FBI CRIME STATISTICS

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Stop with the retarded Islam converting on here. No one's here trying to find a church or belief system. What happened, Mooslums, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok shadowbanned you all too?

 

[AbuSAF]

Stop with the retarded Islam converting on here. No one's here trying to find a church or belief system. What happened, Mooslums, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok shadowbanned you all too?

no they showed facts ab whites being child rapists and someone brought up islam? obvi well respond

 

[sensen]

then they should be convicted? that goes against islam and if you say it has nothing to do w islam, then not all arabs are muslim so the argument was not needed,

but yeah how do u feel ab ur face being on an incel twiiter page

Bro, I never even said anything about Islam. Fucking cry about it nigga

I don't even know what you're talking about

 

[AbuSAF]

Bro, I never even said anything about Islam. Fucking cry about it nigga

I don't even know what you're talking about

nice n word, but yeah the mods on this site linked ur thread on twitter



enjoy being permantantly displayed on a social media

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

Aisha was able to narrate ahadiths and likewise led the ummah together but when countries still have child rapists as young as 5 IRL rn most being white they argue muh muh outliers

To be honest this argument of Aisha is a double edge sword.

If a jew or a christian brings it up, you can easily counterattack with the verse in the Bible which directly says 'Take the child woman for yourselves'

If he is a european or indian supremacist, from those who say "We were the kings of the world" you can also counter attack by showing him how his world was leaded by people who were married at 6 and all of that.

No one who debates seriously would use that argument of Aisha (radiyallahu anha)

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

no they showed facts ab whites being child rapists and someone brought up islam? obvi well respond

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

 

[MugzLePew]

Black fathers are dead or in prison before they have a chance to rape their kid

 

[Shrek2OnDvD]

Those are a minority sect within Shia Islam. No Muslim actually likes them (both Sunni and Shia)

 

[sensen]

nice n word, but yeah the mods on this site linked ur thread on twitter



enjoy being permantantly displayed on a social media

I don't give a shit honestly.

I came here to satisfy the autism for looks, not to get pussy. Gotten enough for the both of us.


and i'll still get more. Fuark, I might even show my profile on .me to my next slay

 

[AbuSAF]

im pretty this guys either shia or taliban so what?

wowwww outlier

 

[AbuSAF]

I don't give a shit honestly.

I came here to satisfy the autism for looks, not to get pussy. Gotten enough for the both of us.


and i'll still get more. Fuark, I might even show my profile on .me to my next slay

soooo cool bro, ur still like 30 ytears old arguing w teenagers on a forum lol

 

[sensen]

soooo cool bro, ur still like 30 ytears old arguing w teenagers on a forum lol

I'm not even arguing. You're arguing.

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

im pretty this guys either shia or taliban so what?

wowwww outlier

Don't worry, BigJimWorn is a christian. We once had this conversation and he started defending the Bible.

Suddenly after he was humilliated he said "Muh muh i never said i am a christian"

Here is the copypaste of the conversation

Bible, Psalms 137: 9
O Babylon, you will be destroyed. Happy is the one who pays you back for what you have done to us. Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.

Why the bible says that happy is the one who dashes innocent infants against rocks? What do innocent children have to do with what the adult babylonians did?

Rather, The Last Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) orders clearly according to several narrations the next if there is a war: "Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery (1) or deviate from the right path (2). You must not mutilate dead bodies (3). Neither kill a child (4), nor a woman (5). nor an aged man (6). Bring no harm to the trees (7), nor burn them with fire (8), especially those which are fruitful. Slay not ary of the enemy's flock (9). save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services (christians); leave them alone (10)." And also according to this other one: "Do not lay hands on the old verging on death, on women, children and babes. Do not steal anything from the booty and collect together all that falls to your lot in the battlefield and do good, for Allah loves the virtuous and the pious."

 

[Deleted member 6128]

You are trying to apply the sociology of today, with that of yesteryear, it doesn't even make sense.
Tell me why back then that would be wrong, based on the context of the time? Nothing.
Same thing with slavery, we agree that it's a bad thing today, but in the past it was normal, does that make some slave owners bad?

Since when did something being legal make it morally right?

Both are wrong always have been

 

[Deleted member 6128]

This whole thread is funny ngl

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Since when did something being legal make it morally right?

Both are wrong always have been

Moral is subjective, you were raised to believe both are bad, in the same way back in the day they were raised to believe it was good.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Moral is subjective, you were raised to believe both are bad, in the same way back in the day they were raised to believe it was good.

Moral is hardly subjective.

