free will doesnt exist

[JordanFagget271]

but thoughts can not be abstract if we take your premise about existence being non-abstract
because thought predicate is existence as well, so if existence is not abstract, then abstractions do not exist at all include thoughts, so by that logic thoughts are not abstract either.

well then existence can be both abstract and non abstract, abstract one comes after the non abstract one is already percieved, abstract one is a thought really, and thats why thoughts are abstract

but anyway existence being non-abstract is a false premise because existence is what we apply to things, but it's not a thing itself

existence is things itself, its like an attribute, same as color or shape, it first exists as non abstract and then that existence we percieve in abstract way

 

[PoopyFartGamer]

our thoughts are abstract by nature based on experiences that arent abstract they are abstrtact connections between experiences forgot to post this reply hours ago

what if theyre not supposed to do that, whatever you do you go with the flow you cant go against it at all which means by saying and doing anything you just go with the flow, its impossible to go against it by anything you do

This is too much mental masturbation, thanks tho for spending ur time typing this out

 

[BigBoy]

Whoa look at this high iq philosopher we got here

 

[theRetard]

well then existence can be both abstract and non abstract, abstract one comes after the non abstract one is already percieved, abstract one is a thought really, and thats why thoughts are abstract

i will make it more clear:
if existence is both abstract and non-abstract (abstract when it comes to the word, non-abstract when it comes to external objects), then abstract things are non-abstract too, because their predicate (existence) is not abstract either (only it's word is abstract)
so thoughts: exist
existence: exists and non-abstract (except the word)
so thoughts aren't abstract either, because their existence is non-abstract

existence is things itself, its like an attribute, same as color or shape, it first exists as non abstract and then that existence we percieve in abstract way

existence is an attribute, but anything without this attribute does not exist, but there's no concrete particular thing such as existence, meaning that it is a universal (general concept), which is an abstract idea. But abstractions exist independently from mind

 

[JordanFagget271]

Whoa look at this high iq philosopher we got here

niggarope