Explaining mtn-htn-chadlite

SunShine Senpai

SunShine Senpai

Bronze
Joined
Sep 14, 2022
Posts
270
Reputation
210
Most ratings are trolls on this site, so I will explain the ratings.

MTN (5/10) - You see them all the time, whenever you go outside or go anywhere, you will always see them (60-70 percentile)
HTN (6/10) - In a classroom, gym, room you might see 1-4 of them (10~ percentile)
Chadlite (7/10) - in a party of 50 people, you might see 1-2 chadlite, rare to see outside (less than 5 percentile)
Chad (8/10) - super rare to ever see outside, mostly online. Maybe in a huge party their might be 1 (.5 percentile)

if ur smv is chadlite or close, you can slay weekly with effort. If your smv is higher than chadlite (7.5-) or chadlite but gymaxxed, you can slay without effort weekly.

HTN can slay with high effort but inconsistently, unless they photomax on Online dating apps.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: 1nonlymogs, diditeverbegin, looks>books and 2 others
[IMG alt="SunShine Senpai"]https://looksmax.org/data/avatars/l/22/22324.jpg?1668878678[/IMG]

SunShine Senpai

 
Most ratings are trolls on this site, so I will explain the ratings.

MTN (5/10) - You see them all the time, whenever you go outside or go anywhere, you will always see them (60-70 percentile)
HTN (6/10) - In a classroom, gym, room you might see 1-4 of them (10~ percentile)
Chadlite (7/10) - in a party of 50 people, you might see 1-2 chadlite, rare to see outside (less than 5 percentile)
Chad (8/10) - super rare to ever see outside, mostly online. Maybe in a huge party their might be 1 (.5 percentile)

if ur smv is chadlite or close, you can slay weekly with effort. If your smv is higher than chadlite (7.5-) or chadlite but gymaxxed, you can slay without effort weekly.

HTN can slay with high effort but inconsistently, unless they photomax on Online dating apps.
sybau
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: diditeverbegin, ey88, iblamemyasymmetry and 1 other person
everything is off by 1. chadlite is 8, chad 9, and 10 doesnt exist. but 9.9 does. :owo::owo::owo::owo::owo::owo:
 
Most ratings are trolls on this site, so I will explain the ratings.

MTN (5/10) - You see them all the time, whenever you go outside or go anywhere, you will always see them (60-70 percentile)
HTN (6/10) - In a classroom, gym, room you might see 1-4 of them (10~ percentile)
Chadlite (7/10) - in a party of 50 people, you might see 1-2 chadlite, rare to see outside (less than 5 percentile)
Chad (8/10) - super rare to ever see outside, mostly online. Maybe in a huge party their might be 1 (.5 percentile)

if ur smv is chadlite or close, you can slay weekly with effort. If your smv is higher than chadlite (7.5-) or chadlite but gymaxxed, you can slay without effort weekly.

HTN can slay with high effort but inconsistently, unless they photomax on Online dating apps.
Chadlite is 1 in a 1000 or a bit rarer.

Htn is 1 in 20 or 30.

Htn by your scale is high mtn actually.

Avg man in west is between high ltn to low mtn.
 
Chadlite is 1 in a 1000 or a bit rarer.

Htn is 1 in 20 or 30.

Htn by your scale is high mtn actually.

Avg man in west is between high ltn to low mtn.
by definition most men cant be below average unless we are comparing to the distance past or we are using psl scaling but this is normie scale not pls scale
 
  • +1
Reactions: panzer of the Lake
  • +1
Reactions: SunShine Senpai
Chadlite isn't 5 percentile, it's lower than that.

Also HTNs don't require high effort to slay. Inconsistent, likely.
 
  • +1
Reactions: castizo_ascender, 1nonlymogs and formergameraddict
Chadlite isn't 5 percentile, it's lower than that.