If you wouldn’t want it to happen to you then it’s wrong simple as

No one was raised to believe that shit was good what the fuck are u babbling out slaves existed for free labour and tended to be enemies.
Child Marriage only existed because of early death thus people would try to reproduce at an earlier age

Retarded ass nigga

 

[BigJimsWornOutTires]

Don't worry, BigJimWorn is a christian. We once had this conversation and he started defending the Bible.

Suddenly after he was humilliated he said "Muh muh i never said i am a christian"

Here is the copypaste of the conversation

Bible, Psalms 137: 9
O Babylon, you will be destroyed. Happy is the one who pays you back for what you have done to us. Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.

Why the bible says that happy is the one who dashes innocent infants against rocks? What do innocent children have to do with what the adult babylonians did?

Rather, The Last Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) orders clearly according to several narrations the next if there is a war: "Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery (1) or deviate from the right path (2). You must not mutilate dead bodies (3). Neither kill a child (4), nor a woman (5). nor an aged man (6). Bring no harm to the trees (7), nor burn them with fire (8), especially those which are fruitful. Slay not ary of the enemy's flock (9). save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services (christians); leave them alone (10)." And also according to this other one: "Do not lay hands on the old verging on death, on women, children and babes. Do not steal anything from the booty and collect together all that falls to your lot in the battlefield and do good, for Allah loves the virtuous and the pious."

Good try, my weak little Mooslum parasite. But everyone on here knows that I'm a Trejoian.

A fairly new cult, I mean belief system based on the Hollywood roles Danny Trejo performed.

 

[Deleted member 4106]

No one was raised to believe that shit was good what the fuck are u babbling out slaves existed for free labour and tended to be enemies.
Child Marriage only existed because of early death thus people would try to reproduce at an earlier age

Thanks for confirming my point.

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

Moral is hardly subjective.

If you wouldn’t want it to happen to you then it’s wrong simple as

That is the harm principle.

That's not true at all, the harm principle is completely subjective because it is based on harm which varies from person to person. There are people who don't care when someone insults their mother, there are others who would punch back.

We could apply this to almost every if not every attitude and behaviour.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Moral is subjective, you were raised to believe both are bad, in the same way back in the day they were raised to believe it was good.

No one was raised to believe that shit was good what the fuck are u babbling out slaves existed for free labour and tended to be enemies.
Child Marriage only existed because of early death thus people would try to reproduce at an earlier age

You’re one retarded person ngl

Thanks for confirming my point.

You said they were taught it was morally good no they fucking wasn’t they did it to survive there’s an absolute difference

Go back to watching that Mid Show Shit-Zero

 

[Dr. Greenberg]

You are trying to apply the sociology of today, with that of yesteryear, it doesn't even make sense.
Tell me why back then that would be wrong, based on the context of the time? Nothing.
Same thing with slavery, we agree that it's a bad thing today, but in the past it was normal, does that make some slave owners bad?

RETARD.

THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT PEOPLE STILL LOOK UP TO THIS PERSON. AND THINK HE IS A ROLE MODEL. I AGREE THAT IT WASN'T WEIRD BACK THEN. BUT WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU WORSHIP HIM?

 

[Deleted member 6128]

That is the harm principle.

That's not true at all, the harm principle is completely subjective because it is based on harm which varies from person to person. There are people who don't care when someone insults their mother, there are others who would punch back.

We could apply this to almost every if not every attitude and behaviour.

Ofc there are exceptions to everything but majority would punch back

 

[Deleted member 4106]

You’re one retarded person ngl

You said they were taught it was morally good no they fucking wasn’t they did it to survive there’s an absolute difference

Go back to watching that Mid Show Shit-Zero

In other words, it was something accepted at the time, which only proves that morality is subjective, as it changes according to situations.

 

[Deleted member 4106]

RETARD.

THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT PEOPLE STILL LOOK UP TO THIS PERSON. AND THINK HE IS A ROLE MODEL. I AGREE THAT IT WASN'T WEIRD BACK THEN. BUT WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU WORSHIP HIM?

I'm not Muslim

 

[Deleted member 6128]

In other words, it was something accepted at the time, which only proves that morality is subjective, as it changes according to situations.

Morality isn’t subjective

Anyone with a conscience knows what is wrong and what is right those without a conscience can even be hardly deemed as sane

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Morality isn’t subjective

Anyone with a conscience knows what is wrong and what is right those without a conscience can even be hardly deemed as sane

By this logic, all peoples would have the same moral code, and of course, this moral code would not suffer so many changes.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

By this logic, all peoples would have the same moral code, and of course, this moral code would not suffer so many changes.

