evolutionary wise average height is better than being tall

[whiteegyptian]

So. the best height evolutionary wise would be average height, being tall was often considered a liability since they required massive amounts of food, and were the first to starve, in a famine, that would not be IDEAL. and they were also more prone to joint failures, cancer and so on. being short was also considered a liability, because while it was more efficient for famines than taller bodies. it was still an advantage in hand to hand combat against larger hominids, and lower leverage for hunting.

meanwhile the average height was the best, because an average human is big enough to defend themselves, hunt, and compete for females, but small enough to survive a famine. that's why most people are average height.

technically average height in modern day terms would be around 5'10 to 6'2.

but still the best height for mogging and domination is 6'5 and above.

@horseman. @killuacel @Resonance @Bully @ØUROBOROS

 

[Brava]

Mayn prime whiteegyptian would already have 4 pages under his posts

I somebwhat agree with your post tho

 

[whiteegyptian]

Mayn prime whiteegyptian would already have 4 pages under his posts

I somebwhat agree with your post tho

it's fine bro. the site is kind of dead.

 

[americanpakitruvcel]

True, being tall is not biologically sustainable in most conditions

 

[bhsoda_destroyer]

Slighlty above average height is the best cause you would be able to survive famines and then defend yourself from other humans

 

[killuacel]

lifefuel for us 5,10 manlets

 

[Azi.org]

This is some next level cope

 

[whiteegyptian]

This is some next level cope

How?

 

[Brava]

it's fine bro. the site is kind of dead.

Yea bro your threads are peak tho

 

[DysgenicArtery]

So. the best height evolutionary wise would be average height, being tall was often considered a liability since they required massive amounts of food, and were the first to starve, in a famine, that would not be IDEAL. and they were also more prone to joint failures, cancer and so on. being short was also considered a liability, because while it was more efficient for famines than taller bodies. it was still an advantage in hand to hand combat against larger hominids, and lower leverage for hunting.

meanwhile the average height was the best, because an average human is big enough to defend themselves, hunt, and compete for females, but small enough to survive a famine. that's why most people are average height.

technically average height in modern day terms would be around 5'10 to 6'2.

but still the best height for mogging and domination is 6'5 and above.

@horseman. @killuacel @Resonance @Bully @ØUROBOROS

By the time civilization came around, you would actually be better off being a manlet

Your main concern in some 3000 bce city in Egypt was getting food from farming, not getting your shit murked by another man

 

[whiteegyptian]

By the time civilization came around, you would actually be better off being a manlet

Your main concern in some 3000 bce city in Egypt was getting food from farming, not getting your shit murked by another man

I understand what you are trying to say, but nah. hypergamy towards taller men peaked in the times where there was peace. like today, and that counts for the past too.