A
Akhi
Luminary
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2023
- Posts
- 7,317
- Reputation
- 10,606
good thread OP
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Any study based on human input is fallible, much more so than a rigorous experimental physics article, for example (which is itself still fallible because that's the nature of science lmfao.)I'd say
Clearly waffling and don't know the methodology of any of the "studies"
They are quite garbage tho
Everyone's biased. And if you think women are unbiased towards men, think again jfl. Just look at how much we disagree on female faces here on .org fucking daily bro. Even the highly knowledgeable users all have different preferences and tendencies.lmao no males are extremely prone to bias when rating
That's not how most of them are made esp how CA got themAny study based on human input is fallible, much more so than a rigorous experimental physics article, for example (which is itself still fallible because that's the nature of science lmfao.)
Yea they are but there's no innate ability to rate male attractiveness tho jflEveryone's biased. And if you think women are unbiased towards men, think again jfl. Just look at how much we disagree on female faces here on .org fucking daily bro. Even the highly knowledgeable users all have different preferences and tendencies.
There is, your opinion just changedYea they are but there's no innate ability to rate male attractiveness jfl
I thought teaching men's fashion mogged opry just 6 years ago
Ik, and that's an even worse way, arguably. Even more prone to bias. A lot of his ratio ranges were taken from scientific papers tho.That's not how most of them are made esp how CA got them
It's just the average of attractive faces to find an acceptable range
DisagreeEvery single claim about aesthetics is water. The human is inherently capable of processing all of this subconsciously. I just articulated what exactly makes it work.
Nigga just because you made a point , doesn't mean i can't make a similar one or reword it even betterI made this exact point on the thread, just didn't use the name 'inter orbital distance'. Again, looks like you didn't even read it properly tbh
I haven't been active here in awhile, you don't know who i am nor what i know, those in my circle knowI know about all the ideal ratio ranges.
This is a half truth which can lead to full liesIt clearly fails to capture the innate subjectivity that each human carries on their brain when they see a face and rate it in less than half a second.
If Korea's system was perfect, he wouldn't have had hundreds of people sometimes disagreeing with him, which is normal.
"Intuitive perception" is much more definitive than you thinkThe holy grail of attractiveness will always be the intuitive human perception, which is itself dependent on each subject (i.e. everyone's brain has an ever so slightly diff 'calculator' for looks inside). You are born with the ability to rate attractiveness. Looks theory knowledge only serves to articulate it, and to plan for surgical adjustments.
You clearly didnt read everything i wrote + for the most part it's pretty objective to decipher the varying looks levels and why someones is better looking vs the otherI don't get this trend of trying to hold on to pure objectivity when it clearly doesn't work that way.
Everyone will speak for himself , i dont just refer to "looks theory" and pure surgical adjustments but each to their owns. Looks theory knowledge only serves to articulate it, and to plan for surgical adjustments.
User checkAlso ironic how that gif implied that you don't think Delon is a PSL God, further reinforcing the notion that, at the upper level, taste matters a lot.
Korea rushed a lot of these measurementsNah i just relied on korea’s measurements for thèse. I remeasured Drago’s chin to Philtrum ratio and i only got Korea’s measurement in a few photos. I still think these measurements could be accurate but I need to remeasure.
How does that prove an innate abilityThere is, your opinion just changed
? And? The idea is to measure someone's facial averageness which they judge subconsciouslyWomen don't go to cephalometric school to do this shit bro jfl
Yea that's preferences, but men are even worse at rating other men esp if unaware of looks theoryAnd we as men can rate women intuitively to the same extent that they can rate guys. The fact that there is so much variation should tell you everything you need to know.
The "scientific" papers use the same methodology, atleast a lot of themIk, and that's an even worse way, arguably. Even more prone to bias. A lot of his ratio ranges were taken from scientific papers tho.
A lot of papers use a large sample group and illustrations, in which the person chooses which one looks the best out of a few options. Then they avg it all out.How does that prove an innate ability
? And? The idea is to measure someone's facial averageness which they judge subconsciously
Yea that's preferences, but men are even worse at rating other men esp if unaware of looks theory
The "scientific" papers use the same methodology, atleast a lot of them
"great tapering" is another stretchHe clearly isn't. I said he had great tapering.
Disagree with it being a "non-issue irl", all these little ticks add up and as people become more aware of "looks theory", and only until then will you be able to admit its dire importanceThat pic with Homelander proves nothing. His head is facing a bit away from the camera, making him lose perceived sagittal depth. In the other picture, with the girls, you can clearly see his depth is sufficient. If Delisolla took that picture with Michale Gioia the mog would've been even bigger, but it's still a non issue irl.
just lol at this, normies are terrible at rating other males. Ratings are literally all over the place. Jsut looking at what men normies consider ideal i can't see why we should just trust intuition.