Moral code evolves with Intelligence and Knowledge so of course it’s changed many times

As evil people find new ways to harm or take advantage of others people learn the consequences of these people’s actions and how it affects the victim

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Moral code evolves with Intelligence and Knowledge so of course it’s changed many times

Cool, looks like the next moral code will be feminist, with women being increasingly promiscuous, and trans children

 

[Deleted member 6128]

Cool, looks like the next moral code will be feminist, with women being increasingly promiscuous, and trans children

JFL

That’s not moral code nigga do u not understand morality difference between good and bad

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

Ofc there are exceptions to everything but majority would punch back

The problem is when it is applied in regards to something with a 50-50 opinion or similar. There are certain matters like killing an innocent soul which 95% of people would agree it is immoral nowadays (and even then, there would be differences in defining what is an "innocent" person and what is not, this shows us that necessity is the biggest performer in regards to defining on a subjective society what is moral and immoral, that's why there is always a constitution, law, book, human rights, whatever from which those morals are rooted)

For example betting, euthanasia, abortion, those kind of things, collateral damage in war are nowadays matters which are discussed deeply. It depends especially on the necessity of the society, and since those are always changing one can never define it as objective.

The scenario you are proposing is that in a society where every need is covered (even needs and necessities are subjective, some people need internet and some need to go to the gym everyday instead, and long etc) there are some morals which would prosper, and that, for example, others which we consider immoral nowadays like slavery would cease.

I don't agree, i have met many people who are knowledgeable on the subject and they agree that if rich countries didn't have access to let's say new clothes or new phones every now and then, which are achieved by means of slavery or borderline slavery in mines and textile corporations, they would most probably see that kind of slavery as completely moral and sooner or later they would promote it.

This can happen with everything.

 

[Enfant terrible]

iam black

 

[Deleted member 13945]

in the USA where black people are still at a disadvantage no shit that maybe on average there may be a bigger crime problem, are we really gonna blame the parent who stole food to feed their family?

 

[buckchadley31]

Morality isn’t subjective

Anyone with a conscience knows what is wrong and what is right those without a conscience can even be hardly deemed as sane

I'd say a moral action is what society deem as average and normal behaviour.
Well ofc cultures vary from a group of people to another, so there will always be a small difference in what's considered normal between two societies.

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

RETARD.

THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT PEOPLE STILL LOOK UP TO THIS PERSON. AND THINK HE IS A ROLE MODEL. I AGREE THAT IT WASN'T WEIRD BACK THEN. BUT WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU WORSHIP HIM?

First and foremost if a muslim worships someone who is not God, including one of the Prophets then he has commited the biggest sin in Islam which is shirk (Associating partners with God, violating the rights of God, saying there is more than One Creator, worshiping someone else than the Independent, Indivisible, outside of time and space Creator)

Second, contrary to other faiths, there is not a single verse in the Qur'an or hadith that orders us "Go and marry children", this is merely something which happened at every place in the world prior to the 18th century and which we don't practice today. The only thing in which we are ordered to follow the Prophet Muhammad (alayhi a salat wa salam) is in regards to religious matters. For example if he says "Pray 5 times a day" we pray 5 times a day, if he says "Don't kill children in war" oŕ "Incline to peace in war" and we can prove that there is a verse which says "War is a religious matter for the muslims" we have to follow his orders.

It is narrated that when the farmers listened to the advice of the Prophet about not artificially fertilizing the palm trees, the trees did not produce any dates the year after. When they brought this to the attention of the Prophet (alayhi a salat wa salam) he said: "You know better about the affairs of your world". Imam Al-Nawawi said about this:
"The chapter on obligation of following what he (alayhi a salat wa salam) says related to Shar' (religion) and not what he (alayhi a salat wa salam) says about the affairs of the world as a personal opinion."

Also you were not someone religious, therefore you believe that morality is subjective and you can't even prove me that a child has more value than a bacteria in a toilet under the basis and roots of your world view, that's why these moral arguments are completely meaningless and in fact are a double edge sword against your point of view. It is for the same reasons that when you ask philosophers on universities they will tell you that having sex with a dead chicken is not immoral. (By the way i want you to know that i speak with respect towards you, as far as you respect me i respect you, don't take what i say as offensive)

 

[mazzi]

no race for your subhuman face

 

[DesperadoRatado]

amdullah, we neever touch childre allahumma

"not in public intrests"

 

[TsarTsar444]

The Islamic ruling is that she needs to be both mentally and physically prepared for consummating marriage.

Of course in a place in which according to historians the life expectancy varied from 26 to 42, that was seen as moral. This argument of Aisha has never been used up until the 19th century if i'm not mistaken.