Also HTNs don't require high effort to slay. Inconsistent, likely.
ya chadlite can be a bit lower than 5 percent
 
Also a true chadlite doesn't require much effort to slay. They just need to go outside literally.
a true chadlite as in the top 2~ of looks still needs effort. If his gymmaxxed and fashion maxxed then it become almost no effort. Only true chads requires almost no effort.
 
a true chadlite as in the top 2~ of looks still needs effort. If his gymmaxxed and fashion maxxed then it become almost no effort. Only true chads requires almost no effort.
Hey man can you rate this guy i know ?
 
by definition most men cant be below average unless we are comparing to the distance past or we are using psl scaling but this is normie scale not pls scale
by definition if 99 ppl are 1/10 and 1 person is 9/10 then 99 people will be below average
 
If I’m getting girls dming me first and asking to meet I should be htn at least right ? Or mtn get that too
 
If I’m getting girls dming me first and asking to meet I should be htn at least right ? Or mtn get that too
PSL and appeal are too diff things if u fit in the girls specific type u would be a 9/10 instantly even if ur a 6/10 So maybe u got high appeal but not that high PSL
 
PSL and appeal are too diff things if u fit in the girls specific type u would be a 9/10 instantly even if ur a 6/10 So maybe u got high appeal but not that high PSL
Oo that makes sense
 
Dont agree with this
 
exactly so the 99 people which are 1/10 would be below average meaning 99% would be below average
lol 1.08 is not far from 1 at all. Literally .08 deviation. So most people would still be around the average number
 
lol 1.08 is not far from 1 at all. Literally .08 deviation. So most people would still be around the average number
You seem to have missed the point entirely. You claimed most men cant be below average per definition which clearly is wrong as I showed in my quite extreme example where 99% were less than average.

Here, lets take another less extreme example:
If we take 3 10/10 guys and 7 2/10 guys the average of these 10 guys would be 4,4/10. And 2 to 4,4 is quite significant. In this scenario 70% of guys are 2,4 points below average.
 
You seem to have missed the point entirely. You claimed most men cant be below average per definition which clearly is wrong as I showed in my quite extreme example where 99% were less than average.

Here, lets take another less extreme example:
If we take 3 10/10 guys and 7 2/10 guys the average of these 10 guys would be 4,4/10. And 2 to 4,4 is quite significant. In this scenario 70% of guys are 2,4 points below average.
in that example yes because a high percentage of people are attractive. Your first example did not show that at all. And real life does not correlate to your second example at all as only around the top 10% of people would be considered good looking (6+/10). while around 50% of people full somewhere in below average to slightly above average category (4.5-5.5/10)
 
Then what's even the point of Psl rating like is it scientifically/mathematically ideal ratios wise or smth?
 
in that example yes because a high percentage of people are attractive. Your first example did not show that at all. And real life does not correlate to your second example at all as only around the top 10% of people would be considered good looking (6+/10). while around 50% of people full somewhere in below average to slightly above average category (4.5-5.5/10)
You still dont get it, I didn't claim any example correlated to real life. I claimed you were wrong about your statement that, by defenition, most men cant be below average.
 
You still dont get it, I didn't claim any example correlated to real life. I claimed you were wrong about your statement that, by defenition, most men cant be below average.
my statement is about real life. In real life most men cannot be below average because most men fall within the average range of 4.5-5.5/10. Am not talking about hypothetical situation. I am talking about now, in real life, and that statement is 100% undeniable true. So if you wasn't responding to that then I don't know what you are even arguing.
 
Then what's even the point of Psl rating like is it scientifically/mathematically ideal ratios wise or smth?
psl scale is about a mathematically perfect face. Normie scale is just about level of looks to get women's attention. It seems that a lot of people have forgotten the point of this two scales. No point in having two scales that is about the samething.
 

Similar threads

I
Replies
15
Views
321
loyolaxavvierretard
loyolaxavvierretard
Brian Weber
Replies
21
Views
496
Brian Weber
Brian Weber
chadintraining
Replies
56
Views
590
chadintraining
chadintraining
midgetfacecumer
Replies
16
Views
714
IrishSlayer1483
IrishSlayer1483
8
Replies
7
Views
471
8psl100harmony
8

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top