German author that specializes on incels, supports hypergamy in her book

[TsarTsar444]

This is from the book:

How men tricked evolution, took power over women and why this is over now. In nature, males have to sing, dance, fight, build, while the females enjoy the show and then take off with the winner. The competition is amongst the males. The principle is called female choice. In humans, this principle was overturned after the discovery of agriculture. The result was a world made by men for men. But it won't stay that way. Meike Stoverock, who has a doctorate in biology, brushes male civilization against the grain biologically and feministically with verve and great knowledge. Only for a very short time - in terms of evolutionary biology - have women been able to help shape the world. And they are not ready to just accept the male world. That is why women are almost always responsible for progressive social changes around the world. The male world order is shaking and the men notice this. Everywhere male, sometimes violent resistance is forming. What now? With a captivating combination of biology, cultural history and a tone that is as clear as it is humorous, Meike Stoverock describes not only where mankind took the wrong turn over 10,000 years ago, but also what needs to change so that man and woman can be happy together today.

funny how she then proceeds by basically proving incel ideology: women are indeed only attracted to a rather small minority of men (biological reasons: women have to be more "picker" then men because they can get less offspring then men, invest more in offsprings etc) hence majority of men in history in old days never reproduced etc...however since these old days lead to high competion and eventually violence and murder amongst men (and to stop the cucking) men established monogamy via religion etc..and thats an unnatural state according to her which she cant wait to get removed by sexual liberation and higher economical status and income of women

she then goes on how this will natural raise the number of incels and gave a few suggestions how to deal with the situation

- introduction of pacifier for incel men: porn, sex roboter (hookers are very bad according to her and prostitution should be forbidden)
- it should be normalised to be incel, the social stigma should be removed. men should learn to accept their incel status. men also should be actively discouraged to go for women except they receive strong signals of interest
- the social state should be strengthen and the support single mums should be increased (so that they are not forced to be with sub8 men for beta providing)
- very interesting: cosmetic surgery was explictitely not recommend. basically everything that could improve the situation and the chances of reproducing for an incel was not recommend

again: all of that was on public german tv.

THIS IS TAKEN FROM LOOKISM POST, IT'S NOT MINE

LOL - lookism.net got featured in german public tv

at 03:07 they showed a discussion after that on TV with "incel experts" which is not available on youtube german "incel experts" (veronika kracher) imagine that, an ugly, overweight woman who get pays to read threads of around ~30-50 people and then talks about it (i noticed she claims...

lookism.net

 

[Tony]

u rotting piece of shit

 

[homo_faber]

absolutely brutal and heartless.

 

[Uglybrazilian]

There is many philosophical and empirical problems with her reasoning

 

[lutte]

you're not abu bakr al baghdadi are you

 

[curryslayerordeath]

I just absolutely love women and their ideas.

 

[Deleted member 5969]

lol caged at this atheist argument

 

[Deleted member 10104]

we need radical christianity or islam to fix this

 

[Yuya Moggershima]

WE SHOULD SPREAD THIS KNOWLEDGE SO PEOPLE ARE RADICALISED

 

[homo_faber]

- the social state should be strengthen and the support single mums should be increased (so that they are not forced to be with sub8 men for beta providing)

absolutely brutal. i assume the "social state" will be financed by incels through tax payer money?

 

[Deleted member 5969]

we need radical christianity or islam to fix this

WE SHOULD SPREAD THIS KNOWLEDGE SO PEOPLE ARE RADICALISED

Allah accept my Jihad

 

[TsarTsar444]

absolutely brutal. i assume the "social state" will be financed by incels through tax payer money?

Yes, in Germany single men pay higher taxes then if you are married....

 

[homo_faber]

wow, at page 5 of that thread they quote an interview that author gave a german newspaper:

Translation:

ON INCELS AND HOW SHE EXPECTS A DRASTIC INCREASING NUMBERS

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: You describe the aggression of sexually frustrated men. But wouldn't it increase if, as you suggest, we return to the principle of choosing women to get out of this toxic situation? Large parts would not be chosen by women, but would be left over and had to resort to pornography and sex workers, for example.

