
shizuku11111
never need a bitch im what a bitch need
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2023
- Posts
- 17,542
- Reputation
- 26,367
can someone post some?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
obviously, but are there more extreme onesDavid Laid
in terms of aesthetics, narrow hips will always be superiorWhilst these might seem aesthetic because they fraud a better v taper ratio, if a human was born with it in nature 1000s of years ago.. it's very likely they would've died in physical competition
Kinda ironic how society praises worse genes..
It's better to look the part than actually be the part
thunder thighs too?Me i got a slvtty waist :3
Yes but the entire idea of aesthetics is it's meant to correlate with stuff that is appealing to nature/evolutionin terms of aesthetics, narrow hips will always be superior
can someone post some?
natural too but i think his ratios are too extreme to be mass appealing
its because you are use to be people with better arms, most average to above average height natties tend to have these proportions due to lack of androgenic delts only people under 5'6 look proportionally normal under 10% bf like jeff nippard but even he looks a bit emaciated, this dude is a more extreme case since his insanely small waist and hips make his chest look too big even if its a a normal bideltuncanny af ngl, idk if its beacuse of his shit chest or what
There is some basis on biological traits yes but most of it will come down to whats most appealing to the society / culture at the time.Yes but the entire idea of aesthetics is it's meant to correlate with stuff that is appealing to nature/evolution
Yes, it's better to look the part than be the part.There is some basis on biological traits yes but most of it will come down to whats most appealing to the society / culture at the time.
hes standing here next to african 6'5 genetic miracle cmon
If there were 2 people the same height and shoulder width.hes standing here next to african 6'5 genetic miracle cmon
both physiques are impossible in natureI prefer looking good according to nature
Yes of course but there’s still an advantage to having wider bone structure, especially the waistboth physiques are impossible in nature
natural hunter gatherer men rarely weigh more than 70kg and have lean, wiry frames
a 6'5 250lbs beast would be a shit tier hunter and would never be able to eat enough to maintain his weight in nature![]()
Me i got a slvtty waist :3
This is why a normal size pelvis but an actual big upper body is idealWhilst these might seem aesthetic because they fraud a better v taper ratio, if a human was born with it in nature 1000s of years ago.. it's very likely they would've died in physical competition
Kinda ironic how society praises worse genes..
It's better to look the part than actually be the part
I don’t think a bideltoid frame like that is even possible with a normal waistThis is why a normal size pelvis but an actual big upper body is ideal
View attachment 3334097
looks shit, this guy framemogs 99.9999% of populationThis is why a normal size pelvis but an actual big upper body is ideal
View attachment 3334097
Wdym?I don’t think a bideltoid frame like that is even possible with a normal waist
I don’t think a bideltoid frame like that is even possible with a normal waist
But if so it would be the most ideal
Do you think that having such a wide ribcage would end up making the shoulders/clavicles not protrude out like that?Wdym?