Face is subjective, Height isnt.

NewOneXY

NewOneXY

6'0 feet mogger
Joined
Sep 13, 2023
Posts
3,789
Reputation
3,916
If you have a normie guy, you will always find some people who will say "He looks all right" and always people who will say "nah not my type".

Face is subjective, if you arent extreme recessed or something.

But Height isnt.

6 feet will ALWAYS be better than 5'9.

5'10 will always be better than 5'7.

6'2 will always be better than 6 feet.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24235 and Deleted member 18522
True, but past 6'4 it does become subjective. Maybe 6'3 dunno, some people think 6'3+ is already nichemaxxing territory.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: yvngbreadstick
Swallow the 5'9 stallone pill
 
Face isn't as subjective as one thinks.

99% of women will see Hemsworth or Evans as hot.
99% of women will see DeVito and Dinklage as subhuman.

Most women will look at ethnic men like Cha Eun Woo or Michael B Jordan and think they are good looking.
And even those that do not find them attractive will understand why most other women do.

Whatever you look like, chances are 8 out of 10 random women will come to a common consensus if asked to genuinely rate you.

Height is 100% objective.
Face is 95% objective.
Very little room for variance.
Subjectivity is cope.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 116780, Equilibrium and Kamui
Face isn't as subjective as one thinks.

99% of women will see Hemsworth or Evans as hot.
99% of women will see DeVito and Dinklage as subhuman.

Most women will look at ethnic men like Cha Eun Woo or Michael B Jordan and think they are good looking.
And even those that do not find them attractive will understand why most other women do.

Whatever you look like, chances are 8 out of 10 random women will come to a common consensus if asked to genuinely rate you.

Height is 100% objective.
Face is 95% objective.
Very little room for variance.
Subjectivity is cope.
Looks are objective but attraction isn’t
 
  • +1
Reactions: Brus Wane
Face isn't as subjective as one thinks.

99% of women will see Hemsworth or Evans as hot.
99% of women will see DeVito and Dinklage as subhuman.

Most women will look at ethnic men like Cha Eun Woo or Michael B Jordan and think they are good looking.
And even those that do not find them attractive will understand why most other women do.

Whatever you look like, chances are 8 out of 10 random women will come to a common consensus if asked to genuinely rate you.

Height is 100% objective.
Face is 95% objective.
Very little room for variance.
Subjectivity is cope.
nah, face is subjective if you are in 4-7/10 range

its only not subjective if you are extremely handsome or extremely ugly
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Brus Wane
Face isn't as subjective as one thinks.

99% of women will see Hemsworth or Evans as hot.
99% of women will see DeVito and Dinklage as subhuman.

Most women will look at ethnic men like Cha Eun Woo or Michael B Jordan and think they are good looking.
And even those that do not find them attractive will understand why most other women do.

Whatever you look like, chances are 8 out of 10 random women will come to a common consensus if asked to genuinely rate you.

Height is 100% objective.
Face is 95% objective.
Very little room for variance.
Subjectivity is cope.
dinklage is gl
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Brus Wane
Looks are objective but attraction isn’t
Yeah. What makes looks objective is that you can reasonably understand why someone is attracted to someone else.
I ain't attracted to any of the Blackpink members but I sure as hell understand why they have so many male fans.
nah, face is subjective if you are in 4-7/10 range

its only not subjective if you are extremely handsome or extremely ugly
How so? Do you have anything to back up this claim?
4-7 is an extremely wide range my guy.
You're either good looking or not.
Do you have any examples of good looking guys that most women find ugly or arent crazily attracted to?
Is there anyone that you consider 4/10 that girls simp over based on his looks?

I get that there isnt one universal standard or rating that applies to a face the same way 5'11 is 5'11 no matter what. But thats about it. Face isn't that far of from height.
dinklage is gl
 
Yeah. What makes looks objective is that you can reasonably understand why someone is attracted to someone else.
I ain't attracted to any of the Blackpink members but I sure as hell understand why they have so many male fans.

How so? Do you have anything to back up this claim?
4-7 is an extremely wide range my guy.
You're either good looking or not.
Do you have any examples of good looking guys that most women find ugly or arent crazily attracted to?
Is there anyone that you consider 4/10 that girls simp over based on his looks?

I get that there isnt one universal standard or rating that applies to a face the same way 5'11 is 5'11 no matter what. But thats about it. Face isn't that far of from height.


indians think hritik roshan is a god given gift to humanity because he is so crazy handsome

meanwhile westernes see him as mediocre at best, for example

1702548271883
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 116780

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top