Escortcels: What’s the best Escort you fucked? Send pics/videos of her. If you have them

[teenage dream]

pure plastic

tits, yes. Ass, no. Still hot

 

[ropemaxxer00]

Plasticcel

 

[shandingo]

What’s the best escort you’ve been with, and what was she like?
How old were you when you were with her, and how old was she? What did she look like?

I fucked this girl in central London for £300 when I was 21 , she was top 3 hottest girls I have fucked looks wise , but her service set her apart , it was incredible , it really felt I was fucking a super hot girl who actually desired me. I can give you a full review if you are interested ?

https://www.divaescort.com/all-girls/brunette-sangria

 

[RichardSpencel]

Say that out loud, I'll slap my dick against your lips with every spoken letter.

Ok vegetacel yo mum loves bbc

 

[Milfhunter-cel.]

This is called looksmax.org the whole point is to look good lol

Yeah if your putting effort in your a cuck, again this doesn't counter my ons point

surprised the escort isn't disgusted by you considering you say foid your a retard

I think you've heard of logic and coherence, right? How does it contradict the argument that you have to work your ass off, if it's even possible, to get a woman equivalent to an escort?

It's like someone telling you it's hard to get bodybuilder and you telling them this is the gym we're in, it's all about bodybuilding... just as an analogy to your "that's Looksmax.org" argument. And Depending on the person/rating, that could mean having your face surgically altered, ripping off your skin, breaking bones to improve your appearance, taking steroids that destroy your organs. How is that worth more than the money an escort charges? And the psychological effects I mentioned are just a bonus: no pressure to perform, no shame, nothing.

You can't argue against facts. it's a fact that, given hypergamy in our time, the cost-benefit analysis for a woman is no longer worth the benefit. You need to possess basic economic knowledge to realize and understand it.

 

[Milfhunter-cel.]

Ok vegetacel yo mum loves bbc

Ok= 2
Vegetacel= 9
Yo= 2
Mum= 3
Loves=5
Bbc= 3

Thats a total of 24 of my dick slaps on your Lipps

 

[Cherkez]

I think you've heard of logic and coherence, right? How does it contradict the argument that you have to work your ass off, if it's even possible, to get a woman equivalent to an escort?

It's like someone telling you it's hard to get bodybuilder and you telling them this is the gym we're in, it's all about bodybuilding... just as an analogy to your "that's Looksmax.org" argument. And Depending on the person/rating, that could mean having your face surgically altered, ripping off your skin, breaking bones to improve your appearance, taking steroids that destroy your organs. How is that worth more than the money an escort charges? And the psychological effects I mentioned are just a bonus: no pressure to perform, no shame, nothing.

You can't argue against facts. it's a fact that, given hypergamy in our time, the cost-benefit analysis for a woman is no longer worth the benefit. You need to possess basic economic knowledge to realize and understand it.

That is such a shitty analogy, it's more like going to the gym then saying "why should I work out when I can just get organ transplants to better my health and fake silicone muscles" and when someone points out that you are here to build strength as well as look good you say "muh cost benefit analysis there's no point working out"

Just admit it your a little bitch who can't pull for shit so you pay for sex like a little cuck, this is so dystopian you are paying someone to pretend to love you

 

[Milfhunter-cel.]

That is such a shitty analogy, it's more like going to the gym then saying "why should I work out when I can just get organ transplants to better my health and fake silicone muscles" and when someone points out that you are here to build strength as well as look good you say "muh cost benefit analysis there's no point working out"

Just admit it your a little bitch who can't pull for shit so you pay for sex like a little cuck, this is so dystopian you are paying someone to pretend to love you

That you find the analogy shitty only confirms my argument, because the analogy was there to illustrate your point that "it's not hard to become good enough for a escort like foid wich means being Chad.

You've now changed the analogy that your previous argument presented in order to change your previous argument, which is no longer possible because it's already written, my dear .

And even your renewed and altered argument is easily refuted because it assumes that escort looking like women meaning Htb+ are attainable through looks maxing, analogous to:

"Achieving health through the gym instead of organ transplantation."

That's simply wrong. Becoming Chad is impossible for 99% of men, even with surgical interventions for some. If your renewed argument were true, then I'd be happy... because it would be as if there were no genetic limits and everyone could lookmax their way up to Chad.

But we know it's impossible for most. To return to your analogy:
it would be like someone with a genetically high cardiovascular risk and other genetic diseases being supposed to cure them just through exercise...which isn't true. To Compare to looksmaxing again, it would be possible for him to minimize the risk of these genetic diseases it would improve be better then like if he started eating McDonald's every day. BUT.. he'll never eliminate the geneticly determined diseases.

To end the analogy, he'll never become Chad.

I'm not saying we should stop working out and just fuck escorts because that would imply that the gym is only for women or only has aesthetic effects, which it isn't. We can train for health but not for women. If we know that the limit of achievable aesthetics wouldn't be sufficient, depending on your genetics, of course you could be born Chad, then my argument would be meaningless, which it isn't because it addresses the other 99% of men. And with that, you got your IQ mogged, my dear.

