Financial crisis are changing the value of looks

[TcEfforts]

I don’t know how the world will be like in 2030, but I‘ve seen already many women struggling to make ends meet. Although you can say only looks bring about true attraction, I ask you, do you really really care about that? Because if you have much money, any woman can simulate fake attraction towards you and you may not even notice it, and if all you have is looks any woman can dump you if she finds someone who can provide things and experience she has never had, then to show off on social media and to become herself a product, making other women jealous and drawing attention from other men.

As the time passes by, women are adapting themselves to luxury opportunities that rich men provide. Following such trends, I believe the value of looks will be lowering as the value of money will be rising in the next years, so percentage variance is to be considered.

Of course looksmaxing is still worth and always will be, but consider that money and status are going to have more value in the long term than they have nowadays.

 

[thereallegend]

I‘ve seen already many women struggling to make ends meet.

What have you seen IRL regarding this?

 

[Deleted member 26657]

stfu faggot

 

[MaartenVaanThomm]

I don’t know how the world will be like in 2030, but I‘ve seen already many women struggling to make ends meet. Although you can say only looks bring about true attraction, I ask you, do you really really care about that? Because if you have much money, any woman can simulate fake attraction towards you and you may not even notice it, and if all you have is looks any woman can dump you if she finds someone who can provide things and experience she has never had, then to show off on social media and to become herself a product, making other women jealous and drawing attention from other men.

As the time passes by, women are adapting themselves to luxury opportunities that rich men provide. Following such trends, I believe the value of looks will be lowering as the value of money will be rising in the next years, so percentage variance is to be considered.

Of course looksmaxing is still worth and always will be, but consider that money and status are going to have more value in the long term than they have nowadays.

Not gonna happen.

High quality woman have good jobs anyway, don't be delusional. Only the pool of the low quality primitive women could actually head towards money options. Looks is above everything else.

 

[autistic_tendencies]

money is still most powerful asset

 

[Kirby7000]

money is still most powerful asset

Being a Jewish goyim and sucking jew dick is the most powerful asset

 

[ascension]

You'll get copers in this thread who undervalue money and say looks are everything.

 

[Tallooksmaxxer]

yeah, unlike west, money is extremely important for 3rd world countries.
And also the barrier for betabuxxing is much lower in in 3rd world countries compared to west and has a way better ROI.

I know its not like raw attraction from physical qualities but it will make you able to go for foids way above your league.
(though the term "betabuxxing" is not the proper word for this situation i guess, "moneypill" suits better)

example from a now broke up turkish couple (guy was a manlet as far as i remember)

 

[SoundnVision]

But in that scenario you might aswell just be banging hookers

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Being a Jewish goyim and sucking jew dick is the most powerful asset

Antisemite fuck off

 

[Octavian_Augustus]

Yes It's evident to see that women care more or less about money depending on their professional opportunities and the economy. Anyone who says otherwise is coping.

In third world countries where poverty is prevalent you see so many stacies getting with oofie doofies or normies because they're rich. In wealthier first world countries where women have access to careers, better standards of living and more generous social benefits / safety nets they put more emphasis on looks. Hence why so many of you complain about the dating markets in Western Europe and the US where being a clean cut and serious guy with a career doesn't do for you what it did for others 50 years ago.

The thing is the woke movement is trying so hard to get women into higher paying / more prestigious fields with quotas, diversity channels etc so women don't have to try nearly as hard as men to have fruitful careers. In my industry you see a stark contrast in level between women who have been handed the job on a platter (some are competent obviously) and non-diversity men who clawed their way in. Modern society is now rigged in so many ways to give women a leg up in every single aspect.

 

[BoneDensity]

Complete opposite from my experience. Women seem to be doing well in HR and other made up jobs where they don't have to do any work due to pussy quotas. And the ones that don't want to work just get government buxx and live off that.

 

[Tallooksmaxxer]

Yes It's evident to see that women care more or less about money depending on their professional opportunities and the economy. Anyone who says otherwise is coping.

In third world countries where poverty is prevalent you see so many stacies getting with oofie doofies or normies because they're rich. In wealthier first world countries where women have access to careers, better standards of living and more generous social benefits / safety nets they put more emphasis on looks. Hence why so many of you complain about the dating markets in Western Europe and the US where being a clean cut and serious guy with a career doesn't do for you what it did for others 50 years ago.

The thing is the woke movement is trying so hard to get women into higher paying / more prestigious fields with quotas, diversity channels etc so women don't have to try nearly as hard as men to have fruitful careers. In my industry you see a stark contrast in level between women who have been handed the job on a platter (some are competent obviously) and non-diversity men who clawed their way in. Modern society is now rigged in so many ways to give women a leg up in every single aspect.

hence thats why foids should be banned from working.

it also greatly affects the balance of power in a marriage. in a marriage where the man is the only bread winner, he will have a great power over his marriage. (though this depends on each relationship, but naturally, in families which the mother works, men deffinietly hold less power over their marriage)

i always said this : To revert feminism, first you need to remove the women from workforce.

