irrumator praetor
Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Posts
- 4,558
- Reputation
- 5,419
- OP
- #151
Youre a turk
Im not saying that all evidence is worthless, what i am saying however is that this specific evidence you are presenting to me is weak since it stands mostly on its own, and is not coming from a neutral stance. And whilst you are correct that bias doesnt make something invalid, what it DOES do is limit how much weight this evidence carries. If your only supporting evidence is someone who has a reason to back you then it doesnt move me as much when deciding on what to concludee
Im not claiming it to be”worthless”, im saying it has limited weight in backing your claims. Courts wont just take someone such as your friend with a clear bias at face value, they will compare them against other evidence to come to a final conclusion. This goes back to my point about how a biased witness ON ITS OWN is usually not that strong.
And whilst youre right that people who actually know you are naturally not neutral, it just means that their testimony cant be the main thing that you rely on. Its not that my standard makes verification impossible, its that youre relying on one of the weaker forms of verification and expecting it to carry the weight that it doesnt
The issue itself isnt that your past statements dont match your current ones, its that youve shown your current views change a lot (as ive seen in all the threads i was consistently tagged in prior to my self-ban). If anything inconsistency with your views on race over time means people will be more likely to not take your current word, which is why we are left with the “trust me bro” method of verification.
These messages are saying that if you cant be black then be white (and vice versa), and if youre not either then its over. This further proves the previous points i have made on how you were clearly saying extreme stuff before, thus making it harder for me to separate what you actually believe from what you say to purposefully bait niggas on this forum
“Im not black so i have no bias” doesnt really work here. Bias isnt just solely about identity, but it can also be about someone leaning into certain narratives for their own reasons. not being a part of a group like @Anakin_10k doesnt make your position suddenly neutral
This isnt about me constantly holding your past over you, its just that you cant use the argument that im judging you by your consistency, whilst also asking people to ignore that your positions have constantly shifted in the past. If anything it just lowers the weight your current claim holds further
Tove Lo married a White Chad
its just an avi it doesnt even represent my thought , I aslo said earlier that any race could biologically acheive peak genes but also proven why black males where on average and in every percentile better than white but didntsay that white were animals that the diff w yall
you are right that beliefs are harder to verify, but that doesn’t make all evidence worthless, we infer beliefs from consistent behavior and statements over time, and my friend is just one piece of that, dismissing their input entirely because of ''bias'' doesn't make sense, by that logic, no one could ever confirm anything about anyone.
No one's saying bias doesn't exist, the problem is you're treating biased testimony as worthless instead of weighing it, like, even in court, biased witnesses are still used, evaluated, not ignored, and for something like beliefs, the people who actually know you are naturally not ''neutral'' so your standard just makes verification impossible.
Now, you decided to bring my consistency and my account history, about how it's all about race, now sure, I did say a lot of inconsistent stuff in the past, but that doesn't account for what I actually believe in now.
this is a message, before I actively started posting threads about ''BBC":
View attachment 4927567
so no, what I said a year ago does not match what I say right now.
another thing is, I'm not even Black myself, there's no reason for me to glaze them like this, there's no emotional grudge, sure @Anakin_10k is Black, so it's natural he'd defend Blacks more aggressively, because, he's Black? but I'm not, there's no emotional grudge that allows me to do it.
u fags r the best for blowing up my thread with the .org race warWell his misc is superior to gandys so gandy cant be 9 misc lmao
![]()
![]()
W org beefs, these convos will be analysed in the future as the pinnacle of human histories discussions, kinda like the declaration of independence
I'd join in but its too long to read