why do normies in face vs height debates allow "tall, average looking" to be used as an example but saying " average height and handsome" isnt

Dondraper75

Dondraper75

Luminary
Joined
Oct 27, 2024
Posts
6,880
Reputation
8,446
ive noticed this a ton where normies who overrate height use extreme examples to give an unfair advantage to height by saying "oh 6'2 mid dude will pull more than 5'3 and handsome" which is true but for some reason anytime you use "oh 5'9 and handsome" they refuse to allow it because "oh they're average height brooo thats not an issue ofc they wont have an issue" its frustrating asf for people to allow height to beat face in these arguments they make it unbalanced and unfair
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 141098, Pandora and proxyy
The face won't be able to be clearly rated, unlike the height, hence the uncertainty.
 
ive noticed this a ton where normies who overrate height use extreme examples to give an unfair advantage to height by saying "oh 6'2 mid dude will pull more than 5'3 and handsome" which is true but for some reason anytime you use "oh 5'9 and handsome" they refuse to allow it because "oh they're average height brooo thats not an issue ofc they wont have an issue" its frustrating asf for people to allow height to beat face in these arguments they make it unbalanced and unfair
normies are retards thats why
 
face > hight > muscle
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 141098

Similar threads

5.5psl
Replies
19
Views
104
maxirraret
maxirraret
whiteegyptian
Replies
14
Views
103
Hess
Hess
cannibaloid
Replies
24
Views
158
james_2006
james_2006
islaymtbs
Replies
0
Views
18
islaymtbs
islaymtbs
M
Replies
8
Views
32
IndecentEyes
IndecentEyes

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top