Foid makes song for Jeremy Meeks and it went VIRAL

Birth rate , number of white itw and mixing graph yes its enough
Debunked, in fact black women love white men 3x more than white women love black men
1776455740225
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
Debunked, in fact black women love white men 3x more than white women love black men
View attachment 4927426
Doesnt correlate w the graph u sended which shown that black women goes 15,4% more for black men again low iq its been 3 time u make the lowest iq take might stop right there
 
I dont even Wanna debate this one its totally useless , also dont forget gandy too
gandy? The textbook north atlantid? Are u defending a white chad sir?
 
if u dnr those it just show how the genes u sended doesnt have measurable impact on intelligence assuch environmmental factor whih is if u make a correlation is logic w africa today state
Have u actually read any of these lmao
 
Doesnt correlate w the graph u sended which shown that black women goes 15,4% more for black men again low iq its been 3 time u make the lowest iq take might stop right there
Wtf are u even on about retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
" misc " in ur wet dream
1776455876698

patchy eyebrows, crows feet, low collagen, hooked nose, flared ears
1776455933471

arvid misc flaws: slightly bulbous nose and undereye
i think ur just a retard and overrate celebs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
I did and it totally disprove the graph pfl sended
Mr. biology expert , you gotta explain these pubmed articles to me. I dont think i have time to read them all they look quite long :feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl
gandy? The textbook north atlantid? Are u defending a white chad sir?
you damn know im not racist and im actually talking abt who mog and why @pfl doesnt even have more knowledge than a basic greycel if hethink that arvid mog gandy also dont forget that I basically was talking abt sallu and that I switch on gandy cuz they are similary looking
 
you damn know im not racist and im actually talking abt who mog and why @pfl doesnt even have more knowledge than a basic greycel if hethink that arvid mog gandy also dont forget that I basically was talking abt sallu and that I switch on gandy cuz they are similary looking
Arvid mogs, hes already explained why his misc is better
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl
Mr. biology expert , you gotta explain these pubmed articles to me. I dont think i have time to read them all they look quite long :feelswhy::feelswhy:
js know that they disprove the influence of all the minor genes that @pfl graph quoted to be more present on white ppl
 
you damn know im not racist and im actually talking abt who mog and why @pfl doesnt even have more knowledge than a basic greycel if hethink that arvid mog gandy also dont forget that I basically was talking abt sallu and that I switch on gandy cuz they are similary looking
Well ur subjective low iq opinion doesnt change objective measurements
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
js know that they disprove the influence of all the minor genes that @pfl graph quoted to be more present on white ppl
Thats not enough bro. How am i meant to know for sure if ive not read it? You gotta summarise it for me
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl
Well ur subjective low iq opinion doesnt change objective measurements
sended 2 arvid analysis even 1 w his morphed pic and he wasnt an overall 8+
 
sended 2 arvid analysis even 1 w his morphed pic and he wasnt an overall 8+
How is it morphed retarded coper
And gandy isnt scoring above a 8 either with those shitty formulas
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
Thats not enough bro. How am i meant to know for sure if ive not read it? You gotta summarise it for me
why wouldnt u read them actually , do u expect from brain study to be short ? and u js have to read those i will not do it for u the sources are here
 
How is it morphed retarded coper
And gandy isnt scoring above a 8 either with those shitty formulas
he got 8 + in every aspect and prob 8,9+ in misc not even debatable u have never seen gandy? even sallu terras by far
 
why wouldnt u read them actually , do u expect from brain study to be short ? and u js have to read those i will not do it for u the sources are here
This is all i needed to hear to confirm u havent read them either, and are just pulling random articles from pubmed
 
And how i would not know its not just someone vouching for their friend.

If i knew that @iblamexyz was a 5’1 subhuman and he @ed me saying “ASK FORMER SHORTCEL HE WILL TELL YOU THAT IM 6’3 HHTN”

Id confirm, id lie, because hes my friend
Appreciate your engagement, and I also appreciate your analogy, but that's where it easily falls.

you are comparing physical objective facts vs ideology or a set of beliefs (let's assume my ideology is BBC), this can't work, height is objective easily falsifiable fact, an internal belief system is not, and is not directly observable.

another reason is that you assume honesty as the default, which is basically a troll tier argument, because following that logic, no witness testimony is valid, and that's not how niggas reason in real life.

and there's no incentive for me to lie about my beliefs, i don't gain nothing, in fact i get more backlash, because the forum is dominated by ethnics and whites, saying blacks are superior to all of them will get me backlash from emotional people, plus even about the reps thing, the forum is caucasoid centric, so even if i do get reps, i will not gain as much as saying niggers or gooks are inferior.
 