Men can also judge averageness (of both genders) subconsciously, we have the same machinery (brain).
The innate ability comes from the fact that children of either gender can judge men and women based on how they look from a giga young age.
Biologically, it would make no sense whatsoever for a male to be able to subconciously judge female bodies and faces, but be completely tone deaf to males. Both are evolutionarily advantageous.
also thiseye spacing should be some sort of combined ratio with esr + icd to pfl + icd / inner eyebrow corner + ocd / bizygo + ipsilateral alar angle + ocd / outer eyebrow corner
Forehead height anf width also play a part
All in one some sort of combined ratio with appropriate weighings (willl always make it a bit subjective), eye color shouldn't be considered, it's just a halo that makes you look good despite other flaws
Not recessed in any metric, quite literally
Good convexity, chin projection, pretty decent infras
Normal =/= GoodI don't consider it as a narrow skull. Looks like a normal skull + good jawline.
Fair enoughngl i feel like you completely missed the point of this thread
I never claimed you could be a PSL God with sub ~43.7ish (this seems to be the low end, since delon is around that), my claim was that you can still have a pleasant and appealing eye area. I explained step by step what are the factors that compensate for a bad ESR, with some being known and some being novel (third point, which I've never seen brought up in this context here).
At the end of the day it's still a failo, much like any other one. But placing a single ratio on a pedestal is precisely what you said shouldn't be done, and I agree. Faces should be analyzed holistically.
And to conclude, all my examples of moggers featured men who are almost universally considered to be gl. And they all pull it off because of the reasons I stated ITT. Somerhalder, for instance, would look better with some wider features, as you said, but not much better. Guy is already insanely maxxed out in terms of dimorphism, bone mass, etc.
Don't kid yourself, you could pick apart anyone's face if you wanted to. And the upper echelon of looks, subjectivity plays a much bigger role than almost anything else (hence the endless discussions on this forum abt best looking men and women oat).
The non issue bit was me theorizing, to know for sure we'd have to see if irl his skull truly looks small enough for it to become a problem. But judging from that pic with Starr i highly doubt that it would be."great tapering" is another stretch
View attachment 2823836View attachment 2823837View attachment 2823842View attachment 2823843
Disagree with it being a "non-issue irl", all these little ticks add up and as people become more aware of "looks theory", and only until then will you be able to admit its dire importance
I never said he was chronically recessed, i just said he has a peanut skull (which he does) and has some hypoplasia which he clearly does
View attachment 2823838View attachment 2823840
Same theme about his profile presents itself in various shots, good camera angle or not
Compact face = / = good facial depth , not saying his is that bad but his splancho isnt that impressive (i also realize i can make a point that wasn't into direct contention to what you said and have it be valid, dont want to get into pedantics with you)
View attachment 2823841
Standardcel phenomenom: true. Could also just be explained by a bigger exposure to hyper attractive faces, thus altering the internal way in which you rate faces deeply. This happens to people on instagram, as well, who aren't trained in aesthetics. A bombarding of moggers/foggers on their fyp can make their standards go up.Disagree
Refer to the phenomenon that many PSLers standards are skewed and they become much more of "standardcels' when their aesthetic knowledge increases
Conscious competence is something different AND certain things regarding facial aesthetics require a discerned eye
Plenty of literature on this
Nigga just because you made a point , doesn't mean i can't make a similar one or reword it even better
I haven't been active here in awhile, you don't know who i am nor what i know, those in my circle know
"Ratio ranges" are just one piece of the puzzle and most ideal "ratios" aren't based off the elite of the elite facially and are caucasoid based
The ideal face has ideal traits from many different phenos but i digress
This is a half truth which can lead to full lies
The environmental impact -> subconscious programming -> that leads to standards is anything but subjective and besides that in most faces it's pretty objective to see who mogs and why
Facial aesthetics isn't as linear as you're making it be, "ratios" are just one piece of the pie
So if people disagree with you -> whatever you said is invalid? jfl
Also I never said his system was perfect (i wasn't even referring to that if u clicked the thread lmao)
I just made the point that beauty really isn't that subjective, "beauty in the eye of the beholder" is nonsense and after a certain looks levels this theme proves itself even more true
"Intuitive perception" is much more definitive than you think
Chalking someones standards to just intuitive perception is what i call burying your head on the side, any seasoned blackpiller would see this
You clearly didnt read everything i wrote + for the most part it's pretty objective to decipher the varying looks levels and why someones is better looking vs the other
This isnt rocket science
eye spacing should be some sort of combined ratio with esr + icd to pfl + icd / inner eyebrow corner + ocd / bizygo + ipsilateral alar angle + ocd / outer eyebrow corner
Forehead height anf width also play a part
All in one some sort of combined ratio with appropriate weighings (willl always make it a bit subjective), eye color shouldn't be considered, it's just a halo that makes you look good despite other flaws
I prefer normal skulls (like Cruise or Gandy) over wide skulls like Barrett (too ogre for me, not really aesthetic)Normal =/= Good
It being normal doesnt invalidate what i see
narrow might be a bit of a stretch tho
A lot of people do suck at it, but that's mostly cause of cultural biases. In a more controlled scenario (like meeting someone irl for the first time), people of either gender are still pretty good at intuitive rating.just lol at this, normies are terrible at rating other males. Ratings are literally all over the place. Jsut looking at what men normies consider ideal i can't see why we should just trust intuition
Never said they're completely tone deaf
It's a lot better to try make a mathematical model to measure averageness, the current one just sucks
also this
From experience most normies suck at rating, but i do agree it makes sense from a biological standpoint.A lot of people do suck at it, but that's mostly cause of cultural biases. In a more controlled scenario (like meeting someone irl for the first time), people of either gender are still pretty good at intuitive rating.