Stoverock: One pattern of Female Choice is that 80 percent of women choose 20 percent of men. The ones that make the most of civilization. But the others don't necessarily have to be pathetic or pathetic. If we go back to the animal world, then the male who cannot find a partner is the norm. The premium male, which has no problem reproducing, is the exception. With all this consideration of basic biological patterns, one has to keep in mind that none of us has chosen this. Neither women chose to have the children, nor did the men choose to have women choose their partners.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: What would it look like in the present when we return to Female Choice?

Stoverock: I think the number of Incels would increase dramatically. The violence against women that has been observed up to now would then only be the beginning of a dramatic, socially endangering development. We must therefore take prompt action to catch these involuntarily abstaining men.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: And how could that happen?

Stoverock: By changing the narrative. We have to find ways in which men can become respectable as men even without sexual success. Anyone who is successful with women is automatically a great pike, while the other is a poor sausage. Whether he's funny, a great musician, a fantastic storyteller: these qualities don't count. And that leads to the fact that even a boy who does not find a girlfriend in his school days grows up feeling like a failure. In principle, the core of this entire male culture for 10,000 years was getting a 1: 1 supply. Every man gets a woman.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: But isn't initmacy also important, for both men and women? Isnt life more then satisfying basic needs [for suvival]?


Stoverock: Exactly. The need for intimacy and contact is gender-independent. But physical automatisms also play a role in sexuality. Because, on the one hand, men feel that involuntary abstinence is accompanied by an increase in frustration and aggressiveness. Sex breaks down testosterone, the hormone that can also lead to aggression. And I believe that at the beginning of the sedentary lifestyle, men felt that they had to get this potential for aggression under control in order to live permanently in a large community of men and women in one place. Otherwise they would be toxic to such a society. And that's why it was so important to provide men with basic sexual care.



ZEITmagazin ONLINE: If women would vote again, which men would they choose according to the female choice principle - tall, broad-shouldered, good teeth, in order to really go into the cliché?



Stoverock: Individual preferences can be different, but there are observable patterns that persist. The fact that men are on average six inches taller than women today shows that women have preferred tall men for likely hundreds of thousands of years. And there is research showing that when women are ovulating and their whole bodies are ready to reproduce, they want athletic daredevils. Outside of this evolutionary phase, however, they definitely choose the reliable type of provider that does not cause any trouble at home.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: According to the female choice principle, far fewer men would become fathers, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the birth rates will decrease. You take Norway as an example, where the number of men who do not have children has increased from 12 to 23 percent in the last 30 years. At the same time, the number of "recycled" men who have women with several children has increased. Sounds difficult for those who can't find a partner.



Stoverock: I'm not saying that female choice makes living together easier. But it would be of great help if this whole socio-political discourse also opened up to biological facts. Sedentary civilization has lasted 10,000 years now, but we are faced with injustice on every nook and cranny. Neither have I yet found an answer to how one can really combine the positive from male civilization - art, science, medicine - with the positive from natural female sexuality. And the positive in the men's world was only possible through oppression and exploitation, that is the structural imbalance. Monogamous marriage only clears the man's mind - free from sexual competition. So that he can go out and devote himself to his big thoughts.

[...]
ON CUCKING AND HOW ITS NATURAL FOR WOMEN TO STOP LOVING THEIR PARTNER AND TO CUCK THEM


Stoverock: Many people don't even realize that this is a normal phenomenon: the female libido has something like an expiration date. Of course, the bond is particularly close as long as the child is small and the woman is therefore very dependent on support. But as soon as the child becomes independent, that changes. In native peoples it is completely normal for a woman to have children from several partners who are born three to four years apart. That is the biological pattern. That does not mean that it cannot be otherwise and that a woman does not have all the children with a partner with all her heart. But it is just not typical of our biology. And I find it highly problematic that a natural biological pattern is pathologized. In fact, it is more women who lose lust, who no longer desire their partner. And they are then persuaded that you have to create more situations as a couple to get in the mood.



ZEITmagazin ONLINE: And how is it with men?



