EYES VERSUS JAW EDIT / MORPH. Thoughts?

[Ergogenic]

This is a side by side comparison of a strong jaw with bad eyes on the left side compared to striking hunter eyes with bad jaw on the right side. Both images are mirrored and made to be as close as possible to each other. Share your thoughts. What do you think?

 

[acm]

 

[Orka]

 

[Ergogenic]

It had to he done. I have no idea which one women would prefer, and this is an on going debate in this forum.

 

[Orka]

It had to he done. I have no idea which one women would prefer, and this is an on going debate in this forum.

Both of them look deformed, women would not want either of them

 

[acm]

It had to he done. I have no idea which one women would prefer, and this is an on going debate in this forum.

not a debate
eye area is law

 

[Ergogenic]

Both of them look deformed, women would not want either of them

Yeah, you are correct. I tried hard to edit these to be fair as possible though. I used Blackops2cel for this. This is an on going debate between Looksmaxxers. Good eyes with bad jaw, or good jaw with bad eyes?

 

[Ergogenic]

not a debate
eye area is law

Eyes versus Jaw is certainly a debate between Looksmaxxers. We had polls with differing opinions here. What matters more is what women think. These edits are bad though despite my best efforts.

 

[r1ght]

Eyes versus Jaw is certainly a debate between Looksmaxxers. We had polls with differing opinions here. What matters more is what women think. These edits are bad though despite my best efforts.

if either is deformed enough the other can't make up for it

 

[Ergogenic]

if either is deformed enough the other can't make up for it

Eyes and jaw are commonly the two most focused on features in Looksmaxxing. Both photographs seem uncanny though. It is hard to say which one is more important. I would like a realistic consensus.

 

[Ergogenic]

View attachment 4637107View attachment 4637108

This is a side by side comparison of a strong jaw with bad eyes on the left side compared to striking hunter eyes with bad jaw on the right side. Both images are mirrored and made to be as close as possible to each other. Share your thoughts. What do you think?

Share your thoughts, everyone. Maybe there are better morphs and edits out there. It is hard for me to decide which feature is more important.

 

[r1ght]

Eyes and jaw are commonly the two most focused on features in Looksmaxxing. Both photographs seem uncanny though. It is hard to say which one is more important. I would like a realistic consensus.

I've never truly got this argument, balance is law, most comparisons use an alright jaw for the good eyes and an awful eye area for a good jaw
Yours is a good comparison which aims to prevent this but both are subhuman

 

[acm]

Eyes versus Jaw is certainly a debate between Looksmaxxers. We had polls with differing opinions here. What matters more is what women think. These edits are bad though despite my best efforts.

no it isn't a debate
eye area is definitely #1

 

[Ergogenic]

I've never truly got this argument, balance is law, most comparisons use an alright jaw for the good eyes and an awful eye area for a good jaw
Yours is a good comparison which aims to prevent this but both are subhuman

Thank you for your input. My edit intentionally aims to fix the problems that all other similar posts have. That being the unfair comparisons because both edits usually have decent jaws with only the eye area changed.

The point of this comparison is to have one with good eyes but a bad jaw, and one with good jaw but bad eyes. Maybe it does not matter as much as we thought?

 

[Ergogenic]

no it isn't a debate
eye area is definitely #1

Thank you for sharing. What is your reasoning for this?

 

[Ergogenic]

I've never truly got this argument, balance is law, most comparisons use an alright jaw for the good eyes and an awful eye area for a good jaw
Yours is a good comparison which aims to prevent this but both are subhuman

In addition to my response to your comment, I agree that balance or harmony is law. We are just debating which feature individually is superior when the other feature is lacking and why.

 

[Ergogenic]

Paranoia indeed. I tried my best to make this a fair comparison though. It is hard to say which feature on its own is more important when the other feature is bad. This post fixed what other posts on the same topic did not consider with the photographic examples.

 

[r1ght]

In addition to my response to your comment, I agree that balance or harmony is law. We are just debating which feature individually is superior when the other feature is lacking and why.

eyes probably because if we compare people with a lean defined jaw (their max pot)
Average maxed out jaw area is closer to perfection than average maxed out eye area

 

[Ergogenic]

eyes probably because if we compare people with a lean defined jaw (their max pot)
Average maxed out jaw area is closer to perfection than average maxed out eye area

Do you mean that the eye area in my photograph is not maxed out?

I think women will notice the feature that is more developed or closer to perfection first. We also see a lot of pretty boys with upper eyelid exposure and suboptimal eye areas. All pretty boys seem to have good or decent jaws with low body fat percentages.

 

[Ergogenic]

View attachment 4637107View attachment 4637108

This is a side by side comparison of a strong jaw with bad eyes on the left side compared to striking hunter eyes with bad jaw on the right side. Both images are mirrored and made to be as close as possible to each other. Share your thoughts. What do you think?

Could jaw be more important than the eye area for male dimorphism and attraction?

A lot of pretty boys have upper eyelid exposure, and most women are still attracted to them. Almost all pretty boys have good jaws and low body fat percentages.

 

[r1ght]

Do you mean that the eye area in my photograph is not maxed out?

I think women will notice the feature that is more developed or closer to perfection first. We also see a lot of pretty boys with upper eyelid exposure and suboptimal eye areas. All pretty boys seem to have good or decent jaws with low body fat percentages.

I mean the average persons max eye are potential is further from perfection than a maxed out jaw

 

[Ergogenic]

I mean the average persons max eye are potential is further from perfection than a maxed out jaw

Certainly. That seems to be the correct observation. We see a lot more good jaws than good eyes. Hypothetically, what if both features were maximised to perfection on an individual? A lot of Looksmaxxers claim that looks are objective, therefore, objective looks means that there must be a reference of perfection.

 

[Ergogenic]

View attachment 4637107View attachment 4637108

This is a side by side comparison of a strong jaw with bad eyes on the left side compared to striking hunter eyes with bad jaw on the right side. Both images are mirrored and made to be as close as possible to each other. Share your thoughts. What do you think?

Many Looksmaxxers claim that looks are objective and not subjective. Therefore, it follows that there must be a reference for perfection like a blueprint that everything else is compared to.

 

[Ergogenic]

Still no definitive answers. Any high knowledge users here? Share your thoughts and knowledge!

 

[Ergogenic]

not a debate
eye area is law

A lot of women love pretty boys that have upper eyelid exposure though. Something that almost all pretty boys seem to have in common is a decently male dimorphic jaw with a low body fat percentage. I currently think that jaw is more important based on my observations.