Eat 2.2k calories and burn 500 with cardio, or eat 1700 calories?

jboard

jboard

Gold
Joined
Aug 6, 2023
Posts
811
Reputation
348
To get to 10% body fat, which option is better?

Does it really matter?
 
doesn't matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: meathead and lestoa
is 1kg of steel or feathers heavier ahh post
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 113182, imightbewrong42, PostivityCore and 1 other person
is 1kg of steel or feathers heavier ahh post
i mean u get more nutrients w 2200. u also build muscle differently doing calisthenics vs weight lifting. so i thought maybe it’d work in a similar way losing weight w cardio v. not eating. maybe eating 2200 would keep metabolism higher long term
 
  • +1
Reactions: PostivityCore
i mean u get more nutrients w 2200. u also build muscle differently doing calisthenics vs weight lifting. so i thought maybe it’d work in a similar way losing weight w cardio v. not eating. maybe eating 2200 would keep metabolism higher long term
This is true if your also tryna build muscle etc but if your tryna reach 10% quickly js water fast or starve it worked for me and you can put in less work which saves you more time in the long run
 
  • +1
Reactions: PostivityCore and a55

Similar threads

gayspringtrap993
Replies
5
Views
126
gayspringtrap993
gayspringtrap993
O
Replies
7
Views
517
Oldcel_WageCuck
O
O
Replies
16
Views
1K
VrillFatNoob24
VrillFatNoob24
J
Replies
35
Views
776
james0123758
J
EYErizs
Replies
15
Views
271
uglyassnigga7
uglyassnigga7

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top