Stoverock: For men, decreasing desire is almost never a problem. Many men still want to sleep regularly with their partner even after many years of relationship. Here you can see that the lifelong partnership was created with the purpose of basic sexual care for men and not out of love. The man really just needs regular access. As long as there is enough sex, he has no reason to change anything about the arrangement. That is why women are also the most likely to file for divorce.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

its over

 

[TsarTsar444]

wow, at page 5 of that thread they quote an interview that author gave a german newspaper:

Translation:

ON INCELS AND HOW SHE EXPECTS A DRASTIC INCREASING NUMBERS

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: You describe the aggression of sexually frustrated men. But wouldn't it increase if, as you suggest, we return to the principle of choosing women to get out of this toxic situation? Large parts would not be chosen by women, but would be left over and had to resort to pornography and sex workers, for example.

Stoverock: One pattern of Female Choice is that 80 percent of women choose 20 percent of men. The ones that make the most of civilization. But the others don't necessarily have to be pathetic or pathetic. If we go back to the animal world, then the male who cannot find a partner is the norm. The premium male, which has no problem reproducing, is the exception. With all this consideration of basic biological patterns, one has to keep in mind that none of us has chosen this. Neither women chose to have the children, nor did the men choose to have women choose their partners.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: What would it look like in the present when we return to Female Choice?

Stoverock: I think the number of Incels would increase dramatically. The violence against women that has been observed up to now would then only be the beginning of a dramatic, socially endangering development. We must therefore take prompt action to catch these involuntarily abstaining men.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: And how could that happen?

Stoverock: By changing the narrative. We have to find ways in which men can become respectable as men even without sexual success. Anyone who is successful with women is automatically a great pike, while the other is a poor sausage. Whether he's funny, a great musician, a fantastic storyteller: these qualities don't count. And that leads to the fact that even a boy who does not find a girlfriend in his school days grows up feeling like a failure. In principle, the core of this entire male culture for 10,000 years was getting a 1: 1 supply. Every man gets a woman.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: But isn't initmacy also important, for both men and women? Isnt life more then satisfying basic needs [for suvival]?


Stoverock: Exactly. The need for intimacy and contact is gender-independent. But physical automatisms also play a role in sexuality. Because, on the one hand, men feel that involuntary abstinence is accompanied by an increase in frustration and aggressiveness. Sex breaks down testosterone, the hormone that can also lead to aggression. And I believe that at the beginning of the sedentary lifestyle, men felt that they had to get this potential for aggression under control in order to live permanently in a large community of men and women in one place. Otherwise they would be toxic to such a society. And that's why it was so important to provide men with basic sexual care.



ZEITmagazin ONLINE: If women would vote again, which men would they choose according to the female choice principle - tall, broad-shouldered, good teeth, in order to really go into the cliché?



Stoverock: Individual preferences can be different, but there are observable patterns that persist. The fact that men are on average six inches taller than women today shows that women have preferred tall men for likely hundreds of thousands of years. And there is research showing that when women are ovulating and their whole bodies are ready to reproduce, they want athletic daredevils. Outside of this evolutionary phase, however, they definitely choose the reliable type of provider that does not cause any trouble at home.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: According to the female choice principle, far fewer men would become fathers, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the birth rates will decrease. You take Norway as an example, where the number of men who do not have children has increased from 12 to 23 percent in the last 30 years. At the same time, the number of "recycled" men who have women with several children has increased. Sounds difficult for those who can't find a partner.



Stoverock: I'm not saying that female choice makes living together easier. But it would be of great help if this whole socio-political discourse also opened up to biological facts. Sedentary civilization has lasted 10,000 years now, but we are faced with injustice on every nook and cranny. Neither have I yet found an answer to how one can really combine the positive from male civilization - art, science, medicine - with the positive from natural female sexuality. And the positive in the men's world was only possible through oppression and exploitation, that is the structural imbalance. Monogamous marriage only clears the man's mind - free from sexual competition. So that he can go out and devote himself to his big thoughts.

[...]
ON CUCKING AND HOW ITS NATURAL FOR WOMEN TO STOP LOVING THEIR PARTNER AND TO CUCK THEM


Stoverock: Many people don't even realize that this is a normal phenomenon: the female libido has something like an expiration date. Of course, the bond is particularly close as long as the child is small and the woman is therefore very dependent on support. But as soon as the child becomes independent, that changes. In native peoples it is completely normal for a woman to have children from several partners who are born three to four years apart. That is the biological pattern. That does not mean that it cannot be otherwise and that a woman does not have all the children with a partner with all her heart. But it is just not typical of our biology. And I find it highly problematic that a natural biological pattern is pathologized. In fact, it is more women who lose lust, who no longer desire their partner. And they are then persuaded that you have to create more situations as a couple to get in the mood.



