Glucosamine has no effect on IGF-1 - spinal decompression-cels GTFIH

pslfinalboss

pslfinalboss

Bronze
Joined
May 20, 2025
Posts
326
Reputation
259
I’ve seen a few people say glucosamine can lower IGF-1 or make you “less sensitive” to it, this isn’t true because that theory comes from cell studies using crazy-high doses of glucosamine. Not actual humans taking 1500mg a day for their joints.

The idea behind why people claim glucosamine hinders IGF-1

This study used HepG2 liver cancer cells and dumped like 20mM glucosamine on them for 18 hours. That’s not even remotely close to what you get from a supplement. They saw reduced IGF-1 receptor phosphorylation:
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12746299/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12746299/)

Another study in lung cancer cells showed glucosamine reducing IGF-1R/Akt signaling:
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901559/)

People saw these and jumped straight to “glucosamine will kill your gains and lower IGF-1.”

What’s actually true:

Human clinical data doesn’t really show meaningful changes in serum IGF-1 from normal glucosamine doses. This joint trial showed about a 5% increase in IGF-1 that wasn’t even statistically significant:
[https://bmccomplementmedtherapies.b...dcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6882-7-34)

There’s just no strong evidence that glucosamine reduces systemic IGF-1 in healthy people.

Why the cell studies are unreliable

* The doses are insanely high compared to what supplements give you
* Cancer cells don’t equal normal human physiology
* Inhibiting receptor signaling in a petri dish isn’t the same as lowering your IGF-1 hormone levels in real life

Tldr
Glucosamine = fine for joints, basically no impact on IGF-1 in regular humans. The scare comes from petri dish data on cancer cells using doses you’ll never reach. If you’re taking 1500mg/day, you’re fine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: renos, GigaAscender, Hernan and 1 other person
I’ve seen a few people say glucosamine can lower IGF-1 or make you “less sensitive” to it, this isn’t true because that theory comes from cell studies using crazy-high doses of glucosamine. Not actual humans taking 1500mg a day for their joints.

The idea behind why people claim glucosamine hinders IGF-1

This study used HepG2 liver cancer cells and dumped like 20mM glucosamine on them for 18 hours. That’s not even remotely close to what you get from a supplement. They saw reduced IGF-1 receptor phosphorylation:
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12746299/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12746299/)

Another study in lung cancer cells showed glucosamine reducing IGF-1R/Akt signaling:
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901559/)

People saw these and jumped straight to “glucosamine will kill your gains and lower IGF-1.”

What’s actually true:

Human clinical data doesn’t really show meaningful changes in serum IGF-1 from normal glucosamine doses. This joint trial showed about a 5% increase in IGF-1 that wasn’t even statistically significant:
[https://bmccomplementmedtherapies.b...dcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6882-7-34)

There’s just no strong evidence that glucosamine reduces systemic IGF-1 in healthy people.

Why the cell studies are unreliable

* The doses are insanely high compared to what supplements give you
* Cancer cells don’t equal normal human physiology
* Inhibiting receptor signaling in a petri dish isn’t the same as lowering your IGF-1 hormone levels in real life

Tldr
Glucosamine = fine for joints, basically no impact on IGF-1 in regular humans. The scare comes from petri dish data on cancer cells using doses you’ll never reach. If you’re taking 1500mg/day, you’re fine.
Link doesn’t work use this instead
 
I’ve seen a few people say glucosamine can lower IGF-1 or make you “less sensitive” to it, this isn’t true because that theory comes from cell studies using crazy-high doses of glucosamine. Not actual humans taking 1500mg a day for their joints.

The idea behind why people claim glucosamine hinders IGF-1

This study used HepG2 liver cancer cells and dumped like 20mM glucosamine on them for 18 hours. That’s not even remotely close to what you get from a supplement. They saw reduced IGF-1 receptor phosphorylation:
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12746299/](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12746299/)

Another study in lung cancer cells showed glucosamine reducing IGF-1R/Akt signaling:
[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ar...ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901559/)

People saw these and jumped straight to “glucosamine will kill your gains and lower IGF-1.”

What’s actually true:

Human clinical data doesn’t really show meaningful changes in serum IGF-1 from normal glucosamine doses. This joint trial showed about a 5% increase in IGF-1 that wasn’t even statistically significant:
[https://bmccomplementmedtherapies.b...dcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6882-7-34)

There’s just no strong evidence that glucosamine reduces systemic IGF-1 in healthy people.

Why the cell studies are unreliable

* The doses are insanely high compared to what supplements give you
* Cancer cells don’t equal normal human physiology
* Inhibiting receptor signaling in a petri dish isn’t the same as lowering your IGF-1 hormone levels in real life

Tldr
Glucosamine = fine for joints, basically no impact on IGF-1 in regular humans. The scare comes from petri dish data on cancer cells using doses you’ll never reach. If you’re taking 1500mg/day, you’re fine.
Glucosamine was likely always going to have a negligible impact on IGF-1 in regular humans. The same goes for the vast majority of over-the-counter medication.
 
Wow, another user that can recite ChatGPT for a topic literally nobody was talking about.
Your AI model hallucinated references and you hallucinated the demand for this absolutely redundant fucking thread.
 
  • +1
Reactions: weepmeep
Wow, another user that can recite ChatGPT for a topic literally nobody was talking about.
Your AI model hallucinated references and you hallucinated the demand for this absolutely redundant fucking thread.
dnr
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
4
Views
53
smegor
smegor
N8Ascendz
Replies
3
Views
66
ntstephn
ntstephn
htnframemax
Replies
7
Views
72
htnframemax
htnframemax
reqlorx
Replies
13
Views
116
Peachy
Peachy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top