This is all i needed to hear to confirm u havent read them either, and are just pulling random articles from pubmed
go read them actually and I alr told u what there are abt tbh js read my recent post
 
I don't care about the race battle that you're all having but how is this foid a stacylite? She has a narrow jaw, short chin, narrow mouth and her eyes are way too far apart
a black stacylite, unless you see better in real life.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Notorious_1676
u see many they are just unknow and prob slay more than white chad , in fact the number of chad around the world is almost the dame every where its js a geographic question , look the guyon my avi who terras mog and ang mog 85% of the white chad on earth
idk why do girls have justin bieber posters and not hypermasc tyrone
 
His orbitals are chad retard
U can see the supra arch and forward growth
View attachment 4927506
Wow such bad orbitals

Brows are thick

Still an actual 9/10 features if not higher

1776456428444

1776456487996


Like i said gandys misc is shit
Ididnt talk abthis browridge js the orbitals shape in general is horrible , the canthus , lips and eye brow are to far not ideal shape , I though you knew abt how to rate ppl ur nothing more than a pathetic millenials khhv w a recessed frontal lob getting debunked by some 15 yrs old ethnic online , shame on u
 
So how is it horrible

U dont need a canthus for 10 misc lmao

Uh dude his eyebrows are thick and long
Do u have down syndrome
u cant read what I said abt the brows ? pls read again , yes the 10 misc guys have pronounced canthus and straight orbitals , again unable to read honeslty it become even more ridiculous
 
Appreciate your engagement, and I also appreciate your analogy, but that's where it easily falls.

you are comparing physical objective facts vs ideology or a set of beliefs (let's assume my ideology is BBC), this can't work, height is objective easily falsifiable fact, an internal belief system is not, and is not directly observable.
Youre right that beliefs arent the same as physical traits, but that just further strengthens my point instead of yours. Because if beliefs are internal and not directly observable, then that will just make them harder to verify rather than easier, which is exactly why “ask my friend” isnt strong evidence. Its still nothing more than just a claim backed by someone with a potential bias towards you, as theyre ur friend
another reason is that you assume honesty as the default, which is basically a troll tier argument, because following that logic, no witness testimony is valid, and that's not how niggas reason in real life.
Im not assuming honesty as the default, what im saying is that bias exists, a friend vouching for you isnt verifying anything, since its not coming from a neutral stance. Its also why niggas in real life dont rely on a sole witness with a personal connection when something actually matters, do u forget what happens in the courtroom by chance jfl
and there's no incentive for me to lie about my beliefs, i don't gain nothing, in fact i get more backlash, because the forum is dominated by ethnics and whites, saying blacks are superior to all of them will get me backlash from emotional people, plus even about the reps thing, the forum is caucasoid centric, so even if i do get reps, i will not gain as much as saying niggers or gooks are inferior.
Your “no incentive to lie” argument doesnt hold well because of the “backlash” you receive. People dont only just lie to gain something , but also for attention and trolling (especially on this forum). Which is why practically all of ur threads since u first made ur account are racebait, or atleast related to racebait. Backlash doesnt automatically make your claim more credible

The overall issue isnt whether or not what you say is objective facts or a set of beliefs, its that your way of “confirming” that you actually believe blacks have the most smv doesnt verify anything
 
Last edited:
go read them actually and I alr told u what there are abt tbh js read my recent post
I will read them soon, its what i have to do all the time for my university course. I just dont understand why you chose to lie about reading them, why is it so hard for you to just summarise them for me? After all we both know you have a lot of time on ur hands, so it wont take long
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anakin_10k
I will read them soon, its what i have to do all the time for my university course. I just dont understand why you chose to lie about reading them, why is it so hard for you to just summarise them for me? After all we both know you have a lot of time on ur hands, so it wont take long
Sry im busy proving that gandy mog arvid i didnt it would go that far for such a stupid q and ill resume u this shi in this hour dw
 
Sey im busy proving that gandy mog arvid i didnt it would go that far for such a stupid q and ill resume u this shi in this hour dw
Sir, what the fuck are you saying? Is your translator messing up again?
 
Sir, what the fuck are you saying? Is your translator messing up again?
im busy trying to prove that gandy mog arvid and I didnt knew it would go that far for such a stupid question , I will answer u abt those studies in the next hours
 
  • +1
Reactions: Former Shortcel
View attachment 4927554i dont see any universe where this is 9+ misc and make the diff between browridge projection and supra orbitals shape pls
Sir, do i have permission to post your tiktok profile as a reply? I dont want to get a possible ban for “doxxing”

After all, thats what happened to @FiendFiend
 
  • +1
Reactions: joao23
Sir, do i have permission to post your tiktok profile as a reply? I dont want to get a possible ban for “doxxing”

After all, thats what happened to @FiendFiend
u can but like why? i dont even post anything
 
Youre right that beliefs arent the same as physical traits, but that just further strengthens my point instead of yours. Because if beliefs are internal and not directly observable, then that will just make them harder to verify rather than easier, which is exactly why “ask my friend” isnt strong evidence. Its still nothing more than just a claim backed by someone with a potential bias towards you, as theyre ur friend
you are right that beliefs are harder to verify, but that doesn’t make all evidence worthless, we infer beliefs from consistent behavior and statements over time, and my friend is just one piece of that, dismissing their input entirely because of ''bias'' doesn't make sense, by that logic, no one could ever confirm anything about anyone.
Youre right that beliefs arent the same as physical traits, but that just further strengthens my point instead of yours. Because if beliefs are internal and not directly observable, then that will just make them harder to verify rather than easier, which is exactly why “ask my friend” isnt strong evidence. Its still nothing more than just a claim backed by someone with a potential bias towards you, as theyre ur friend