ZEITmagazin ONLINE: And how is it with men?



Stoverock: For men, decreasing desire is almost never a problem. Many men still want to sleep regularly with their partner even after many years of relationship. Here you can see that the lifelong partnership was created with the purpose of basic sexual care for men and not out of love. The man really just needs regular access. As long as there is enough sex, he has no reason to change anything about the arrangement. That is why women are also the most likely to file for divorce.

JFL AND PEOPLE STILL HAVEN'T WOKEN UP AND THINK INCELS ARE DELUSIONAL, FUCKING DISGUSTING, AT THIS MOMENT I WOKE UP, NO LONGER IM A LEFTIST, FUCK THE LEFT AND FUCK SOYCIALISM, THE STATE SHOULD EITHER BE DESTROYED OR TAKEN IN HANDS OF STRONG MEN WHO ARE GOING TO COMPLETELY DECIMATE ANY CUCKOLDRY THATS HAPPENING LIKE THIS, WOMEN ARE GOING TO LOSE ALL RIGHT. WHEN SRE MEN OF ALL RACES GOING TO WAKE UP AND KILL CUCKS???

 

[MentalistKebab]

TikTok

vm.tiktok.com

 

[Deleted member 10104]

Stoverock: For men, decreasing desire is almost never a problem. Many men still want to sleep regularly with their partner even after many years of relationship. Here you can see that the lifelong partnership was created with the purpose of basic sexual care for men and not out of love. The man really just needs regular access. As long as there is enough sex, he has no reason to change anything about the arrangement. That is why women are also the most likely to file for divorce.

this is such fucking bullshit. this dumb whore really thinks she knows everything, lmfao. STRANGE pussy is the best pussy, and any man who would fit her OWN descriptions of being in the top 20% would agree that they can and do get tired of fucking the same girl.

 

[homo_faber]

this is such fucking bullshit. this dumb whore really thinks she knows everything, lmfao. STRANGE pussy is the best pussy, and any man who would fit her OWN descriptions of being in the top 20% would agree that they can and do get tired of fucking the same girl.

yes however i dont think majority fakes headache to not have sex like women do after a certain amount of time in their marriage. they still lust for strange pussy but they still like to fuck their wife from time to time. you have to keep in mind their are marriage where people sleep once every 6-12 month and the reason for that is in most cases not the man

 

[TsarTsar444]

this is such fucking bullshit. this dumb whore really thinks she knows everything, lmfao. STRANGE pussy is the best pussy, and any man who would fit her OWN descriptions of being in the top 20% would agree that they can and do get tired of fucking the same girl.

Fucking hell she is right, she blakcpilled me hard, we nwed to take away power from women, i fucking hateeee cucks who gave women any inch of power, fuck all men who are left wing and progressive, you are your own biggest enemy you absolute scumbags

 

[Deleted member 9355]

just let the 5'2 balding indian janitor have children bro

 

[TsarTsar444]

yes however i dont think majority fakes headache to not have sex like women do after a certain amount of time in their marriage. they still lust for strange pussy but they still like to fuck their wife from time to time. you have to keep in mind their are marriage where people sleep once every 6-12 month and the reason for that is in most cases not the man

Fucking suicidefuel, if my gf does this to me im going to go eR fuck

 

[homo_faber]

Fucking hell she is right, she blakcpilled me hard, we nwed to take away power from women, i fucking hateeee cucks who gave women any inch of power, fuck all men who are left wing and progressive, you are your own biggest enemy you absolute scumbags

yes but you have be cautious about the thoughts in real life

 

[TsarTsar444]

just let the 5'2 balding indian janitor have children bro

All men deserve a wife, women shouldn't have any rights and in that way even the ugliest men will be able to reproduce inshallah

 

[TsarTsar444]

yes but you have be cautious about the thoughts in real life

Wdym?

