Deleted member 1973
pastebin.com/Tb8AYcyk
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2019
- Posts
- 5,826
- Reputation
- 6,885
Their diet is 90% of the key to there ability to survive the north. They are able to get all the vitamin D they need because of the high levels of seafood they eat. Arctic seafood is extremely high in vitamin D. They do have a sorter limb to torso ratio than average.
The most advantageous cold weather adaption they have is there boys' response to the extreme cold. For example when submerged in freezing water. They are able to survive 2 to 3 times longer.
The normal human reaction to cold water submersion. It causes all blood to leave the extremities. Which conserves heat close to the vital organs. Unfortunately. This leaves you with no strength to self-rescue.
Eskimos Carry a neanderthal gene which causes the body to react differently. The blood is not pulled out of the limbs. Rather it is pulled away from the skin and into the core of the muscles. While at the same time their metabolism goes into overdrive. Burning all available energy and converting it to heat.
The funny thing about this gene variant is that it is common among Asians and Europeans. Yet it has to be activated by living in cold environments. So only by constant exposure to extreme cold. Will this natural defense system automatically take over.
That is why you see people being able to do extreme feats of cold water immersion. So it is up for debate. Whether or not Eskimos have a more active variant of this gene or their environment makes it active. This and the natural ability to lighten and darken skin tone. Have been found in most Europeans native Americans and Asians. Yet they are not common to sub-Saharan Africans.
This shows a natural limitation to the Sub Saharan Africans ability to survive in northern regions in ancient times. While whites and Asians could live in any environment on earth.
There have been populations of whites living in northern Africa and the Canary Islands. Known to have lived there since the stone age. While the native Americans lived from one extreme to the other in the Americas. Yet Saharan Africans are supposedly the people who populated the world. Recent Gene studies have shown that this is not the case.
Modern sub-Saharan Africans are not the same as Homo sapiens, sapiens. They are just as different from them if not more than any other race. The more logical explanation is that the original Homo sapiens had a brownish skin tone and straight or curly hair. That is what you get if you average the races around the world. Southern Africans represent an extreme among human populations. So do northern Europeans.
In animal populations almost always start with a group of individuals in the middle physically and then radiate outward to the extremes You rarely see starting at one extreme and then evolving to the other. Never would it happen in the short time humans have been on earth. When we look at the most successful animals other than humans. You see the common trait is not specialization. They all share the trait of extreme flexibility.
That is further evidence that sub-Saharan Africans are not the root base of modern Humans. They are highly adapted for life in sub-Saharan Africa. So much so that they would be unable to live in northern or the Americas without modern technology and modern medical knowledge. The Key to evolution is that it has to be forced upon a species. There has to either be competition or environmental factors that drive it.
That is why there are thousands of species unchanged for millions of years. Homo sapiens just took advantage of hundreds of thousands of years of adaptations. Which had been done by our cousins living in each of the 3 regions of the world? This resulted in the 3 base races. So out of Africa may be true for homo sapiens, sapiens, Yet it is not true for homo sapiens modern
The most advantageous cold weather adaption they have is there boys' response to the extreme cold. For example when submerged in freezing water. They are able to survive 2 to 3 times longer.
The normal human reaction to cold water submersion. It causes all blood to leave the extremities. Which conserves heat close to the vital organs. Unfortunately. This leaves you with no strength to self-rescue.
Eskimos Carry a neanderthal gene which causes the body to react differently. The blood is not pulled out of the limbs. Rather it is pulled away from the skin and into the core of the muscles. While at the same time their metabolism goes into overdrive. Burning all available energy and converting it to heat.
The funny thing about this gene variant is that it is common among Asians and Europeans. Yet it has to be activated by living in cold environments. So only by constant exposure to extreme cold. Will this natural defense system automatically take over.
That is why you see people being able to do extreme feats of cold water immersion. So it is up for debate. Whether or not Eskimos have a more active variant of this gene or their environment makes it active. This and the natural ability to lighten and darken skin tone. Have been found in most Europeans native Americans and Asians. Yet they are not common to sub-Saharan Africans.
This shows a natural limitation to the Sub Saharan Africans ability to survive in northern regions in ancient times. While whites and Asians could live in any environment on earth.
There have been populations of whites living in northern Africa and the Canary Islands. Known to have lived there since the stone age. While the native Americans lived from one extreme to the other in the Americas. Yet Saharan Africans are supposedly the people who populated the world. Recent Gene studies have shown that this is not the case.
Modern sub-Saharan Africans are not the same as Homo sapiens, sapiens. They are just as different from them if not more than any other race. The more logical explanation is that the original Homo sapiens had a brownish skin tone and straight or curly hair. That is what you get if you average the races around the world. Southern Africans represent an extreme among human populations. So do northern Europeans.
In animal populations almost always start with a group of individuals in the middle physically and then radiate outward to the extremes You rarely see starting at one extreme and then evolving to the other. Never would it happen in the short time humans have been on earth. When we look at the most successful animals other than humans. You see the common trait is not specialization. They all share the trait of extreme flexibility.
That is further evidence that sub-Saharan Africans are not the root base of modern Humans. They are highly adapted for life in sub-Saharan Africa. So much so that they would be unable to live in northern or the Americas without modern technology and modern medical knowledge. The Key to evolution is that it has to be forced upon a species. There has to either be competition or environmental factors that drive it.
That is why there are thousands of species unchanged for millions of years. Homo sapiens just took advantage of hundreds of thousands of years of adaptations. Which had been done by our cousins living in each of the 3 regions of the world? This resulted in the 3 base races. So out of Africa may be true for homo sapiens, sapiens, Yet it is not true for homo sapiens modern