Im not assuming honesty as the default, what im saying is that bias exists, a friend vouching for you isnt verifying anything, since its not coming from a neutral stance. Its also why niggas in real life dont rely on a sole witness with a personal connection when something actually matters, do u forget what happens in the courtroom by chance jfl
No one's saying bias doesn't exist, the problem is you're treating biased testimony as worthless instead of weighing it, like, even in court, biased witnesses are still used, evaluated, not ignored, and for something like beliefs, the people who actually know you are naturally not ''neutral'' so your standard just makes verification impossible.

Now, you decided to bring my consistency and my account history, about how it's all about race, now sure, I did say a lot of inconsistent stuff in the past, but that doesn't account for what I actually believe in now.

this is a message, before I actively started posting threads about ''BBC":

1776457925675


so no, what I said a year ago does not match what I say right now.

another thing is, I'm not even Black myself, there's no reason for me to glaze them like this, there's no emotional grudge, sure @Anakin_10k is Black, so it's natural he'd defend Blacks more aggressively, because, he's Black? but I'm not, there's no emotional grudge that allows me to do it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Anakin_10k
Thank you

Sir, why do you claim the black man is superior and mogs “mayos”, yet you have a white chad as your avi?
View attachment 4927582
@pfl
its just an avi it doesnt even represent my thought , I aslo said earlier that any race could biologically acheive peak genes but also proven why black males where on average and in every percentile better than white but didntsay that white were animals that the diff w yall
 
Last edited:
you are right that beliefs are harder to verify, but that doesn’t make all evidence worthless, we infer beliefs from consistent behavior and statements over time, and my friend is just one piece of that, dismissing their input entirely because of ''bias'' doesn't make sense, by that logic, no one could ever confirm anything about anyone.
Im not saying that all evidence is worthless, what i am saying however is that this specific evidence you are presenting to me is weak since it stands mostly on its own, and is not coming from a neutral stance. And whilst you are correct that bias doesnt make something invalid, what it DOES do is limit how much weight this evidence carries. If your only supporting evidence is someone who has a reason to back you then it doesnt move me as much when deciding on what to concludee
No one's saying bias doesn't exist, the problem is you're treating biased testimony as worthless instead of weighing it, like, even in court, biased witnesses are still used, evaluated, not ignored, and for something like beliefs, the people who actually know you are naturally not ''neutral'' so your standard just makes verification impossible.
Im not claiming it to be”worthless”, im saying it has limited weight in backing your claims. Courts wont just take someone such as your friend with a clear bias at face value, they will compare them against other evidence to come to a final conclusion. This goes back to my point about how a biased witness ON ITS OWN is usually not that strong.

And whilst youre right that people who actually know you are naturally not neutral, it just means that their testimony cant be the main thing that you rely on. Its not that my standard makes verification impossible, its that youre relying on one of the weaker forms of verification and expecting it to carry the weight that it doesnt
Now, you decided to bring my consistency and my account history, about how it's all about race, now sure, I did say a lot of inconsistent stuff in the past, but that doesn't account for what I actually believe in now.
The issue itself isnt that your past statements dont match your current ones, its that youve shown your current views change a lot (as ive seen in all the threads i was consistently tagged in prior to my self-ban). If anything inconsistency with your views on race over time means people will be more likely to not take your current word, which is why we are left with the “trust me bro” method of verification.
this is a message, before I actively started posting threads about ''BBC":

View attachment 4927567

so no, what I said a year ago does not match what I say right now.
These messages are saying that if you cant be black then be white (and vice versa), and if youre not either then its over. This further proves the previous points i have made on how you were clearly saying extreme stuff before, thus making it harder for me to separate what you actually believe from what you say to purposefully bait niggas on this forum
another thing is, I'm not even Black myself, there's no reason for me to glaze them like this, there's no emotional grudge, sure @Anakin_10k is Black, so it's natural he'd defend Blacks more aggressively, because, he's Black? but I'm not, there's no emotional grudge that allows me to do it.
“Im not black so i have no bias” doesnt really work here. Bias isnt just solely about identity, but it can also be about someone leaning into certain narratives for their own reasons. not being a part of a group like @Anakin_10k doesnt make your position suddenly neutral

This isnt about me constantly holding your past over you, its just that you cant use the argument that im judging you by your consistency, whilst also asking people to ignore that your positions have constantly shifted in the past. If anything it just lowers the weight your current claim holds further
 
  • +1
Reactions: joao23
bump 76444577644
 

Similar threads

Pale God
Replies
0
Views
27
Pale God
Pale God
StillGrowingTaller
Replies
10
Views
101
NinjaRG9
NinjaRG9
I
Replies
4
Views
42
nestivv
nestivv
kranerman23123
Replies
6
Views
47
kranerman23123
kranerman23123

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top