 

[Deleted member 10104]

yes however i dont think majority fakes headache to not have sex like women do after a certain amount of time in their marriage. they still lust for strange pussy but they still like to fuck their wife from time to time. you have to keep in mind their are marriage where people sleep once every 6-12 month and the reason for that is in most cases not the man

that's not a chad/slayer problem, that's not a problem of the men in the top 20% like she says. any girl that feels the genuine social relationship DREAD of her man having the ability to go out and fuck a different girl whenever he wants WILL give him her pussy as often as he wants. and that's just reality.

 

[homo_faber]

just let the 5'2 balding indian janitor have children bro

in the past, what the author called "the natural state" this indian janitor either died or raped. when you argue in a strictly darwinistic way you argue in way that doesnt know any morals, hence you couldnt condem rape in that argumentation either. (for the record i neither support rape nor i think its justified in either way because im a moralic person.)

 

[TsarTsar444]

in the past, what the author called "the natural state" this indian janitor either died or raped. when you argue in a strictly darwinistic way you argue in way that doesnt know any morals, hence you couldnt condem rape in that argumentation either. (for the record i dont support rape neither i think its justified in either way because im a moralic person.)

Yup, this disgusting femhorroid basically preaches a completely godless moraless society where all evil is let loose. This is what happens when there is no religion

 

[Deleted member 9355]

why tf they do they have authors specializing in inceldom know
this is getting a bit too serious bros

 

[homo_faber]

WE SHOULD SPREAD THIS KNOWLEDGE SO PEOPLE ARE RADICALISED

somebody post this on incels.is i think their reactions would make me laugh so hard

 

[Deleted member 2729]

wow, at page 5 of that thread they quote an interview that author gave a german newspaper:

Translation:

ON INCELS AND HOW SHE EXPECTS A DRASTIC INCREASING NUMBERS

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: You describe the aggression of sexually frustrated men. But wouldn't it increase if, as you suggest, we return to the principle of choosing women to get out of this toxic situation? Large parts would not be chosen by women, but would be left over and had to resort to pornography and sex workers, for example.

Stoverock: One pattern of Female Choice is that 80 percent of women choose 20 percent of men. The ones that make the most of civilization. But the others don't necessarily have to be pathetic or pathetic. If we go back to the animal world, then the male who cannot find a partner is the norm. The premium male, which has no problem reproducing, is the exception. With all this consideration of basic biological patterns, one has to keep in mind that none of us has chosen this. Neither women chose to have the children, nor did the men choose to have women choose their partners.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: What would it look like in the present when we return to Female Choice?

Stoverock: I think the number of Incels would increase dramatically. The violence against women that has been observed up to now would then only be the beginning of a dramatic, socially endangering development. We must therefore take prompt action to catch these involuntarily abstaining men.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: And how could that happen?

Stoverock: By changing the narrative. We have to find ways in which men can become respectable as men even without sexual success. Anyone who is successful with women is automatically a great pike, while the other is a poor sausage. Whether he's funny, a great musician, a fantastic storyteller: these qualities don't count. And that leads to the fact that even a boy who does not find a girlfriend in his school days grows up feeling like a failure. In principle, the core of this entire male culture for 10,000 years was getting a 1: 1 supply. Every man gets a woman.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: But isn't initmacy also important, for both men and women? Isnt life more then satisfying basic needs [for suvival]?


Stoverock: Exactly. The need for intimacy and contact is gender-independent. But physical automatisms also play a role in sexuality. Because, on the one hand, men feel that involuntary abstinence is accompanied by an increase in frustration and aggressiveness. Sex breaks down testosterone, the hormone that can also lead to aggression. And I believe that at the beginning of the sedentary lifestyle, men felt that they had to get this potential for aggression under control in order to live permanently in a large community of men and women in one place. Otherwise they would be toxic to such a society. And that's why it was so important to provide men with basic sexual care.



ZEITmagazin ONLINE: If women would vote again, which men would they choose according to the female choice principle - tall, broad-shouldered, good teeth, in order to really go into the cliché?



