examples of really narrow hips physique

shizuku11111

shizuku11111

never need a bitch im what a bitch need
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Posts
17,542
Reputation
26,367
can someone post some?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore, halloweed and Dominicoon
David Laid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore, R@m@ and shizuku11111
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore, Dominicoon and greycel
Me i got a slvtty waist :3
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Costcosuperstore and shizuku11111
Whilst these might seem aesthetic because they fraud a better v taper ratio, if a human was born with it in nature 1000s of years ago.. it's very likely they would've died in physical competition

Kinda ironic how society praises worse genes..

It's better to look the part than actually be the part
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: halloweed, NoReedemingFeature, 6ft4 and 1 other person
Whilst these might seem aesthetic because they fraud a better v taper ratio, if a human was born with it in nature 1000s of years ago.. it's very likely they would've died in physical competition

Kinda ironic how society praises worse genes..

It's better to look the part than actually be the part
in terms of aesthetics, narrow hips will always be superior
 
  • +1
Reactions: LonelyLooksmaxxer, Bitchwhipper2, Costcosuperstore and 2 others
in terms of aesthetics, narrow hips will always be superior
Yes but the entire idea of aesthetics is it's meant to correlate with stuff that is appealing to nature/evolution
 
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore and shizuku11111
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ss07, Costcosuperstore and shizuku11111

natural too but i think his ratios are too extreme to be mass appealing

uncanny af ngl, idk if its beacuse of his shit chest or what
 
uncanny af ngl, idk if its beacuse of his shit chest or what
its because you are use to be people with better arms, most average to above average height natties tend to have these proportions due to lack of androgenic delts only people under 5'6 look proportionally normal under 10% bf like jeff nippard but even he looks a bit emaciated, this dude is a more extreme case since his insanely small waist and hips make his chest look too big even if its a a normal bidelt
 
  • +1
Reactions: Costcosuperstore and shizuku11111
Yes but the entire idea of aesthetics is it's meant to correlate with stuff that is appealing to nature/evolution
There is some basis on biological traits yes but most of it will come down to whats most appealing to the society / culture at the time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: shizuku11111, Costcosuperstore and greycel
There is some basis on biological traits yes but most of it will come down to whats most appealing to the society / culture at the time.
Yes, it's better to look the part than be the part.
They like the masculine idea of this:
1731812874988


Until his prettyboy waistcel falio comes into play, when he's in frame with another human:

1731813003935


It's because having a skinny waist frauds the idea of wider shoulders
 
  • +1
Reactions: shizuku11111 and distance decay
hes standing here next to african 6'5 genetic miracle cmon
If there were 2 people the same height and shoulder width.

The guy with the narrower waist would have an illusory effect of having wider shoulders than he actually has, with a supposed normal waist.. if he is by himself in a frame.

The guy with the wider waist who can generate more torque -> more power, in his own frame would look to be narrower as his shoulder to waist ratio is unideal.
Until, he steps into a frame with the guy with a narrower waist.
Then that dude looks like a bitch.

Also David Laid is 6'2, Ngannou is 6'3.5

We can chase different things tbh. You might chase aesthetics or looking good according to society. I prefer looking good according to nature
 
I prefer looking good according to nature
both physiques are impossible in nature
natural hunter gatherer men rarely weigh more than 70kg and have lean, wiry frames
a 6'5 250lbs beast would be a shit tier hunter and would never be able to eat enough to maintain his weight in nature :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Obeliskcel, SoundnVision and greycel
both physiques are impossible in nature
natural hunter gatherer men rarely weigh more than 70kg and have lean, wiry frames
a 6'5 250lbs beast would be a shit tier hunter and would never be able to eat enough to maintain his weight in nature :lul:
Yes of course but there’s still an advantage to having wider bone structure, especially the waist
 
Whilst these might seem aesthetic because they fraud a better v taper ratio, if a human was born with it in nature 1000s of years ago.. it's very likely they would've died in physical competition

Kinda ironic how society praises worse genes..

It's better to look the part than actually be the part
This is why a normal size pelvis but an actual big upper body is ideal
3cba1bc6f12efd94ed6c37f5487f26b71
 
  • Love it
Reactions: greycel
  • +1
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature

Similar threads

Saint Casanova
Replies
10
Views
175
It'snotover
It'snotover
shredded4summer
Replies
96
Views
1K
Evgeniy291
Evgeniy291
B
Replies
4
Views
85
bc123456
B
O
Replies
40
Views
369
mrdouchebag
mrdouchebag
Jason Voorhees
Replies
44
Views
1K
Obeliskcel
O

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top