 

[Cherkez]

That you find the analogy shitty only confirms my argument, because the analogy was there to illustrate your point that "it's not hard to become good enough for a escort like foid wich means being Chad.

You've now changed the analogy that your previous argument presented in order to change your previous argument, which is no longer possible because it's already written, my dear .

And even your renewed and altered argument is easily refuted because it assumes that escort looking like women meaning Htb+ are attainable through looks maxing, analogous to:

"Achieving health through the gym instead of organ transplantation."

That's simply wrong. Becoming Chad is impossible for 99% of men, even with surgical interventions for some. If your renewed argument were true, then I'd be happy... because it would be as if there were no genetic limits and everyone could lookmax their way up to Chad.

But we know it's impossible for most. To return to your analogy:
it would be like someone with a genetically high cardiovascular risk and other genetic diseases being supposed to cure them just through exercise...which isn't true. To Compare to looksmaxing again, it would be possible for him to minimize the risk of these genetic diseases it would improve be better then like if he started eating McDonald's every day. BUT.. he'll never eliminate the geneticly determined diseases.

To end the analogy, he'll never become Chad.

I'm not saying we should stop working out and just fuck escorts because that would imply that the gym is only for women or only has aesthetic effects, which it isn't. We can train for health but not for women. If we know that the limit of achievable aesthetics wouldn't be sufficient, depending on your genetics, of course you could be born Chad, then my argument would be meaningless, which it isn't because it addresses the other 99% of men. And with that, you got your IQ mogged, my dear.

The fact you think getting a htb means you need to be chad further proves my argument that you are a retard with a milkshake for a brain. I changed the analogy because clearly your monkey brain couldn't understand the first one

 

[Milfhunter-cel.]

The fact you think getting a htb means you need to be chad further proves my argument that you are a retard with a milkshake for a brain. I changed the analogy because clearly your monkey brain couldn't understand the first one

Firstly, ad hominem. This proves your lack of intellect to refute my arguments. Secondly, Htb wants a Chad.

Women naturally strive for the best man because, compared to men, they cannot survive independently. They were not hunters, and their search for a man is a struggle for survival, which, if lost, means their genetic extinction. Modernity weakens this effect but does not eliminate it.

But you need evolutionary biology 101. I attacked your analogy for what it attempted to refute, according to your marking of which part of my text you wanted to contradict with the analogy. You changed it again I understood and reconstructed it . IQ Let (ad hominem back to you* ) Australopithecus nibble on my IQ to gain a few more points.

 

[Cherkez]

Firstly, ad hominem. This proves your lack of intellect to refute my arguments. Secondly, Htb wants a Chad.

View attachment 4944814

Women naturally strive for the best man because, compared to men, they cannot survive independently. They were not hunters, and their search for a man is a struggle for survival, which, if lost, means their genetic extinction. Modernity weakens this effect but does not eliminate it.

But you need evolutionary biology 101. I attacked your analogy for what it attempted to refute, according to your marking of which part of my text you wanted to contradict with the analogy. You changed it again I understood and reconstructed it . IQ Let (ad hominem back to you* ) Australopithecus nibble on my IQ to gain a few more points.

No it isn't an ad hominem because I am refuting your argument, I'm just calling you a retard as well because you couldn't understand a simple analogy. Clearly you must be on the spectrum if you think life fits neatly into that graph, the first problem with the graph is there is a difference between objective reality and perceived reality, most htb and stacies don't actually think they are htb or stacy this graph only adjusts for the lower end having a different perceived reality not the upper end

 

[Milfhunter-cel.]

I'm just calling you a retard...

This was an image from a scientific study about online dating behavior, which is objective reality. If you try to say that it doesn't work in the real world meaning outside in clubs, Cafés etc. , that still wouldn't contradict the fact that it's objective reality, because both are. Because I'm being intellectually honest, I'll say that it doesn't mean that women in real life behave according to this graphic, but they won't behave astronomically differently either as they dont change dating personality as whole when they turn tinder off. Furthermore, the image isn't the cause but the result of a woman's biological predisposition. One of the reasons is the one I mentioned; there are, of course, millions more. If you want, I can list a couple of them. The idea that a Htbs doesn't perceive themselves as such is absurd when you consider how supportive women are of each other online and in real life, when they describe overweight, unattractive women as beautiful, cute, and thus distorb their subjective perception of their attractiveness. Of course, I can't prove this deductively because there are no scientific studies for it, but inductively, there are numerous TikToks you can search for. Therefore, I sit back and consider that I don't have the burden of proof for YOUR argument, but you do. Prove that Htbs don't perceive themselves as Htbs? I doubt there's a study on the incel definition of women, so would you also point to TikTok? But would you honestly admit that it's not deductive evidence?

Milfhunter-cel PhD