Foids have limited dialogue options and are literal npcs

gautama333

gautama333

Trismegistus
Joined
Jan 17, 2026
Posts
169
Reputation
136
Yesterday I was at a uni party and was hitting on a foid I didn't know beforehand. Hltb to lmtb, good enough to get laid.

It is going well and we keep talking. She then tells me an ex boyfriend story and I realize it is the exact same story that every other chick I've banged had told me.

The structure is the following: 1) she was long term with an ex boyfriend that was toxic, cheated or both. 2) At the beginning they were really good but then he betrayed and hurt her in some way. 3) They broke up (ALWAYS) between 1-3 months ago and is trying to meet new people cause their whore friends convinced them to (to say they don't usually go to parties and offer themselves, so that you think they are not actually whores.) They usually tell the story between the first and third day you've met/been together

Then I realized there are many other dialogue options that repeat like that ("what would you do if you were the other gender for one day?" and their answer is always jerk off, "do you go to therapy?", etc.).

Are nt foids just all the same person?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel, User28823, GrandInquisitor and 4 others
i like foids tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roara and bhsoda_destroyer
If i could choose I would jbg but unfortunately I can't and have to like them too
damn, you dont have to just be by yourself. but why dont u like them i feel that tehy are just good and it always lowers stress to be with them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roara
damn, you dont have to just be by yourself. but why dont u like them i feel that tehy are just good and it always lowers stress to be with them
They're not usually very interesting in character, not funny, and avoid conflict at all costs leading to mimicking and some dishonesty. Older women who don't look at you romantically or sexually can be interesting and knowledgeable, but the moment one is somewhat interested their character becomes very dull.
 
  • +1
Reactions: IQmaxxedCHAD and Roara
women like fitting in and social validation seemingly as much as men like women's bodies

thats the dichotomy of the sexes in that frame of view

makes sense honestly :ogre::soy::feelsgood::feelsgood:
 
They're not usually very interesting in character, not funny, and avoid conflict at all costs leading to mimicking and some dishonesty. Older women who don't look at you romantically or sexually can be interesting and knowledgeable, but the moment one is somewhat interested their character becomes very dull.
fair enough, but you can just talk with you friends if you want some good knowledge and convo. being with girls is just a different type of pleasure imo. u cant lay in the bed all night with you hbs:LOL:
 
women like fitting in and social validation seemingly as much as men like women's bodies

thats the dichotomy of the sexes in that frame of view

makes sense honestly :ogre::soy::feelsgood::feelsgood:
That is true. Although I wish they had (or at least were overt about it) more diverse traits in character. They all love therapy, while not interested in the topic as a subject; usually not knowing the difference between behaviorism, psychoanalysis, gestalt, or intentional psychology, and therefore not having the ability to understand or question the philosophical subject-structures they have to presuppose (all VERY different, all with some epistemological problems) for practice. Instead they repeat a memorized set of poor arguments for the ideal outcomes of the practice, like that you have to know and take care of yourself (completely ambiguous), and that it will help you prevent hurt towards yourself and others (as if it were a moral obligation).

All of them have centrist political takes and a mild lean towards feminism, but not commiting very much, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Roara
That is true. Although I wish they had (or at least were overt about it) more diverse traits in character. They all love therapy, while not interested in the topic as a subject; usually not knowing the difference between behaviorism, psychoanalysis, gestalt, or intentional psychology, and therefore not having the ability to understand or question the philosophical subject-structures they have to presuppose (all VERY different, all with some epistemological problems) for practice. Instead they repeat a memorized set of poor arguments for the ideal outcomes of the practice, like that you have to know and take care of yourself (completely ambiguous), and that it will help you prevent hurt towards yourself and others (as if it were a moral obligation).
describing how most of them work mentally isnt worth it IMO, better to just reactively try other use their psychology to your own gain

not in a sigma way :forcedsmile: but by just trying to ease your QOL

you do need to be NT for that sadly :ogre::feelswah::lul:
 
do you think a foid has ever contemplated their own existence or the meaning of the universe

i think they are in a constant state of distraction and stuck in a permanent child like state
 
they are boring and every foid is a copy of the other cause they operate on hivemind
 
  • +1
Reactions: gautama333
do you think a foid has ever contemplated their own existence or the meaning of the universe

i think they are in a constant state of distraction and stuck in a permanent child like state
Not even that, but they don't have any concern with the implied causes and conditions of what they say or think.

It's like they have no curiosity or genuine interest beyond the conventional use of things.

And it's not that they are necessarily unintelligent, if I had to say who the most stupid people I've met are, it would all be men (same as if I had to say who the most intelligent people I've met are), but they just don't truly commit to anything and have very weak wills.

The most stupid men I've ever met are also usually insanely funny and have interesting and strange reasoning processes, and are affected by strange and unconventional life experiences that are ultimately interesting. Instead, most foids have the same, almost exactly the same, life experiences, and thoughts that, even if not absurd, are extremely boring and conventional.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: User28823
describing how most of them work mentally isnt worth it IMO, better to just reactively try other use their psychology to your own gain

not in a sigma way :forcedsmile: but by just trying to ease your QOL

you do need to be NT for that sadly :ogre::feelswah::lul:
I have tried that with some success but the problem is not getting slightly annoyed. When it was novelty and I hadn't heard the same shit 20 times it wasn't that bad and I could just convince myself to think they were sprcial. Now I don't get that anymore and have lower tolerance to all that bullshit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roara
I have tried that with some success but the problem is not getting slightly annoyed. When it was novelty and I hadn't heard the same shit 20 times it wasn't that bad and I could just convince myself to think they were sprcial. Now I don't get that anymore and have lower tolerance to all that bullshit
the annoyance decreases with age, you also eventually just accept that women are of similar psyche, though

just improve your looks and more "options" when it comes to women will be opened :ogre::feelsgood:
 
the annoyance decreases with age, you also eventually just accept that women are of similar psyche, though

just improve your looks and more "options" when it comes to women will be opened :ogre::feelsgood:
And it's true that if they just looked better I would care less. So I just hove to leanmaxx until I can bang htb+ brutal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roara

Similar threads

Thinking_CEL
Replies
7
Views
105
_MVP_
_MVP_
greycel
Replies
10
Views
82
SecularIslamist
SecularIslamist
6’7whitechad
Replies
11
Views
102
6’7whitechad
6’7whitechad
GalacticHero
Replies
1
Views
26
True Spaniard
True Spaniard
inversions
Replies
5
Views
74
inversions
inversions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top