Ik, it sounds paradoxical.From experience most normies suck at rating, but i do agree it makes sense from a biological standpoint.
cagedIf that somehow went to shit we would be big in deep fucking trouble, cause all the proper looksmaxxing efforts would go largely unnoticed, except for the 2 ppl in your town who browse .org or BP stuff on tiktok/yt
Some normie women are utter dogshit at rating too, tho, which is a huge pet peeve I have with guys like bgm who dm girls asking them to rate guys from 0-10caged
As lojg as women see it subconsciously idc tbh
and men will always respect a more dimorphic face imo, they don't care about other parts of beauty as much from experience (if not extremely deviant)
since giant implants OBO innovation, many people have been coping with the idea that OBO will fix their poor midface ratios. I think your post hints that such attempts would fail.
Both of them dont have "normal" skulls, they're chads lolI prefer normal skulls (like Cruise or Gandy) over wide skulls like Barrett (too ogre for me, not really aesthetic)
Maybe it's only me, IDK
?? Delonmogs is my nigga and I JUST KNOW everything he types is high IQ. Stop jumping to conclusions, son.MFs see a thread with large underscored segments + images for reference and scream BOTB. Good thread OP though.
@DelonLover1999?? Delonmogs is my nigga and I JUST KNOW everything he types is high IQ. Stop jumping to conclusions, son.
He's my nigga, one of the best ppl ik from BP related circles@DelonLover1999![]()
where did you found that site to measure is ESRand a 0.45 ESR, sometimes it's .44 depending on the photo
![]()
Not ideal but it's acceptable, especially for a caucasoid male
Another pic 0.45 ESR
![]()
care to explain "those in my circle" list there names boyoI haven't been active here in awhile, you don't know who i am nor what i know, those in my circle know
why do you think there skulls are idealSomeone like Charlie Wilson or Elia Fongaro or Dominik bauer have ideal or close to ideal skulls of what i've seen so far, etc etc
nigga if you ask thecel he's gonna show you some ultra compact and squished skull from the slums of his morph folder. He's a great user, but very very biased in that regard.why do you think there skulls are ideal
also @StrangerDanger @thecel
what you guys consider the perfect skull or examples of it and why you think so![]()
It's like people who went blind and cope with this idea that tech will be so advanced in the near future that they will have new lab-grown eyeballs and have their sight restored.since giant implants OBO innovation, many people have been coping with the idea that OBO will fix their poor midface ratios. I think your post hints that such attempts would fail.
KindaSo at the end of the day it is not about actually having ideal ratios, its just about giving off that illusion. High iq repped
That is exactly what I meant by illusion. For example, if ur midface ratio is good but ur overall face is long it gives an illusion of a longer midface. The opposite is also true. See how alessandro dellisolas horseface is saved by his short upper third. Harmony is basically just ratios.Kinda
But for the illusion to fully work, you still need other ratios to be ideal (like the ipsilateral alar angle)
Does he actually have 0.41?Zac efron is another example, his es ratio is even worse at 0.41, tier 6 score which is supposed to be extremely bad yet it looks rather fine and not that close set on him.
110.5/268Does he actually have 0.41?
Show your measurement pls, I doubt it's that low
i think hes a bit fatter there, so bizygo might be a little higher than usual110.5/268
nice morph
also with scleral show. And even pfw, when u have brown eyes u gotta have top notch shape to mog.nice morph
coloring indeed makes a diff in perceived eye separation imo
Mainly cuz ESR measurement isn’t noticed much IRL but here it’s autistically considered a massive failo for some reason.Zac efron is another example, his es ratio is even worse at 0.41, tier 6 score which is supposed to be extremely bad yet it looks rather fine and not that close set on him.
It is a massive failo brother trust meMainly cuz ESR measurement isn’t noticed much IRL but here it’s autistically considered a massive failo for some reason.