Baldingman1998
Emerald
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Posts
- 36,129
- Reputation
- 65,085
Deleted member 6475
Six Feet Under
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2020
- Posts
- 12,558
- Reputation
- 22,996
plain average
rydofx
Mistral
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Posts
- 2,129
- Reputation
- 2,410
average
Sikkunt23
Retired , here to look better. No affiliations
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
- Posts
- 9,913
- Reputation
- 17,064
Literally plain average .
wateriswet
MD
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2020
- Posts
- 311
- Reputation
- 880
not bad, squint and you're fine
Sikkunt23
Retired , here to look better. No affiliations
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
- Posts
- 9,913
- Reputation
- 17,064
Pluck ur uni brows jfl
spark
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Posts
- 7,701
- Reputation
- 9,188
hard to tell without seeing the whole face but probably below average
Baldingman1998
Emerald
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2019
- Posts
- 36,129
- Reputation
- 65,085
- OP
- #8
spark
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Posts
- 7,701
- Reputation
- 9,188
Do you have a overbite? Now that
spark
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2018
- Posts
- 7,701
- Reputation
- 9,188
can't edit sry (pressed enter by mistake)
now that I see the whole face I think the eye area is NOT below average
now that I see the whole face I think the eye area is NOT below average
EverythingMattersCel
I don't see people anymore, I only see genetics
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2020
- Posts
- 10,104
- Reputation
- 21,805
It is not below average. Average colouring, some upper eyelid exposure, looks like an average palpebral fissure length. neutral canthal tilt, average PFL, looks like you might have a negative orbital vector but would need a side profile view to be certain. It won't failo you. A good lower third would compensate for sure.