True, but OP is a hypocrite, why does he say "why do white men ike 'children' so much" when "children" in the west is anyone bellow 16yo.
Islamicaly its not forbidden to have sex with a girl that has had menstruation

 

[TITUS]

They put mexiniggers and sandniggers into those stats, keep coping and wait for the ethnic cleansings.

 

[cracka]

7 in 10 child rapists in America are White males according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. According to the FBI, White males are 4 times more likely per capita to rape or sexually abuse a child than any other male group in the U.S. Per the BJS, White males account for 30% of the overall population in the U.S., yet they comprise 72% of all convicted child rapists.

Why do white men love kids?

99% of child rapists are men so saying it's 30% of the population is just fucking retarded, just go by race in general if you weren't such a low iq shitskin you'd know this, why don't you check out swedens rape stats. also, muhammad did penetrate a 6yr old. 5% over white demographics isn't crazy.

 

[cracka]

Don't worry, BigJimWorn is a christian. We once had this conversation and he started defending the Bible.

Suddenly after he was humilliated he said "Muh muh i never said i am a christian"

Here is the copypaste of the conversation

Bible, Psalms 137: 9
O Babylon, you will be destroyed. Happy is the one who pays you back for what you have done to us. Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks.

Why the bible says that happy is the one who dashes innocent infants against rocks? What do innocent children have to do with what the adult babylonians did?

Rather, The Last Prophet of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) orders clearly according to several narrations the next if there is a war: "Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery (1) or deviate from the right path (2). You must not mutilate dead bodies (3). Neither kill a child (4), nor a woman (5). nor an aged man (6). Bring no harm to the trees (7), nor burn them with fire (8), especially those which are fruitful. Slay not ary of the enemy's flock (9). save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services (christians); leave them alone (10)." And also according to this other one: "Do not lay hands on the old verging on death, on women, children and babes. Do not steal anything from the booty and collect together all that falls to your lot in the battlefield and do good, for Allah loves the virtuous and the pious.

you don't humiliate people on aything last time i took down all of your points and you just kept acting retarded, also you thinking that CP has lost any of his debates just goes to show how you judge debates

 

[Dr. Greenberg]

Where are you from? What is your background? European, American, Indian?

Because if you knew history then you should realize that a lot of kings and leaders (and i mean hundreds) were marrying at ages varying from 6 to 12 in the entire world, especially in Europe up until the 18th century.

But we don't worship them today, do we? We don't see them as the "ideal man". Your argument for your prophet being good is "BUT YOU GUYS DID IT TOO!". Come on man....

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

you don't humiliate people on aything last time i took down all of your points and you just kept acting retarded, also you thinking that CP has lost any of his debates just goes to show how you judge debates

Look man, you and i know that you are just deluding yourself. You were literally trying to convince by saying "Jesus said 'I did not come to abolish the law and everyone who teaches different commands will go to hell' and then he proceeded to abolish it"

 

[Marsiere214]

7 in 10 child rapists in America are White males according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. According to the FBI, White males are 4 times more likely per capita to rape or sexually abuse a child than any other male group in the U.S. Per the BJS, White males account for 30% of the overall population in the U.S., yet they comprise 72% of all convicted child rapists.

Why do white men love kids?

However
America also considers middle easterners and indians white
Nice try though!

 

[cracka]

Look man, you and i know that you are just deluding yourself. You were literally trying to convince by saying "Jesus said 'I did not come to abolish the law and everyone who teaches different commands will go to hell' and then he proceeded to abolish it"

that's not what the verse says you fucking retarded, you're embarrassing yourself

 

[Marsiere214]

View attachment 1241612

Who knows, perhaps it just doesnt get convicted in black neighbourhood. CPS could be weaker there. There's too many factors and their statistics are generally faulty.

View attachment 1241613

Also ironic that a Muslim made this thread
View attachment 1241614

However
America also considers middle easterners and indians white
Nice try though!

 

[Deleted member 13994]

its because of genetics, duh, they are born with incest and rape tendencies like how black men have big cocks and asians have high iq

That makes no sense considering the middle east and africa have the highest rates of incest

 

[ThatDjangoWalk]

But we don't worship them today, do we? We don't see them as the "ideal man". Your argument for your prophet being good is "BUT YOU GUYS DID IT TOO!". Come on man....

We don't worship Prophets, we just follow them, and we do so based on whetwr we prove our way of life as truthful or not.

First a lot of people regard in your society them as heroes and have statues wherever you go. Second, your entire society is, in it's majority, the result of the actions of those people

Also so what if you follow or don't follow them? Prove me that under an agnostic-atheist world view that a kid has more value than a bacteria if you can.

 

[Marsiere214]