Explaining mtn-htn-chadlite

[SunShine Senpai]

Most ratings are trolls on this site, so I will explain the ratings.

MTN (5/10) - You see them all the time, whenever you go outside or go anywhere, you will always see them (60-70 percentile)
HTN (6/10) - In a classroom, gym, room you might see 1-4 of them (10~ percentile)
Chadlite (7/10) - in a party of 50 people, you might see 1-2 chadlite, rare to see outside (less than 5 percentile)
Chad (8/10) - super rare to ever see outside, mostly online. Maybe in a huge party their might be 1 (.5 percentile)

if ur smv is chadlite or close, you can slay weekly with effort. If your smv is higher than chadlite (7.5-) or chadlite but gymaxxed, you can slay without effort weekly.

HTN can slay with high effort but inconsistently, unless they photomax on Online dating apps.

 

[lestoa]

[IMG alt="SunShine Senpai"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/l/22/22324.jpg?1668878678[/IMG]

SunShine Senpai​

 

[SunShine Senpai]

[IMG alt="SunShine Senpai"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/l/22/22324.jpg?1668878678[/IMG]

SunShine Senpai​

bump

 

[copercel123]

Most ratings are trolls on this site, so I will explain the ratings.

MTN (5/10) - You see them all the time, whenever you go outside or go anywhere, you will always see them (60-70 percentile)
HTN (6/10) - In a classroom, gym, room you might see 1-4 of them (10~ percentile)
Chadlite (7/10) - in a party of 50 people, you might see 1-2 chadlite, rare to see outside (less than 5 percentile)
Chad (8/10) - super rare to ever see outside, mostly online. Maybe in a huge party their might be 1 (.5 percentile)

if ur smv is chadlite or close, you can slay weekly with effort. If your smv is higher than chadlite (7.5-) or chadlite but gymaxxed, you can slay without effort weekly.

HTN can slay with high effort but inconsistently, unless they photomax on Online dating apps.

sybau

 

[Squidwardmaxx]

everything is off by 1. chadlite is 8, chad 9, and 10 doesnt exist. but 9.9 does.

 

[smartstyle]

Most ratings are trolls on this site, so I will explain the ratings.

MTN (5/10) - You see them all the time, whenever you go outside or go anywhere, you will always see them (60-70 percentile)
HTN (6/10) - In a classroom, gym, room you might see 1-4 of them (10~ percentile)
Chadlite (7/10) - in a party of 50 people, you might see 1-2 chadlite, rare to see outside (less than 5 percentile)
Chad (8/10) - super rare to ever see outside, mostly online. Maybe in a huge party their might be 1 (.5 percentile)

if ur smv is chadlite or close, you can slay weekly with effort. If your smv is higher than chadlite (7.5-) or chadlite but gymaxxed, you can slay without effort weekly.

HTN can slay with high effort but inconsistently, unless they photomax on Online dating apps.

Chadlite is 1 in a 1000 or a bit rarer.

Htn is 1 in 20 or 30.

Htn by your scale is high mtn actually.

Avg man in west is between high ltn to low mtn.

 

[SunShine Senpai]

Chadlite is 1 in a 1000 or a bit rarer.

Htn is 1 in 20 or 30.

Htn by your scale is high mtn actually.

Avg man in west is between high ltn to low mtn.

by definition most men cant be below average unless we are comparing to the distance past or we are using psl scaling but this is normie scale not pls scale

 

[SunShine Senpai]

everything is off by 1. chadlite is 8, chad 9, and 10 doesnt exist. but 9.9 does.

brainrot

 

[panzer of the Lake]

everything is off by 1. chadlite is 8, chad 9, and 10 doesnt exist. but 9.9 does.

Chad is 8/10 or 6psl, always has been.

 

[zemult]

Chadlite isn't 5 percentile, it's lower than that.

Also HTNs don't require high effort to slay. Inconsistent, likely.

 

[SunShine Senpai]

Chad is 8/10 or 6psl, always has been.

100%

 

[SunShine Senpai]

Chadlite isn't 5 percentile, it's lower than that.

Also HTNs don't require high effort to slay. Inconsistent, likely.

ya chadlite can be a bit lower than 5 percent

 

[ey88]

water

 

[zemult]

ya chadlite can be a bit lower than 5 percent

Also a true chadlite doesn't require much effort to slay. They just need to go outside literally.

 

[SunShine Senpai]

Also a true chadlite doesn't require much effort to slay. They just need to go outside literally.

a true chadlite as in the top 2~ of looks still needs effort. If his gymmaxxed and fashion maxxed then it become almost no effort. Only true chads requires almost no effort.

 

[Phillybeard1996]

a true chadlite as in the top 2~ of looks still needs effort. If his gymmaxxed and fashion maxxed then it become almost no effort. Only true chads requires almost no effort.

Hey man can you rate this guy i know ?

 

[SunShine Senpai]

Hey man can you rate this guy i know ?

sure bro

 

[SkiSquadJPG]

by definition most men cant be below average unless we are comparing to the distance past or we are using psl scaling but this is normie scale not pls scale

by definition if 99 ppl are 1/10 and 1 person is 9/10 then 99 people will be below average

 

[formergameraddict]

If I’m getting girls dming me first and asking to meet I should be htn at least right ? Or mtn get that too

 

[zhilbrix]

If I’m getting girls dming me first and asking to meet I should be htn at least right ? Or mtn get that too

PSL and appeal are too diff things if u fit in the girls specific type u would be a 9/10 instantly even if ur a 6/10 So maybe u got high appeal but not that high PSL

 

[formergameraddict]

PSL and appeal are too diff things if u fit in the girls specific type u would be a 9/10 instantly even if ur a 6/10 So maybe u got high appeal but not that high PSL

Oo that makes sense

 

[AustrianMogger]

Dont agree with this

 

[SunShine Senpai]

by definition if 99 ppl are 1/10 and 1 person is 9/10 then 99 people will be below average

i asked chaptgpt to do the math and the average would be 1.08

 

[SkiSquadJPG]

i asked chaptgpt to do the math and the average would be 1.08

exactly so the 99 people which are 1/10 would be below average meaning 99% would be below average

 

[SunShine Senpai]

exactly so the 99 people which are 1/10 would be below average meaning 99% would be below average

lol 1.08 is not far from 1 at all. Literally .08 deviation. So most people would still be around the average number

 

[SkiSquadJPG]

lol 1.08 is not far from 1 at all. Literally .08 deviation. So most people would still be around the average number

You seem to have missed the point entirely. You claimed most men cant be below average per definition which clearly is wrong as I showed in my quite extreme example where 99% were less than average.

Here, lets take another less extreme example:
If we take 3 10/10 guys and 7 2/10 guys the average of these 10 guys would be 4,4/10. And 2 to 4,4 is quite significant. In this scenario 70% of guys are 2,4 points below average.

 

[SunShine Senpai]

You seem to have missed the point entirely. You claimed most men cant be below average per definition which clearly is wrong as I showed in my quite extreme example where 99% were less than average.

Here, lets take another less extreme example:
If we take 3 10/10 guys and 7 2/10 guys the average of these 10 guys would be 4,4/10. And 2 to 4,4 is quite significant. In this scenario 70% of guys are 2,4 points below average.

in that example yes because a high percentage of people are attractive. Your first example did not show that at all. And real life does not correlate to your second example at all as only around the top 10% of people would be considered good looking (6+/10). while around 50% of people full somewhere in below average to slightly above average category (4.5-5.5/10)