Features vs ratios

Which one matters more

  • Features

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Ratios

    Votes: 7 87.5%

  • Total voters
    8
shtbender

shtbender

Recessedcel
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Posts
352
Reputation
484
Ive argued with someone about this before, i wanna know what u retards think about it
 
ratios are more important
This guy has good features but bad ratios and is ugly

1731983063013
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
ratios easily, look at chico. he has above average everything for sure, but perfect ratios in everything. "harmony" is just ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: shtbender and Mugwump
ratios easily, look at chico. he has above average everything for sure, but perfect ratios in everything. "harmony" is just ratios
yea good features + bad ratios = unconventionally attractive
good features + good ratios = conventionally attractive
 
  • +1
Reactions: mightbecooked123 and shtbender
yea good features + bad ratios = unconventionally attractive
good features + good ratios = conventionally attractive
no, good features + bad ratios = striking but weird, its what's actually "uncanny" as tiktokcels put it
 
no, good features + bad ratios = striking but weird, its what's actually "uncanny" as tiktokcels put it
same shit i said. Uncanny but striking is unconventionally attractive
kinda like bella hadid, shes a gaylien with long midface not conventionally attractive like natalie portman yk
 
  • +1
Reactions: mightbecooked123 and idkwhattoputhere
yea good features + bad ratios = unconventionally attractive
good features + good ratios = conventionally attractive
Best way to put it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mugwump

Similar threads

Maurya.Rezv
Replies
28
Views
435
katsubiran
K
turneywest
Replies
0
Views
54
turneywest
turneywest
C
Replies
11
Views
191
Corpuscula
Corpuscula
R@m@
Replies
17
Views
127
NORDEN SLAVORUM
NORDEN SLAVORUM
cswagg
Replies
30
Views
283
motiascension
motiascension

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top