 

[autistic_tendencies]

I

hence thats why foids should be banned from working.

it also greatly affects the balance of power in a marriage. in a marriage where the man is the only bread winner, he will have a great power over his marriage. (though this depends on each relationship, but naturally, in families which the mother works, men deffinietly hold less power over their marriage)

i always said this : To revert feminism, first you need to remove the women from workforce.

In the old times men essentially bought their wives
That’s why you see chads coming from rich families most often

 

[Deleted member 17872]

hence thats why foids should be banned from working.

it also greatly affects the balance of power in a marriage. in a marriage where the man is the only bread winner, he will have a great power over his marriage. (though this depends on each relationship, but naturally, in families which the mother works, men deffinietly hold less power over their marriage)

i always said this : To revert feminism, first you need to remove the women from workforce.

Jfl. Woman even in middle ages were never banned from working. Even in muslim societies it was not the case.

Most lower class women worked. It was mostly as servants, artisans, peasants, maids and similar occupation. Only the rich women could never afford to work.

What is needed is to end affirmative action in the workforce And to segregate workplaces.

 

[Tallooksmaxxer]

Jfl. Woman even in middle ages were never banned from working. Even in muslim societies it was not the case.

Most lower class women worked. It was mostly as servants, artisans, peasants, maids and similar occupation. Only the rich women could never afford to work.

What is needed is to end affirmative action in the workforce And to segregate workplaces.

nah bro i am mid lower class and my mother never worked.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

nah bro i am mid lower class and my mother never worked.

n = 1.

My mother didn't worked because my father didn't liked it but my grandmother did.
What i'm saying is you can't ban women from the workforce because a significant proportion of lower class women(40-50%) will need work to make their ends meet. Many men in lower class families are just deadbeats and will send their women to work than work a little harder.

You just need to end the affirmative action in the workplace. Only allow those women who are as efficient as men.

 

[Tallooksmaxxer]

n = 1

Actually i dont know any foid relative who works, all housewife.

Its pretty common for the mothers of my generation to be a housewife but it depends on your circle too. Me being a member of lower middle class in one of the most conservative cities of turkey.

Many men in lower class families are just deadbeats and will send their women to work than work a little harder.

If these people make up more than %5 of the population, that country is kind of fucked anyway.

You just need to end the affirmative action in the workplace. Only allow those women who are as efficient as men.

i would rather a job segration based on the gender. foids suit for roles like preschool teacher, nurse etc. but ideally those should be temporary source of incomes for foids who are not married because ideal foid is a housewife.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

If these people make up more than %5 of the population, that country is kind of fucked anyway.

In the modern gen these people are 50% of the population.
How do you think feminism even succeeded?

Fuck men

Why hate women when it was the men who are responsible for feminism?

looksmax.org

i would rather a job segration based on the gender. foids suit for roles like preschool teacher, nurse etc. but ideally those should be temporary source of incomes for foids who are not married because ideal foid is a housewife.

Would be ideal. That it's hard to make it work in practice.

 

[MaartenVaanThomm]

money is still most powerful asset

You'll get copers in this thread who undervalue money and say looks are everything.

There are things that you just CAN NOT BUY for any amount of money. One of those things are pure, intimate affection by the opposite gender. It's easy to make money these days, nearly every stacy knows that when in trouble she can put her footie footage on OF and make some cash easily. Stop coping with this 1990-2010 myth.

 

[Deleted member 20064]

Young women 18-22 will always get with a good looking guy. Not everyone is rich. It’s only after women are past their prime that money begins to matter more.

 

[autistic_tendencies]

There are things that you just CAN NOT BUY for any amount of money. One of those things are pure, intimate affection by the opposite gender. It's easy to make money these days, nearly every stacy knows that when in trouble she can put her footie footage on OF and make some cash easily. Stop coping with this 1990-2010 myth.

For sure. But you can bypass certain obstacles with money

 

[Kirby7000]

Antisemite fuck off

Be a good little goyim won't ya

 

[Wallenberg]

There are things that you just CAN NOT BUY for any amount of money. One of those things are pure, intimate affection by the opposite gender.

 

[Deleted member 16970]

Yes believe it or not, not all women want to cheat on their normie bf with brokie chad

 

[horizontallytall]

M

I don’t know how the world will be like in 2030, but I‘ve seen already many women struggling to make ends meet. Although you can say only looks bring about true attraction, I ask you, do you really really care about that? Because if you have much money, any woman can simulate fake attraction towards you and you may not even notice it, and if all you have is looks any woman can dump you if she finds someone who can provide things and experience she has never had, then to show off on social media and to become herself a product, making other women jealous and drawing attention from other men.

As the time passes by, women are adapting themselves to luxury opportunities that rich men provide. Following such trends, I believe the value of looks will be lowering as the value of money will be rising in the next years, so percentage variance is to be considered.

Of course looksmaxing is still worth and always will be, but consider that money and status are going to have more value in the long term than they have nowadays.

Man i searched a thread to know about this issue exactly. I am indian . I hope india collapses jfl so that my future wife will be loyal to me and not a social media thot. I am studying 15 hours a day to get a really really good career. I hope man things go the way zionists planned in the protocol of elders.