Aiwass
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2026
- Posts
- 1,316
- Reputation
- 1,238
title
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
our biologytitle
proof?our biology
Guiltproof?
There is an innate moral
so if i kill a baby but dont feel guilty thats moral?Guilt
No lolso if i kill a baby but dont feel guilty thats moral?
so i disproved uNo lol
ive proven im a manFoid thinks she has any right speaking on this topic
![]()
Morality ≠ feelings. Objective wrongness exists independently of guilt. Feeling nothing doesn’t make a horrific act moral; it just means your psychology is misaligned with reality retarded niggerso i disproved u
but u just said objective morality was based upon our biologyMorality ≠ feelings. Objective wrongness exists independently of guilt. Feeling nothing doesn’t make a horrific act moral; it just means your psychology is misaligned with reality retarded nigger
me neitherI don't believe in objective morality
everyone who wants peace of mindtitle
I don't think there is any type of decree to be moral but we still feel bad for making "immoral" choicesme neither
thats gay and anti-lifeeveryone who wants peace of mind
then we’re all homo-abortioniststhats gay and anti-life
i dont care about killing babiesthen we’re all homo-abortionists
i wasn’t being literali dont care about killing babies
of course i would if it was going to negatively impact me
i just dont want other people to have abortions because it promotes hook-up culture which negatively impacts me
Objective morality can’t exist, and you cannot be “not moral”. Any desicion you make is a reflection of you, ie your OWN morality.title
missaligned with YOUR perception, doesn’t make that objective morality. Neither does my perception.Morality ≠ feelings. Objective wrongness exists independently of guilt. Feeling nothing doesn’t make a horrific act moral; it just means your psychology is misaligned with reality retarded nigger
why cant it?Objective morality can’t exist, and you cannot be “not moral”. Any desicion you make is a reflection of you, ie your OWN morality.
Explain on the second part, I’ll reply to your first question tomorrow. 3 am and too sleepy:3why cant it?
and second part is false
u can do things that dont align with ur moralityExplain on the second part, I’ll reply to your first question tomorrow. 3 am and too sleepy:3
If you do stuff that’s out of your own morality then it was never your morality in the first place. Action dictates your morals, not what you think you would do.u can do things that dont align with ur morality
thats just untrueIf you do stuff that’s out of your own morality then it was never your morality in the first place. Action dictates your morals, not what you think you would do.
whatever niggertitle
EXPLAIN OR DNIthats just untrue
If you can’t follow your own morals, then it was a mirage for what your ACTUAL morals are.thats just untrue
Not necessarily. Doing actions against your own morals is cognitive dissonance.If you do stuff that’s out of your own morality then it was never your morality in the first place. Action dictates your morals, not what you think you would do.
morals are logic/reasoning to decide whether or not said action is moral + doing said moral thingEXPLAIN OR DNI
why?It’s in your interest
if an objective morality is there, it means we have to follow it. There would be a higher force like God to impose such morality and you would have to be forced to follow it or else.title
I suppose you’re right, maybe I should’ve used weak morals. But even so, how could something out of your control force you to make decisions that don’t align with your morals? You’re still the one making the decisions.Not necessarily. Doing actions against your own morals is cognitive dissonance.
Normally, if youre doing something out of your morals it’s usually out of your control.
If you guaranteed the existence of an objective morality, it is the Truthwhy?
For example, being forced to kill someoneI suppose you’re right, maybe I should’ve used weak morals. But even so, how could something out of your control force you to make decisions that don’t align with your morals? You’re still the one making the decisions.
Yes but action is the deciding factor, if you take out action there is only a framework of what your morals are. Thought is only a subjective judgement upon our actions. I.E objective morality can’t exist.morals are logic/reasoning to decide whether or not said action is moral + doing said moral thing
its based upon thoughts and actions
If you’re not willing to suffer for your morals, and the consequences that come with them. Then you have weak morals, if at any discomfort of your morals being challenged you stray away from them, you never stood by them in the first place.For example, being forced to kill someone
or needing to do this certain thing as a last resort to achieve a goal that'll benefit you or others (I.E needing to rob someone for money to pay rent)
So if it comes down to it, will you die for your morals?If you’re not willing to suffer for your morals, and the consequences that come with them. Then you have weak morals, if at any discomfort of your morals being challenged you stray away from them, you never stood by them in the first place.
Hypothetically yes. But I haven’t come to that situation so I can’t objectively say that is true.So if it comes down to it, will you die for your morals?
drop phallus photoive proven im a man