FRAUDING VS REALITY MEGATHREAD (GTFIH!)

[Racky]

Post examples of fraud you have seen online ITT. This is going to be .org's version of r/Instagramvsreality

This is probably the most hilarious frauding I have ever seen online. This man takes squintfrauding to a whole another level. Not even squintfraud, it's frownfraud. I never thought I'd ever see such a thing outside of .org's Ratings subforum. People need to stop criticizing Nick Bateman when there are people like this :

In every video and pic he's squinting super hard with furrowed brows @FunkyMcMunky24
You may ask, why squint so hard? There is your answer...

Hating aside, he does have good PFL and medial canthus, which is why his eye area looks decent when squinting that hard. The fraud seems to be working quite well for him. In his comments roasties systematically compliment his frauded eyes :

This one is from this thread. Users pointed out that he was frauding using lighting and angles on Omegle, and even made his eye color seem lighter by having light directly go into his eyes
On Omegle :

Meanwhile in reality as pointed out by @fruitgunpop :

 

[lelouch]

Omega frauder, his other features are good though

 

[Deleted member 21661]

brutal

 

[advancevision]

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

I expected some insanely bad looking bug eyes but what I got was a fairly decent eye area instead.
If he had green eyes, a slightly better tilt (making it neutral instead of his slight negative one) and better undereye support his eye erea would be top tier. Slight UEE is ideal.

Talking about the black dude btw

 

[lelouch]

View attachment 1958801

should not be allowed to reproduce

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

 

[Baldingman1998]

should not be allowed to reproduce

Some desparate white incel or ethnic will impregnate her

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

Professional modelling photoshoot:

Reality:

 

[lelouch]

Some desparate white incel or ethnic will impregnate her

AND FOR WHAT? IMAGINE THEIR KIDS! More truecels ? Unbelievable.

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

AND FOR WHAT? IMAGINE THEIR KIDS! More truecels ? Unbelievable.

Total: 2,138 (Looksmaxers: 519, Bluepillers: 1,619)

They have to come from somewhere

 

[Racky]

I expected some insanely bad looking bug eyes but what I got was a fairly decent eye area instead.
If he had green eyes, a slightly better tilt (making it neutral instead of his slight negative one) and better undereye support his eye erea would be top tier. Slight UEE is ideal.

I agree. He could easily ascend if he had Taban fix his droopy lower eyelid / poor undereye support.
The canthal tilt isn't even actually negative. The lateral canthi aren't lower than the medial canthi. It's just the droopy lower eyelid giving this impression. That's why when he squints it doesn't appear negative anymore, because he is raising his lower eyelid.

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

I agree. He could easily ascend if he had Taban fix his droopy lower eyelid / poor undereye support.
The canthal tilt isn't even actually negative. The lateral canthi aren't lower than the medial canthi. It's just the droopy lower eyelid giving this impression. That's why when he squints it doesn't appear negative anymore, because he is raising his lower eyelid.

I agree with you but would add that in his squint pics he's also taken the picture from a slight upper angle which hides slight NCT. At the same time in his unfrauded ones the pics are from a lower angle which gives the impression of NCT. If he fixes those lower lids like you said, he would be golden

 

[khvirgin]

 

[Enfant terrible]

most frauding ont this forum
occurs in selfies dont trust them

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

most frauding ont this forum
occurs in selfies dont trust them

This right here, selfies are the most easily frauded way to view someone if the person knows how to take them and honestly it's pretty easy to learn. In turn the opposite is true, if you don't know how to take a selfie you might end up looking way worse than you actually do. I always tell rating thread OPs to post a 2 feet away, face height pic from the back camera of their phones.

 

[Artemis]

Post examples of fraud you have seen online ITT. This is going to be .org's version of r/Instagramvsreality

This is probably the most hilarious frauding I have ever seen online. This man takes squintfrauding to a whole another level. Not even squintfraud, it's frownfraud. I never thought I'd ever see such a thing outside of .org's Ratings subforum. People need to stop criticizing Nick Bateman when there are people like this :

In every video and pic he's squinting super hard with furrowed brows @FunkyMcMunky24
You may ask, why squint so hard? There is your answer...
View attachment 1958718

Hating aside, he does have good PFL and medial canthus, which is why his eye area looks decent when squinting that hard. The fraud seems to be working quite well for him. In his comments roasties systematically compliment his frauded eyes :

This one is from this thread. Users pointed out that he was frauding using lighting and angles on Omegle, and even made his eye color seem lighter by having light directly go into his eyes
On Omegle :

Meanwhile in reality as pointed out by @fruitgunpop :

This is why i say:

CHAD IRL DOES NOT EXIST

This is "PERCEIVED" Chad (based on Make-up, and lights, and CGI, and shit), when he is exposed to REAL LIFE:

If a top model looks like this without favourable lights and makeup, WHAT CHANCE DOES A TIKTOK FAGGOT HAVE?

 

[Racky]

This right here, selfies are the most easily frauded way to view someone if the person knows how to take them and honestly it's pretty easy to learn. In turn the opposite is true, if you don't know how to take a selfie you might end up looking way worse than you actually do. I always tell rating thread OPs to post a 2 feet away, face height pic from the back camera of their phones.

tbh even that isn't a good representation of reality still

There are few issues :
1) If your camera doesn't have 50 mm+ focal length, the ratios will be distorted whether or not you move the camera 2 feet away or not. It's still not a good representation of reality.
@Korea made 2 threads going deep on the subject so I won't talk too much:

In Depth Explanation about how truly brutal Lens Distortion is.

