circular reason / begging the question fallacy to his advantage. He takes it as a given it is true, then explains it. “Why? Because it’s true. But how? It just is.” I hope you get what I’m getting at.

Also, Greene just states these maxims with confidence of that of an immutable law. They’re just his opinions. He just twists history. I caught him, personally, at times using outright fiction from Tudor intrigues.

Plus, the laws which seemingly contradict, he is well-aware of this I assume, however he doesn’t offer any in between. It’s an odd piece of writing. I’m sorry to say so.

I could go on and on, but I hope you get my gist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies and got.daim
Is this o9a book good? I've came across the book before but never bought it.
It’s reads more of manual for practice of magick rather than theory or entertainment. Bases a lot of its contents on Jung’s ideas
 
  • +1
Reactions: FaceandBBC and got.daim
i cant focus on books, i get all my info from short form content ideally with subway surfers on the side
 
  • +1
Reactions: Latvianchud185
Fair, but again, it’s almost begging the question. He has this sort of, mask (?), acting as a summary so to say which he tries to use at the end of the chapter. But there’s never a single footnote of anything to it bar cherry-picked anecdotes. Now, I don’t want to speak for him, but it seems obvious he’s using a circular reason / begging the question fallacy to his advantage. He takes it as a given it is true, then explains it. “Why? Because it’s true. But how? It just is.” I hope you get what I’m getting at.

Also, Greene just states these maxims with confidence of that of an immutable law. They’re just his opinions. He just twists history. I caught him, personally, at times using outright fiction from Tudor intrigues.

Plus, the laws which seemingly contradict, he is well-aware of this I assume, however he doesn’t offer any in between. It’s an odd piece of writing. I’m sorry to say so.

I could go on and on, but I hope you get my gist.
Yeah i have caught him directly contradicting what Machiavelli says which confused me. Maybe he is on the spectrum.
I do believe though he shares some of the elites strategies, like a tell all book on their behalf, hard to explain,
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose
Yeah i have caught him directly contradicting what Machiavelli says which confused me. Maybe he is on the spectrum.
I do believe though he shares some of the elites strategies, like a tell all book on their behalf, hard to explain,
True. We agree there.
 
  • +1
Reactions: autistic_tendencies
i read fan fic and scp does that count ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: got.daim
i read fan fic and scp does that count ?
do you want to help me write a yaoi about @Blackgymmax and @Clavicular
 

Similar threads

cromagnon
Replies
3
Views
38
cromagnon
cromagnon
McSkziofren
Replies
12
Views
105
InanimatePragmatist
InanimatePragmatist
Doryphoros
Replies
12
Views
127
javier-varela
javier-varela
iluvmilk
Replies
26
Views
141
iluvmilk
iluvmilk
zslqam
Replies
5
Views
45
Robloxfan25
Robloxfan25

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top