Does love really start at HTN?

1ForwardGrowthPleas

1ForwardGrowthPleas

Average HMTN
Joined
Apr 20, 2026
Posts
790
Reputation
395
I've heard this before, but with HMTN and MTN already being above the general population, would it not make more sense that MTN is when love begins?
 
Starts mmtn if your lucky
 
  • +1
Reactions: normanx
I've heard this before, but with HMTN and MTN already being above the general population, would it not make more sense that MTN is when love begins?
It starts at MTN. People dont acknowledge this but mtn is top 25-30% facially. Mtn is actually above averge and attractive in the real world.
As long as you are mtn ideally also with other postives like height, dimorphism, physique, frame and JBW you will be able to find real love.
But if you are mtn but averge height, dimorphism, physique and frame you should also be able to find real love. I just pointed out that you should also have other positives in addition.
But at MTN it is more subjective. Some people will find you to be good looking, some really good looking and some mid asf and some wil think you are ugly and some ugly af. So you are going to find people who do find you attractive but not everyone will. At htn/htb + pretty much everyone will agree that you are good looking
 
Last edited:
It starts at MTN. People dont acknowledge this but mtn is top 25-30% facially. Mtn is actually above averge and attractive in the real world.
As long as you are mtn ideally also with other postives like height, dimorphism, physique, frame and JBW you will be able to find real love.
But if you are mtn but averge height, dimorphism, physique and frame you should also be able to find real love. I just pointed out that you should also have other positives in addition.
I strongly agree with this sentiment, people who get mad at being MTN don't understand the premise of these ratings, as they say comparison is the thief of joy, and most people will never even SNIFF htn. The difference in my life pre and post mtn was so drastic its not even arguable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orbital1
our average for gen z is probably around 6 feet too (excluding indian and asian immigrants) but to compete with crazy chad genetics u need to be huge
im 6'4 and my parents were both models, chad genetics dont always make chad kids
 
I strongly agree with this sentiment, people who get mad at being MTN don't understand the premise of these ratings, as they say comparison is the thief of joy, and most people will never even SNIFF htn. The difference in my life pre and post mtn was so drastic its not even arguable.
People online throw around MTN like it’s an insult, when in reality being MTN already puts you ahead of 70–80% of the global population. The problem is that most people have zero understanding of what real‑world attractiveness distribution actually looks like.
In real life, the majority of people fall into LTN or below. Well over half — realistically around 70% — sit in the 3–4 range. MTN is basically a 6/10, which is already noticeably above average.
Even LTN isn’t “ugly” the way the internet tries to frame it. LTN is still conventionally good‑looking in the real world. It’s still slightly above the true global average and completely normal‑looking in day‑to‑day life. The only reason people think MTN or LTN is “bad” is because they compare themselves to filtered influencers and model-tier outliers instead of actual humans walking around outside.

HTN and especially HTN+ in chadlite, chad and adamlite contendors are extremely rare, but the internet exposes us to them every single day. Because of that constant exposure, people start thinking those faces are “normal,” when they’re actually the absolute top percentiles of the population.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tyroid and 1ForwardGrowthPleas
People online throw around MTN like it’s an insult, when in reality being MTN already puts you ahead of 70–80% of the global population. The problem is that most people have zero understanding of what real‑world attractiveness distribution actually looks like.
In real life, the majority of people fall into LTN or below. Well over half — realistically around 70% — sit in the 3–4 range. MTN is basically a 6/10, which is already noticeably above average.
Even LTN isn’t “ugly” the way the internet tries to frame it. LTN is still conventionally good‑looking in the real world. It’s still slightly above the true global average and completely normal‑looking in day‑to‑day life. The only reason people think MTN or LTN is “bad” is because they compare themselves to filtered influencers and model-tier outliers instead of actual humans walking around outside.

HTN and especially HTN+ in chadlite, chad and adamlite contendors are extremely rare, but the internet exposes us to them every single day. Because of that constant exposure, people start thinking those faces are “normal,” when they’re actually the absolute top percentiles of the population.
Yo, how do I put this as an explanation? This is a genuinely goated effort at explaining this. I do agree, were decensetized to pretty faces.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orbital1
crazy bro did u just lose out to the bad genes and didnt get any of the good ones?
No, I did ok, but my father ascended in his early twenties, so I'm hoping that happens to me. These are my parents.
IMG 7636
IMG 4956
 

Similar threads

Paul Paulovski
Replies
2
Views
32
hezaymoglet
hezaymoglet
1
Replies
7
Views
104
swaggerdoodle
swaggerdoodle
kcalbWianBrilson
Replies
2
Views
59
blonde slayer
blonde slayer
L
Replies
21
Views
128
d1cooperr
d1cooperr
1ForwardGrowthPleas
Replies
10
Views
64
1ForwardGrowthPleas
1ForwardGrowthPleas

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top