TLDR: Lens Distortion is the devil. If your phone doesn't have a camera with at least a 50mm Focal Length Telephoto Lens. Don't ever take pictures basically. The distance between you and the camera means nothing if the camera doesn't have the focal length to match. Cut straight to the chase, I...

looksmax.org

How Focal Length Works.

This is a small continuation of my previous thread. Lens Distortion Thread. Now I'm not going to lie, I thought that thread was pretty good. Basically laid out in plain english, how Lens Distortion can alter measurments upwards of 15mm. The last bit of confusion is that some users believed...

looksmax.org

2) With most phone cameras, the more you move away from the camera, the more certain features get obscured and blurred. The skin becomes more even, for example, and we don't see things like hyperpigmentation, acne or melasma(that can be serious failos) as much, and subtle details of the face that might halo someone also become less evident

For example this guy has an insane, almost Eriksen-tier medial canthus (contact frauding in the video tho lol) :

But with a smartphone 28mm focal length lens camera far away, he loses almost all of his halo from medial canthus and his eye area looks much less striking, when that's his main and strongest halo and should be considered :

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

My 4 inch elevator shoe demonstration (Video)

Here is a pair of my 4 inch lift shoes WITH insoles added and a video demonstration of me showing in real time how much height it adds. The lowest point of the shoe to the highest point of the inside insole is 4 inches, the height insole slopes down from heel to toe, then I put in an additional...

looksmax.org

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

tbh even that isn't a good representation of reality still

There are few issues :
1) If your camera doesn't have 50 mm+ focal length, the ratios will be distorted whether or not you move the camera 2 feet away or not. It's still not a good representation of reality.
@Korea made 2 threads going deep on the subject so I won't talk too much:

In Depth Explanation about how truly brutal Lens Distortion is.

TLDR: Lens Distortion is the devil. If your phone doesn't have a camera with at least a 50mm Focal Length Telephoto Lens. Don't ever take pictures basically. The distance between you and the camera means nothing if the camera doesn't have the focal length to match. Cut straight to the chase, I...

looksmax.org

How Focal Length Works.

This is a small continuation of my previous thread. Lens Distortion Thread. Now I'm not going to lie, I thought that thread was pretty good. Basically laid out in plain english, how Lens Distortion can alter measurments upwards of 15mm. The last bit of confusion is that some users believed...

looksmax.org

2) With most phone cameras, the more you move away from the camera, the more certain features get obscured and blurred. The skin becomes more even, for example, and we don't see things like hyperpigmentation, acne or melasma(that can be serious failos) as much, and subtle details of the face that might halo someone also become less evident

For example this guy has an insane, almost Eriksen-tier medial canthus (contact frauding in the video tho lol) :
View attachment 1958904View attachment 1958929
But with a smartphone 28mm focal length lens camera far away, he loses almost all of his halo from medial canthus and his eye area looks much less striking, when that's his main and strongest halo and should be considered :
View attachment 1958912

With a distance like his for sure but from 2/3 feet away, a good smartphone camera would show a good bunch of your skin failos and the lens distortion would be minimal IMO so your bones would look more or less like in IRL. It's not perfect but good enough.

 

[Prettyboy]

 

[Racky]

Throwback to this thread @Xangsane @Mewton @bogii @Enfant terrible @fucclife @ROTTING @8PSLcel @PrinceLuenLeoncur :

JUST SEE THIS DISGUSTING INSTAGRAM FRAUD PHOTOSHOPPER

@Xangsane is he your uncle???

looksmax.org

JFL at him in "motion" :

Meanwhile in reality...

Just your average German uncle.

 

[eyes]

This right here, selfies are the most easily frauded way to view someone if the person knows how to take them and honestly it's pretty easy to learn. In turn the opposite is true, if you don't know how to take a selfie you might end up looking way worse than you actually do. I always tell rating thread OPs to post a 2 feet away, face height pic from the back camera of their phones.

How to learn how to take selfies properly for good frauding?

 

[Deleted member 294]

Professional modelling photoshoot:
View attachment 1958812

Reality:
View attachment 1958813

I guess everybody has their bad angle, if Chico posted on here without anyone knowing who he is with the the photo below you guys would say it's over.

 

[aesthetic beauty]

Post examples of fraud you have seen online ITT. This is going to be .org's version of r/Instagramvsreality

This is probably the most hilarious frauding I have ever seen online. This man takes squintfrauding to a whole another level. Not even squintfraud, it's frownfraud. I never thought I'd ever see such a thing outside of .org's Ratings subforum. People need to stop criticizing Nick Bateman when there are people like this :

In every video and pic he's squinting super hard with furrowed brows @FunkyMcMunky24
You may ask, why squint so hard? There is your answer...
View attachment 1958718

Hating aside, he does have good PFL and medial canthus, which is why his eye area looks decent when squinting that hard. The fraud seems to be working quite well for him. In his comments roasties systematically compliment his frauded eyes :

This one is from this thread. Users pointed out that he was frauding using lighting and angles on Omegle, and even made his eye color seem lighter by having light directly go into his eyes
On Omegle :

Meanwhile in reality as pointed out by @fruitgunpop :

Mikal Bridges Looking MF.