Stoverock: Individual preferences can be different, but there are observable patterns that persist. The fact that men are on average six inches taller than women today shows that women have preferred tall men for likely hundreds of thousands of years. And there is research showing that when women are ovulating and their whole bodies are ready to reproduce, they want athletic daredevils. Outside of this evolutionary phase, however, they definitely choose the reliable type of provider that does not cause any trouble at home.

ZEITmagazin ONLINE: According to the female choice principle, far fewer men would become fathers, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the birth rates will decrease. You take Norway as an example, where the number of men who do not have children has increased from 12 to 23 percent in the last 30 years. At the same time, the number of "recycled" men who have women with several children has increased. Sounds difficult for those who can't find a partner.



Stoverock: I'm not saying that female choice makes living together easier. But it would be of great help if this whole socio-political discourse also opened up to biological facts. Sedentary civilization has lasted 10,000 years now, but we are faced with injustice on every nook and cranny. Neither have I yet found an answer to how one can really combine the positive from male civilization - art, science, medicine - with the positive from natural female sexuality. And the positive in the men's world was only possible through oppression and exploitation, that is the structural imbalance. Monogamous marriage only clears the man's mind - free from sexual competition. So that he can go out and devote himself to his big thoughts.

[...]
ON CUCKING AND HOW ITS NATURAL FOR WOMEN TO STOP LOVING THEIR PARTNER AND TO CUCK THEM


Stoverock: Many people don't even realize that this is a normal phenomenon: the female libido has something like an expiration date. Of course, the bond is particularly close as long as the child is small and the woman is therefore very dependent on support. But as soon as the child becomes independent, that changes. In native peoples it is completely normal for a woman to have children from several partners who are born three to four years apart. That is the biological pattern. That does not mean that it cannot be otherwise and that a woman does not have all the children with a partner with all her heart. But it is just not typical of our biology. And I find it highly problematic that a natural biological pattern is pathologized. In fact, it is more women who lose lust, who no longer desire their partner. And they are then persuaded that you have to create more situations as a couple to get in the mood.



ZEITmagazin ONLINE: And how is it with men?



Stoverock: For men, decreasing desire is almost never a problem. Many men still want to sleep regularly with their partner even after many years of relationship. Here you can see that the lifelong partnership was created with the purpose of basic sexual care for men and not out of love. The man really just needs regular access. As long as there is enough sex, he has no reason to change anything about the arrangement. That is why women are also the most likely to file for divorce.

Jfl only islam or a second Hitler can save us now

 

[TsarTsar444]

why tf they do they have authors specializing in inceldom know
this is getting a bit too serious bros

This was on national german tv, every women knows that that she should ride the cock corosel cause God isn't real according to them and morals are arbitrary

 

[TsarTsar444]

Jfl only islam or a second Hitler can save us now

A mix is the best ngl, we need it, when will men of all races wake up ffs

 

[Deleted member 7580]

Hypergamy doesn’t exist but it can be a good thing as only genes genes would pass

If hypergamy was real Bosnian chicks wouldve preferred serb guys

 

[TsarTsar444]

Hypergamy doesn’t exist but it can be a good thing as only genes genes would pass

If hypergamy was real Bosnian chicks wouldve preferred serb guys

Kys

 

[Deleted member 9355]

Kys

wtf is this man saying bosnians mog

 

[TsarTsar444]

wtf is this man saying bosnians mog

He has severe autism, it's not funny to make fun of him like that

 

[homo_faber]

Hypergamy doesn’t exist but it can be a good thing as only genes genes would pass

If hypergamy was real Bosnian chicks wouldve preferred serb guys

if you argue eugenic, low genetic value women should also be stopped reproducing, otherwise subhuman genetics will always find a way. see the balding gene. but of course in the argumentation of the author low genetic women still should have the right to get pumped by chad and then later get their bastard children financed by society (=taxpaying incels)

 

[Deleted member 8853]

Too dangerous to be left alive
Someone must put an end to that scourge

 

[TsarTsar444]

Too dangerous to be left alive
Someone must put an end to that scourge

Double edged sword, at one point this is good cause it can wake many men up

 

[Enfant terrible]

I think hypergamy is largely exaggerated by this forum
Its enough to be above average/ chadlite

 

[homo_faber]

this whole thing reminds me of france where they try to make a law that allows single women to not only conceive children with medical help (chad sperm) but would also make it free for them (meaning society will pay for it, both for the artificial fertilization and later for the child support (there is no father to pay child support hence society has to do it)

French protests against IVF treatment for gay and single women

Thousands march in Paris to oppose new law aimed at extending reproductive rights

www.theguardian.com

they literally trying to do what the author suggested, dystopia has already started boyos

 

[Baldingman1998]

JFL AND PEOPLE STILL HAVEN'T WOKEN UP AND THINK INCELS ARE DELUSIONAL, FUCKING DISGUSTING, AT THIS MOMENT I WOKE UP, NO LONGER IM A LEFTIST, FUCK THE LEFT AND FUCK SOYCIALISM, THE STATE SHOULD EITHER BE DESTROYED OR TAKEN IN HANDS OF STRONG MEN WHO ARE GOING TO COMPLETELY DECIMATE ANY CUCKOLDRY THATS HAPPENING LIKE THIS, WOMEN ARE GOING TO LOSE ALL RIGHT. WHEN SRE MEN OF ALL RACES GOING TO WAKE UP AND KILL CUCKS???

Why being a bbc cuck is high iq

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to be into cuckolding. The fetish is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of your wife's orgasms will go over a typical chad’s head. There’s also my wife's boyfriend's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into...

looksmax.org

 

[Baldingman1998]

It's over. Be chad or develop a cuck fetish. It's over for billions of men

 

[HumidVent]

I think hypergamy is largely exaggerated by this forum
Its enough to be above average/ chadlite

Hypergamy is not Giga Chad getting all the women. It's women dating up. So average guys get ugly women, above average guys get average women etc. However this means that ugly guys get nothing because they are at the bottom.

 

[Deleted member 7580]

if you argue eugenic, low genetic value women should also be stopped reproducing, otherwise subhuman genetics will always find a way. see the balding gene. but of course in the argumentation of the author low genetic women still should have the right to get pumped by chad and then later get their bastard children financed by society (=taxpaying incels)

Low genetic value women would be wiped out in few generations if only chads reproduced

I agree but that’s not really how it works in nature

 

[Deleted member 10913]

This is from the book:



funny how she then proceeds by basically proving incel ideology: women are indeed only attracted to a rather small minority of men (biological reasons: women have to be more "picker" then men because they can get less offspring then men, invest more in offsprings etc) hence majority of men in history in old days never reproduced etc...however since these old days lead to high competion and eventually violence and murder amongst men (and to stop the cucking) men established monogamy via religion etc..and thats an unnatural state according to her which she cant wait to get removed by sexual liberation and higher economical status and income of women

she then goes on how this will natural raise the number of incels and gave a few suggestions how to deal with the situation

- introduction of pacifier for incel men: porn, sex roboter (hookers are very bad according to her and prostitution should be forbidden)
- it should be normalised to be incel, the social stigma should be removed. men should learn to accept their incel status. men also should be actively discouraged to go for women except they receive strong signals of interest
- the social state should be strengthen and the support single mums should be increased (so that they are not forced to be with sub8 men for beta providing)
- very interesting: cosmetic surgery was explictitely not recommend. basically everything that could improve the situation and the chances of reproducing for an incel was not recommend

again: all of that was on public german tv.

THIS IS TAKEN FROM LOOKISM POST, IT'S NOT MINE

LOL - lookism.net got featured in german public tv

at 03:07 they showed a discussion after that on TV with "incel experts" which is not available on youtube german "incel experts" (veronika kracher) imagine that, an ugly, overweight woman who get pays to read threads of around ~30-50 people and then talks about it (i noticed she claims...

lookism.net

These people are really demons.

---

 

[TsarTsar444]

These people are really demons.

---

Society without God

 

[mewcoper]

Incel uprising when guys ? this is literally a war at this time.

 

[mewcoper]

@SayHeyHey i think it's good time for to come back islam bro ngl

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Fucking hell she is right, she blakcpilled me hard, we nwed to take away power from women, i fucking hateeee cucks who gave women any inch of power, fuck all men who are left wing and progressive, you are your own biggest enemy you absolute scumbags

she is right? you agree with her?